Klinker Portfolio

Jason Klinker4205 South Carey St, Apt. A, Marion, IN 46953 • t: 260.438.4626 • e: [email protected]

IndexSelected Student and Professional Works

Student Work

Staying Young in Old CityUrban Kitchen Remodel • AIAS/AARP Aging in Place Competition • 2nd Place • Spring 2012

Adaptive Form: Interactive SkinZero-Net Energy Training Center • Leading Edge Competition • 1st Place • Spring 2010

Professional Work

Downtown Bus TerminalRenovation & New Canopy • Marion, IN • Completed 08/2012

Community School of the ArtsFacade Preservation/Design & Masterplan • Marion, IN • In Progress

Evergreen HomesLow-Income Housing Duplexes • Marion, IN •Completed 07/2012

Historic Hostess HouseArchive Documentation & Presentation Board • Marion, IN • Completed 07/2012

Urban Kitchen Remodel • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania • AIAS/AARP Design Competition • Spring 2012

Staying Young in Old City

*Contributed post editing (photoshop/lightroom) and design concepts. (Digital Model by Partner, Revit 2010)

existing kitchen proposed kitchen

Staying Young in Old City Securing Independence through Adaptable Design

Awards: 2nd Place AIAS/AARP “Aging In Place” National Design Competition (2-person Team)

Tools Used: AutoCAD, Adobe CS5, Adobe Lightroom. *Digital Model by Partner (Revit 2010)

Description: The challenge was to redesign a galley style kitchen using ‘Aging in Place’ and Universal Design concepts. Our solution creates the kitchen as a connected social hub, bases materials on neighborhood character, and adds custom features to standard casework making the kitchen adaptable for various user needs.

Contribution: Plans, sections, details, peninsula/lazy susan concept, integration of vertically sliding and carousel casework, research/pricing of standard base cabinets. Assisted with cost estimate.

Casework Section @ CarouselCasework Section @ Pullout Cart

*Contributed Casework Sections and Details, Developed Concepts (AutoCAD 2012)

*Digital Model and Rendering by Partner (Revit 2012)

*Develop overall Estimated Project Cost with partner. Contributed Merillat casework research and pricing.

ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTAppliances/Fixtures

General Construction

Soft Cost

Model #

Appliances/Fixtures Sub Total

General Construction Sub Total

Soft Cost Sub TotalTOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST

Manufacturer

Description

Percent of Construction

Unit Cost

Total Cost

$10,435

$31,372

$7,580$49,387

Total Cost

Total Cost

Dishwasher Fisher & Peykel

by Merillat Masterpiece

by StageMotion

Custom

Custom

Butcher Block

Mosaic Tile

Wire Frame

Can/Pend/Spot

Hardwood

Concrete

GE

LG

GE

Fagor

Rangecraft

Kohler

Kohler

DD24SUT7

Per Catalog

Estimated

Estimated

Estimated

$50/SF

$10/SF

Estimated

Estimated

Estimated

Estimated

8% of Construction

10% of Construction

PP944STSS

GR-G227TVS

PEB1590SMSS

5HA-200LX

Viser

K-6411-2-FE

K-6227-C15-BV

$1,000

$17,422

$3,400

$2,500

$4,180

$1,100

$200

$3,750

$700

$500

$1,800

$700

$2,700

$1,249

$2,699

$599

$849

$2300

$859

$880

Cooktop

Casework

Designer Fee

Rotating Pantry

Contractor Markup

Casework Lifts Under counter Cart

Refrigerator

Countertops

Microwave

Back splashes

Oven (Side Open)

Range Hood

Sink

Suspended Ceiling

Faucet

Lighting

Book Shelves

Peninsula Base

BACK WALL CASEWORK ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/4” = 1’-0”

What’s Your ABILITY?Casework “Slide-ability”

These cabinets slide vertically along tracks for accessible storage of plates, glasses, and small appliances

Casework “Reach-ability”The vertically moving casework, carosel pantry, 9” toe space, and the placement of appliances in the prime reachable zone allow for increased reach-ability for wheelchairs or those with limited read

Casework “Aff ord-ability”Although many of these cabinets have custom features, nearly all of the casework has been picked from standard Merillat Masterpiece series cabinets

Casework “Flex-ability”The fl exible pull-out cart can tuck away for normal counter use, be moved around for increased counter space where needed, used to move hot or heavy items, or anything else

re needed, used to move hot or heavy items, g else

BACK WALL CASEWORK ELEVATION

What s Your ABILITY?

Casework “Adapt-ability”A vertical carosel pantry based on the AutoPantry by StorageMotion adapts to the needs of any individual, bringing even the highest items to any level

http://woodworkingnetwork.com

Casework “Push-ability”After market wheels to Marillat’s standard pullout trash/recycle cabinet lets heavy bins be pushed to the dumpster

http://www.merillat.com

Casework “Store-ability”A tall utility closet allows for storage of brooms, mops, and foldable grocery carts

Casework “Write-ability”A chalk board face to this pantry door adds another fun and useful utility

http://2.bp.blogspot.com

*Contributed Peninsula and Lazy Susan Concepts, Floor Plans, and Details (AutoCAD 2012)

Floor Plan @ 42” A.F.F. Floor Plan @ 12” A.F.F. Lazy Susan Sliding Door Axon (AutoCAD 2012)

*Contributed ‘What’s Your Ability’ Concept, Elevation, and Graphics (AutoCAD 2012, Sketchup, Photoshop)

Zero-Net Energy Training Center • Long beach, CA • 2009-2010 Leading Edge Competition • Spring 2010

Adaptive Form: Interactive Skin

View of Building from Northwest (Building model by partner - Sketchup)

Internal Sensible Heat Gains (Day)


Therm Mass Collection (Day)



Therm Mass Collection (Day)

HVAC AsNeeded (Day)

Nighttime Flushing of Thermal Mass Ceilings(All Floors)

Nighttime Flushing of Thermal Mass Ceilings(All Floors)

Stac

k Ven

tilatio

n in A

trium

Cross Ventilation (Day Time Cooling)

Nighttime Flushing of Thermal Mass Ceiling

Seasonably Adjustable PV Panels

Adaptive Form: Interactive SkinZero-Net Energy Training Center • Long Beach, California

Awards:

Tools Used:

1st Place - Leading Edge International Design Competition(200 entries from over 5 countries)

AutoCAD, Sketchup, Photoshop, Illustrator, Excel

Description:

Narrative:

Worked in a 3-person team to develop a 30,000 s.f. Zero-Net Energy Training Center in Long Beach. The competition required that the building reach a goal of zero-net energy. Achievement of that goal was illustrated in with a 100 page Technical Analysis Report.

Sliding, warm wooden screens, smooth concrete walls, pure day lit spaces and immersion in the natural Californian xeriscape create a sense of place, informed by systematic environmental design; The Workforce Training Center replenishes the energy it uses to embrace a tangible and instinctive net zero energy.

Our Adaptive Skin dances within the poetic relationship between the built and the natural environments by acknowledging technological marvels like PV panels, geothermal systems, and automated roof structures while giving a gracious nod to time tested sustainable strategies like thermal mass and passive cooling. Designed for the fi eld tripping student, the after work class taker, and the routine employee that nestles into a cozy offi ce each day, this humble structure reaches out and interacts with its friends. The cool ventilation on a warm afternoon; the warm touch of a wood shading system and concrete mass walls; the visual pleasure of vibrant yellow and lavender blue heightened with the sweet fragrance of the Jasmine Flowers - it is through these stimulating interactions that our building speaks. A soul touching conversation between the rigid forms of man and Mother Nature’s whimsical tale reminds us of the importance of sustainable building and living practices.

Contribution: Outside of contribution to overall design development, I developed the fl oor plans, sections, and details. I also contributed a large portion of the technical analysis report including excel calculation tables for each room that were linked to energy use summary tables. These were used throughout the design process to monitor the effects our design decisions had on the overall energy usage.

Wall Section (AutoCAD 2010)Training Room Section (AutoCAD 2010, Illustrator)

Summer

Summer

Winter

South Facade Ground Level Shop RoomsA wooded trellis, located on the south façade of the shop rooms not only gives the space an aesthetic character, but also a strategic in design. During the summer months, the trellis would be the location for small, fl owing vines. When the vines are full, direct heat gain is greatly reduced and the space becomes an exterior place on the site that is thermally acceptable when areas in full sun are too warm. The vines diffuse daylight, reducing the lighting load in these spaces. During winter months, the vines lose leaves/fl owers and allow solar heat gain through the closed garage door and diffused light through the shade.

South Facade Upper Level RoomsThis operable window system contains sliding louvers, sliding window panes, and pull down shades. This offers a range of options for the user. During the winter the louvers can be moved out of the way to allow for solar heat gain that is trapped inside the closed window. The shade can be pulled down to fi lter the low-angle sun for diffused lighting. During the summer, the louvers can be used to catch some of the solar heat before it enters the building. This also allows for passive ventilation to cool the internally load dominated classrooms.

Winter

First Floor PlanThird Floor Plan

North

<

Internal Heat Gains (Btu / h)7 = 3,600 (January) 3,600 (July)

January: 2,040 July: 2,040

(Area) x (SHG) = Heat Gain Btu/h

Int. Heat Gains People (Btu/h) =

Internal Heat Gain People = (Area) x (Sensible Heat Gain Btu/h ft2)

1200 1.7 2,040

January: 720 July: 720

(Area) x (SHG) = Heat Gain Btu/h1200 0.6 720

Internal Heat Gain Equip = (Area) x (Sensible Heat Gain Btu/h ft2)

Int. Heat Gains Equip. (Btu/h) =

January: 840 July: 840

(Area) x (SHG) = Heat Gain Btu/h1200 0.7 840

Int. Heat Gains Lights (Btu/h) =

Internal Heat Gain Lights = (Area) x (Sensible Heat Gain Btu/h ft2) 8

Solar Heat Gain Glazing (Btu / Month) = (Jan.) (July)

North FaçadeJanuary 300 0 1.00 0.49 31 0

July 300 151 1.00 0.49 31 688,107

1,951,716 970,670

Solar Heat Gain Glazing 9 = (Area of Glazing) x (Radiation Btu/SF Day) x (SC) x (SHGC Glaze) (Day/Mnth)

(Area Glaze) x (Radiation) x (SC) x (SHGC)10 x (Day/Mnth) = Heat Gain Month

10South FaçadeJanuary 240 1709 0.62 0.15 31 1,182,491

July 240 310 0.15 0.15 31 51,894East Façade

January 90 549 1.00 0.31 31 474,830July 90 889 0.15 0.31 31 115,334

West FaçadeJanuary 90 549 0 62 0 31 31 294 395




January 90 549 0.62 0.31 31 294,395July 90 889 0.15 0.31 31 115,334

Month North Façade South Façade East Façade West FaçadeJanuary 0 1709 549 549

July 151 310 889 889

Direct Solar Radiation11

7. Heat Gain Coefficients from MEEB (10th ed., Appendix Table F.3 Parts A and B, p.1610).8. Sensible Heat Gain from lighting is based on the Daylight Factor for the space. Assumed

10. SC Shading + SHGC Glazing Values from MEEB (Appendix Tables E.15 and E.20, p. 1585 and 1590) 11.g g y g

DF < 1 for Base Case Analysis and DF > 4 for Competition Design Case Analysis 9. SHGC Base Case value assumes clear single glazed for January and no glazing (open windows) for July. For Competition Design Case SHGC is based on type of window best for facade. See Part I: Technical Task #1 for additional information.

)Data collected from PEC Solar Calculator created by Charles C. Benton, and Robert A. Marcial with The PG&E Energy Center, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 1993. (See Part II: Reference Charts for worksheet).

Space #Envelope(Btu / h)

Internal Gain (Btu / h)

Direct Solar (Btu / Month) Month1

15,815 3,600 1,951,716 January20 15 0 1200 9,912 3,600 970,670 July

Heat Flow Through Envelope (Btu / h) = 15 815 9 912

Summary of Gains and Losses for This SpaceGeneral Space Input Data

104Classroom

Estimated# People

Floor to Floor Height Roof Area Floor Area

(January - Loss) (July - Gain)Heat Flow Through Envelope (Btu / h) = 15,815 9,912Horz. Length Total Surface Glazing Glazed Area Opaque Area

Feet S.F. Percent S.F. S.F. Opaque (Op-2) 0.035 Jan. Exterior 38North Façade 40 600 0.5 300 300 Glazing (Gl-2) 0.49 Jan. Atrium 43South Façade 40 600 0.4 240 360 Glazing (Gl-4) 0.15 Jan. Interior 65East Façade 30 450 0.2 90 360 Glazing (Gl-5) 0.31 July Exterior 90West Façade 30 450 0.2 90 360 Roof 0.025 July Interior 74

(January - Loss) (July - Gain)

Façade Areas Envelope U-Values2 Temprature Data ( ˚F )3

January: 6,721 (Loss) July: 4,594 (Gain)

January (Loss) 300 0.49 300 0.035 0 0.025 43 65 3465July (Gain) 300 0.49 300 0.035 0 0.025 90 74 2520

Envelope Heat Flow = [ U (Btu/h ft2 F) x A (ft2) ] x t ( F)

[ (North Glazing x U-Glazing) + (North Opaque x U-Opaque) + (Roof Area x U-Roof) ] x [Ext.Temp5. - Int. Temp] = Total Btu/h

Envelope Heat Flow (Btu/h)4 =



[ (East Glazing x U-Glazing) + (East Opaque x U-Opaque) + (Roof Area x U-Roof) ] x [Ext.Temp. - Int. Temp] = Total Btu/h

[ (South Glazing x U-Glazing) + (South Opaque x U-Opaque) + (Roof Area x U-Roof) ] x [Ext.Temp5. - Int. Temp] = Total Btu/h


January: 346 (Loss) July: 135 (Gain)

Infiltration = (ACH #/hr) x (.018 btu/ft3 F) x (Space Vol. ft3) x t ( F)

Infiltration (Btu/h)6 =

[ (West Glazing x U-Glazing) + (West Opaque x U-Opaque) + (Roof Area x U-Roof) ] x [Ext.Temp. - Int. Temp] = Total Btu/h

Total Btu/hJanuary 0.73 0.018 975 38 65 346

July 0.48 0.018 975 90 74 135

January: 8,748 (Loss) July: 5,184 (Gain)

(ACH) x (Cpcty of Air) x (Space Vol) x (Ext. Temp - Int. Temp) =

Ventilation (Btu/h) =

Ventilation = (# People) x (.018 btu/ft3 F) x (15 ft3/min. Person) x (60 min/hr)

(People) x (Cpcty of Air) x (CFM) x (60 Min/Hr) x (Ext. Temp - Int. Temp) = Total Btu/hJanuary 20 0.018 15 60 38 65 8,748

July 20 0.018 15 60 90 74 5,184

1. January conditions include Atrium Spaces that are enclosed but not conditioned creating a warmer winter temperature in the Atrium Spaces. July conditions open the Atrium Spaces causing the temperatures inside the Atriums to be equal to the exterior temperatures.2. Grouping the materials into north + east and south + west categories allows for variation in façade construction and glazing type. This allows for systems to maximize the efficiency of the façade with respect to orientation to the sun See Part I: Technical Task #1 for U-Value Tables and

4. Equation from MEEB (10th ed., Section 7.8(a) Design Heat Loss, p.203-204).5. January exterior temperature for north and south facades are determined based on the room location. Facades that separate interior space from Atrium Space use the January Atrium temperature, facades located on an exterior surface use the January Exterior temperature.6. Design Infiltration Rates (ACH) are taken from MEEB (10th ed., Appendix Table E.27 Parts B and C, p 1601) Assumed Medium Construction Type for Base Case Analysis and Tight Construction Type forfaçade with respect to orientation to the sun. See Part I: Technical Task #1 for U-Value Tables and

Wall Assemblies.3. Temperatures for January Exterior, January Interior, July Exterior, and July Interior are collected from Section 6 of the competition description. January Atrium temperature assumes a moderate winter temperature for the enclosed and unconditioned Atrium Spaces. This value was taken from MEEB (10th ed., Appendix Table B.1 p.1489) from Los Angeles that has a slightly warmer winter temperature.

p.1601). Assumed Medium Construction Type for Base Case Analysis and Tight Construction Type for Competition Design Case Analysis.

Adaptive Form: Interactive SkinZero-Net Energy Training Center • Long Beach, California

Developed Excel Spreadsheets used for each space that excel calculation tables for each room that were linked to energy use summary tables. These were used throughout the design process to monitor the effects our design decisions had on the overall energy usage. The numbers highlighted in gray were the variables that we would input.

Interior Rendering of Atrium Space (Base Model by Partner, I added color and entourage in Photoshop)

North <

Renovation & New Canopy • Marion, IN • Professional Work (Halstead Architects) • Completed 08/2012

Downtown Bus Terminal

The renovation encloses an additional 700 s.f. and increases indoor seating from 18 to 54. Renovated rest rooms are fully ADA compliant, and double as public rest rooms for Marion’s First Friday festivals through the summer.

Downtown Bus Terminal Renovation & New Canopy • Marion, Indiana

Tools Used: AutoCAD, Sketchup, Microsoft Offi ce

Description: Built in the 1980’s, the downtown transit terminal is becoming a hot spot for a growing number of residents. Daily ridership averages are around 1,200 and growing, putting a strain on the old facility. Interiors were worn, roofs were leaky, heating and cooling systems were ineffi cient, and the old terminal struggled to accommodate for Marion’s disabled riders. The renovated terminal addresses all of these issues and more.

Contribution: My involvement with this project included working with the owner and involved parties to develop a canopy design and revised fl oor plan. I used Sketchup to create several canopy design options. I coordinated and produced a large portion of the construction documents including plans, schedules, and details. I was also involved throughout the construction phases doing fi eld observations and reports, reviewing shop drawings, and working closely with the contractor/owner through questions. I worked under supervision from the project architect.

Design Development Model (Sketchup)

New interior fi nishes and fresh paint on the exterior freshen up the building. A new canopy covers the bus loading area, keeping the patrons dry and the sidewalks ice free. New landscaping completed by the Youth Unlimited organization.

*My contribution included most of the construction drawings including all details, schedules and plans.

Facade Preservation/Design & Masterplan • Marion, IN • Professional Work (Halstead Architects) • In Progress

Community School of the Arts

Marquee south wall highlights local stars (I.E. James Dean, Cole Porter, etc.) with banners and plaques (Sketchup, Photoshop)Existing Structure

Community School of the Arts Facade Preservation/Design & Masterplan • Marion, Indiana

Tools Used: AutoCAD, Sketchup, Photoshop

Description: This project has many components including the preservation of the historic front façade and the development of a “Wall of Stars” on what was a blank, crumbling façade. The “Wall of Stars” showcases nine of the area’s most notable stars. The contribution each star has made is described in a dedication plaque lower on the wall. In addition to the nationally recognized fi gures, the “Wall of Stars” incorporates brick/limestone carving allowing everyone in the community to become part of the legacy. Also included was a code review and master plan study done to investigate the feasibility of future expansion and programs.

Contribution: I have played a key role in this project from the onset. I worked with the schools director and others on the board and in the community in the development of the “Wall of Stars” and master planning ideas. In those efforts, I produced all of the images that have been used for development and also fundraising/marketing efforts. I was responsible for the code review (based on IBC 2006) and fi nal master plan creation. I also produced bidding drawings for the preservation work and have helped in the development of multiple budgets. Engraving of lower wall bricks and stone panels provides fundraising for school and

community sense of ownership of building. Educational plaques offers a description of each local star.

First Floor Master Plan - Creates new coffee shop and lobby space and organizes circulation into two primary cores. A second egress stair is also added to the basement to allow the space to become usable for pottery classes as well as set building and design.

Third Floor Master Plan - Creates additional dance studios along with a small performance and multi-purpose space. With the front facade facing the courthouse square, the third fl oor provides one of the better views in town.

Low-Income Housing • Marion, IN • Professional Work (Halstead Architects) • Completed 07/2012

Evergreen Homes

Five energy effi cient duplexes bring life to a looked over site. Our project has added a spark to some neighbors, two have added new roofs and several offered and provided informal security. Several stories were conveyed to our contractor of thieves run off in the night.

Original neglected site

Evergreen Homes Low-Income Housing • Marion, Indiana

*Contributed all photographs

Tools Used: AutoCAD, Microsoft Offi ce

Description: This project created fi ve, low-income duplexes and a small, shared community building. It was developed in one of Marion’s most economically distressed neighborhoods and is serving as a spring board for investment in the area. The project met NAHB Bronze standards for energy effi ciency.

Contribution: My primary contribution to this project was in the form of coordination and project management. I began working on this project as it went out to bid. After initial bids came back over budget, I worked with the owners and my boss to cut cost. This included revising most of the construction documents and assisting in revising specifi cations. I coordinated most of the bidding efforts including fi elding contractor questions and preparing addenda. During construction, I was accompanied my boss at all fi eld visits, wrote fi eld reports, and handled much of the general project coordination and communications, working directly with the owner and contractors.

Community Building offers a meeting place, exercise room, laundry machines, and home base for shared garden in the back

Just fi nished and tenants are already showing signs of ownership

*Original construction drawings were completed by others in the offi ce. My revisions to the construction drawings included identifying and coordinating a revised laundry room layout, window sizes and quantities, porch revisions, and the removal of dormers and other details. I was responsible for the coordination of these changes throughout the drawings.

Archive Documentation & Presentation Board • Marion, IN • Professional Work (Halstead Architects) • Completed Fall 2012

Historic Hostess House

Historic Hostess HouseArchival Documentation & Presentation Board • Marion, Indiana

Tools Used: AutoCAD, Photoshop, InDesign

Description: The Hostess House, designed by Samuel Plato, is one of Marion’s great treasures. The House is currently utilized as a banquet space and lunch time restaurant. The non-profi t group received a small grant to do a documentation of the building and develop a ‘to do list’ of items that need to be under taken.

Contribution: My primary contributions included fi eld documenting the building, creating the plans and elevations, and laying out a presentation board to be displayed in the front foyer. I also attended meetings with the board members and assisted in the development of the ‘to do list’.

Site Plan and First Floor Plan - created using AutoCAD 2012 and Photoshop

Presentation board developed using Photoshop and Indesign for display in foyer

Front Facade - created in AutoCAD 2012

Basement Plan Second Floor Plan Third Floor Plan

Klinker Portfolio

Documents