Top Banner
KFPA LO Modifications (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review January 30, 2009 G. Anderson
15

KFPA LO Modifications (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

madeson-taylor

KFPA LO Modifications (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review. January 30, 2009 G. Anderson. Concerns. Several issues were raised during single-pixel KFPA prototype testing with regard to the LO system: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LOModifications (from single pixel results)

Critical Design Review

January 30, 2009

G. Anderson

Page 2: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

2

Concerns

• Several issues were raised during single-pixel KFPA prototype testing with regard to the LO system:

• Why does the output power fall off rapidly at the band edges? Can we increase the frequency range of the 1st LO output?

• Should the output power specification be modified?

• Should additional spectral purity requirements be added to the specification?

Page 3: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

3

Original Requirements

• Two local oscillator sources (HP/Agilent 83620 synthesizers that generate up to 20 GHz) are available in the GBT receiver room. The original specification called for the following to be supplied to each of 7 Downconverter modules:– LO1:

• 25.7 to 32.4 GHz• At 25.7 GHz, -2 dBm (+/- 5 dBm)• At 32.4 GHz, -4 dBm (+/-7 dBm)• A gain slope of -0.3 dB/GHz at the mixer input would give

nominal levels.

– LO2: 8.9 GHz @ +3 dBm (+/- 5 dBm)

Page 4: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

4

• No spectral purity specification was imposed. However, a self-imposed specification of 30 dB rejection of the third harmonic of the 1st LO input signal (as provided by the 83620 generator) seemed reasonable and was used as a design guide.

• The following are slides from the Conceptual Design Review giving the schematic of an LO Distribution Module. One module will supply LO power to all 7-pixels. (one output is not used and is terminated)

Original Requirements

Page 5: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

5

LO Distribution Module(High Frequency Side)

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

Input:12.85 - 16.2 GHz+7 dBm

(from LO Driver Module)

HittiteHMC578 (Active Multiplier)

Output +17 dBm for +4 dBm drive

BPFX23dB

Output (each):- 1 dBm

Loss = 1.5 dB MAX

Page 6: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

6

LO Distribution Module(Low Frequency Side)

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

8.9 GHz-1.5 dBm(from LO Driver Module)

HittiteHMC451Gain = 22 dBOutput IP3 = +32 dBmNF = 7 dB

Each Output:

+4 dBm

+17.5 dBm

Page 7: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

7

Single Pixel Testing

• Single-pixel tests were performed using a test fixture consisting of the multiplier and bandpass filter shown in the schematic (LO Distribution Module (High Frequency Side)) above.

• Tests showed the following problems:• The LO multiplier output dropped off sharply outside the original

frequency range. • During test, the LO drive desired for the input of the downconverter

was significantly higher than called for by the LO1 specification.• A spur was detected at the noise floor during a one minute

integration. Its frequency indicated that one of the mixing inputs that created it was the LO1 input to the x2 multiplier. This was verified during test when an improvised high pass filter (waveguide) was added to the x2 output and the spur disappeared.

Page 8: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

8

Corrective Action

• The multiplier output filter was originally designed around the initial specification. The original bandwidth was kept as narrow as possible to improve the 3rd harmonic rejection and to give some margin to allow for manufacturing tolerances.

Page 9: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

9

New Filter

Page 10: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

10

Specification Change

– LO1: • 24.8 to 34.3 GHz• At 24.8* GHz, -5 to +3 dBm • At 34.3* GHz, -3 to +4 dBm • Specified differently at upper and lower band edges to allow a

positive gain slope. This will largely counteract the negative gain slope from cables.

– LO2: 8.9 GHz @ +3 dBm (+/- 5 dBm)

Page 11: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

11

• The wider LO1 frequency range will allow operation over the sky frequency range of 18.0 to 27.5 GHz. The minimum power levels to be applied to the Down-Converter Module were also increased.

Page 12: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

12

High Pass Filter

• The original plan was to add a high-pass filter to the multiplier output.– The spurious output that drove this addition was at the noise floor for a

1 minute integration.

– Discussion with T. Minter and J. Lockman revealed that the maximum integration time one could ever expect was 1000 hours……worst case.

– The reduction to the noise floor would be proportional to the square root of the ratio of integration time…..yielding a reduction in the noise floor of 23.9 dB.

Page 13: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

13

Bandpass Filter

• Instead of adding a high pass….why not cascade another bandpass filter?– Still reduces the feedthrough of any x2 fundamental.– Adds additional rejection to any x3 multiplier output.

• Why not increase the number of poles of the original filter?– We already have greater than 50 dB rejection of the

x2 input.– Approaches ultimate rejection of the filter where stray

coupling dominates.

Page 14: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

14

New Amplifier

• The addition of the high-pass filter and the change in the output power specification forced the addition of an amplifier to the multiplier output. The large attenuators placed at the input and output serve two functions:– to lower the amplifier input power– to mask the input and output return loss of the

amplifier (output return loss is 6 dB).

Page 15: KFPA LO Modifications  (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, 2009

15

Final Version

LO Distribution Module (High Frequency Side)

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

3dB

Input:12.4 -17.15 GHz+7 dBm (from LO Driver Module)

HittiteHMC578 (Active Multiplier)Output +17 dBm for +4 dBm drive

BPFX2

3dB

Output (each):1 dBm*

Loss = 2 dB MAX

3dB

BPF

10 dB HittiteHMC283 Amplifier+21 dB gain

3 dB

Loss = 2.0 dB MAX