Introduction to Industrial Innovation & Partnerships (IIP) Kesh Narayanan Division Director, Industrial Innovation & Partnerships
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Introduction to Industrial Innovation & Partnerships (IIP)
Kesh Narayanan
Division Director, Industrial Innovation & Partnerships
2
INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION and PARTNERSHIPS
2
Partnerships
for InnovationSara Nerlove
Grant Opportunities
for Academic
Liaison with
IndustryDonald Senich
Small Business
PartnershipsJoe Hennessey
Division DirectorKesh Narayanan
AAAS Fellow
Malathi Srivatsan
(Tiffany Sargent)
Academic
PartnershipsDonald Senich
Nanotechnology, Advanced
Material & Manufacturing
(NAM)
Cheryl Albus, Ben Schrag,
Grace Wang
Biotechnology and
Chemical Technology
(BCT)
Greg Baxter, Ruth
Shuman, Tony Walters
Information &
Communication Technology
(ICT)
Errol Arkilic, Juan Figueroa,
Murali Nair
Education Applications
Glenn Larsen, Ian Bennett,
Einstein Fellow
Kevin Simmons
Bernadine Okoro
Operations
Specialist
Greg Misiorek
Program
Support
Manager
Amanda May
Expert / Special Topics
James Rudd, George
Vermont
Industry/University
Cooperative
Research CentersRathindra DasGupta
Larry Hornak
Innovation through Partnerships
University
Small Business
Investors
IndustryEN
G o
vera
ll
NSF
ove
rall
GO
ALI
I /U
CR
CPFI
ERC
STTR
SBIR
STC
Res
ou
rces
Inve
sted
Discovery Development Commercialization
Foundations
NSF Innovation Investments
AIR
Translational Research
3Directorate for Engineering
See http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/innovation.pdf
IIP Budget Request for 2011 (in Millions)
2007 2008 2009 2009 ARRA
2010
Small Business $ 108.23 $ 109.00 $ 119.2 $ 49.91 $125.77Academic $ 21.86 $ 21.76 $ 21.73 $ 4.4 $26.23*Innovation EcosystemTotal $130.09 $130.77 $140.93 $54.70 $152.00
4
2011 Req.
$142.86$22.91
$12.00*
$177.77
*Innovation EcosystemIntensive OSTP/ENG discussions led to targeted NSF budget request in 2011
NSF SBIR/STTR Innovation Model
PHASE IIIProduct
Development toCommercial
Market
PHASE IFeasibilityResearch
$100k/6 mos
Taxes
Federal Investment
PHASE IIResearchtowards
Prototype$500k/24 mos
MATCHMAKER
Phase IIBThird PartyInvestment
match
Private Sector or Non-SBIR
Investment
Unique to NSF
Phase IB Third Party
Investment match
I/UCRC: The Mechanism
I/UCRCDiscovery
&Innovation
GovernmentNSF
IndustryMembers
UniversityMembers
I/UCRCs work like a research “franchise” with operational guidelines and evaluation tools
Center catalyzed by a small investment from NSF.
NSF takes a supportive role throughout the life of the center.
An I/UCRC is primarily fundedby industry members
Single ormulti-university
ERC and I/UCRC Technology SectorsLead Institution shown (# ERCs , # I/UCRCs )
7
IUCRC Nano Footprint
• CAPCE
-Ohio State/Florida State/Wisconsin
• CASNA
-Columbia Uni.
• CCMS
-Rutgers/ Univ. New Mexico/Penn State
• CMC
- Northeastern/Arizona
8/18/10 8
99
Pilot Programs
1. IFR: Industry-defined Fundamental Research• IRI (Industrial Research Institute) corporate members
– Lignin to Chemical Feedstock
– Fundamentals of Adhesion and Predictive Capability
2. TRAC: Translation Research in Academic Community• Supplements to current GOALI grantees to translate
fundamental research results into potential commercial applications
Strengthening Programs2010
• Industry Inspired Fundamental Research (IRI )
• i6 Regional Innovation Challenge (EDA)
• Partnerships between Centers & Small Businesses– SBIR/STTR with I/UCRC & ERC
• Post-docs in SBIR/STTR (ASEE)
• SBIR 2.0 (SBA)– Robotics Joint Solicitation (5 agencies)
10
Office of Science and Technology Policy , February 1, 2010
Promote the commercialization of promising technologies: The Budget proposes $12 million for the National Science Foundation (NSF) for a new Innovation Ecosystem in which universities partner with other institutions to increase the impact of the most promising innovations through commercialization, industry alliances, and start-up formation.
Promoting Innovation and Economic Growth
11Directorate for Engineering
With community input, NSF designed two new solicitations to encourage translation of new knowledge to economic or societal impact:
Accelerating Innovation Research (AIR), and a
‘reinvented’ Partnerships for Innovation (PFI)
12
What Do the PFI Partnerships Organize to Do?
Research &Knowledge Transfer
Education/TrainingSTEM Workforce & Entrepreneurs
Innovation Infrastructure& Community
AIR: Technology Translation Plan Competition ($4M)
• Single Investigator and Small Groups of Faculty
– Creates entrepreneurial small groups of faculty
– Encourages academic researchers to translate technologically-promising, fundamental discoveries into commercial reality
– PI or co-PI must be a current or prior NSF awardee and a faculty member at a US college or university at the time of award in the current competition
– Develops technology transfer plans to embark on the path towards full business plans
• Key Requirements
– Preliminary Technology Translation Plan (PTTP): $300k/2 Years per grant (3rd
party investments required for budget requests in excess of $150,000)
– Final Technology Translation Plan (FTTP), submitted as a supplement to the original award: $50k
13Directorate for Engineering
AIR: Research Alliance Competition ($8M)
• Partnerships of Large Research Groups– Builds synergistic research alliance between NSF -funded research
consortium and other institutions to accelerate commercialization
– Other partner(s): another research entity (either NSF-funded, other government agency funded, or privately funded), a small business consortium, or a local or regional innovation entity
– Creates innovation ecosystem that fosters entrepreneurial culture, encourages spin-offs, and builds new partnerships
• Key Requirements– Award: $1M/2 Years per grant
• Third-party investment (1:1) required
Directorate for Engineering 14
Grant Opportunities forAcademic Liaison with Industry
(GOALI)
The Mechanisms• Faculty and Students in industry
• Industry Scientists and Engineers in Academe
• Industry-University Collaborative Research Projects
GOALI: Collaborative Research
Projects
• Industry co-PI; must present a real industry commitment
• Detailed plan for industry-university collaboration, w/division of research tasks
• Industry cost-sharing and technological relevance are essential evaluation criteria
• Proprietary issues - agreement on intellectual property is required
• Dissemination Plan
For a GOALI Proposal Answer
• What is impact/relevance if research is successful?• Who will be industrial Co-PI?• Has industry committed time/effort of Co-PI?• How much time and money is required for effort?• What resources has industry committed to effort?
• What about intellectual property?
NOW CONTACT THE PROGRAM OFFICER
GOALI Nano Awards
• During the period 2005 thru 2010
– Total Number of ENG awards 89
– Total Nano GOALI ENG Funds ($) $5.14 M
– Total Nano GOALI Award ($) $32.878 M
ENG GOALI contributions represent 15.6% of total funding for 2005-2010 Nano-related awards
8/18/10 18
GOALI Award Rates
DIVISIONGOALI
AwardedGOALI
Funding Rate
2007-9
CBET 97 36%
CMMI 179 42%
ECCS 72 36%
2007-9 TOTAL 348 39%
19
Funding Rate for GOALI significantly higher than that for ENG Base
Related Documents
