Top Banner
Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity
63

Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Kim “Avrama” BlackwellGeorge Mason University

Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying

Synaptic Plasticity

Page 2: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Importance of Signaling Pathways

• Neuromodulators, e.g. Dopamine and Norepinphrine, modulate channel behaviour via intracellular signaling pathways

• Synaptic plasticity, cell excitability, gene regulation and memory are controlled by intracellular signaling pathways

• Intracellular signaling pathways are modelled as biochemical reactions

Page 3: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Mammalian Synaptic Plasticity

• Long Term Synaptic Plasticity– Long lasting, activity dependent change in

synaptic strength– Duration is one hour or more

• Potentiation - increase in synaptic strength

• Depression – decrease in synaptic strength

– Persistence and activity dependence of change makes this an attractive mechanism for memory storage

Page 4: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

5 ms

1 mV

Hippocampal LTP

•Hippocampus involved in memory storage

– Damage produces amnesia

Page 5: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Long-term potentiation of Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses

• High frequency stimulation of CA1 afferents enhances synaptic transmission – Repetitions of 1 sec of 100 hz– Pathway 1 receives high

frequency stimulation– Stimulus 2 is unstimulated

– High frequency stimulation required for firing of post-synaptic neuron (Hebb’s postulate)

Page 6: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Long-term potentiation of Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses

• Synaptic Pathway Specificity– Only stimulated pathway

enhanced– Strengthening persists

for hours

Field Recordings

Nguyen, Abel and Kandel. 1994. Science

Page 7: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Frequency requirement of LTP• Low frequency

stimulation produces long term depression

Heynen et al. Neuron 2000 Dudek and Bear, J Neurosci 1993

Page 8: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Properties of long-term potentiation of CA1 synapses

• Cooperativity– Magnitude of induction

increases with number of stimulated afferents

• Associativity– Weak stimulation of

pathway 2 during strong stimulation of pathway 1 potentiates pathway 2

0

100

200

300

400

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Stimulation Amplitude

LT

P (

% o

f Ba

selin

e) Cooperativity

Page 9: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Mechanisms Underlying LTP

• Depolarization of post-synaptic neuron (Hebb’s postulate) explains many properties of LTP– Cooperativity: multiple fibers required for

sufficient depolarization of post-synaptic neuron– Frequency dependence – high frequency required

for depolarization to accumulate– Associativity – high frequency of strong pathway

produces depolarization for weak pathway• Pre-synaptic activation of weak pathway required for

glutamate release

• NMDA receptor channel explains depolarization requirement

Page 10: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

NMDAR Channel Detects Coincidence, Permeable to Calcium

AMPAR NMDARMg++

Na+

AMPAR NMDARMg++

Na+

Hyperpolarized Depolarized

Ca++

Ca++

Page 11: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

NMDA Receptors and Calcium

• NMDA type glutamate receptors are calcium permeable

• Calcium required for LTP– Intracellular calcium

buffers block LTP, without disrupting the non-patched neurons

Malenka et al. Science 1988

Page 12: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Calcium and Plasticity• Type of plasticity, i.e. depression versus

potentiation depends on NMDA receptor activation, which controls calcium influx

– Low activity = small calcium elevation = LTD

– High activity = large calcium elevation = LTP

Replotted from Johnston et al. (2003) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B

Page 13: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Role of Calcium in LTP• Calcium (influx through NMDA receptor)

binds to Calmodulin– Calmodulin activates calcium calmodulin

dependent kinase type II (CaMKII)

• Inhibition of CaMKII blocks LTP

Replotted from Otmakhov et al., J Neurosci 1997

Page 14: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Multiple Calcium Actions in LTP

Page 15: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

LTP and Memory• Late phase of LTP (L-

LTP) shares more characteristics with memory storage than early phase– Produced by 4 bursts of

tetanic stimulation– Persists for more than

two hours– Requires transcription

and translation

Page 16: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

PKA and Late-phase LTP

<= 2 hours

> 2 hours

translation

Page 17: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

STDP• Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity

– Recent experiments show that relative timing of action potentials plays a critical role in determining sign and amplitude of changes in synaptic efficacy

• These experiments typically involve paired intracellular recordings– AP induced in pre-synaptic neuron

• Release of Glutamate– AP induced in post-synaptic neuron

• Requires AP to propagate backward into the dendritic tree

Page 18: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity

• Pre-synaptic AP before post → LTP– Pre-synaptic AP may have

contributed to post-synaptic activity

• Pre-synaptic AP after post → LTD– pre-synaptic AP could NOT

have contributed

• Relationship between calcium elevation and sign of plasticity ?

Pawlak and Kerr J Neurosci 2008

Page 19: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Can Calcium Explain STDP?• In neocortical

pyramidal neurons, magnitude of peak calcium does not predict direction of plasticity

• Calcium and CaMKII does not explain everything!– LTD also requires endocanabinoids

• Produced post-synaptically,

• Diffuse to pre-synaptic receptors

Nevian and Sakmann J Neurosci 2006

Page 20: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

How to Model Signaling Pathways

• Identify and describe biochemical reactions comprising the signaling pathway– Metabotropic Receptors– G proteins– Membrane bound enzyme– Diffusible second messenger– Kinase or phosphatase activation

Page 21: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

How to Model Signaling pathways

• Metabotropic Receptors– Protein does not form channel– Protein is linked to GTP binding protein (G

protein)– Effect mediated by

• Activated G protein subunits

• Downstream second messengers

– Receptor bound to neurotransmitter is an enzyme which activates G protein

Page 22: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Ionotropic vs Metabotropic

LL

Direct transmitter action

Indirect transmitter action

Ionotropic receptor

Metabotropic receptor Ion channelSecond Messenger

L

L

Page 23: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Heterotrimeric GTP Binding Proteins• Binds to GTP or GDP

– GDP bound form is inactive– GTP bound form is active

• Three subunits– Alpha

• Binds to guanosine nucleotides: GDP or GTP• Many different subtypes

– Beta and Gamma

• Binds to alpha subunit, prevents it from interacting with effector

• Stabilizes G protein in membrane • Can be effectors

Page 24: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Activation of GTP Binding Protein

Page 25: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Direct and Indirect Action of G Proteins

• Direct action – G subunit directly gates channel– Limited spatial extent– Usually G

• Indirect action– G protein binds to enzyme– Enzyme produces intracellular second

messenger– Wide spatial extent due to diffusible

second messenger

Page 26: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Direct Modulation of Channel via Active G Protein Subunits

Page 27: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Indirect action

Page 28: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Enzymes Activated by G proteins

• Adenylyl Cyclase– Also activated by calcium-calmodulin– Produces cAMP– Activates protein kinase A– Activates cyclic nucleotide gated channels (IH)

• Phospholipase C– Produces diacylgylcerol and Inositol

triphosphate– DAG activates protein kinase C– IP3 causes calcium release from the ER

Page 29: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 30: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Biochemical Reactions

• Bimolecular Reactions– Stoichiometric interactions between

substrate molecules to form product molecule

• Formation of bond between the substrate molecules

• Stoichiometric implies that the reaction specifies the number of each molecule required for reaction

• Molecules are consumed in order to make product

Page 31: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Biochemical Reactions

• Bimolecular Reactions– Reaction order is the number of

simultaneously interacting molecules• First order reaction: single substrate becomes

product

• Rate constants: rate (units: per sec) at which substrate becomes product

• Ratio of rate constants gives concentration of substrates and products at equilibrium

Page 32: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

substra te product

product

substra te

K

K

K

K

b

f

f

b

[ ]

[ ]

• First order reaction:

• At equilibrium:

Bimolecular Reactions

Page 33: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Bimolecular Reactions• Differential equations express rate of

change of molecule quantity with respect to time– Rate constants give frequency of transitions– Equations describe behavior of large

numbers of molecules (mass action kinetics)

– In closed system, mass is conserved, thus:• Substrate = initial value - produce

dproduct

d tK substra te K productf b [ ] [ ]

Page 34: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

• Second order reaction:

• Each molecule of product requires 1 molecule of subs1 and 1 molecule of subs2

• Conservation of mass applies to both substrates– Subs1(t) = subs1(t=0) - product(t)– Subs2(t) = subs1(t=0) - product(t)

subs subs product

K

K

f

b

1 2

dproduct

d tK subs subs K productf b [ ][ ] [ ]1 2

Bimolecular Reactions

Page 35: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

• Third order reaction:

• Order of reaction is number of molecules needed for product

• Substrate 2 is consumed twice as fast as substrate 1– Subs1(t) = subs1(t=0) - product(t)– Subs2(t) = subs1(t=0) - 2 product(t)

subs subs product

K

K

f

b

1 2 2

dproduct

d tK subs subs K productf b [ ][ ] [ ]1 2 2

Bimolecular Reactions

Page 36: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 37: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 38: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 39: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 40: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 41: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 42: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

LTD in the Cerebellum• Purkinje cells are projection neurons of

the cerebellum

• Many parallel fiber inputs from granule cells synapse on spines

• A single climbing fiber from inferior olivary nucleus synapses massively onto dendrites

From Neuromorpho.org, NMO_00892

Page 43: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Associative LTD in the Cerebellum• LTD requires concurrent stimulation of parallel

fibers (glutamate) and climbing fibers (depolarization)

PFCF

8 pulses100 Hz

3 pulses20 Hz

30 s

– Long term decrease in parallel fiber EPSP

Schreurs et al. J Neurophys 1996

Before

After

Page 44: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

LTD Mechanism in the Cerebellum

• Calcium influx through VDCC– Release of calcium from

the ER

• Activation of protein kinase C

• Glutamate binds to metabotropic glutamate receptor– Production of DAG and IP3

Page 45: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 46: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 47: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

General rules• One differential equation for each molecule

in the system of biochemical reactions• Two terms on the right hand side of a

differential equation for each set of arrows– Both terms must be in two different differential

equations

• Conservation equations can replace some differential equations

• Michaelis Menten approximation reduces number of equations

Page 48: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 49: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.
Page 50: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

XPPAUT example

• General purpose ODE solver commonly used in neuroscience

• http://www.math.pitt.edu/~bard/xpp/xpp.html

• Xppaut mglu-ip3.ode– Evaluate role of aG decay– Evaluate role of IP3 decay

Page 51: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Three Types of Objects in Chemesis/Kinetikit

• Pools of molecules– Keep track of concentration

• Uni- and Bi-molecular Reactions– Transformation of one or more molecules

into equal number of another molecule

• Enzyme reactions– One enzyme molecule can transform

multiple copies of substrate into equal number of product

Page 52: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Compartment-Like Objects• Keep track of molecule quantities and

concentrations•Similar to compartment calculating voltage

• Requires geometry/morphology values•length

•Radius

• Takes messages from reaction objects, enzyme objects, calcium release objects and current influx

•Integrates all increases and decreases

•Divides quantity by volume to calculate concentration

Page 53: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Compartment-Like Objects• Rxnpool (chemesis)

•Morphology fields:

• Len (length)

• Radius

• Surface area and volume (vol) calculated from shape (cylinder or shell)

• area of outer surface

• area of inner surface (can be zero)

• area of side surface

•UNITS fields!!!

• units: 1 for SI, 1e-3 for mmole, etc

• Dunits (length): 1 for SI, 1e-3 for mmeter, etc

• Iunits: 1e-12 to convert from nA, msec to A, sec

Page 54: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Compartment-Like Objects– rxnpool (Chemesis)

• dC/dt = A - B C

• A = change in quantity independent of present quantity

• B = rate of change

• Receives messages with quantities A and/or B from other objects (enzymes, reactions, also calcium influx)

• RXN0 (A), RXN1 (B), RXN2 (A and B)

•For concentration inputs

• RXN0MOLES (A), RXN2MOLES (A and B)

•For quantity inputs

• CURRENT (valence current)

Page 55: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Compartment-Like Objects• Keep track of molecule quantities and

concentrations– conservepool (Chemesis)

• C = Ctot - Ci

• Quantity is remainder after all other forms of molecule accounted for

• Also has volume and units fields

– pool (Kinetikit)

• dC/dt = A - B C

• Or C = Ctot - Ci(if flag is set to conserve)

• Can also implement stochastic reactions

Page 56: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Concentration Pools• chemesis

• genesis #1 > showobject rxnpool

• genesis #2 > showobject conservepool

• genesis #3 > showobject pool

Page 57: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Enzyme and Reaction objects

• Calculate changes due to reactions– mmenz (Chemesis)

• Use if MM assumptions are met

• Fields: Km and Vmax

• Inputs: enzyme, substrate concentration

• Calculates Vmax times [Enzyme] times

[substrate] divided by ([substrate] + Km)

• Send messages RXN0 or RXN0moles to rxnpool

• Empirical feedback modification of enzyme activity can be added

Page 58: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Enzyme and Reaction objects• Calculate changes due to enzyme

reactions• Stores ES substrate concentration

• Has fields for volume

• Fields: Kcat, Kf, Kb

– Enzyme (Chemesis)• Fields: units, surface areas (as rxnpool)

• Inputs: enzyme, substrate quantity

• Calculates change in product, enzyme, substrate

– Enz (kinetikit)• Inputs: enzyme, substrate quantity

• Can implement stochastic reactions

Page 59: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Enzyme and Reaction objects

• Calculate changes due to reactions– reaction (Chemesis) or reac (kinetikit)

• Fields: kf, kb

• Inputs (messages): substrates and products

• Calculates:– forward rate constant times substrate molecules– backward rate constant times product molecules

• send messages RXN0 - RXN2 to rxnpool

Page 60: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Enzyme and Reaction objects

• Genesis #4> showobject mmenz

• Genesis #5> showobject enzyme– Compartment dimensions allows

membrane bound enzyme to have different volume than substrate and products

• Genesis #5> showobject enz

• Genesis #6> showobject reaction

• Genesis #7> showobject reac

Page 61: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Creating Chemesis Simulation

• Create rxnpool pool1

• Create conservepool pool2

• Setfield pool1 Cinit initvalue ...

• Addmsg pool1 pool2 CONC Conc

Page 62: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Creating Chemesis Simulation

• Create reaction rxn1• Setfield rxn1 kf kfvalue kb kbvalue• Addmsg pool1 rxn1 SUBSTRATE Conc• Addmsg pool2 rxn1 SUBSTRATE Conc• Addmsg pool3 rxn1 PRODUCT Conc• Addmsg rxn1 pool1 RXN2 kbprod

kfsubs– To substrate – kbprod is first

• Addmsg rxn1 pool3 RXN2 kfsubs kbprod– To product – kfsubs is first

Page 63: Kim “Avrama” Blackwell George Mason University Modeling Signaling Pathways underlying Synaptic Plasticity.

Chemesis Example

• Metabotropic receptor to PLC to IP3

– mglu-ip3-chemesis.g for complete example– Setclock – to determine the time step– Include param.g – set of parameters used– Create several instances of rxnpool,

conservepool, reaction, enzyme and mmenz

– Include graphs.g to plot some output– Step - to run simulation