Off-grid Solution for Provisioning Energy Access Jeevan Prakash Mohanty Fellow, Social Transformation Division
Jul 15, 2015
Off-grid Solution for
Provisioning Energy Access
Jeevan Prakash Mohanty
Fellow, Social Transformation Division
• The Energy & Resources Institute (TERI)
• Formally established in 1974
• “We will work towards global sustainable development, creating innovative solutions for a better tomorrow”
• Focus: Environment, Energy and Sustainable Development.
• Headquarters in New Delhi, 5 regional centers
• Over 1000 research professionals
• Headed by Dr. R K Pachauri
Where does energy fit in?
Energy is an ‘enabler’: essential for achieving human development goals
Energy Poverty: “inability to cook with modern cooking fuels and the lack of a bare minimum of electric lighting to read or for other household & productive activities at sunset” (UNDP 2005)
Lack of access to energy can directly influence livelihood, education, health, and overall quality of life – measurable in the HDI
What are its dimensions?
ENERGY ACCESS ENERGY EFFICIENCY RENEWABLE ENERGY
• Access to modern
cooking fuels
• Access to electricity
• Beyond access:
affordability, availability
and reliability
• Access most limited at
the bottom of the
pyramid
• Minimize losses in BAU
scenario
• Focus on energy
efficiency technology
• Reduce gap between
energy production and
consumption
• Save money and
reduce emissions
• Enhance share of RE in
energy production
• Create favorable policy
environment for RE
production and use
• Develop efficient RE
technology
• Finance RE projects to
create a viable market
What does this translate to?
Energy poverty and economic poverty form an
interconnected vicious cycle – one leads to the other
Lack of access to electricity has a direct impact on education
outcomes (performance, interest, attendance) of children
Energy access is gender biased – with women facing the
most severe problems due to lack of access to energy e.g.
traditional biomass cookstoves
Access to electricity is directly linked to provision of quality
healthcare to children. Household air pollution kills several children every year
What does this translate to?
Household air pollution from inefficient stoves kills more
than 10 lakh women and children each year
Access to energy helps in better provision of health facilities
in hospitals and dispensaries
Inefficient energy devices use large amounts of fuel and
produce large quantities of wastes which pollute the
environment
Tackling the problem of access to energy requires
partnership of governments, corporate firms and the civil society
Key Energy Related Issues in ASEAN
• South East Asia’s primary energy demand growing at more than twice the global average
• The region’s energy demand rising by 83% between 2011 and 2035 • Share of Coal in primary energy mix rising from 16% in 2011 to 28% in
2035 • Demand for oil rising from 4.3 mb/d to 6.8 mb/d
• Higher dependence on biomass for cooking leading to fall in share of renewables in the primary energy mix
• Electricity demand to increase by half by 2020 and to almost 1900 Terawatt Hours (Twh) in 2035
• The region’s energy related CO2 emissions almost double, reaching 2.3 Gigatonnes (Gt) in 2035
• Carbon intensity – the amount of CO2 emitted per unit of GDP – improving significantly, but falling by 33% over 2011-2035
• Balancing the Supply and Demand in the region depend on interplay of multiple factors
• Government policies, demographics, urbanization • Economic trends – shifts in structure of economic activity, energy pricing
and technological developments
Key Energy Indicators for ASEAN
Indicators Units 1990 2000 2011 2000-2011
GDP (Market Exchange Rate (MER)
$ billion 788 1 261 2 185 5.1%
GDP (PPP) $ billion 1 225 1 966 3 413 5.1%
Population million 444 522 597 1.2%
Primary energy demand Mtoe 223 373 549 3.6%
Primary energy demand per capita
toe 0.5 0.7 0.9 2.3%
Primary demand/GDP (MER)
toe/$1 000 0.28 0.30 0.25 -1.5%
Net oil trade** mb/d 0.7 -0.3 -1.9 18.7%
Net gas trade bcm 46.8 68.7 62.1 -0.9%
Net coal trade Mtce 0.4 37.8 219.6 17.4%
Energy-related CO2 emissions
Mt 368 715 1 166 4.5%
* Compound average annual growth rate. ** Negative values indicate imports. Notes: MER = market exchange rate; PPP = purchasing power parity, Mtoe=Million tonne equivalent Mtce=Metric tonne carbon equivalent.
The ASEAN Energy System, 2011 (Mtoe)
*Transformation of fossil fuels from primary energy into a form that can be used in the final consuming sectors. ** Includes losses and fuel consumed in oil and gas production, transformation losses and own use, generation lost or consumed in the process of electricity production, and transmission and distribution losses.
ASEAN Electricity Generation by Source (Twh)
1990 2011 2020 2035 2011-2035** Share
2011 2035
Fossil fuels 120 596 880 1 470 3.8% 86% 78%
Coal 28 217 439 914 6.2% 31% 49%
Gas 26 307 394 523 2.2% 44% 28%
Oil 66 72 47 34 -3.1% 10% 2%
Nuclear - - - 31 n.a. 0% 2%
Renewables 34 100 184 378 5.7% 14% 20%
Hydro 27 73 122 214 4.6% 10% 11%
Geothermal 7 19 28 51 4.1% 3% 3%
Bioenergy 1 8 23 63 9.2% 1% 3%
Other 0 0 11 50 24.0% 0% 3%
Total 154 696 1 063 1 879 4.2% 100% 100%
* Inter-regional trade in electricity (i.e. from the ASEAN region to/from other regions) is assumed to be zero. ** Compound average annual growth rate.
Access to Modern Energy Services in ASEAN
Population without Access to Electricity
Population relying on traditional use of biomass
cooking
Name of Counties Million Share Percentage
Million Share Percentage
Brunei Darussalam 0 0% 0 0%
Cambodia 9 66% 13 88%
Indonesia 66 27% 103 42%
Lao PDR 1 22% 4 65%
Malaysia 0 1% 1 3%
Myanmar 25 51% 44 92%
Philippines 28 30% 47 50%
Singapore 0 0% 0 0%
Thailand 1 1% 18 26%
Vietnam 3 4% 49 56%
Total ASEAN 134 22% 279 47%
* Preliminary estimates based on IEA and World Health Organization (WHO) databases
TERI has been working on developing practical,
cost-effective and sustainable solutions to tackle
the problem of lack of access to energy
• Energy efficient & clean technology
• Pro-poor delivery model
• Enabling business environment
• Rigorous monitoring
• Adaptive action research
• Policy advocacy
TERI adopts phased approach
Catalyzing access to menu of technology options
Identifying the Technology
Project Surya, a scientific intervention, created evidence for IAP from traditional cookstoves
Established forced draft ICS as solution to mitigate BC
Development/Promotion of technology options
Developed/Promoted 7 plus forced draft ICS models in India alone
Market value chain at last mile:
Facilitated over 20 business models for ICS in India alone during last 18 months
Nurtured chain of 100 plus micro-social enterprises for after-sales-service and retail
Addressing affordability and monitoring adoption
Climate Credit Pilot Project (C2P2): an innovative approach
C2P2 deploys “SootSwap”, an IT application that enables remote
monitoring of ICS usage & facilitates data capture for direct climate credit remittance to HHs
for BC mitigation
Harnessing a network of Micro Social Entrepreneurs @TERI
Over 2500 VLEs in 22 states (India)
200 plus Energy Enterprises or
Uttam Urja Kendras
Forced draft Improved Biomass Cookstove based on evidence from “Project Surya”
TERI advances access to customized technology solution for lighting and cooking
Facilitated market based value chain for ICS
20,000 plus ICS
disseminated in India through social enterprise
networks
Solar Charging Station (SCS)– A
community based lighting option
with mobile lanterns
Solar Micro Grid:
(SMG)
A wired electricity supply system designed
based on the community feedback
Solar Home Light Systems (SHLS)–
Individual system with luminaries
and mobile phone charging
option
Integrated Domestic Energy
System (IDES): Modern lighting,
mobile phone charging and to
operate improved
cookstoves
Solar Multi Utility (SMU): Energy to
operate village enterprises like spices grinding unit and power
households
Designed/Developed specification for cost-effective solutions SCS/SMG and SMU are operated and managed by VLEs on fee-for-service model SHLS and IDES meet needs of individual HHs/shops
Menu of technology options for lighting and
cooking
Global “Lighting a Billion Lives Campaign”: Clean lighting in 400,000 plus households
Introduced cost effective: Solar Charging Station(SCS) model: Over 2000 villages (including LWE and forest villages)
Instrumental in driving Micro and Pico grids: 200 plus SMGs installed/ commissioned
Lab to field: Glimpse
A: Clean Lighting
Early advocators for integrated approach (Clean Lighting+ Improved Cookstove + Mobile Charging) Introduced IDES as a customizable technology product to policy makers manufacturers, retailers, and rural consumers in India Customization and design of technology specification for IDES 5000 plus IDES commissioned in Bihar alone
Starting while India had only 4 models of forced draft ICS: TERI has already introduced 7 models
1 Patent granted, 5 models already approved by India’s premier Institution: IIT Delhi
Introduced in field
Brought onboard 2 plus new ICS manufacturers in India
Partnership with existing manufacturers: NDMI, Alpha-renewables
20,000 ICS already disseminated through social enterprise networks
B: Clean Cooking
C: Integrated Approach
Consumer Education • Provide Choice
– All clean cooking technologies ON THE SHELF
• Partner with NGOs for IEC
• Demand+ dissemination= 1,00,000
Our Footprints
Lighting in 22 States of India
105,000+ Solar Lanterns
disseminated
3,000+ SHLS installed
5,000+ IDES installed
200+ SMGs commissioned
20,000 ICS disseminated in 15
states
Addressing barriers!!
Effective delivery & service provision
Addressing technical barriers
Addressing non-economic barriers
Financial support
ü TP Networks ü Value chain creation
– distributor & EE
ü Incentives ü Credit – network with
RRB/MFI
ü Customization ü Technical inputs to
manufactures
ü Information Education and Communication
(IEC)
I.
II.
III.
IV.
1. 2. Value proposition Customer segment 3. Channels
5. Key activities 4. Customer relationship
6. 7. Key partners Financial Flows
Local Grass root organizations
Community based organizations
SHG Federations
Energy Enterprise
a.
b.
v Establishment of EE & Distributor network v Setting up benchmarks for manufacturing v Developing a network of TP
v Networking with Financial Institutions – Commercial bank/ RRB/ MFI
v Developing and implementing a framework of
incentives
v Customization of technology v Technical support to manufacturers v Policy advocacy
v Awareness generation within end users, manufacturers and policy makers
v Policy advocacy
v Networking with knowledge institutions for research & development
Sustainability Approach
Building of capacities at local levels for operation and maintenance of
technology
Dovetailing with existing and proposed government
programmes
Awareness generation amongst policy makers
Impact on national priorities
Setting up of networks for continuous O&M e.g.
encourage entrepreneurship
Setting up networks in the region to track and
subsequently incorporate latest technical advances
Customization of technology
Sustainability