Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz REGIONAL EFFECTS OF GERMAN INTERNAL EAST-WEST-MIGRATION AND THE PROBABILITY OF RETURN- MIGRATION 3rd INTERNATIONAL POPULATION GEOGRAPHIES CONFERENCE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL 19-21 JUNE 2006
Dec 21, 2015
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
REGIONAL EFFECTS OF GERMAN
INTERNAL EAST-WEST-MIGRATION
AND THE PROBABILITY OF RETURN-
MIGRATION
3rd INTERNATIONAL POPULATION GEOGRAPHIES
CONFERENCE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL
19-21 JUNE 2006
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
• Decline in East Germany: poor economy, low GDP,
high unemployment rate
• Recent Problems: Demographic change, birth deficit,
demographic aging, shrinking cities
• In East Germany huge out-migration to West-
Germany
• 40 % of the current population loss is caused by out-
migtration to West-Germany
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
Netmigration from East to West Germany (incl. Berlin)
-200.000
-180.000
-160.000
-140.000
-120.000
-100.000
-80.000
-60.000
-40.000
-20.000
0
20.000
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
under 18 18 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 50 50 - 65 65 and more
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2005
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
East-West migration flows 2003
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. ResuméeN: 1151
Educational levels of out-migrants and total population
7.0
28.243.9
39.6
59.2
42.7
13.424.6
10.4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
out-migrants total population young population (20 to 35)
others/nothing secondary modern school (8 years) secondary school (10 years) A-level (12 or 13 years) n
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
Educational costs
0
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
secondarymodern pupil
w ithout vocationaltraining
secondary pupilw ith vocational
training
Student(university for
applied science)
Student(university)
e.g.: medicalstudent
Eu
ro
school education occupational education
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2005
41.60055.000
79.680
130.396
257.982
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
Occupational group in% Examples Agricultural occupations 1,0 farmers, gardners
Lower manual worker 7,6 building aids, drivers, painters, roofers, turners
Qualified manual occupations
11,0 fitters, mechanics, plumbers, carpenters, butchers, bakers
Technicians 8,7 land surveyor technician, electronic technicians, printers P
rod
uc
tio
n
Engineers 8,9 architects, civil engineers, electrical engineers, chemists, computer scientist
Lower services 7,7 cleaners, waiters, landladies, caretakers
Qualified services 5,5 soldiers, policemen, photographers, hairdressers
Semiprofessions 14,5 nurses, physiotherapists, pharmaceutical assistants, old people‘s nurses S
erv
ice
s
Professions 10,3 doctors, teachers, scientists, lawyers
Lower office employees 5,7 Salesman and sales assistances, telephonists (call center), simple secretaries
Qualified office employees 17,5 bank clerks, accounters, assistants, officials in charges
Ad
min
istr
ati
on
Manager 1,6 managing directors, factory managers, managers
Total 100
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
Possibility of return migration by origin
23,633,4 28,0
5,7 4,2
41,136,2
40,0
68,2
35,9
35,3 30,4 32,026,1
59,9
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
60,0
70,0
80,0
90,0
100,0
all born in LSA born in East Germany born in West Germany born in foreigncountries
most probable returnees possible returnees very improbable returnees
N: 1074Pearson Chi-Scare .000
Klaus Friedrich & Andrea Schultz
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
Answers (multiple answers possible) Counts in %
Regional identity, “Heimat”memoriesIdentity with hometown or -region, family and friends , positive private memories, memories of former job and study
1253 63,5
Quality of life, social environmentbeautiful nature or landscape, friendly mentality, culture, good leisure-time facilities, good social conditions (e.g. care of children); good living conditions
255 12,9
Social environment, living conditions in a negative senseunfriendly people or racism, bad housing or architecture (e.g. Plattenbau), bad social environment, dirty towns
75 3,8
Politics and economics, rather negative tenorunemployment, bad economic conditions, old industries, bad policy, political and economic change, agenda for economic recovery “Aufbau Ost”
132 6,7
Regional characteristicscities or regions (e.g., Halle, Harz), signs or beautiful architecture, regional specialities (e.g. chocolates, yogurt), regional personalities (e.g. Luther), regional institutions (e.g. Martin Luther university)
166 8,4
Otherother negatively, other positively, ambivalent feelings, nothing/anything 92 4,7
N= 1091, Counts= 1973 100
Attachment to the area of origin
Male migrant to Bielefeld, age 37 (native East German):
“I have a very good memory of Halle. I found my student time was great. We had good conditions to study, and part of the lecturers was quite committed. […] I also find the special charm of the city verybeautiful. The town has its own mixture of a radical-socialist proletarian culture and then, due to its large University, some student atmosphere. That is an impressive mixture. There are beautiful contrasts. This I totally enjoyed. […]I have a very good friend who works in Halle at the University and she keeps telling me what happens and what it is like in Halle now.”
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée
Male migrant to Cologne, age 38 (formerly born in West Germany):
“The first subsidies we received on the condition that we found our enterprise in Halle. Therefore the guys could not come with me to Cologne. I am not an altruistic person or whatever you call this. I have not founded the company because East Germany should be supported or people should do something there. But I founded the company together with students, because these are my friends and you can make money through that. So I did it mainly for my benefit and I would like others to profit from it, Halle benefits from it and so do the guys. Due to this they got an employment and have an exciting time. If the company is successful, they can get rich, too. If not, in any case they will gain some good experience for their future.”
1. The context
2. Internal migra- tion streams
3. The Human Capital outflow
4. Networks and return migration
5. Resumée