KS UX/UI, please list specific examples of the UI that’s changed as a result of the Rice 2.4 upgrade, indicating whether the change is an improvement or not an improvement. If necessary or applicable, provide screenshots and perhaps a rough estimation of the level of effort to resolve it (Low, Medium, High), if it should be corrected (Change) or if its acceptable (Accept). Provide any references, if available. There’s no need to create JIRAs for any of these at this time, but if there’s already one, provide the link. May 8, 2014 Differences Buttons Bootstrap 3 introduced new button styles. However, these are lacking affordances (i.e. stylistically very flat) and there’s not enough contrast between the background and text colors. Recommendation: Change Effort: Low Some exploration into a recommended style: http://codepen.io/oliverng/pen/uwmHa Alerts Inconsistent padding and styling. Not all CSS classes are included where they’re expected. Do we use Bootstrap 3 alert styling or explore custom styles? Is the problem Rice or KS on this one? Contract should be examined, like in the Buttons recommendation. Padding should be examined, like in the Pixel Units recommendation. Recommendation: ? Effort: ? Unable to identify source; likely Kuali Student 1 12 May 2014 Reproduced from a Windows Word file, larger images not available
22
Embed
KS Rice 2.4 UI Differences & Resolution Recommendation.docx€¦ · Web view · 2015-01-09KS UX/UI, please list specific examples of the UI that’s changed as a result of the
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
KS UX/UI, please list specific examples of the UI that’s changed as a result of the Rice 2.4 upgrade, indicating whether the change is an improvement or not an improvement. If necessary or applicable, provide screenshots and perhaps a rough estimation of the level of effort to resolve it (Low, Medium, High), if it should be corrected (Change) or if its acceptable (Accept). Provide any references, if available. There’s no need to create JIRAs for any of these at this time, but if there’s already one, provide the link.
May 8, 2014
Differences
ButtonsBootstrap 3 introduced new button styles. However, these are lacking affordances (i.e. stylistically very flat) and there’s not enough contrast between the background and text colors.
Recommendation: ChangeEffort: Low
Some exploration into a recommended style:http://codepen.io/oliverng/pen/uwmHa
AlertsInconsistent padding and styling. Not all CSS classes are included where they’re expected. Do we use Bootstrap 3 alert styling or explore custom styles? Is the problem Rice or KS on this one? Contract should be examined, like in the Buttons recommendation. Padding should be examined, like in the Pixel Units recommendation.
Recommendation: ?Effort: ?
Icon FontsConflict with Rice’s default icon set. We will continue to use the custom icon set before the upgrade. Further collaboration with UXI is needed to see if there’s a set of icons or method of implementing icons that would be universally recommended for all of Kuali.
Recommendation: ChangeEffort: ?
Unable to identify source; likely Kuali Student 1 12 May 2014Reproduced from a Windows Word file, larger images not available
Labels IBy default, all labels are now positioned on top of form controls. We recommend against this default, and will retain alignment as it originally was. This will require restructuring beans to shift to the Bootstrap layout manager wherever there was a left aligned label.
Recommendation: ChangeEffort: Medium
Labels IIIn cases where labels are placed to the left of input fields, labels are now top aligned. They use to be centered aligned.
Pixel UnitsBootstrap heavily utilizes pixels (e.g. for spacing, layout, etc.) where it would be much more appropriate for scalable units to be used (e.g. rem, em, %) as a way to support efforts toward responsive design and accessibility.
Recommendation: ChangeEffort: Medium–High
Application HeaderPrior to the upgrade, the color of the Term text use to be white. It has now changed to black which does not provide enough contrast with the background color.
Unable to identify source; likely Kuali Student 2 12 May 2014Reproduced from a Windows Word file, larger images not available
aford, 05/12/14,
I think these are really the same thing. The effort could really be high if we are changing the layout in all cases. If wejust use CSS, the effort is medium-low.
Primary Action/Cancel Button AlignmentOn multiple screens throughout the application the Save and Cancel buttons in the sticky footer appear stacked vertically, rather than side-by-side.
Copy Course Offering - Copy from ExistingPagination controls now appear above the table and the whitespace that was previously above the Options header is no longer there.
Action BarThe action bar layout is broken. Button groups appear stacked vertically (instead of horizontally), and some of the button labels are not visible.
Schedule of Classes - Expand/CollapseThe expand/collapse column is now wider but resizes to the correct size when refreshing the page. The page is a blank screen when attempting to expand.
● The facets box is narrowed by a few pixels, causing a header to line-wrap.● Mouse-over shading for facets no longer span across the entire facet box.● The facet headers are taller.● The borders are inconsistent with the original design - thicker, and shows
gaps in between.
Unable to identify source; likely Kuali Student 14 12 May 2014Reproduced from a Windows Word file, larger images not available
KSAP-1301 – Checkbox Alignment127 KB 06/May/14 7:02 AM
KSAP: Planner - Add Link and Credits are not Bottom Aligned For the Planned Items
The Planned Items section of the planner is a fixed height and the items list should start right after the header and fill in top to bottom. The Add to Plan Link and the credits for the section should be at the bottom of the section with white space between them and the plan items if the list of 8 is not full. It looks like these use to be in different sections but the krad upgrade puts them in the same.
The image that is displaying for the toggle is not the correct image. The image that we were using on env2 was located in the following directory on env2: