Top Banner
57

values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence

Jul 07, 2018

Download

Documents

lediep
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 2: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 3: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 4: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 5: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 6: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 7: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 8: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 9: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 10: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 11: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 12: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 13: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 14: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 15: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 16: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 17: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 18: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 19: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 20: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 21: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 22: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 23: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 24: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 25: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 26: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 27: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 28: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 29: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 30: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 31: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 32: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 33: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 34: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 35: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 36: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 37: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 38: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 39: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 40: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 41: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 42: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 43: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 44: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 45: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 46: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 47: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 48: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 49: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 50: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 51: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 52: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 53: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 54: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 55: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 56: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence
Page 57: values of p, q, and r. Since there are three propositions, that would be 23 — 8 truth value combinations. A truth table with n constituent propositions needs 2n rows Logical Equivalence