Focus Schools Critical Success Factor #2: Quality Data to Drive Instruction Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC 972-348-1480 [email protected]
39
Embed
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC 972-348-1480 [email protected].
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Slide 1
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10
ESC 972-348-1480 [email protected]
Slide 2
Sound Check! Type in and let me know if you can hear me!
Slide 3
Sound Check Complete! Things are working on our end! If you
cant hear me, check your speakers and system. If you still cant
hear, call in to the phone number in the link you received for the
webinar and you can listen through your phone.
Slide 4
Performance Index Framework Index 1: Student Performance Index
2: Student Growth Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 4:
Postsecondary Readiness
Slide 5
Index 1 Measures achieved Level II Phase 1 Who Passed This is
the most familiar to us! Most like the old system The questions it
raises are crucial to improvement! TARGET 55%
Slide 6
Index 1 What Does the Data Tell You? The rating tells you an
overall average for all students The calculation shows the number
of passers and tests per subject The Safeguards (Page 2) tell you
the percentage score for each subject The Safeguards also tell you
how each student group performed
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Index 1 What Questions Need to Be Answered? How did each grade
level within the subject perform? Where more than one teacher was
teaching that course/subject, were their scores comparable? How
does the performance of your student groups compare to the All
Students performance? How does the membership in the student groups
change for 2014-2015?
Slide 10
Index 1 What Questions Need to Be Answered? Part 2 Do the
scores indicate systematic issues within each subject? within a
grade level? within a course? What staff development is needed for
individuals or all teachers in a subject/grade/course?
Slide 11
Index 1 What Questions Need to Be Answered? Part 3 What does
the SE level data tell you? Compare Readiness/Supporting/Process
Scores Does longitudinal data indicate ongoing SE concerns? Within
an SE with multiple questions, is there variation in performance?
Which SEs were challenging for special education students? ELL
students? Advanced Students? How well are kids passing?
Slide 12
Interventions What interventions were in place last year? Did
they improve student performance? What interventions are in place
this year? Do they meet the needs identified in your data study?
How do student group memberships change from last year?
Slide 13
Index 1: Looking Forward How will Index 1 be impacted by a
passing standard that will rise in 2015-2016? Target will rise in
2014-2015!
Slide 14
Index 2: Who Grew? Student Groups Contribute Points to Index 2
One Point for Meeting Growth Two Points for Exceeding Growth For
2013-2014, Growth was available for Math and Reading at 3-8 and
Math only at high school For 2014-2015, 7 th grade Writing will
receive a growth measure
Slide 15
Growth Calculation The Student Progress Measure is calculated
by subtracting 2 years of vertical scale scores. The number of
points needed to meet or exceed growth varies by grade/subject
Example: 2014 math vertical score MINUS 2013 math vertical score
Calculations are available here:
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/
Slide 16
Who is Supposed to Grow? Low Students Middle Students High
Achieving Students Special Education Students ELL Students Students
in each Race/Ethnicity
Slide 17
Who is Supposed to Grow? EVERYONE!!!
Slide 18
Side Notes: 3 rd Grade and English Students at the high school
can have Progress Measure Data ELL Progress Measure STAAR Alternate
(Eng 1 and Eng 2) 2 Districts in Region 10 missed Index 2, but had
Index 1 scores of 92 and 95
Slide 19
What Does Your Data Tell You? Reading and Math are Reported
Separately Then combined into one rating Each indicator can earn up
to 200 points Compare to 200!
Slide 20
Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: 2014 Construction Page 21
Acct. Manual
Slide 21
Index 2: Student Progress
Slide 22
Index 2 Target: Targets (released July 29): District 16
Elementary 33 Middle 28 High School/K-12 NA Groups: Race/Ethnicity,
Sped, ELL Minimum Size: 25
Slide 23
Index 2: What Questions Need to Be Answered? How does each
grade level/subject/course/teacher contribute to the Index? Which
kids grew more than others? Which groups not represented on the
chart grew/didnt grow? How did our interventions impact growth? How
do we ensure high performing students continue to grow?
Slide 24
Index 2: The Big Question How do we measure, monitor, and
foster growth??? (Hint: They cant grow if we dont teach the TEKS.
We have to teach ALL of EVERY TEK! Thats the FIRST STEP).
Slide 25
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Looking at the student groups
with the lowest performance from 2013 on your campus, AND
Economically Disadvantaged students, how many passed (1 point) OR
earned Advanced Level III (2 points?)
Slide 26
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps: Group Selection Economically
Disadvantaged Students (no minimum size) AND. From 2013 Data, any
race/ethnicity group with at least 25 tests in Reading AND Math is
eligible. The lowest performing are chosen for 2014 analysis If 3+
groups meet minimum size, then lowest 2 are chosen If 2 groups meet
minimum size, then lowest is chosen If 1 group meets minimum size,
then no race/ethnicity group is used
Slide 27
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: 2014 Construction
Page STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Economically Disadvantaged
Lowest Performing Race/Ethnic Group - 1 Lowest Performing
Race/Ethnic Group - 2 Total Points Maximum Points Example
Calculation for Reading Weighted Performance Number of Tests 804025
Performance Results: Phase-in 1 Level II Satisfactory and above
Number Percent 80 100% 20 50% 25 100% Level III Advanced Number
Percent 40 50% 0 0% 25 100% Reading Weighted Performance Rate
15050200400600 READING
Slide 28
STAAR Weighted Performance Rate Economically Disadvantaged
Lowest Performing Race/Ethnic Group - 1 Lowest Performing
Race/Ethnic Group - 2 Total Points Maximum Points Reading Weighted
Performance 15050200400600 Mathematics Weighted Performance
12510090315600 Writing Weighted Performance 8090125295600 Science
Weighted Performance 1204090250600 Social Studies Weighted
Performance 504080170600 Total14303000 Index 3 Score (total points
divided by maximum points)48 Index 3: 2014 Construction Table 2
(based on 2014 assessment results by subject area) Index 3: Closing
Performance Gaps
Slide 29
1 Pointers and 2 Pointers The students who earn 1 point for
passing in this index are the same students who counted in Index 1.
Raising Index 1 will raise Index 3. If your Index 1 is good, then
your best chance to raise Index 3 is to increase the number of
students earning Advanced Level III.
Slide 30
Index 3: Rethinking Terminology What Does Final Level III Mean
Instructionally? Students can only miss 5 (approximately!)
questions! This means they have to answer the hardest questions on
the test.correctly! Students who score in the top 3 raw scores get
2 points automatically!
Slide 31
Do your students have experience answering the 5-6 hardest
questions on the test? Have they been challenged to that level
consistently in your class? Are ALL students expected to try those
problems INDEPENDENTLY???
Slide 32
Performance Level Descriptors Posted by Subject at
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=2147485762&menu_id=793
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=2147485762&menu_id=793
Slide 33
Index 3 Targets Targets (released July 29): Districts 28
Elementary 28 Middle 27 High School/K-12 31 AECs: 11
Slide 34
Index 4: Post Secondary Readiness Final Level II on 2+ Tests
This component applies to all grades! High Schools: Grad/Dropout
Rates Diploma Plans Post Secondary Indicators TAKS, SAT/ACT
Slide 35
Final Level II on 2+ Tests* Questions to Ask: What is the Final
Level II breakdown by Subject? What is the Final Level II breakdown
by Grade? What is the Final Level II breakdown by Teacher? How does
the All Students Final Level II compare to each student group? Are
all students low in this area, or just certain groups? THIS WILL
EVENTUALLY BE INDEX 1! *if they only take 1 test, they must meet it
on that test
Slide 36
Indicator All Students Afric an Amer. Amer. Indian Asian
Hispani c Pacific Islande r White Two or More Races ELL Special Ed.
Total Points Max. Point s STAAR Score STAAR % Met Final Level ll on
Two or More Tests 29%16%40%23%38%36%182600 STAAR Score (STAAR total
points divided by maximum points)30 Graduation Score (Gr. 9-12)
4-yr. graduation rate84.3%78.8% 91.6%86.0%44.2%69.8%533.5700 5-yr.
graduation rate85.1%78.8%80.0%92.1%84.0%48.9%77.5%546.4700 Highest
Graduation Total546.4700 Graduation Score (best of total graduation
points divided by maximum points)78.0 RHSP/DAP Score 4-yr.
graduation Percent RHSP/DAP 82.7%76.4%83.6%83.0%325.7400 RHSP/DAP
Score (best of total RHSP/DAP points divided by maximum points)81.4
Postsecondary/College-Ready Graduates Score College-Ready Graduates
subject (ELA & Math) 82.0%72.0%78.0%89.0%321.0400 College-Ready
Score (total points divided by maximum points)80.2 Overall Index
Score STAAR Score30.0 Multipl y by Weight Graduation Score78.0
RHSP/DAP Score81.4 College-Ready Score 80.2 Index Score (sum of
weighted index scores) Minimum Size is 25 STAAR Component: All
Grade Levels Minimum Size = 25 This IS Index 4 for Elementary and
Middle Schools
Slide 37
High School Graduation/Dropout Rates Review procedures for
leavers and coding Graduation Plans Will continue to be refined for
Foundation Plan students Post-Secondary Indicators TAKS kids are
through system Will need refining What are we doing to help
students be successful on SAT/ACT?
Slide 38
Index 4 Targets Targets are based on your campus configuration.
(P. 15 of the Accountability Manual) Elementary is 12 Middle School
is 13 High Schools who only have one component is 21 High Schools
With All is 57 Districts who ONLY have the STAAR Component is
13.
Slide 39
In the end. What it really comes down to is HIGH expectations
for ALL students Are we teaching the TEKS to their depth and
complexity? Are we challenging ALL students?