TECHNICAL REPORT ON KIRKLAND LAKE MINERAL PROPERTIES (Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore, Wright-Hargreaves) Located in Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada For FOXPOINT RESOURCES LTD. Prepared and Submitted By: Roland Ridler, B.A.Sc. (hons.), M.A.Sc., Ph.D. (Econ. Geol.), P.D. November 30, 2001
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
TECHNICAL REPORT ON
KIRKLAND LAKE MINERAL PROPERTIES (Macassa Mine, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore,
Wright-Hargreaves)
Located in Kirkland Lake, Ontario, Canada
For
FOXPOINT RESOURCES LTD. Prepared and Submitted By: Roland Ridler, B.A.Sc. (hons.), M.A.Sc., Ph.D. (Econ. Geol.), P.D. November 30, 2001
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION..................................................................................................5
ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................................................10
GEOLOGY OF THE ABITIBI GREENSTONE BELT......................................................................................................... 28 GEOLOGY OF THE KIRKLAND LAKE CAMP ................................................................................................................. 34
One deep hole intersected 0.29/23.2’ at –900’ vertical.
As part of the project, camp-wide drill holes were incorporated in one database for the first time.
Although incomplete, exploration opportunities are indicated.
#6 Break
The #6 Break is a splay off the Main Break, dipping at ~50 degrees to the South. It, and subsidiary
veining were mined extensively at Kirkland Minerals and Teck Hughes. One sub vein was mined for
1200’ along strike and for 400’ of dip length. The majority of the ore at Teck-Hughes and Kirkland Lake
Gold was mined from veining at the confluence of the #6 Break and Main Break. The #6 Break
continues westward to Macassa where the stopes have identical geometries to those at Teck-Hughes and
Kirkland Lake Gold.
46
Surface Zones
Numerous vein systems in the Kirkland Lake Camp have unmined, or incompletely mined, surface zones.
The most significant are:
#1 Lakeshore/Teck Hughes crown pillars
#2 other Main Break/South Break crown pillars (in town)
#3 Main Break at Kirkland Lake Gold
#7 Vein
A drilling program was underway, at the time of the mine closure, which was designed to delineate the #6
Break around the 4500’ level. The programme was half finished at closure. The last hole drilled on the
property extended past the #6 Break. It intersected the #6 Break returning 0.61 oz/T Au over a 5.2’
horizontal mining width (HMW). At 1100’ south of the Main Break the tuff contains very fine quartz
stringers that contain visible gold. This area has an intersection that generated a value of 0.76 oz/T over
12.8 feet of horizontal mining width. Very few holes extend 1100’ south of the Main Break. Seven holes
have intersected a significant vein 1100’ south of the Main Break.
This is the most promising underground target after the extension of the Main Break to surface. There
are a number of other exploration targets of decreasing immediacy in the files, too numerous for inclusion
in this report.
Sources and Verification of Data
Foxpoint Resources Ltd. has not carried out any exploration on the subject properties nor have they
verified any of the previous exploration work. Activity on the properties date back to the early 1900’s and
a vast amount of information and data, including years of production history on all subject properties, has
47
been generated. The company chooses to rely on this well documented production history as verification
of the data and potential of the properties.
The author of this report has had a great deal of experience in the area, has visited the properties and has
reviewed the technical information in the Macassa minesite offices in Kirkland Lake. As a result, the
author is able to comment on the data and potential of the area.
Sampling Method and Cutting
Near the end of the past production history at Macassa Mine only chip sampling and diamond drill hole
sampling were used as it was determined by the geological department, at Macassa Mine, that muck
sampling was non-representative and created unreliable data. A number of cutting formulae were
attempted over the years with varying results
Core Samples
The most recent drilling in the area was carried out using BQ drill string and the core was placed in core
boxes and delivered to the company by a drilling contractor. A company geologist oversaw the drilling
programs.
All core was logged by a company geologist and samples were marked, cut, and half core was sent for
assaying. Samples were taken according to geology and the maximum sample length was not greater than
3.0 feet.
The focus in the camp, and at Macassa, has been on assaying quartz veins. However, the mining history
of the camp indicates that the walls of the veins may carry considerable gold. The most obvious indication
of this is that stopes have traditionally been “overdrawn”; that is, more is removed than the drill pattern
was to have provided even counting conservative dilution, in some cases more than 50% more. This can
48
only have come from volumetrically significant sloughing from the walls and backs of stopes indicating that
the grade of so called “dilution” was, in many cases ore.
In the case of Teck-hughes this material was even given a formal “camp” name, “slough ore”.
Chip Samples
The chip samples underground were taken perpendicular to the ore zone, and as close to the back as
possible, as channel samples, by either a geologist or geological technician. The samples were taken, and
collected in plastic bags, in intervals corresponding to geology and the maximum sample length was not
greater than 3.5 feet. Composite samples were then weighting according to sample width with individual
assays being cut to 3.5 oz/T.
Sample Preparation and Analysis
During the exploration campaigns by Kinross Gold Corporation all samples were taken under the
supervision of a geologist or a geological technician and sent for analysis using the following methods.
Core Analysis
A weight of 29.166 grams is used for a core assay. The sample is then carried through the classical fire assay technique, except
that the gold/silver bead is completely dissolved in a test tube and then assayed using an atomic absorption machine. This
method is called a Fire Assay with an AA Finish. Any sample resulting in a reading over 0.10 oz/ton is pulled and ran the
normal classical fire assay technique with the gold bead being weighed on a microbalance.
Chip Analysis
49
A weight of 14.58 grams is used for assaying purposes on the chip samples. The sample is then carried through the classical
fire assay technique with the gold bead being weighed on a microbalance.
Quality Control
Quality Control samples were analyzed on each batch of samples. If the quality control sample, which was of a known value,
was within limits then the batch of samples were reported. If the QC sample was not within limits and the AA had been
properly checked, then the batch was re-weighed and run again. Cross-checking occurred every 5 or 6 months and
no consistent variation had been delineated.
The relative lack of coarse gold, and the consistency of historic results, militate against general use of
screened assays.
Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing
The existing Macassa Mill (currently on standby) is capable of treating 1450 st/d (1315 mt/d) of ore
(Figure 11) that has, in the past, averaged 0.45 oz./st (12.75 g/mt) gold. This circuit also has the capability
of having a split circuit that can treat ore and tailings at the same time, at a tonnage of 625 st/d ore and
1200 st/d tailings. (Figure 12).
Crushing
The crushing plant has the capability of crushing 1850 Tons in a 24-hour period. Actual crushing time
however is only 20 hrs. per day due to clean up, shift changes and repairs.
Crushing is carried out in 3 stages using a 28 in. x 36 in. primary jaw crusher in series with a 4 ¼ standard
Symons crusher and a 4 ¼ shorthead Symons crusher. The primary jaw crushes from 12 in. material
down to 4 in. then the standard from 4 in. reduces it to 1 in. The Shorthead then reduces down to the final
product of 7/16 in. material. There are two screen decks in the circuit, one between the jaw crusher and
50
standard crusher and one before the shorthead crusher. When the material is finally sized it is transferred
to a 1500 Ton bin located by the Mill.
Tailings Reclamation
At this time the equipment for reclaiming tailings is on the Lakeshore site consisting of Pumps, Water
Cannon, Screen Plant and Piping. The heavy equipment that was rented consisted of two 20 Ton dump
trucks and two excavators.
51
52
Tailings Grinding
Tailings at 50% solids will be pumped from the Reclaim Surge Tank at 50 st/hr. to a pulp distributor which
will split the pulp between the 12 ½ ft. x 16 ft., 1600 HP Ball Mill and the 200 HP Tower Mill taken from
the existing plant. This latter mill will have a net finished product capacity of about 5.5 st/hr.
The Ball Mill and Tower Mill will operate in closed circuit with multiple Cyclones. The underflow
returning to the Pulp Distribute and the overflow at 40% solids being pumped to the Leaching Circuit. The
target product size is 95% - 37 micrometers, however, it is estimated that at maximum throughputs 80-
85% - 37 micrometers will be obtained. Testwork data indicated that this would reduce leach recovery
from 75 to 70%.
Ore Grinding
Depending on Tonnage and the number of Mills being used the Ore will be withdrawn from the Fine Ore
Bin at a rate of 18 – 60 st/hr. using two variable speed Slot Feeders controlled by a Weightometer on the
Primary Mill Feed conveyor. Primary Grinding will be conducted in a 10 ½ dia. by 13 ft. 800 HP Ball Mill
operating in a closed circuit with 3 x 15 in. dia. Cyclones (2 operating and 1 standby). Calcium Cyanide
solution and Lime Slurry will be added to the Cyclone Feed Pumpbox.
The Cyclone overflow product size will vary over the range II 5 – 235 micrometers depending on
throughput. This material will gravitate to the Secondary Cyclone Feed Pumpbox for pumping to 6 x 10 in.
dia. Cyclones (5 operating and 1 standby) operating in closed circuit with the Secondary Ball Mill. The
Secondary Mill is a 10 ½ x 13 ft. 800 HP Ball Mill. This material will gravitate to the Tertiary Mill Cyclone
Feed Pumpbox for pumping to 8 X 10 in. dia. Cyclones (6 operating and 2 Standby) operating in closed
circuit with the Tertiary Ball Mill. The Tertiary Ball Mill is a 12 ½ x 16 ft. 1600 HP mill. The Tertiary
Cyclone overflow at 18% solids and with P80 size of 30 micrometers will gravitate through off the Trash
Screen to remove wood chips, plastic, etc. and be pumped to a 33 ft. dia. x 33 ft. Pre-leach Tank located
outside.
53
54
Ore Pre -leaching, Thickening and Carbon Columns
Experience in the existing plant has shown that total gold recovery is enhanced by pre-leaching using low
solids density and that approximately 60% of the gold is leached in the grinding circuit and pre-leach
section. Trash screen underside will therefore be pumped to a 33 ft. diameter x 33 ft. Pre-leach Tank
located outside providing 5 – 7 hours residence time. This tank will overflow to a 65 ft. diameter
Thickener fitted with a high capacity feedwell that will thicken the pulp to 45% solids prior to pumping to
the leach circuit.
Thickener overflow containing approximately 2 ppm gold will be pumped via a Surge Tank to 3 x 5 ft. dia.
x 15 ft. high Carbon Columns in series. Granulated carbon (6 x 16 mesh) will be pumped periodically in
batches counter currently to the solution flow at a maximum rate of 1.3 st/d. The carbon will load to 145-
175 oz/st (5000 – 6000 g/mt) gold and be transferred from the first column to the carbon stripping circuit.
Barren solution will overflow from the third column to the mill solution tank for use in the ore grinding
circuit.
It is estimated that approximately 85% of the gold in the thickener overflow will be recovered onto the
carbon.
Leaching
Reground tailings will be pumped to the first of 5 x 40 ft. dia. x 45 ft. leach tanks in series located outside.
Calcium Cyanide solution and Lime Slurry will also be added to the first tank. Partially leached ore from
the ore thickener will be added to the third tank. This configuration will provide 133 hours of residence
time for tailings and 53 hours for ore.
Overflow from the fifth tank will gravitate through a trash screen to the CIP feed pumpbox.
55
Carbon-In-Pulp (CIP)
Trash screen underside will be pumped to the first of 5 x 20 ft. dia. x 20 ft. CIP tanks in series located
within the mill buildings. Each tank will provide 1.5 hours residence time and be fitted with a twin impeller
high efficiency agitator and a launder screen equipped with 3 screen panels per side.
The pump will gravitate through the tanks via the launder screens and finally discharge from the CIP tank
No. 6 from where it will gravitate to the vibrating carbon safety screen. This screen will collect any
carbon that escapes through the launder screen while allowing the tailings to pass to the tailings pumpbox.
Tailings will be pumped to the dam via a 6 in. dia. HDPE pipeline.
Carbon will be added to tank No. 6 at a maximum rate of 1.3 st/d and be advanced through the tanks using
recessed impeller pumps. The carbon concentration in the pulp will be about 15 g/l. Pulp from tank No. 1
will be pumped to a vibrating washing screen located above and adjacent to the carbon stripping circuit.
Washed carbon loaded to 145 – 175 oz/st (5000 – 6000 g/mt) gold will gravitate directly to the loaded
carbon storage tank while the pulp will return to the CIP feed pumpbox. The carbon pumping sequence
will be controlled by operator adjusted timers linked to a programmable logic controller. Both fresh and
recycled carbon will be screened and added to tank No. 6 via the stripped carbon storage tank.
Carbon Stripping and Gold Recovery
Loaded carbon from the washing screen and carbon column No. 1 will be educted to the stripping column
which has been sized to take up to 3.3 tons of carbon each, i.e. one day’s production. Stripping will be
conducted at high pressure using up to 15 gpm of solution containing 1.5% sodium hydroxide and 0.5%
sodium cyanide at 140 degrees C. The time required to reduce the carbon to a gold loading of about 5
oz./st (150 g/mt) will be 8 hours.
The barren strip solution will be pumped from the fresh eluate tank through an in-line electric solution
heater to bring it to the required 1400 degrees C and the to the strip column.
56
Loaded eluate containing 100 – 140 ppm gold will gravitate from the strip circuit to the electrowinning cell
which contains 13 cathodes each loaded with 4 – 5 lbs. of stainless steel wool. Up to 300 oz. of gold will
be loaded onto each cathode and cathodes attaining this weight will be removed form the cell one per
week.
Barren strip solution from the electrowinning cell containing about 5 ppm gold will be returned to the fresh
eluate tank. Make-up additions of sodium cyanide and sodium hydroxide solutions will be added as
required from a mixing tank.
Carbon Handling and Regeneration
To retain its activity, the carbon requires periodic acid washing and regeneration. Acid washing will be
carried out in a 5% hydrochloric acid solution while regeneration will be carried out in an externally heated
horizontal rotary kiln at 6000C.
The carbon educted from the strip vessel can be directed to the sizing screen, the acid wash tank, or the
dewatering screen ahead of the regeneration kiln feed hopper. Acid treated carbon will be neutralized
with sodium hydroxide prior to educting to either the regeneration kiln or the sizing screen. Carbon
discharging from the kiln will be water quenched and then educted to the sizing screen.
Carbon will be transported through the circuit using eductors powered by a dedicated high-pressure water
system. Water will be pumped from the eductor water tank to each eductor as required and then drained
back to this tank from the vessel to which the carbon is delivered. The tank will be fitted with a central
feedwell that will allow carbon fines, which accumulate in the eductor water, to settle. The collected fines
will then be pumped to a filter press.
Carbon consumption is expected to range from 0.04 – 0.10 lb./st (20 – 50 g/mt) of ore treated. The
losses will be made up with fresh carbon that will be educted to the carbon sizing screen from a
conditioning tank. Batches of up to 1.0 ton of carbon will be agitated for several hours with water in this
tank to break off weak comers from the carbon grains which would otherwise degenerate to fines in the
57
CIP circuit and cause losses of gold. The fines will be removed as sizing screen undersize that will drain
to the eductor water tank feedwell.
Cathode Leaching and Gold Refining
Cathodes removed from the electrowinning cell will be dismantled on the stripping table and the wire wool
and deposited gold placed in a drying oven overnight. This dried material will be fluxed and smelted on an
electric induction furnace and poured into bullion molds.
Mineral Resource Estimates
Foxpoint Resources Ltd. has not carried out any resource or reserve estimates.
There are scattered blocks of interesting mineralization within the old underground workings east of
Macassa. Most are in pillars. Very little, if any would qualify for definition purposes according to
National Instrument 43-101 policies. Compilation has begun.
In 1998, near the time of closure, Kinross listed an accessible mining reserve at Macassa of 132,903 tons
at 0.41 ounces of gold per ton proven and 276,927 tons at 0.51 ounces of gold per ton probable
in their company files. These historic reserves have been permitted for exploitation. Foxpoint has not
formally audited these historic reserves from the perspective of NI 43-101; but, has no reason to doubt the
high professional standards of the previous mining companies. Examination of several representative
Kinross estimates by the author revealed no obvious discrepancies with standard industry practice.
Recommendations and Conclusions
The subject properties, with their long, productive mining history, have, east of Macassa, left behind many
small amounts of defined mineralization too scattered and inaccessible to be of any immediate mining
58
interest or to qualify as resources or reserves according to Policy NI 43-101, at the present time. These
should be compiled on a single database to enhance their exploration value.
Various attempts to generate a cutting formula which consistently reconciles reserves with mill results
have been tried. Results have varied. The author’s experience indicates that all such formulae are
inherently scientifically arbitrary and unnecessarily conservative. Reserves are invariably understated. A
primary source of major error is lack of knowledge of real gold distribution. An initial programme of
detailed saturation sampling of exploration holes followed by rigorous mathematical analysis is
recommended.
There is an abundance of technical historic data available within which are numerous indications of
exploration potential. These should be compiled on a single database.
The few existing holes for which core is available above the mined mineralization at Macassa should be
subject to saturation sampling. At roughly one thousand foot separations, only composite concentrations of
geologically anomalous gold over several feet or better, several tens of feet, could possibly be broadly
correlated.
This technical report has identified and prioritized a selection of zones of immediate exploration interest for
follow up which in the author’s opinion provide the greatest opportunities at the least cost and shortest time
to define qualified resources, 1) by limited underground development taking advantage of the existing,
relatively easy to rehabilitate infrastructure associated with the #3 shaft, and 2) by surface drilling.
The two highest priority targets are:
1) The extension of previously mined mineralization above the current vertical limit of mining
both from underground and surface and
2) Up-grading of the incompletely drilled No. 7 zone by underground drilling, to resource quality.
To do the above the No. 3 Shaft has to be dewatered, rehabilitated and recommissioned to the 4250 level.
Five drill stations and cross cuts have to be cut into the footwall at ~ 500’ intervals to allow for fan drilling
59
sufficient to generate piece points no further than 200’ apart on the Main Break. It is anticipated that his
will require ~ 30,000’ of drilling. A rough estimate of the cost is:
5 stations @ ~ 15,000. 75,000.
30,000’ @ $11. Contract. 330,000.
Saturation ** assaying @ 3’ @ $10. 100,000.
Logging, splitting etc. 50,000.
-----------
555,000.
Contingency @ 20% 111,000.
-----------
Total 666,000.
Say $ 700,000.
The surface program will be less costly because all holes will be on section.
Say $ 650,000.
Exploration of No. 7 will be less costly because of existing information:
Say $ 550,000.
Grand Total $1,900,000.
__________
Say $2,000,000.
* Past sampling has been influenced by a belief that gold is correlated with quartz veining and little else. The initial sampling and assaying should be total to test the entire interval transected (see history of the Camp). Once a satisfactory, consistent behavior is established then the degree of saturation can be reduced, to say, every third hole, with lots of room for the supervising geologist’s direction.
60
This program will provide coverage of the Main Break at 200’ centers for 1000’ up from existing
underground infrastructure and 1000’ down from surface, leaving an untested interval of about 1000’ for
future exploration. Moreover, the broader prospective width of the Main Break, understood as a zone,
given the established history of the Camp, will also be tested for significant distances on either side of the
trace of the Main Break itself.
Kinross’ historic mining reserve estimate of 132,903 tons at 0.41 ounces of gold per ton proven and
276,927 tons at 0.51 ounces of gold per ton probable , though unlikely to be flawed, should
nevertheless be representatively audited by a third party expert in these matters prior to the mining of
these reserves and resources.
61
CERTIFICATE To accompany the Technical Report dated November 30, 2001: Technical Report on Kirkland Lake Mineral Properties, (Macassa, Kirkland Lake Gold, Teck-Hughes, Lake Shore, Wright-Hargreaves) I, Roland H. Ridler, B.A.Sc. (hons), MASc, Ph.D. do hereby certify that: 1. I reside at 2 Shaughnessy Blvd., Willowdale, Ontario, M2J 1H5. 2. I am a Consulting Geologist. 3. I am a Member of the Association of Geoscientists of Ontario; Member of the Prospectors and Developers
Association of Canada; Member of the Society of Economic Geologists; Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada; and a Member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. I hold an Honours Bachelor Degree in Applied Geology from the University of Toronto, a Masters Degree in Applied Geology from the University of Toronto, a Ph.D. in Economic Geology from the University of Wisconsin, Madison and did Post Doctoral Studies at the University of Western Ontario. I have practiced my profession as an economic/exploration geologist for 32 years and have worked extensively in Sweden and North America, and briefly in Finland, South Africa, Australia and Brazil. I have worked with the Canadian Geological Survey and the private sector. My Ph.D. thesis was on the relation of mineralization to volcanic stratigraphy in the Kirkland Lake area. I have directed, a) metallogenetic studies for the Geological Survey of Canada in the Kirkland Lake area, and b) an exploration programme for the private sector at Kirkland Lake and authored papers and reports on the geology and mineral deposits. I also visited the Macassa Mine, and others, some years ago while in operation. I am familiar with the geology and mineral deposits of the area.
4. I am a qualified person for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101, “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects”. 5. I visited the subject property November 26th to November 30, 2001. 6. I prepared and supervised preparation of the technical report in its entirety. 7. I am not aware of any material fact, or material change, with respect to the subject matter of the Technical Report
which is not reflected in the Technical Report for which the omission to disclose would make the Technical Report misleading.
8. Neither I nor any affiliated entity of mine is at present, nor under any agreement, arrangement or understanding,
expects to become an insider, associate, affiliated entity, partner or employee of Foxpoint or an associate or affiliate of Foxpoint.
9. Neither I nor any affiliated entity of mine owns, directly or indirectly, nor under any agreement, arrangement or
understanding expects to receive: a) any securities of Foxpoint or of an affiliate of Foxpoint, or b) any royalty interest in the properties which are the subject of the Technical Report.
10. Neither I nor any affiliated entity of mine has earned the majority of our income during the preceding 3 years from
Foxpoint or an associate or affiliate of Foxpoint. 11. Neither I nor any affiliated entity of mine,
a) is, or by reason of an agreement, arrangement or understanding expects to become an insider, affiliate or partner of any person or company which has an ownership or royalty interest; or
62
b) has, or by reason of an agreement, arrangement or understanding expects to obtain an ownership or royalty interest, in a property which has a boundary within two kilometers of the closest boundaries of the subject properties.
12. I have not previously worked on these properties. I have worked on a non-contiguous property 500’ across
strike from an isolated claim of the subject properties twenty-three years ago. 13. I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and have prepared the Technical Report in compliance with NI 43-101
and Form 43-101F1 and in conformity with generally accepted Canadian mining industry practices. Dated the 30th day of November, 2001 “signed” Dr. Roland H. Ridler
63
REFERENCES Burrows, A. G., and Hopkins, P. E., 1925: Kirkland Lake gold area (revised edition); Ontario
Dept. Mines, Vol. XXXII, 1923. Calvert, A.J. and Ludden, J.N. 1999, Archean continental assembly in the southeast superior
Province of Canada; Tectonics. Cameron, E.M., 1990, Alkaline Magmatism at Kirkland Lake, Ontario: Product of Strike-Slip
Orogenisis, Geol. Surv. Canada. Card, K.D., 1990, A Review of the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield, a producer of
Archean accretion; Precambrian Research. Charlewood, G.H., 1964, Geology of Deep Developments on the Main Ore Zone at Kirkland
Lake; Ontario Department of Mines. Goodwin, A.M., 1977, Archean Volcanism in Superior Province, Canadian Shield: Geol. Assoc.
Canada, Spec. Paper No. 16. Hawley, J.E., 1950, Mineralogy of the Kirkland Lake Ores; Geology of the Main Ore Zone at
Kirkland Lake; Ont. Mines, Ann. Rept.
Jackson, S.L. and Fyon, J.A. 1991 The western Abitibi Subprovince in Ontario; in Geology of Ontario, OGS, Special Volume 4, Part 1, p.405-484
Jackson, S.L., Cruden, A.R., White, D. and Milkereit, B. 1995 A seismic-reflection-based regional cross section of the southern Abitibi greenstone belt; Can. J. Earth Sci., v.32, p.135-148
Jensen, L.S. and Langford, F.F. 1985, Geology and petrogenesis of the Archean Abitibi belt in the
Kirkland Lake area, Ontario; OGS, MP 123, 130p.
Jolly, W.T., 1978, Metamorphic History of the Archean Abitibi Belt; Metamorphism in the Canadian Shield, Geol. Surv. Canada.
Lackey, T.N.L., 1990, Alkaline Tuffs at Kirkland Lake, Ontario; M.Sc. Thesis, Queen’s
University
Legault, M.I. and Hattori, K. 1994 Late Archean geological development recorded in the Timiskaming Group sedimentary rocks, Kirkland Lake area, Abitibi greenstone belt, Canada; Precambrian research, v.68, p.23-42
McInnes, B.I. 1985 Ore petrology and wallrock alteration studies at the Lakeshore Gold Mine, Kirkland Lake, Ontario; Unpublished B.Sc. thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario 131p
64
Mueller, W. and Donaldson, J. 1992 A felsic dyke swarm formed under the sea: the Archean Hunter Mine Group, South-central Abitibi Belt Quebec, Canada; Bulletin of Volcanlogy Vol. 332,
Mueller, W., Donaldson, J.A. and Doucet, P. 1994 Volcanic and tecto-plutonic influences on sedimentation in the Archean Kirkland Basin, Abitibi greenstone belt, Canada; Precambrian Research v.68, p.201-230 Thomson, J.E., 1950, Geology of Teck Township and the Kenogami Lake Area, Kirkland Lake Gold Belt; Ontario Department of Mines, Annual Report
Thomson, Jas. E., Charlewood, G. H., Griffin, K., Hawley, J. E., Hopkins, H., Maclntosh, C. G.,
Ogryzio, S. P., Perry, O. S., and Ward, W. 1950: Geology of the main ore zone of Kirkland Lake; Ontario Dept. Mines, Vol. LVII.
Todd, E. W., 1928: Kirkland Lake gold area; Ontario Dept. Mines, Vol. XXXVII.
Tyrell, J. B., and Hore, R. E., 1926: The Kirkland Lake Fault; Royal Society Canada Trans. (third series), Vol. XX.
Watson, G. P., 1984. Ore Types and Fluid Regimes: Macassa Gold Mine, Kirkland Lake; Faculty
of Graduate Studies, The University of Western Ontario.
.Wark, W.J. 1948 A Contribution to the Mineralogy and Paragenesis of the Kirkland Lake Gold
Ores; Gold
65
CONSENT TO: FOXPOINT RESOURCES LTD. (“Foxpoint”) AND TO: THE ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION, THE ALBERTA SECURITIES COMMISSION AND THE
BRITISH COLUMBIA SECURITIES COMMISSION (collectively the "Securities Regulators") RE: TECHNICIAL REPORT OF DR. ROLAND H. RIDLER DATED NOVEMBER 30,2001 IN RESPECT OF
CERTAIN MINING PROPERTIES TO BE ACQUIRED BY FOXPOINT.
Reference is made to the technical report dated November 30, 2001 which I prepared for Foxpoint in respect of the acquisition by Foxpoint of certain miming properties from Kinross Gold Corporation (the "Technical Report"). I hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Report with the Securities Regulators, to the written disclosure of the Technical Report and to the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary thereof in the Annual Information Form (AIF) of Foxpoint. Date this 30th day of November, 2001.