RESEARCH PROPOSAL QA KM 2012 Lecture 10 Friday, November 30, 12
Jan 20, 2015
RESEARCH PROPOSAL QAKM 2012 Lecture 10
Friday, November 30, 12
OVERVIEW
Research Proposal
Finding your topic
Defining your research question
Writing it up
Research Poster: Communicating your idea visually
Peer Review: Providing positive feedback
Lightning Talk: Condense your idea
Logistics
Friday, November 30, 12
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Friday, November 30, 12
FINDING YOUR TOPIC
Which topics in the course did you like?
Which problem should be solved?
Think out of the box, what have you seen in the literature in other lectures that may be of use here?
Sleep on it.
Am I still excited about it? OK, go to step 2
Friday, November 30, 12
INSPIRATION
Friday, November 30, 12
INSPIRATION
Friday, November 30, 12
INSPIRATION
&URZGOLQNLQJ$XWKRU��7KRPDV�3ORHJHU��.H\ZRUGV��:HE�RI�'DWD��FURZGVRXUFLQJ��,QWURGXFWLRQ7KLV� GRFXPHQW� LV� D� SURSRVDO� IRU� D� UHVHDUFK� SURMHFW� WKDW� DLPV� WR� HYDOXDWH� WKH� EHQHILWV� RI� XVLQJ�FURZGVRXUFLQJ�RQ�WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD��)LUVW��ZH�ZLOO�VXFFLQFWO\�LQWURGXFH�WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD�DQG�GHVFULEH�WKH� SUREOHP� WKDW�ZH� H[SHFW� WR� VROYH��1H[W��ZH�ZLOO� LQWURGXFH� FURZGVRXUFLQJ� DQG� GHVFULEH�ZK\�ZH�H[SHFW�WKDW�LW�ZLOO�VROYH�WKH�SUREOHP�WKDW�ZH�KDYH�GHVFULEHG��:H�ZLOO�FRQFOXGH�ZLWK�GHVFULELQJ�KRZ�WKH�UHVHDUFK�SURMHFW�VKRXOG�HYDOXDWH�RXU�SURSRVHG�VROXWLRQ��,QWURGXFLQJ�7KH�:HE�RI�'DWD7KH�:HE�RI�'DWD�LV�EXLOW�DURXQG�WZR�FRUH�SULQFLSOHV��7KH�ILUVW�SULQFLSOH�LV�PDNLQJ�GDWD�DYDLODEOH�RQ�WKH�:HE��7KH�VHFRQG�SULQFLSOH�LV�FUHDWLQJ�OLQNV��HQDEOLQJ�KXPDQV�RU�PDFKLQHV�WR�QDYLJDWH�WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD��%HUQHUV�/HH���������8QOLNH�OLQNV�EHWZHHQ�UHVRXUFHV�RQ�WKH�WUDGLWLRQDO�:HE�RI�'RFXPHQWV��OLQNV�EHWZHHQ�UHVRXUFHV�RQ�WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD�DUH�W\SHG�OLQNV��7KLV�PHDQV�WKDW�WKH�OLQNV�DOORZ�XV�WR�VSHFLI\�PHDQLQJIXO�UHODWLRQVKLSV�EHWZHHQ�UHVRXUFHV���7KLV� GLIIHUHQFH� LQ� OLQNV� RQ� WKH�:HE� RI�'RFXPHQWV� DQG� WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD� LV� LOOXVWUDWHG� LQ� )LJXUH� ���ZKLFK�LV�UHSURGXFHG�IURP�.RLYXQHQ��0LOOHU���������2Q�WKH�OHIW��ZH�VHH�DQ�H[DPSOH�RI�WKH�:HE�RI�'RFXPHQWV��ZLWK�XQW\SHG�OLQNV��2Q�WKH�ULJKW��ZH�VHH�DQ�H[DPSOH�RI�WKH�:HE�RI�GDWD��ZLWK�W\SHG�OLQNV�VXFK�DV�³GHSHQGV2Q´�RU�³FUHDWRU´�
��)LJXUH����/HIW���/LQNV�LQ�WKH�:HE�RI�'RFXPHQWV��5LJKW���/LQNV�LQ�WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD�
�7KH�W\SHG�OLQNV�WKDW�IRUP�WKH�:HE�RI�'DWD�DUH�W\SLFDOO\�FUHDWHG�E\�WZR�GLIIHUHQW�PHWKRGV��DV�GHILQHG�E\�%L]HU� HW� DO�� �������� 7KH� ILUVW� LV� WKH�PDQXDO�PHWKRG�� LQ�ZKLFK� D� SHUVRQ�PDQXDOO\� LGHQWLILHV� WZR�UHVRXUFHV� WR� OLQN��DQG� WKHQ�FUHDWHV� WKH� OLQN��%HFDXVH� WKLV�DSSURDFK�REYLRXVO\�GRHV�QRW� VFDOH�ZHOO� WR�ODUJH�VHWV�RI�UHVRXUFHV��DXWRPDWHG�PHWKRGV�IRU�OLQNLQJ�UHVRXUFHV�ZHUH�GHYHORSHG��$Q�H[DPSOH�RI�VXFK�DQ�DXWRPDWHG�PHWKRG� LV� VHHQ� LQ� WKH� µ5')�%RRN�0DVKXS¶� WKDW�ZDV� �GHYHORSHG�E\�%L]HU��*DX����������ZKLFK�XVHV�D�UHODWLYHO\�VLPSOH�SDWWHUQ�PDWFKLQJ�DOJRULWKP�WKDW�XVHV�,6%1�QXPEHUV� WR� FUHDWH� OLQNV�EHWZHHQ� UHVRXUFHV� DERXW� WKH� VDPH�ERRN��$Q�H[DPSOH�RI� � D�PRUH� DGYDQFHG�
Friday, November 30, 12
DEFINING YOUR RQ
Dig into the literature, has my problem been researched before?
If so, what techniques have been used to deal with it?
Is my proposed solution novel and viable?
No literature? Ask yourself if the problem you want to investigate is relevant.
Friday, November 30, 12
WRITING IT UP
Make sure the proposal is self-contained, i.e., any peer reviewer should understand your main problem and proposed solution by just reading your document
Use examples, or figures to explain your proposal
Don’t forget any parts (literature etc.)
Friday, November 30, 12
YOUR RESEARCH POSTER
Friday, November 30, 12
VISUALISING YOUR IDEA
A picture says more than a thousand words
Come up with a catchy example
Don’t paste text from your proposal into your poster!
Friday, November 30, 12
Knowledge & Media Conference 2011December 12th VU University Amsterdam
J u i c i n g t h e L O D C l o u d w i t h W o r d N e t
Ben A. StudentVU University Amsterdam
Use WordNet to suggest new linksin the LOD Cloud
Use a validation metricto determine the
relevance of new links
The number of data sets that link to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 to 10 or more than 10 other data sets
Though at first glance it may seem as if there are many connections between data sources in the LOD Cloud, a more detailed look will show that most data sources are connected to only one or two other data sources. This also follows from the LOD Cloud statistics. More than 50% of the data sources in the LOD Cloud link to no more than two other
sources, and more than 66% of them link to no more than three other sources.
Use WordNet as a semantic and relational knowledge base to analyze the subjects,
predicates and objects of existing triples in the LOD Cloud and propose new links
between data items based on the linguistic relations defined in WordNet. Nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs are grouped into sets
of cognitive synonyms called synsets, each expressing a distinct concept. Synsets are
interlinked by means of conceptual-semantic and lexical relations.
WordNet contains 3 major relation types that could be utilized: Synonymy relations; relations between words that have similar meaning, e.g. ‘forest’ is synonymous to ‘wood’. Hyponymy relations; relations
between words that are sub concepts or super concepts of each other, e.g. ‘taxi’ is a sub concept of ‘car’, which in turn is a sub concept of ‘vehicle’. Meronymy relations;
relations that define if words are sub concepts, e.g. ‘bumper’ is a part of ‘car’.
Derive identifying terms from existing RDF Triples
▼Match these terms against synsets in
WordNet▼
Use synonymy hyponymy and meronymy relations
▼Suggest links based on
distance in the linguistic WordNet relation and matching percentage
▼Use a filter for
domain specific applications
Friday, November 30, 12
PEER REVIEW
Friday, November 30, 12
PROVIDING POSITIVE FEEDBACK
Meant to help each other in improving the proposal
Read critically, but fairly
Provide detailed as well as high level comments to aid the author whose work you are reviewing
Friday, November 30, 12
LIGHTNING TALK
Friday, November 30, 12
CONDENSING YOUR IDEA
Explain the core of your idea in one minute
Don’t try to summarise your entire proposal
Create a single slide to communicate your idea
Friday, November 30, 12
Try-on eyewearSerious gaming for opticians
Friday, November 30, 12
Music discovery and recommendations using the Semantic Webby Justin van Wees
Problem statement Research question• Enormous collections of music are available
online• To !nd new, possibly interseting music,
users can: - Read reviews - Listen to lots of tracks - ... or use colleborative !ltering services like:
20+ million songs
Colleborative !ltering methods have several disadvantages:• compares on (very few) high level
metadeta properties• content-based properties are
ignored• prone to a popularity bias; makes
it unlikely for artists located in the ‘Long Tail’ to be ever recommend
• recommendations are not transparent
The Top–737 artists accumulate 50% of total playcounts (Celma and Cano, 2008).
Can we create a system that generates personalized music recommendations by using Semantic Web technologies and currently available Linked Open Data?
We wan to:• help users discover new music that
!ts personal taste• combine collaborative !ltering data,
expert-based data and high-level content based features
• provide meaningful feedback on why items are suggested (Cohen and Fan, 2000)
• intergrate with a (popular) existing service
Methods• collect music related linked data and map it to the
Music Ontology (Raimond et al., 2007)• build and evaluate recommendation methods• determine what information on recommendations is useful to
the end-user
References Casey, M., Veltkamp, R., Goto, M., Leman, M., Rhodes, C., and Slaney, M. (2008). Content-based music information retrieval: current direc-tions and future challenges. Proceedings of the IEEE, 96(4):668–696. Celma, O. and Cano, P. (2008). From hits to niches?: or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery. In Proceedings of the 2nd KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Recommender Systems and the Net"ix Prize Competition, page 5. ACM. Cohen, W. and Fan, W. (2000). Web-collaborative !ltering: Recommending music by crawling the web. Computer Networks, 33(1):685–698. Raimond, Y., Abdallah, S., Sandler, M., and Giasson, F. (2007). The music ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, pages 417– 422. Citeseer. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITunes_Store#Music, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotify http://dbtune.org/
Text
Friday, November 30, 12
Crowdsourcing for documentation and revitalization of endangered languages
Language embeds knowledge…
documenting
sharing
in the hands of the crowd
Friday, November 30, 12
LOGISTICS
Friday, November 30, 12
SUBMITTING TO EASYCHAIR
Friday, November 30, 12
REVIEWING
Friday, November 30, 12
LIGHTNING TALK SLIDE
Submit a PDF file with one single slide to the dropbox, named <LASTNAME>_slide.pdf
Deadline: Friday 7 December 23:59 CET.
Make sure the slide is in landscape mode and has at dimensions 1024x768 or greater with same proportions
Friday, November 30, 12
FINAL VERSION
Process reviewers’ comments and lightning talk comments
Explain your improvements in a response letter
Deadline: Sunday 23 December 23:59 CET
Resubmit using Easychair
Friday, November 30, 12
QUESTIONS?
Friday, November 30, 12