Kenji Kuwayama et al.

Comparison and Comparison and classification of classification of

methamphetamine seized methamphetamine seized in Japan and Thailand in Japan and Thailand

using using gas chromatography with gas chromatography with liquid-liquid extraction liquid-liquid extraction

and solid-phase and solid-phase microextractionmicroextraction

Kenji Kuwayama Kenji Kuwayama et al.et al.

2

3

INTRODUCTION

4

Methampheta

mine

Caffeine Amphetamine

5

Methampheta

mine

Amphetamine

6

eat inject smoke inhale

7

HN

OH

O

HN

Methamphetamine

1-phenyl-2-propanone (P2P)

Ephedrine compound

8

Presumptive Test Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) Gas Chromatography Flame Ionization Detector (GC-FID) Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

ท่ีมา : United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

9

Two GC method for MA impurity profiling

NRIPS ONCB

The national Research Intitute of Police Science

The Office of the Narcotics Control Board

JAPAN THAILAND

10

LLE

JAPAN THAI

11

Chromatograms obtained using the ONCB method

tablet

crystal

THAI

12

Chromatograms obtained from an MA crystal

ONCB

NRIPS

13

The aim of this study

•Improve the analytical method for profiling MA impurity

•Compare and classification MA crystals seized in different countries

•Information in criminal investigation ; traffic routes , the source of supply and relationships between seizures

14

MethodMethod

Liquid-Liquid Extraction( LLE )

Solid-Phase Microextraction

(SPME )

GC-FID & GC-MS

1515

Technique LLE

sample

centrifuge

Shaking

solution

Organic layer

GC

16

Technique SPME

SPME fiber

SPME fiber

GC

Head space

17

FID

Technique GC-FID

18

Technique GC-MS

19

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

20

Reagents and chemical1. MA.HCl crystals seized in Japan

(69) and Thailand (42)2. Std. d-MA.HCl3. l-ephedrine.HCl4. dl-Dimethylamphetamine.HCl5. cis-1,2-dimethyl-3-phenylaziridine6. n-Alkanes : Internal Standard7. Solvents 8. SPME holder and fiber coated with

DVB/CAR/PDMS9. Inlet liner for SPME

21

1.GC-FIDAgilent – 6890

Auto inject : 7683

Gas chromatographic analysis

22

2.GC-MSAgilent – 6890

Agilent 5973N MSD

23

COLUMN GC-FID & GC-

MS DB-5 capillary

column 30( m. x 0.32

mm. x film thickness 10.

µm. )

2424

LLE procedure ( NRIPS )

MA.HCl 50 mg

buffer solution1 mL0.5 mL Ethyl acetate + Istd.

GC

ShakingCentrifuge 3000 rpm

5 min

Istd. n-decane (C10,IS1) n-pentadecane (C15,IS2) n-eicosane (C20,IS3) n-octacosane (C28,IS4) 0.02 mg/ml

25

SPME procedure

SPME fiber

SPME fiber

GC

MA.HCl 10 mg

Headspace at 85OC 35 min

26

Condition: GC-FID & GC-MS Initial temperature : 50 0 C held

1 min. increase of 10 0C/min. to 300 0 C held 10 min.

Inject temperature : 2 4 0 0 C Detector temperature : 300

0 C Carrier gas : He (g) flow rate 2mL / min.

Injection : 1 µL splitless mode Condition for SPME were the same as those for LLE

27

RESULTS

28

Data processing for LLE & SPME

•Peak data integrated by Chemstation software

•Processed using the Drug Micro-Component Analysis & Comparison System (DMCPS)

Calculation of Euclidean distances

Cluster analysis by Ward method

29

Data processing for Data processing for LLELLE

Istd.

30

Typical chromatograms obtained from MA crystal using

NRIPS

Ephedrine (pseudoephedrine)

Istd.

31

Data Data processing processing for SPMEfor SPME

32

Typical chromatograms obtained samples by

SPME

Empty vial without MA

33

Typical chromatograms obtained samples by SPME

34

1.Optimization of analytical procedure

ONCB optimized for the analyzed of MA tablet

NRIPS optimized for the analyzed of MA crystal

considered more efficient than the ONCB

LLE

35

2.Cluster analysis of sample seized in Japan and Thailand MA crystals seized

Japan = 69 sample

Thai = 42 sample

NRIPS method

Fourteen characteristic impurity peakCluster analysis

36

2.Cluster analysis of sample seized in Japan and Thailand

No.sam. (J/T)15/19 25/0 17/15 12/8

NRIPS method

37

Typical chromatograms of MA samples in each group using the

NRIPS

Group A

Group B

High purity

1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl naphthalene1-benzyl-3-methylnaphthalene

38

Typical chromatograms of MA samples in each group using the

NRIPS

Group C

Group D

cis-1,2-dimethyl-3-phenylaziridine

Ephedrine (pseudoephedrine)

39

3.Comparison and classification of sample in the high purity group by

SPMEWhen MA crystals were extracted with SPME and analyzed by GC (SPME ), the chromatograms had many impurities while the chromatograms in case of LLE had few impurities

Characteristic peaks for data processing seven peaks

Many impurity

MA

40

3.Comparison and classification of sample in the high purity group by

SPME

15/19

NRIPS

SPME

41

Chromatograms were distinguished clearly from SPME method , whereas in the case of LLE it was difficult to compare and classify samples in the high-purity group because there were so few impurities.

The SPME method enables us to compare and classify high-purity

MA

3.Comparison and classification of sample in the high purity group by

SPME

42

CONCLUSION

43

ComparedLLE

ONCB

NRIPSSuperior for detecting and separating MA impurities

Classified into four groups

14 peakscharacteristic

44

LLE

SPMEEffective for comparing high-purity MA because it detected many characteristic peaks

45

46

QUESTION