KCONWAYB Database: PROD Permanent Bridge Inspection …

Page 1 of 604

Date Printed: 2017/02/16

User Id: IDIR\KCONWAYB

Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:

BC Ministry of Forests and Range

Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K421 K421 SKUHUN 2014/08/27

Permanent Bridge Inspection Report

Forest District: Cascades Natural Resource District Most Recent Inspections Only: Yes Sort By: Project Number, Branch, User KM (Asc)

Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:

Total Length (metres):

Abutments (Left/Right): (looking downstream)Superstructure

Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:

Crossing Name: Next Inspection Date:

Concrete Lock Blocks

UTM Easting:

# Spans:

Year Superstructure Installed:

Running Surface:Deck Type:

UTM Northing:

Span Length(s) (metres):

Skuhost Cr 12.80 13.00 2017/08/27

0814 01 Cascades Natural Resource District

Steel I-beam

Timber - Untreated Timber Planks

6.5

10 640141 5576212

Jeremy Araki 1987

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

Not ApplicableBracing

GoodBallast Wall

GoodConcrete Lock Blocks

Not ApplicableCorrosion Protection

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

Not ApplicablePiles or Posts

GoodRiprap

Not ApplicableWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment left approach has tight horizontal corner

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing

YesBrushing Required LT: brushing required.

0Delineator Missing Left(approaching structure)

0Delineator Missing Right(approaching structure)

NoneFender Condition None

41Posted Load Rating see pic

FairRoad Surface Good at site, road to site is washed out LT: Fair - Grown in vegetation

Corporate Bridge Register (CBR)

Disclaimer:

1) Structure and site information is current at the time of report creation and may have changed since the inspection was submitted and/or accepted.

2) Historic Load Rating data not available, contact FLNRO Regional Office for detailed information.

Page 2 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

GoodCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts

GoodDeck to Girder Bolts

GoodHardware

Not ApplicableHand Rails/Walkouts

GoodNails

GoodOverall Deck Condition

GoodRunning Planks

UnratedSub Deck none

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodDiaphrams at ends

GoodGirders LT: some gravel on flanges visible on photo.

GoodHardware

Not ApplicableUnder Trussing

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS

Estimated Present Water Level Depth: Estimated Present Water Level Width:

Estimated High Water Level Clearance:

High Water: Debris:Scour: Aggradation:Ice:

Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.1 2.5

# Status Priority Estimate Description

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 3 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

All signs in place. Road is badly washed out on the way there

LT (2014/12/17): Light brushing required.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L

Professional Inspection Required? Report Status:No

Replacement Date for full log haul traffic (year): Replacement Date for light vehicle traffic (year): 2032 2037

Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 0 Design Vehicle Config.:

Accepted By Lester Thiessen on 12/20/2014 8:57:53AM

41

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 4 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K423 K423 SKUHUN-PIMAINUS 2016/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Chataway Cr 10.56 10.50 2019/06/26


Steel I-beam


7.0

10 647258 5576442

Ron Peace 1987

1

Bridge km. 17.5 by markers, 0 km. at Craigmont km. 10.5 from begining FSR at Aberdeen Road (POT 03 Branch on Ex. A) Km.

43.9 By exibit A dated march 21/88.

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap Rip rap has been placed in the channel restricting the flow on the upstream side


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing None

NoBrushing Required



NoneFender Condition

nonePosted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 5 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


FairNails


GoodRunning Planks Some wear at bridge ends and along line of traffic travel

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

Not ApplicableHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.9

0.4 1.7


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 6 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 63 Design Vehicle Config.: CL625

Reviewed By Drew Alway on 1/10/2017 3:30:52PM

63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 7 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:



Major Culvert Inspection Report


Inlet Cover (mm):

Culvert Length (metres):

UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:

Opening Height (mm):

UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Skuhost Cr 25.40 33.00 2019/06/26


Round Corrugated Steel

1,300 1,000

0.0

23.5 1,400 2,300

10 639906 5586896

Ron Peace 2006

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT

Not ApplicableBaffles

Not ApplicableBolted Connections

GoodCoupled Connections No access into culvert

GoodCoating

GoodEmbedment Materials

GoodFill

GoodFloor

Not ApplicableFooting

GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 8 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

FairRiprap

FairRoof

FairSide Walls

Not ApplicableTrash Rack

Not ApplicableWiers/Backwater Structures

GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.5

0.1 0.9


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The culvert length is 23.5 m. and the fill depth is 1.0 m. at the outlet and 1.3 m. at the inlet.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 63 Design Vehicle Config.: BCL625


64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 9 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K484 K484 SKUHUN-SPAIST WEST 2016/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Pimainus Cr 0.21 40.10 2019/06/26


Concrete Box Beam

Gravel Concrete

7.6

10 633883 5584728

Ron Peace 1990

1

Bridge is at 40 .1 km. by km markers.Access:

7

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


UnratedBallast Wall None

GoodConcrete Precast


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing The #2 sign is missing

YesBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 10 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

Not ApplicableConcrete Deck Covered in gravel


Not ApplicableDeck Joints

Not ApplicableGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



UnratedWelded/grouted shear connectors Covered in gravel

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.2 2.0


1 $300.00 Install bridge ahead sign at #2 approachLowRequired

2 $150.00 Brush out bridgeMediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 11 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 68 Design Vehicle Config.: L75


68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 12 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1117 K1117 -SKUHOST BRANCH 15 2015/06/23



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Skuhost #2 2.01 29.00 2018/06/23


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 639525 5578612

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings No rubber bearing pads


FairBallast Wall Do not extend the full depth of the girder, allowing fill through ont the lock blocks

FairConcrete Precast Three blocks\abutment, each beariing rests only on a single indipendant lock block

and appear to be uneven.


PoorCaps or Sills No sill, see above

FairFill



PoorRiprap Not much in place

FairWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment 6% grade down onto the bridge from the #1 approach


YesBrushing Required Brush out around the bridge





FairRoad Surface Settled at #2


Disclaimer:



Page 13 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition

FairRunning Planks Some of the planks have high rot values, may need repair for industrial haul

UnratedSub Deck None

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.2 4.8


1 $300.00 Brush out bridgeMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 14 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

None of the monitor or repair items have been addressed. The deck now has some planks that will not take

industrial haul.

Replacement of deck planks is required prior to industrial haul. This is a temporary installation and as

mentioned in the last inspection should be rebuild with permanent abutment installation if long term industrial

access is required. Monitor abutments for scour and differential settlement.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 15 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K888 K888 SKUHUN-INKIKUN 32 2016/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Inkukuh Cr 0.81 12.00 2019/06/26


Steel I-beam


7.6

10 632404 5592645

Ron Peace 2004

1

Road is known locally as Laura Lakes MRF 11/2013Access:

7.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall Not connected to the superstructure



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


PoorRiprap Steep and unstable, rock has pinched the creek


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Oppossing curves at the approaches with the transition over the bridge


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 16 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks Recent redeck, very dirty


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.2 2.2


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor oversyeepened and unstable rip rap

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 17 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Appears to have been recently redecked

RSS drawings requested and file request started.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L




Reviewed By Drew Alway on 2/6/2017 11:57:06AM

68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 18 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1512 K1512 SKUHUN-CALLING LAKE 2016/06/26



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Calling lake OverFlow 0.20 14.50 2019/06/26


Open Bottom Corrugated Steel

Steel Footing

300 600

3.0

9.8 1,300 2,700

10 634000 5591700

Ron Peace 2007

Road locally known as Laura Lakes. MRF 11/2013Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT


GoodBolted Connections

Not ApplicableCoupled Connections

GoodCoating

FairEmbedment Materials Erosion along the Lower portion of the footing

GoodFill

Not ApplicableFloor

PoorFooting THe #1 has been scoured but appears to be stable from last inspection

GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 19 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1512 K1512 SKUHUN-CALLING LAKE 2016/06/26



GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.2

0.2 1.2

THe #1 has been scoured but appears to be stable from last inspection


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 The #1 footing has been scoured but appears to be stable from last inspection, continue to monitor

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Erosion of the footing appears to be unchanged

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Replacement Date for full log haul traffic (year): Replacement Date for light vehicle traffic (year): 2050



64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 20 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K424 K424 PLACER MOUNTAIN 2014/08/11



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Pile -Permanent Materials

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Similkameen R 0.41 0.20 2017/08/11


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

54.4

10 678016 5451525

M. Hanson & D. Harrison 1997

2

Access:

26.9, 27.5

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No


1 $15,000.00 Replace all curb rails and risersHighRequired

2 $500.00 Replace bridge ahead sign at right approach.HighRequired

3 $5,000.00 Replace deck joint compression seal at Pier 1MediumRequired

4 $20,000.00 Consider extending steel plate pier diaphragm to mudline during low

flows.

MediumRequired

5 $500.00 Remove rodent nests from abutments.LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

LT 19/12/14: added repair items from pdf inspection report.


Disclaimer:



Page 21 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K424 K424 PLACER MOUNTAIN 2014/08/11



PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L




Accepted By Lester Thiessen on 12/19/2014 11:44:15PM

68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 22 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1309 K1309 PLACER CREEK 2014/08/08



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Steel Pipe and Precast Pad

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Watson Cr 0.45 12.60 2017/08/08


Concrete Slab Girders

Concrete Concrete

8.6

10 682899 5449460

Ali Sadeghi 2003

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

UnratedBracing not visible

GoodBallast Wall

UnratedCorrosion Protection not visible

GoodCaps or Sills concrete cap beam

FairFill fill behind the right abutment at center span appears to be settling, monitor

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




-Posted Load Rating not posted

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 23 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts timber

GoodDeck Joints joints between slabs not sealed LT: not sealing is a standard detail.


GoodHardware



FairRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodHardware

GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors welded shear keys

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.1 2.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 it appears the fill behind the structure at center span, on right approach is settling. More fill may be needed.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

LT (2014/12/17): reviewed. Deleted repair to seal girder joints as this is intentional with welded shear key

connectors.


Disclaimer:



Page 24 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 25 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Lynx Cr 3.00 15.50 2017/08/08



Concrete Gravel

9.6

10 682599 5447972

Ali Sadeghi 2003

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills concrete cap beam

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required

0Delineator Missing Left

installed in the course of inspection(approaching structure)

0Delineator Missing Right

4 Delineators installed(approaching structure)


-Posted Load Rating not posted

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 26 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairConcrete Deck 5 slabs

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts timber rail, some damage on the upstream left approach, minor

GoodDeck Joints


UnratedGravel Surface no gravel surface

FairHardware


FairOverall Deck Condition fair bit of debris (gravel) on deck

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodHardware

GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors welded shear keys

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.2 5.0


2 $200.00 LT: Clean sand & gravel from deck, install waterbar to prevent gravel from

being carried onto deck.

LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Damaged rail LBUS corner.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

4 Delineators installed

LT (2014/12/17): Added clean sand & gravel from deck, install waterbar on approach to prevent gravel from

being carried onto deck.


Disclaimer:



Page 27 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 28 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K520 K520 HURLEY RIVER NORTH 2015/06/18



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Bridge R 0.00 0.60 2018/06/18


Concrete I/T Beam

Concrete Composite Gravel

38.2

10 510725 5632525

Ron Peace 1987

1

Access:

37.8

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill Continues to ravel toward creek

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



GoodFender Condition

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 29 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some have significant rot, but do not require replacement at this time

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

UnratedGravel Surface None

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodHardware

GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

2.8

2.0 27.0

Water was high no indication of increased erosion.


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Reviewed monitor items all observable comments appear stable, however the water was to high to comment

on erosion and crib failure. Ground inspection only.

Note their are a number of complex concrete repairs that are outstanding for this structure. These will require a

qualified contractor and a PEng. certification of repair completion.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 30 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 31 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Nine Mile Cr 13.87 14.60 2018/06/18


Steel I-beam

Concrete Composite Concrete

33.5

10 504737 5621711

Ron Peace 1998

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

GoodCorrosion Protection

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

Not ApplicableRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment






GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 32 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts One section failed, see photo

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

8.9

1.5 3.0



2 $300.00 Replace failed riser at the #2 approach upstream side. requires 1-

24"x10x10" block

HighRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor wing and bulkheads for rot

2 Curb and riser rotMO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Ground inspection only


Disclaimer:



Page 33 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 34 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hurley R 15.84 16.50 2018/06/18


Steel I-beam


27.5

10 504120 5619881

Ron Peace 1982

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings No pads metal to metal

GoodBracing

FairBallast Wall Extensive Rot


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap

PoorWing Wall Extensive rot some planks failing

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




PoorRoad Surface Surface water off the #1 approach has been ditched onto the bridge eroding fill at

the downstream corner

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 35 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









FairNails


PoorRunning Planks Rotten and worn see photo. requires repair

FairSub Deck

FairTies only 4x4" timber

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.4

2.0 26.0


1 $200.00 Surface water off the #1 approach has been ditched onto the bridge

eroding fill at the downstream corner. Grader could redirect water.

MediumRequired

2 $5,500.00 Leaving outside planks iin place and replacing only the 8 runs of 3x12"

the bridge is approximarely 90 ft long so 2160 Bf is needed

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor Ballast and wing wall rot

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 36 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The deck needs repair, the outer planks could be left in place. Ground inspection only.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 37 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Waterfalls Cr 16.61 17.50 2018/06/18


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

15.0

10 503881 5619212

Ron Peace 1997

1

Transferred to MOTI, as road was originally under their tenure. DA

Transferred back to FLNRO. MRF 09/14

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 38 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

0.3 5.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No tag on this structure


Disclaimer:



Page 39 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 40 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 19.52 20.50 2018/06/18



Concrete Concrete

11.6

10 502710 5616786

Ron Peace 2002

1

Transferred back to MOTI, as road was originally under Hwys tenure. DA april 2011.


Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 41 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.3 5.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Bridge has no tag

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 42 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 43 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hope Cr 22.45 23.30 2018/06/18


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

24.4

10 501591 5614179

Ron Peace 1998

1

Structure was transferred back to MOTI, as FSR was under original tenure of Hwys. 2011


Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 44 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.5 10.7


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No tag on this structure, likely due to new curbs


Disclaimer:



Page 45 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 46 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 28.02 28.80 2018/06/18



Concrete Concrete

6.0

10 497655 5610618

Ron Peace 1988

1

Section of FSR transferred back to MOTI, as Hwys had original tenure. 2011. DA.


Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings





GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



FairRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition One section @ the #2 approach upstream side has fallen over (see photo) likely not

an issue

GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 47 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some impact damage @ #2 dowstream side, still functional

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



Not ApplicableWelded/grouted shear connectors

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.8

0.2 2.7


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 48 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 49 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1021 K1021 HURLEY RIVER SOUTH 2011/10/19

Log Stringer Bridge Inspection Report


Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Crib, Log or Untreated Timber

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 0.01 5.10 2013/10/19


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 494039 5611504

Shane Stockwell 1970

1

no vehicular access, quick heli access inspections.Access:

0

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Refer to Inspection Comments for historical PEng CommentsPEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 50 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1021 K1021 HURLEY RIVER SOUTH 2011/10/19






Accepted By Drew Alway on 1/28/2014 12:00:00AM

68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 51 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K535 K535 HURLEY RVR-SOUTH 2011/10/19



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Sill -Temporary Materials

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hurley R 0.50 4.30 2013/10/19


Steel I-beam


15.6

10 494746 5612409


1

Access:

0

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 52 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K535 K535 HURLEY RVR-SOUTH 2011/10/19







68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 53 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1346 K1346 PARADISE LAKE 2015/06/13



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Quilchena Cr 12.33 16.50 2018/06/13


Steel I-beam

Timber - Treated Timber Planks

15.0

10 691941 5539960

Ron Peace 2005

1

The Quilchena Bridge K1346 is accessed from the Elkhart interchange up to Paradise Km 16.5, a sharp left turn at the base of

the hill just before the washout thence 1.8 km back along the base of the hill on the new road.

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills Treated no significant rot

FairFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap

Not ApplicableWing Wall `

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Road ends just beyond the bridge

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Sign is missing on the High chain end

YesBrushing Required Brush out #1 end of bridge




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 54 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.2 1.3


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The Road ends just beyond the bridge. There is no bridge ahead sign on that side. The bridge has an incorrect

Tag K1343.


Disclaimer:



Page 55 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 56 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1492 K1492 TEPEE LAKES BR 01 2016/07/09



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Tepee Cr 7.80 1.00 2019/07/09


Steel I-beam

Timber - Untreated - Panels Timber Planks

17.0

10 700930 5515883

Ron Peace 2009

1

Access:

16.3

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Surface water is running off both approaches onto the bridge

2Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Both missing

NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Settled at the #1 approach

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 57 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






PoorDeck to Girder Bolts Only 1/2" lags used, no washers and some loose.

GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Dirty and some wear

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.2 1.1


1 $1,000.00 Grade or waterbar approaches to remove surface water from bridgeHighRequired

2 $1,000.00 Remove lags and install larger lags with washers. some of existing are

loose

HighRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 58 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

There appear to have been previous inspections. Only 1/2 lags used to connect deck without washers and

some are loose.

road approach works and lag tightening and installation for missing top flange to tie connections to be installed.

Utilize tie clips if holes in flange due not line up with ties above.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 59 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K671 K671 THYNNE-LOWER MCPHAIL 2016/06/27



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:McPhail Cr 7.59 6.70 2019/06/27



1,300 1,200

0.0

18.0 3,000 3,000

10 652621 5510375

Ron Peace 1993

Lower McPhail road junction around 5-6 km off main.Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Not required

YesBrushing Required The outlet is very overgrown and debris is collecting at the outlet





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT



GoodCoupled Connections No access

PoorCoating Rusty

Not ApplicableEmbedment Materials

FairFill Very steep at the outlet and a slump has occured at the #1 downstream side

PoorFloor Rusted out the full length of the culvert


PoorHead Wall Oversteepened slumped on the downstream side

FairInlet Debris was collecting, cleared at inspection

PoorOutlet Very grown in debris collecting


Disclaimer:



Page 60 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K671 K671 THYNNE-LOWER MCPHAIL 2016/06/27



PoorOverall Much of the flow is beneath the culvert now that the bottom is rusted through

PoorRiprap Oversteepened and not much placed at the inlet

PoorRoof Irregular

FairSide Walls Irregular



FairWing Wall Steep

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No Yes Yes

0.6

0.1 0.5

The culvert invert is rusted through and materials are being scoured out under the culvert. Lots of woody debris

collecting at the outlet.


1 $35,000.00 Replace culvertHighRequired

2 $600.00 Clear debris from inlet and outletHighRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor culvert for failure

2 Monitor debris collecting at this site

3 Monitor downstream fill failure

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This culvert is in very poor condition, the culvert invert is rusted through the entire length. Consider for

replacement

The creek is partially flowing under the culvert.

I'll leave the load rating as 63.7 GVW, but users should plan for this replacement. Note I would verify this site is

fish bearing or not as the GA replacement design may require an open bottomed structure. Leave the FLHRD

to 2019, giving users time to complete the GA design and make plans for replacement

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L

Professional Inspection Required? Report Status:Yes




64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 61 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1495 K1495 DUFFEY LAKE 2015/06/22



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Unamed 0.30 0.30 2017/06/22



800 800

12.0 600 600

10 553517 5587485

Ron Peace 2009

BCTS to construct 09.Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


PoorFill Some erosion when flows exceeded culverts capasity

GoodFloor


PoorHead Wall Low

PoorInlet one has damaged inlet and one is partially plugged with a large rock just inside

culvert

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 62 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





PoorOverall Under capasity and insuficiant daimeter

FairRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



FairWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

0.0

0.1 10.0

Chance of failure from any of the hazards high.


1 $2,000.00 Remove rock from #3 culvertHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor closely for plugging. spent 1 hour clearing culvert at inspection

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Only 600 mm. x3 culverts materials fushed down creek are larger than diameter of culvert. One has a large

rock embeded inside (first #2 approach) Cleared all culverts except the one with the rock. This site will likely

blow out at high water if not before.

These culverts were only designed for a q2 event. Therefor they do need to be cleaned annually. If not then they

should be deactivated.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 63 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Unamed 0.80 2018/06/22


Round Concrete

800 800

12.0 600 600

10 553592 5587541

Ron Peace 2009

BCTS constructed 2009.Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


FairFill

GoodFloor


PoorHead Wall Low

PoorInlet The middle culvert is damaged

GoodOutlet

PoorOverall likely unable to take maximum flows and very prone to plugging


Disclaimer:



Page 64 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





FairRiprap

FairRoof

GoodSide Walls



FairWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

0.0

0.1 3.0

Subject to failure from any of the above hazards.


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor closely, likely unable to take maximum flows and very prone to plugging

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Failure of culverts a high probability, only 3x600mm culvert. Cleared inlet at inspection.

as with the structures downstream, they were only designed for Q2 return events. So they need frequent

maintenance or recommend to pull culverts if to be left for wilderness maintenance.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 65 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Blowdown Creek 3.00 2018/06/22


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 553507 5585901

Ron Peace 2008

1

Access:

17.8

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

PoorCorrosion Protection None

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment






GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Missing nuts and washers on 3 curb bolts


Disclaimer:



Page 66 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






FairHardware missing nuts and washers


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Worn and high rot values, may not last long if used for industrial haul


FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.7

1.0 6.0



2 $200.00 This woork was not completed at this inspection

Guardrail: Install 4 nuts and washers on guardrail bolts.

2 X-ties are damaged making the guardrail bolt useless, on these 2 it is

possible to redrill the holes into undamaged wood.

LowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 If used for industrial haul deck may deteriorate quickly, the most econimical fix might be to add run strips prior to haul.

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 67 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

If used for industrial haul deck may deteriorate quickly, the most econimical fix might be to add run strips prior

to haul.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 68 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:020-07 K1588 DOWNTON CREEK 2015/06/24



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Cayoosh Cr 0.10 0.10 2017/06/24


Steel I-beam


36.6

10 564122 5603974

Ron Peace

1

Access:

36

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Sill not well supported at bearing upstream #2


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills As noted above one of the two tie/support logs has extensive rot at upstream

bearing

GoodFill


FairLog/Timber Cribs Old crib for fill retension and erosion controll primarily


FairRiprap

PoorTie-backs #1 and #2 tie backs At the #2 abutment have extensive rot in the bearing area (see

photo)

FairWing Wall

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition Low


Disclaimer:



Page 69 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:






GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts one riser block has elevated rot values, still funtional, some loose curbs


GoodHardware


FairNails


FairRunning Planks The #2 appraoch has some wear and rot as well as a loose plank

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

1.5 29.0


1 $2,000.00 Replace worn and loose deck planks, requires 13- 4x8" x9', 312 BFHighComplete

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 70 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

1 Monitor log support under Sill log at the upstream side of #2 abutment

2 Monitor curb risers and ties for rotMO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This structure has been upgraded, old crib is primarily for fill retention and erosion controll. It has rot but it is

stable. New logs have been laid in the retained fill perpendicular to the creek (like tie backs) and the sill log is

resting on these (7). Generally the logs are good with exception of #1 and #2 , upstream #2 abutment. These

two "tie backs" have extensive rot (see photo) One of the rotten logs is at bearing of the sill log which is 700

mm dia. but is notched to 600 mm at the bearing plate. Additional support may be required.

Need for professional inspection to assess FLHRD.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): Design Vehicle Config.: L75


68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 71 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1593 K1593 DOWNTON CREEK 2016/06/17



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Downton Cr 4.90 4.90 2018/06/17


Log Stringers


12.0

10 560262 5604450

Ron Peace 2007

1

Access:

11.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodLog/Timber Cribs


GoodRiprap

GoodTie-backs

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Corner at the #1 approach





Installed at inspection(approaching structure)



GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 72 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1


Not ApplicableDeck to Girder Bolts

GoodHardware Curb cables


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Dirty


FairTies Some of the ties are not shimmed to stringer tops

STRINGERS

Span 1

Stringer # Peeled Rot Depth

(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

3 Core sample at next inspection on #1 endYes 0 0 0 fir650

4 Core sample at #1 end next inspectionYes 0 0 0 fir650

GoodLog Curbs

FairNeedle Beam(s) and Shims Shimmed but not tight

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

1.0 6.0


1 $100.00 Brush out bridgeMediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor ties not shimmed

2 Core sample the #1 end of stringers 3and 4 at next inspectionMO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 73 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

No significant rot was found, stringer have many large knots. Some gravel still on deck and not brushed out

This structure seems to be preforming well. I've updated the FLHRD to 2018 as stringer appear fair.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 74 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Downton Cr 3.40 2017/06/22


Log Stringers


12.5

10 561543 5604396

Ron Peace 2007

1

Access:

12.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill




GoodRiprap

GoodTie-backs

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 75 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

STRINGERS

Span 1

GoodLog Curbs

GoodNeedle Beam(s) and Shims

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

1.2 7.6


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 76 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): Design Vehicle Config.: L75


68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 77 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Downton Cr 2.50 2018/06/17


Rail Car


16.6

10 562291 5604621

Ron Peace 2007

1

Access:

15.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


PoorBallast Wall None


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Poor visibility






20Posted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 78 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Cabled log, missing mid span riser at the downstream


GoodHardware Cables


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Some deterioration at the #2 end, if used for heavy industrial may require ugrading


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing Rusty and dirty


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.7

1.0 5.2


1 $3,400.00 For heavy industrial haul full deck replacement may be required deck is

16.6 m. long and 4.6 wide

LowRequired

2 $300.00 Clean super structure

This is required to allow for adequate inspection of the railcars on future

inspections.

LowRequired

3 $100.00 Brush out bridgeHighComplete

4 $2,000.00 Install new curbsMediumComplete

5 $2,000.00 Add 19 mm dia bolts to connect each railcar section at the centerline with

nuts and bolts, @ O.C. 600 mm.

D.A. Ensure ties in future have angle iron connection to each railcar

section @ O.C. spacing of 1200 mm.

The two items above will bring us in line with the ministry std drawing for

rail car bridges.

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 79 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The deck dimensions are 16.6x4.6 m.and the clear span is 15.2 m. the rail cars are resting on a single log sill

and the girders are at most 300 mm above the fill.

Curbs have not been replaced

Monitor ties as they may require deck replacement in the coming years. At that time ties should be moved to

200X250 ties @ 400mm O.C. spacing. I've added repair item #5: to outline the hardware required to bring this

structure in line with the ministry standard rail car dwgs. See detailed repairs. Consider replacing ties if

industrial hauling is required, ok at the time of this inspection, but will most likely require replacement after the

next inspection.

Once all the repairs are completed then this bridge will move to CL-625, for now it will stay at a 20 tonnes load

restriction.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





20

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 80 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Downton Cr 1.50 2018/06/17


Rail Car


16.6

10 563291 5604783

Ron Peace 2007

1

Access:

16.3

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment









GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 81 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Lof no mid span riser or cable


GoodHardware Cables


GoodNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Requires upgrading

PoorRunning Planks Extensive rot will deteriorate quickly if used for heavy haul


FairTies 'Some extensive rot likely 6-10 ties are 8 3/4 " x 83/4" x20' 6"

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing Dirty


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.9

1.0 5.6


1 $4,500.00 New decking 14.5' x 57' or 3306 BF of 4" deck planks.MediumRequired

2 $2,000.00 New curbs and risers for 60' +/-MediumComplete

3 $1,000.00 Replace ties that have high rot when redecking 6-10

20'x83/4x83/4" each

DA Replace ties with 200X250 ties on 400 mm O/C spacing. You can

achieve a 4.88 m deck width. With riser blocks and connection to the

curbs at 2400 mm max spacing. With at least one angle iron connection

from the ties to each rail car section at 1200 mm spacing.

MediumRequired

4 $100.00 Brush oout bridgeMediumComplete

5 $250.00 Clean super structure

These girders are dirty and require cleaning to be able to properly inspect

them in the future.

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 82 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This structures center to center of bearing is 16.3 m. The bridge will need a new deck for industrial haul as well

as some new ties and curbs. See amounts in repairs

Note I've updated the repairs and added some detailed repairs. Once these are completed and reviewed by a

P.Eng then this structure load rating will increase to CL-625 loading.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): Design Vehicle Config.: CL625


20

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 83 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Downton Cr 2.70 2018/06/17


Log Stringers


11.4

10 562149 5604564

Ron Peace 2007

1

Access:

11

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill




GoodRiprap

GoodTie-backs

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment







GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 84 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware Cables


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition Will require full redeck soon, sooner if used for industrial haul

PoorRunning Planks Failed section requires a 12',16' and a 9' 4x8" planks to fill failed and rotten planks


GoodTies

STRINGERS

Span 1

GoodLog Curbs

FairNeedle Beam(s) and Shims Shimmed but not tight

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

0.9 5.5


1 $1,000.00 Failed section requires a 12',16' and a 9' 4x8" planks to fill failed and

rotten planks. If used for industrial haul others may not last long.

Consider full redeck for industrial haul

HighComplete


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No significant stringer rot. the deck has a failed section and materials for a patch job are listed in the repairs.

A full redeck might be considered.


Disclaimer:



Page 85 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





planks were replaced after this inspection and approach barriers added. Moved FLHRD to 2019 as stringer

appear to be doing well.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 86 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1587A K1587 VAN HORLICK 2016/06/17



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Unnamed 5.90 2019/06/17



400 900

5.0

9.0 2,000 2,000

10 549563 5577899

Ron Peace

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Not required

YesBrushing Required The creek channel is very overgrown, brushing might minimize debris hanging up at

structure





FairRoad Surface Some erosion at inlet to outside edge of road upstream side

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


FairHead Wall Not well armoured between the upstream end of the culverts

GoodInlet Overgrown


Disclaimer:



Page 87 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1587A K1587 VAN HORLICK 2016/06/17



GoodOutlet Overgrown

GoodOverall

FairRiprap Notmuch protection between the culverts

FairRoof Irregular and rock bruises on the #1 culvert

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No Yes No

0.8

0.2 6.4

The creek channel is very overgrown, brushing might minimize debris hanging up at structure, some scouring of

fill at inlet


1 $400.00 The creek channel is very overgrown, brushing might minimize debris

hanging up at structure

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor erosion of fill at inlet, and debris blockage

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The creek channel is very overgrown, brushing might minimize debris hanging up at structure

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): Design Vehicle Config.: CL625


63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 88 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K753 K753 WHIPSAW CREEK 2016/07/06



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Corral Cr 4.53 4.50 2019/07/06



2,200 0

3.0

22.0 2,200 2,200

10 673210 5469153

Ron Peace 1983

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Wide sweeping corner


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT



GoodCoupled Connections

FairCoating Some rust


GoodFill

FairFloor Uneven


FairHead Wall Steep at the outlet

GoodInlet


Disclaimer:



Page 89 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





FairOutlet Eroded back from the outlet 1.8 m. andthe drop from invert 0.8 m to large erosion

pool

FairOverall

FairRiprap Steep at the outlet

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



FairWing Wall Steep at the outlet

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.1 1.2


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 90 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Fifteen Mile Cr 9.56 9.80 2019/07/06



7,600 6,600

5.0

30.0 2,200 2,200

10 671051 5465751

Ron Peace 1986

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Wide sweeping corner


YesBrushing Required Brush out the inlet





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT

GoodBaffles


FairCoupled Connections The first section from the inlet joint is quite wide but appears to be sealed

GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

FairInlet Very overgrown

GoodOutlet Discharges into large erosion pool


Disclaimer:



Page 91 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

FairRoof The downward deflection of the roof mesurment is 1.6 m. from the weir top at the

lowest point

GoodSide Walls

GoodTrash Rack

GoodWiers/Backwater Structures

GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.1 1.5


1 $350.00 Clear inlet of brushHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor inlet roof deflection. The downward deflection of the roof mesurment is 1.6 m. from the weir top at

the lowest point

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The inlet is very overgrown and should be brushed. The downward deflection of the roof mesurment is 1.6 m.

from the weir top at the lowest point

Keep monitoring the roofPEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 92 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K754 K754 WHIPSAW-LAMONT 2016/07/06



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Lamont Cr 3.09 5.20 2019/07/06



9,000 8,000

5.0

40.0 1,500 1,500

10 672998 5472395

Ron Peace 1979

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT



UnratedCoupled Connections No access into the culvert.

FairCoating Rusty


GoodFill

FairFloor uneven


FairHead Wall Steep

GoodInlet

FairOutlet Drop from invert into large erosion pool is .4 m.


Disclaimer:



Page 93 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K754 K754 WHIPSAW-LAMONT 2016/07/06



FairOverall

FairRiprap

PoorRoof Deflected down, previous 2010 inspection suggests .45 m.

FairSide Walls



FairWing Wall Steep

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.7

0.2 2.7


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor roof deflection

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Deflection of the roof appears unchanged, no access due to water and unsecured footing. Rope may be

required to safely traverse to culvert.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 94 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K426 K426 KENNEDY 2010/09/21



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Whipsaw Cr 0.32 9.30 2012/09/21


Log Stringers


7.4

10 671351 5465882

Chris Cole 1986

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

Not ApplicableBearings


UnratedBallast Wall Bridge has been removed.


UnratedCaps or Sills Bridge has been removed.

GoodFill


FairLog/Timber Cribs



FairTie-backs


APPROACHES

UnratedAlignment Bridge has been removed.


NoBrushing Required




NonePosted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 95 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1

UnratedCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Bridge has been removed.




UnratedNails Bridge has been removed.

UnratedOverall Deck Condition Bridge has been removed.

Not ApplicableRunning Planks

UnratedSub Deck Bridge has been removed.

UnratedTies Bridge has been removed.

STRINGERS

Span 1

UnratedLog Curbs Bridge has been removed.

UnratedNeedle Beam(s) and Shims Bridge has been removed.

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

999.0

0.3 4.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Bridge has been removed


Disclaimer:



Page 96 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:






Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 97 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1348 K1348 GARRISON 2016/07/06



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Whipsaw Cr 0.03 16.00 2019/07/06



Concrete Concrete

13.6

10 668358 5461050

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

13

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills A chip on the top edge of the #1 sill

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 98 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot on some of the downstream curbs

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware


FairOverall Deck Condition Requires repair to downstream curbs and risers

GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.3 4.1


1 $3,500.00 Some risers and 2 curb sections have very high rot. 2-16' curbs and 7-2'

7-3' risers. 559 BF of 10x10" timber

HighRequired

2 $250.00 Brush out bridgeHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There are some curb repairs due for this structure.


Disclaimer:



Page 99 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





When completing curb repairs. This structure is a good candidate for moving it to the metal retrofit curb HSS or

W beam systems. Alternatively, this structure would benefit from treated bracket and riser blocks, if going with

the CL-1 timber curb system.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 100 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper Cr 12.06 27.50 2019/07/06


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

11.6

10 665804 5452257

Ron Peace 1995

1

Access:

11

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




FairCaps or Sills The #1 is chipped along its top edge, some rebar is exposed on the downstream

corner

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts Not visibile

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required







GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 101 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


FairDeck Joints Some are open


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.3 4.3


1 $200.00 The top edge of the #1 sill is chipped, some rebar exposed @ the

downstream end.

MediumRequired

2 $200.00 Seal the deck jointsMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 102 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 103 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper Cr Trib 12.17 27.60 2019/07/06


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

14.0

10 665448 5452932

Ron Peace 1998

1

Access:

13.5

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall

UnratedConcrete Precast None


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required


Installed @ inspection(approaching structure)


Installed @ inspection(approaching structure)



GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 104 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairConcrete Deck Bolt heads at the lift points on the deck, bolt heads extend above the deck panels,

see photo

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts

FairDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.3 4.5


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 105 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The lift bolts are still in the deck panels, see photos

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 106 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K649 K649 NICOMEN 2016/07/06



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper CrTtrib 5.04 30.50 2019/07/06



Concrete Concrete

10.6

10 664060 5451661

Ron Peace 2002

1

Access:

10

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment The #2 approach is a tight corner and some impact damage to both ends of the

downstream curb. The 31 approach is on a more gentle curve


NoBrushing Required


Repaired at inspection(approaching structure)


repaired at inspection(approaching structure)



GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 107 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck

GoodCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some impact to both ends of the downstream still functional

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.2 4.8


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The shop drawings match the structure.


Disclaimer:



Page 108 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 109 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper Cr Trib 10.79 36.40 2018/07/06


Steel I-beam


11.3

10 660080 5452808

Ron Peace 2003

1

Access:

9.8

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings


FairBallast Wall Logs not connected to the superstructure

PoorConcrete Lock Blocks 3 blocks per abutment 2 paralell to the creek and perpendicular between the other

two


FairCaps or Sills The 8x10" untreated timber plank is resting on uneven lock blocks. This has the sill

to deform and it is splited at the upstream of #2 at bearing.

FairFill

FairHardware


FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required






Disclaimer:



Page 110 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Flanges are dirty



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.5

0.2 2.9

Some along toe, appears stable


1 $200.00 Clean flangesLowRequired

2 $80,000.00 I've decreased the FLHRD to 2017. I think users should plan to

reconstruct this abutment under the direction of a P. Eng. With a structural

evaluation of these steel girders, including steel sections cut for

sampling. Timber sill is cracked and undersized, it should be a 200 mm

X 400 mm treated timber sill. The abutment configuration should be

reviewed as it appears undersized for this structure. Recommend

replacement and posting at 10 tonnes. DA

HighRequiredRE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 111 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

1 Monitor uneven lock blocks.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Scour a monitor item appears to be stable. The lock blocks either were installed uneven or they have settled,

causing the sill timber to deform. The upstream corner of the bridge at the #1 abutment appears to be lower.

I've decreased the FLHRD to 2017. I think users should plan to reconstruct this abutment under the direction of

a P. Eng. With a structural evaluation of these steel girders, including steel sections cut for sampling. Timber

sill is cracked and undersized, it should be a 200 mm X 400 mm treated timber sill. The abutment configuration

should be reviewed as it appears undersized for this structure. Recommend replacement and posting at 10

tonnes.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 0 Design Vehicle Config.: Other


10

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 112 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:TKA017 K1625 FOURTH BROTHER 2015/06/25



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Garrison Creek 1.60 1.60 2018/06/25


Steel I-beam


19.8

10 662074 5453051

Ron Peace 2015

1

Access:

19.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

FairBallast Wall At both ends of the bridge there are 8x8 timber and plank stacked on ballast top to

bring it to deck grade. Is this a new design or was there issues attaching the

balllast wall. There is no tag on this structure


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Steep and no toe protection @ #2


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Slight jog in approach form low chain (#2), grade down onto the bridge from both

appraoches is5- 6%


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 113 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Not bevel cut on ends


FairHardware Bolts not countersunk


FairNails Not many/plank


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

4.1

0.2 2.0

Monitor toes of both abutments


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor toe erosion of rip rap

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 114 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

At both ends of the bridge there are 8x8 timber and plank stacked on ballast top to bring it to deck grade. Is

this a new design or was there issues attaching the balllast wall. There is no tag on this structure

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 115 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:WO 1619 K1642 THREE BROTHERS 2016/07/06



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Other

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper Creek 0.20 0.20 2018/07/06


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 661895 5455249

Ron Peace 2015

1

Access:

15.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

UnratedBracing Mostly buried

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodGeneral Abutment Condition

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap THe rip rap is not keyed in well at the toe of both abutments


APPROACHES

FairAlignment The #2 approach is on a steep hill and slight corner.

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing The #2 is falling over

NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Ungraded and rough


Disclaimer:



Page 116 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.3 4.3

Some scour potential at the rip rap toes


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 117 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 118 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1347 K1347 HORNET-MYSTERY BR 14 2016/07/10



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Allison Cr 0.09 18.00 2019/07/10


Steel I-beam


9.1

10 676179 5510158

Ron Peace 2005

1

The Mystery Lake is accessed from the Dillard FSR via Hornet to 18K turnoff then 0.8 km to new road start, thence 150m

northerly.

Access:

9

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

FairBallast Wall Not connected to superstructure


GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

PoorAlignment Not vertically aligned well, the #2 is very low but #1 is less so.








PoorRoad Surface Pot holed and low at both ends of the bridge

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 119 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Punky


GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Worn, dirty

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.8

0.2 2.2


1 $1,000.00 Bring both approach up to the level of the deck.HighRequired

2 $150.00 Brush out around bridgeMediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Deck and subdeck are untreated. Bridge ahead signs have been installed


Disclaimer:



Page 120 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





The repair of the approaches for this structure through addition of fill should be completed and was first

identified in 2013. This should be completed prior to industrial hauling to ensure no damage to the structure or

decking occurs.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 121 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1396 K1396 HORNET BR 16 2014/06/27



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Allison Cr 0.00 16.70 2017/06/27


Steel I-beam


12.2

10 675508 5511087

Ben Pellett 2004

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings difficult to see LT: unrated


FairBallast Wall


UnratedCaps or Sills difficult to assess due to low clearance

GoodFill

UnratedHardware not visible

UnratedLog/Timber Cribs n/a


Not ApplicableRiprap no riprap

Not ApplicableTie-backs


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface needs ditches


Disclaimer:



Page 122 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



FairHardware


FairNails


PoorRunning Planks very worn, replacements needed. LT: no photo depicting wear.

GoodSub Deck

FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

FairBracing LT: Rated fair in previous inspection.

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders LT: Rated fair in previous inspection.

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.5 1.2


1 $500.00 Clean inlets

LT: and brush grown in vegetation close to structure.

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 123 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

LT (2014/12/12) No comments on the culverts installed below this bridge. Debris at inlet of culverts is a risk for

culvert fill to be washed out. Ties condition and bearings also need to be assessed. No evidence of drilling

timber components for rot depth. No photos showing deck wear as indicated in inspection. For long term use

of this crossing, culverts should be removed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 124 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1161 K1161 LALUWISSIN-N. LALUWI 2016/06/16



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Laluwissin Cr trib 0.00 17.00 2019/06/16



0 0

0.0

20.0 1,800 1,800

10 599720 5596136

Ron Peace 2006

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing None required

NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating

GoodEmbedment Materials Some loss of fines at the outlet, 2.5 m in

GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 125 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1161 K1161 LALUWISSIN-N. LALUWI 2016/06/16



GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.6

0.1 1.7


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor embeded materials, appears to be funtioning well

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Ten years in and this embeded culvert is working well. Some loss of fines in the last 2.5 m. at the oulet

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 126 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K714 K714 SPIUS CREEK 2016/06/27



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


S Fork Spius 14.48 14.30 2019/06/27



Concrete Concrete

12.0

10 635612 5533301

Ron Peace 1994

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills The #1 is chipped along its top edge

FairFill At #2 the fill does not extend up to the base of the sill


GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Large and round some scour along the toe and at the up sream corner of #1


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 127 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


FairDeck Joints A few voids


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors The girder panels have many hair line cracks

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

2.2

0.2 3.8

Large and round some scour along the toe and at the up sream corner of #1



RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Large and round some scour along the toe and at the up sream corner of #1

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 128 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 129 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Spius Cr 14.69 14.50 2019/06/27


Steel I-beam


22.0

10 635434 5533278

Ron Peace 1990

1

Access:

21.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Junction at both approaches

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Junction at both approach, bridge ahead signs may not be required





nonePosted Load Rating f

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 130 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some curb sections have extensive rot and may require replacement before next

inspection

FairDeck Joints Small void at the bulkhead to deck at #1

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.1

0.8 10.0


1 $300.00 Clean sillsMediumRequired


PA

IRS

# Description

1 Some curb sections have extensive rot and may require replacement before next inspection

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Some curb sections have extensive rot and may require replacement before next inspection


Disclaimer:



Page 131 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 132 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Spius Cr 10.35 21.00 2019/06/27


Steel I-beam

Concrete Not Available

23.0

10 637607 5536708

Ron Peace 1986

1

Bridge is located at 21 km. by markers.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings Couvered in gravel


GoodBallast Wall



FairCaps or Sills Covered in gravel

GoodFill



FairRiprap None at the # 1 its is bedrock


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 133 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


UnratedNails Grouted


Not ApplicableRunning Planks

UnratedSub Deck None, concrete deck

UnratedTies none

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.4

1.2 13.0


1 $500.00 Clean sillsHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 134 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The inspection comments appear to be for another structure, unless the comment refers to the #2 abutment.

Also this structure has concrete deck not ties.

The sill should be cleaned

Updated the concrete deck in CBR. Follow up professional inspection required to determine non-composite or

composite decking and evaluation after that point.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 135 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 0.01 22.70 2016/06/25


Steel I-beam


10.0

10 627854 5532769

Ali Sadeghi 1965

1

33.5 km by the road markers.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings no sill


GoodBallast Wall

GoodConcrete Lock Blocks three rows.


PoorCaps or Sills steel - concrete contact

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap no rip rap in front - rip rap recently added to the up/s right corner


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Steep vertical curve woods direction


YesBrushing Required around delineators




n/aPosted Load Rating not posted

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 136 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

Not ApplicableConcrete Deck timber deck update CBR

GoodCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts timber

PoorDeck to Girder Bolts missing deck to girder bolts in some spots, add more

Not ApplicableDeck Joints timber deck update CBR

Not ApplicableGrout Pockets timber deck update CBR

GoodHardware


FairNails


GoodRunning Surface Treated timber

FairRunning Planks

FairSub Deck

FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

FairDiaphrams

FairGirders

FairHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.5

0.5 8.0


2 $2,000.00 Upgrade girder to deck connection by welding more plates to the girder

and bolting to ties

MediumSuggested

4 $500.00 brush roadLowSuggested

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 137 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

timber deck, update CBR

only 4 cross ties on each side bolted to girder, upgrade girder connection

Deck to girder connection upgrade may be accomplished through additional tie clips if required. If redecked

with timber modules, should have 6 clips or bolt connections per 10 ft section as per ministry standard

drawings. DA.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 138 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Silver Cr 12.60 23.10 2018/06/24


Steel I-beam


16.0

10 636523 5534838

Ron Peace 1990

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings The downstream at #2 abutment downstream is dirty


GoodBallast Wall

FairConcrete Precast Some damage and exposed rebar at the #2 abutment top edge


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap Round and not well placed, erosion at the toe of #2 abutment.


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




nonePosted Load Rating g

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 139 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

GoodCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Newly installed

FairDeck Joints The joint at the ballast wall to first panel is chipped and open

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No Yes No

1.7

0.3 5.0

Debris dam upstream of bridge has diverted the histoical flow and caused erosion of the #2 abutment


1 $1,000.00 Remove debris dam upstream of bridge has diverted the histoical flow

and caused erosion of the #2 abutment

HighRequired

2 $200.00 Fill gap between ballast and deck panelLowRequired

3 $100.00 Clean bearing ar #2 abutmentLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Debris dam upstream of bridge has diverted the histoical flow and caused erosion of the #2 abutment

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 140 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The curb bolts are round machine heads, no washers.

The lack of timber washers should be fixed at time of next curb replacement.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 141 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Spius Cr 13.68 24.30 2017/07/16


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

24.0

10 636060 5533900

Jean-Guy Bernat 1991

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall welded - 50mm gap on right upstream due to deck panel placement, some soil

falling between rigth Ballast wall and end deck panel

PoorCorrosion Protection not painted

UnratedCaps or Sills none

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap some rounded but oversize


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment slightly steep vertical


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 142 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck minor chips

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts some rot, do not meet MoF standard, to be replaced with std MoF block and curb

designs

GoodDeck Joints gap between panels not consistent, LT: third panel from RB on u/s not filled

GoodGrout Pockets

FairHardware few damaged bolts, still functional


FairOverall Deck Condition due to curbs. LT: not deck photos.

GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

Not ApplicableHardware welded assembly


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.6 12.0


1 $6,000.00 LT: Replace curbs and blocks.HighRequired

2 $2,000.00 LT: Custom fit and glue timber at gap location between ballast wall and

deck to retain fill properly. Form seat may be required to retain filler.

MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Curb and block replacement not completed. Pull back of old birdge fill not completed. Did not repeat these

items in repair list.

GPS Coordinates: zone 10 0636060 E 5533900 Google Earth Place marker not over bridge,

update with new coordinates


Disclaimer:



Page 143 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





LT (2014/12/17): Repair added: Replace curbs and blocks, seal gap location between RB ballast wall and deck

to retain fill properly, previous attempts have failed. No deck photos showing non-standard curbs. Approach

photos taken too far away.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 144 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 20.70 31.30 2015/06/25


Steel I-beam


6.0

10 629638 5533004

Ali Sadeghi 1986

1

31.3 km. by road markers.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings vertical fracture iobserved n timber crib.


PoorBallast Wall rotten


PoorCaps or Sills fractured underneat load path.

FairFill


PoorLog/Timber Cribs Timber crib four high, vertical fracture underneath load path as far as bottom timber.

Left abutment crib is bulding


PoorRiprap right bank exposed and scouring observed under timber crib.



APPROACHES

FairAlignment






5Posted Load Rating Update CBR


Disclaimer:



Page 145 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





PoorRoad Surface Bridge settling caused a bump at left and right approaches.

DECK

Span 1


PoorDeck to Girder Bolts Deck not bolted to girder.

FairHardware


FairNails


FairRunning Planks

UnratedSub Deck no present

PoorTies Rot at ends and some have rot in the center of the tie.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


FairDiaphrams

FairGirders Paint chipping off

FairHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.3 3.0


1 $60,000.00 Replace structure prior to any loading above a pickup truckHighSuggested

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 To continue to monitor structure for load rating

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 146 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Bridge should be inspected prior to passage of of any industrial traffic.

Users should plan for removal of this structure within the next two years. As the deck will deteriorate beyond

use by 5 tonnes loads within this period. DA.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 147 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 22.57 33.20 2016/06/25


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

9.9

10 627951 5532956

Ali Sadeghi 1965

1

33.2 km by the road markers.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings Not present, right abutment lock block cracked where girder is rested is directly

rested on concrete.


FairBallast Wall excessive rot

FairConcrete Lock Blocks


PoorCaps or Sills No cap or bearing pad, right abutment lock block cracked where girder is rested.

PoorFill d/s left abutment scour causing bank to fail into creek.



PoorRiprap no rip rap in the front and lack of rip rap d/s left corner has led to major scour

PoorWing Wall rotten logs

APPROACHES

FairAlignment on sharp h-curve.


NoBrushing Required




n/aPosted Load Rating design load limit indicate as 0 on file - update CBR

FairRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 148 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairConcrete Deck u/s right approach panel fractured underneath and rebar exposed


FairDeck Joints sealed


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

FairGirders Non-weathering steel paint peeling off

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

2.2

0.5 6.0


2 $1,000.00 clean debris off girders a bearingHighSuggested

3 $2,000.00 rip rap d/s left abutment to avoid scour (1 load of D50 750mm rip rap)HighSuggested

4 $1,000.00 repair the damage to panel to ensure rebar not exposed.

Utilize sikatop 123 product and ensure 50 mm of grout coverage. With

hand tools, remove as much rust as feasible. Prior to grout repair. DA.

MediumSuggested

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 149 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

1 Monitor girders, paint peeling off.

2 Monitor scourMO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

D/S left approach is scouring. Rip rap should be added.

Upon next inspection users should be prepared to install a new timber sill to better distribute the load and

replacement of balllast wall timbers will be required at that point. Structure is 48 years old at this point and will

continue to provide service for 5 to 10 more years if properly maintained. DA.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 150 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K626 K626 SPIUS SOUTH 2016/06/27



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


S Fork Spius 3.66 19.50 2019/06/27


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

17.4

10 635062 5530435

Ron Peace 2001

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill Does not extend up to the base of the bulhead

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Tight corner

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Grown in

NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 151 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Rot values are elevated in some curbs and risers, may need upgrading prior to the

next inspection

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Some rocks and gravel on flanges

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.3

0.2 7.8


1 $150.00 Clean girder flangesLowRequired

2 $250.00 Brush out bridge ahead signsMediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Rot values are elevated in some curbs and risers, may need upgrading prior to the next inspection

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Rot values are elevated in some curbs and risers, may need upgrading prior to the next inspection


Disclaimer:



Page 152 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





This bridge would be a good candidate for treated timber bracket blocks and treated timber risers in the future.

Once the curb replacement is required.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 153 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K434 K434 PROSPECT MINER A 2015/06/15



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Prospect Cr 0.09 13.60 2018/06/15


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

21.3

10 632433 5545053

Ron Peace 1999

1

Bridge is located at 24.1 km by markers.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


PoorCorrosion Protection none

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment






GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 154 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.3 10.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 155 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 156 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Miner Cr 0.28 13.70 2019/06/28


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

13.0

10 632431 5544828

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

FairCorrosion Protection Pipes are painted

GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill Does not extend up to the base of the bulkhead

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Steep and round


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 157 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.6 10.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor rip rap stability

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 158 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 159 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Silver Cr 10.28 23.60 2018/06/15



Concrete Concrete

11.6

10 631666 5538280

Ron Peace 2008

1

Access:

11

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 160 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.2 2.9


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 161 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 162 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Silver Cr 12.24 25.50 2018/06/15



Concrete Concrete

11.6

10 630743 5536844

Ron Peace 2008

1

Access:

11

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



FairRiprap Some erosion @ the upstream toe of the #1 abutment


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface Setttled at the end of bridge #1 approach

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 163 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.9

0.1 2.1

Some erosion @ the upstream toe of the #1 abutment


1 $100.00 Brush out bridge ahead signsLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Some erosion @ the upstream toe of the #1 abutment

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 164 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 165 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K682 K682 PROSPECT BR 03 2016/06/28



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Cast in Place

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Spius Cr 29.19 0.50 2019/06/28


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

16.0

10 640826 5555592

Ron Peace 1993

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Some rubber pad compression, see photo


GoodBallast Wall

FairConcrete Cast in Place Not well bonded to the bedrock


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Some slipage, steep and unstable at the #2 upstream corner, see photo

FairWing Wall Lock blocks

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Installed at inspection

NoBrushing Required Installed at inspection





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 166 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairConcrete Deck Some wear

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some of the timber components have high rot levels, expect3 year life

FairDeck Joints THe first joint at the #1 end is partially open. Viewed from the bottom some of the

joints are cracked around the joint, see photo


FairHardware Some impact damage, still functional


GoodOverall Deck Condition Plan to recurb within 3 years

GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing Rusty

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Rusty

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

2.2

1.2 14.3

Some scouring of the rip rap on the #2 upstream corner.


4 $600.00 Add damn sacks under the downstream right bank log wing wall. To

protect against scour. DA.

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor the #2 upstream rip rap

2 Monitor curb and riser rot.MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 167 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The water was low enough to access the abutments, the concrete to rock bond does not appear to be fully in

contact. conection to the bedrock is not observable.

review repairs listed as this is a high use public structure and high value fish habitat.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 168 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K439 K439 MANNING CREEK 2016/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Nicola R 0.03 0.10 2019/06/26


Steel I-beam


51.5

10 634290 5568644

Ron Peace 2000

2

Access:

34.4, 17.1

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment The #2 approach is tight and also includes navigating through a gated cattle guard.

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing The #2 sign is missing

NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Potholed at the #2

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 169 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some sections have extensive rot and life is limited 1-2 yr.

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

Span 2

GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Sections with extensive rot.

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

PIERS

Pier 1

GoodBearings

GoodBracing or Sheathing

GoodCaps Ground inspection only

Not ApplicableCribs

Not ApplicableDolphins

GoodHardware

GoodOverall

GoodPiles or Posts


GoodWall

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


Disclaimer:



Page 170 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


Span 2

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

3.0

0.8 26.0

The #1 span is fully plugged with woody debris, see photo. This has concentrated the flow to the #2 span entirely.

Consideration might be given to removal of this material


1 $2,500.00 The #1 span is fully plugged with woody debris, see photo. This has

concentrated the flow to the #2 span entirely. Consideration might be

given to removal of this material

MediumRequired

2 $200.00 Install bridge ahead sign at the #2 approachMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor rot in curbs

2 Monitor after high-water events. Both woody debris build up upstream of this pier and at times this pier has had

significant ice jams above this pier. But the ice has always flushed itself

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Some of the curb sections have extensive rot, expect less than two years life.

The #1 jump span is full blocked with woody debris, consider removall or perhaps cutting up the jam with the

expectation of it flushing at the nex high water.

This structure is scheduled for a peeper inspection 2017. Users should monitor both woody debris jams and

ice jams above this pier. If either are significant they may require professional inspection or clearing.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 171 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 172 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Manning Cr 2.03 2.00 2018/06/23



1,600 2,000

7.0

21.0 1,000 1,000

10 633235 5570030

Ron Peace 1990

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

FairInlet Very overgrown, lots of small woody debris migrating down the creek

FairOutlet Drop from invert to erosion pool 600mm.


Disclaimer:



Page 173 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.0

0.1 2.1

Lots of small woody debris migratiing down the creek


1 $300.00 Brush out inlet. Very overgrown, lots of small woody debris migrating

down the creek

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 174 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1094 K1094 NICOAMEN RIVER 2015/06/23



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 16.20 16.20 2017/06/23


Log Stringers


8.7

10 613747 5562677

Ron Peace 2002

1

Access:

7.7

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings 200 mm of rot

FairBracing Cable

PoorBallast Wall None, allowing fill onto stringer ends


FairCaps or Sills Top rot 200 mm +/_

GoodFill

FairHardware


FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 175 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot and insect infestation


FairHardware cable


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Elevated rot values


FairTies

STRINGERS

Span 1

PoorLog Curbs Extensive rot and insect infestation

Not ApplicableNeedle Beam(s) and Shims

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No


1 $500.00 Install bridge ahead signLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor closely as structure age is approaching end of industrial life for Fd stringers

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Consider load rating and or replacement. The structure has no bulkheads and fill covers the stringer ends. This

has caused all stringers to have some degree of core rot from the ends. The ones noted have extensive rot

with stringer #7 rotted through. The main body of the stringers have top rot up to 250 mm.

See photo of stringer rot.


Disclaimer:



Page 176 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





to be professionally inspected in 2016, possible load restriction to follow.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 177 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K882 K882 4768 2016/06/16



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Kwoiek #1 1.17 0.10 2019/06/16


Steel I-beam


24.6

10 601724 5551181

Ron Peace 1998

1

Access:

23.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings Some compression of the rubber pad at the #1 downstream bearing

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

FairCorrosion Protection

GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill Some raveling from in front of the ballast wallat the #2 abutment

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 178 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

4.6

2.0 8.8


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor rubber bearing pads

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 179 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 180 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Kwoiek #3 2.90 2.00 2017/06/21


Steel I-beam


19.3

10 600348 5552369

Ron Peace 1989

1

Access:

18.3

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



FairCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 181 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

1.0 10.2


2 $500.00 Install 2 bridge ahead signsLowRequired

3 $500.00 The #2 bearing is supported on the upstream but not at the girder end on

the downstream. A suggestion would be to shim the bearing on the

downstream end

MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 182 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The #2 sill is two timbers and while not centered it is at both stiffners, see photo. The #2 bearing is supported

on the upstream but not at the girder end on the downstream. A suggestion would be to shim the bearing on

the downstream end. see photo No tag on the bridge

I'm glad to see the proper signage posted alsoPEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 183 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K890A K890 4768 2016/06/16



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Kwoeik #4 3.69 3.80 2018/06/16


Steel I-beam


26.8

10 599512 5552623

Ron Peace 2011

1

Access:

26.5

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings


FairBallast Wall Logs not connected to the super structure


FairCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Hill at the #1 limited visibility and a jog in the road at both ends, some minimal

impact scuffing at the #1 downstream curb


NoBrushing Required






GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 184 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Span 1



GoodHardware


FairNails Some exposed heads


FairRunning Planks Somw wear along traffic track


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Dirty flanges



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.4

1.2 11.0

Minimal at toe


1 $400.00 Install bridge ahead signsLowRequired

2 $400.00 Clean flanges and bearingsLowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 185 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 186 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Kwoiek #5 4.53 4.70 2018/06/16


Steel I-beam


26.8

10 598878 5552352

Ron Peace 2011

1

Access:

26.5

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Only 8x10 treated timber, some crushing at the #2 downstream bearing


FairBallast Wall No connection to the girders, wall comprises of stacked logs


FairCaps or Sills Only 8x10 treated timber, some crushing at the #2 downstream bearing

GoodFill


FairLog/Timber Cribs Old log cribs are for fill retension and erosion control only


GoodRiprap

FairTie-backs


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Limited visibility from the #2 approach and a jog in theroad from #!


NoBrushing Required






GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 187 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.4

1.0 11.0



2 $150.00 Clean bearings and flangesLowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Only 8x10 treated timber sills utilized by IPP proponent, some crushing at the #2 downstream bearing

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 188 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 189 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Kwoiek #6 12.29 12.60 2017/08/27


Steel I-beam


16.3

10 592327 5554773

Jeremy Araki 1989

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings treated sills


GoodBallast Wall creosote treated timbers


GoodCorrosion Protection bolts coated and timbers creosited

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap scouring LT: appears stable


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required LT: obscuring signs


LT: No visible delineators on photos.(approaching structure)


LT: No visible delineators on photos.(approaching structure)

PoorFender Condition not functional


GoodRoad Surface minor potholes


Disclaimer:



Page 190 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts fair to poor, have rot but still intact, replace when doing running deck

GoodDeck to Girder Bolts see pic

GoodHardware


GoodNails except running plank nails

PoorOverall Deck Condition due to running planks

PoorRunning Planks rotten

GoodSub Deck creosote

GoodTies creosote

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

UnratedDiaphrams none

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No Yes No

1.0

0.5 4.0

monitor for scour. Debris has the potential to make that worse as well


1 $8,000.00 LT: Replace running deck and curbs.HighRequired

2 $600.00 LT: Install bridge ahead signs and delineators.HighComplete

3 $1,000.00 consider upgrading approach barriersMediumRequired

4 $500.00 Brushing required.HighComplete

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 191 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

running deck still not replaced. Scour still a potential but still not affecting load path

LT (2014/12/18): RB approach photo taken from too far away. No visible delineators on photos. Add bridge

ahead signs and delineators. Detail extents of riprap scour for monitoring.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 192 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K963 K963 LAWLESS CREEK 2015/06/14



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:10 Mile Cr 8.15 16.70 2018/06/14



3,400 4,300

7.0

20.0 3,000 3,000

10 653302 5496341

Ron Peace 1999

Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Limited visibility of the opposing approach


YesBrushing Required The inlet is grown in not critical




GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet Drop from invert to erosion pool .7 m. The scour back from the outlet at the invert is

.6 m. and appears to be stable


Disclaimer:



Page 193 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.1 1.4


1 $200.00 Brush is growing up around the inlet, non critical.LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The scour back from the outlet at the invert is .6 m. and appears to be stable

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 194 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Unnamed 11.32 19.80 2012/08/28


Open Bottom Corrugated Steel

Precast Concrete Footing

1,740 3,140

9.0

14.0 3,000 3,000

10 652103 5498761

Travis Mackenzie 2000

Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Sharp vertical curves.






GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating

PoorEmbedment Materials Scoured to geotextile fabric

GoodFill

Not ApplicableFloor

GoodFooting

GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet

GoodOverall


Disclaimer:



Page 195 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

FairSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.2

0.0 0.0

bed materials are mostly scoured out, exposing geotextile fabric, no threat to footings as they a embedded

deeper.


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor geotextile fabric for damage, check that no more stream bed is eroded.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

At install a stream bed underlain with geotextile fabric must have been built, it appears that most of the

materials on top of fabric have been washed away. There is no threat to the structure as the fabric is staying

in place providing protection for the footings. Next inspection ensure fabric is still in place.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 196 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:




2,700 3,000

3.0

14.0 3,200 3,200

10 650891 5500384

Chris Cole 2000

Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


GoodFill

Not ApplicableFloor

GoodFooting doesn't seem to be exposed.

Not ApplicableHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 197 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.0 0.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 198 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001D

File:



Woodbox/Log Culvert Inspection Report


Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Pioneer Cr 13.35 22.10 2013/07/14


Box Other

1,600 2,200

0.0

13.0 2,100 2,100

10 650882 5500399

Chris Cole 1995

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface Deactivation adjacent on culvert.

WOODBOX CULVERT

GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodInlet

GoodOutlet

GoodOverall

PoorRiprap Requires some.

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls




Disclaimer:



Page 199 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001D

File:






CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.2 1.6


2 $1,000.00 Brush out inlet. Culvert Removed.MediumComplete

3 $4,000.00 Place rip-rap at inlet and outlet. Culvert Removed.MediumCompleteRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Coordinates are correct.

Cross ditch on left bank of culvert.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 200 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K755 K755 LAWLESS-BRITTON 2015/06/14



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Skwum Cr 12.19 11.90 2018/06/14


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

12.0

10 651256 5494340

Ron Peace 1995

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Rubber pads are compressed

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


FairCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner at the #2 approach, traffic impacting curb


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 201 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Will require replacement soon, missing 2 riser to deck bolts as well

FairDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

FairHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.1 1.3


1 $250.00 Re grout deck panel damage. see photoMediumComplete

2 $3,000.00 Requires approximately 1,500 Bf of 10x10" timber as well as reusing

some newer wood on bridge. Also missing 2 riser to deck bolts

MediumComplete

3 $100.00 Install missing delin.LowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor grout between panels

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The deck damage has been repaired but rebar is still exposed. It was previously noted that the grout between

the deck panels would need replacing. It has not deteriorated further. Curbs are in poor condition.

K755 is incorrectly placed on the supplied map. It is located at the K441 site. The GPS coord for this site are

49' 34.964" 120' 54.448"


Disclaimer:



Page 202 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





coord updatedPEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 203 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Lawless Cr 14.58 14.50 2018/06/30


Steel I-beam


17.0

10 653267 5494706

Ron Peace 1994

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



GoodFender Condition 1 only


FairRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 204 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.3 10.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 205 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 206 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K602 K602 MUD CREEK BR 01 2014/08/30



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Jim Cr 3.22 3.20 2017/08/30



Concrete Concrete

12.7

10 529402 5641549

Jeremy Araki 1998

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

UnratedBracing buried

GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts buried

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



PoorFender Condition missing on left

n/aPosted Load Rating none

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 207 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

UnratedConcrete Deck gravel over


UnratedDeck Joints gravel over


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



UnratedWelded/grouted shear connectors gravel over

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

0.2 3.0


1 $2,000.00 add approach barriers on leftLowRequired

2 $500.00 Clean gravel from deck and assess deck & joints condition.LowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment: LT (2014/12/19): Updated load rating to 68 tonnes. No photos of bearing arrangement. Clean gravel from deck

and assess deck & joints condition.


Disclaimer:



Page 208 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 209 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Liza Cr 14.01 14.10 2017/08/30


Steel I-beam


18.8

10 522604 5645055

Jeremy Araki 1998

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

GoodCorrosion Protection posts and bracing painted

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment LT: Tight turn radius on RB approach.


NoBrushing Required



PoorFender Condition missing on left


GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 210 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts some damage to right downstream, see pic. not enough to replace

UnratedDeck Joints gravel over, look good from underneath

UnratedGrout Pockets gravel over

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

0.2 8.0


1 $2,000.00 left approach barriersLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

LT (2014/12/19) Updated load rating to 68 tonnes according to bridge label L75.


Disclaimer:



Page 211 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 212 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Noaxe Cr 24.35 24.90 2017/08/30



Concrete Concrete

13.6

10 517595 5651486

Jeremy Araki 2001

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings due to left issue


GoodBallast Wall integral with cap


FairCaps or Sills Good except for the left issue with touching the slabs

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts cannot see

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

ExcellentAlignment 0


NoBrushing Required



GoodFender Condition noposts


GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 213 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface LT: gravel covered some of the surface.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

0.3 4.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: Monitor cap for LB bearing

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

On the left abutment the very front edge of the cap is touching the slabs. No cracks or anything is noted. I

would take this off the monitor items as it is functioning okay.

THere is another comment about tension cracks, I think they are refering to the surface stress releif cracks in

the slabs which are a normal item. I could not find any other cracking.

LT (2014/12/20) reviewed.


Disclaimer:



Page 214 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 215 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K504 K504 MUD-NOAXE CREEK 2016/06/14



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Noaxe Cr 15.45 15.90 2018/06/14


Log Stringers


12.0

10 520962 5657281

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

11.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware



FairRiprap Small angular

GoodTie-backs

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment The #1 approach was recently widened, it still is tight but traffic is tracking well.


NoBrushing Required






GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 216 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks 4" planks


GoodTies

STRINGERS

Span 1

GoodLog Curbs

GoodNeedle Beam(s) and Shims Shimmed and tight

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.2 7.8


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This structure is in very good condition, no significant rot was encountered. The #1 approach appears to have

recently been widened. Consider returning structure to regular inspection interval. There would have to be

extensive approach work done in order to install fenders.

Stringers are sound.


Disclaimer:



Page 217 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 218 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K505 K505 MUD-TAYLOR CREEK 2015/06/19



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Tyaughton Cr 1.44 1.60 2018/06/19


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

26.0

10 517677 5649607

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface Materials continue to ravel down onto both approaches

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 219 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Loose

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

2.0 5.2


1 $400.00 Clear the #2 approach of raveled rock and gravelMediumRequired

2 $300.00 Tighten curb boltsLowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No tag on bridge


Disclaimer:



Page 220 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 221 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K506 K506 MUD-TYAUGHTON CRK 2015/06/19



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Tyaughton Cr 0.62 107.50 2017/06/19


Steel I-beam


27.8

10 517152 5652619

Ron Peace 2000

1

Note a number of cut slope failures on the access to this structure. DA. Feb 2014Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodLog/Timber Cribs Old cribs used for erosion controll only


FairRiprap

FairTie-backs

FairWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment The grade is very steep from the high chain, it does level out somewhat just before

the bridge 9%.

2Bridge Ahead Signs Missing In stall bridge ahead signs

NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 222 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Some break down on plank ends, minimal


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.5

2.0 15.1



RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Some breakdown on the blank ends

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 223 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

It appears that rock and fill were added to the downstream corner of the #2 approach. addressing the monitor

note

appears water bar was not installed.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 224 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K620 K620 MUD-PARADISE CREEK 2014/08/31



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Mud Cr #1 1.10 0.90 2017/08/31


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

27.9

10 515700 5655668

Jeremy Araki 1998

1

12 ft ladder to inspect girders.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

GoodCorrosion Protection posts and bracing coated

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required LT: RBDS delineator obscured.



PoorFender Condition none


FairRoad Surface some potholes

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 225 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface LT: Gravel on deck.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

5.0

0.3 5.0


1 $2,000.00 consider adding approach barriers, big drops off bridge cornersHighRequired

2 $500.00 LT: Brushing required.MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

LT (2014/12/22): Added repair: RB brushing required, RBDS delineator obscured.


Disclaimer:



Page 226 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 227 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Relay Cr 1.64 1.60 2017/08/31


Steel I-beam

Concrete Composite Gravel

21.7

10 515524 5656131

Jeremy Araki 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

GoodCorrosion Protection posts and bracing coated

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required LT: Minor brushing required, one delineator obscured (RBDS)



PoorFender Condition none


FairRoad Surface some potholes

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 228 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts some rot in risers, see pic

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodGravel Surface

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

0.3 10.0


2 $2,000.00 consider adding approach barriersMediumRequired

3 $500.00 LT: Brushing required.LowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment: LT (2014/12/22): Updated load rating to L75 according to bridge label. Minor brushing required, one delineator

obscured.


Disclaimer:



Page 229 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 230 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1130 K1130 MUD-SLUICEBOX CRK 2015/06/19



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Mud Cr 0.08 0.10 2018/06/19


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

18.6

10 517811 5662301

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

PoorFill Both approaches have settled and a sink hole has developed at the #2 approach.

This is largely caused by the lack of fill in front of the ballast walls.

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

2Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Install bridge ahead signs

YesBrushing Required Brush out around bridge




PoorRoad Surface Both approaches have settled and a sink hole has developed at the #2 approach.

This is largely caused by the lack of fill in front of the ballast walls.

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 231 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets




GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.3 9.5


1 $1,000.00 Both approaches have settled and a sink hole has developed at the #2

approach. This is largely caused by the lack of fill in front of the ballast

walls.

Add additional fill materials to both approaches and some addition 300

mm angular rock at toe of ballast walls where gaps exist.

HighRequired

2 $200.00 Brush out around the bridgeMediumRequired

3 $500.00 Install 2 bridge ahead signsLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 232 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Both approaches have settled and a sink hole has developed at the #2 approach

addition approach fill required will be a lot cheaper of a fix than the concrete repairs that will be required for the

damaged ballast walls. Suggest users should complete this repair as soon as feasible.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 233 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K509 K509 MUD-PACKHORSE 2016/06/14



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Mud Cr 0.01 0.20 2019/06/14


Steel I-beam


23.4

10 517107 5660581

Ron Peace 2001

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap Mostly bed rock

GoodWing Wall Lock blocks

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Corner at the #1 aproach


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 234 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Structure risers have elevated rot at a few locations

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

8.5

0.3 5.5


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Structure risers have elevated rot at a few locations

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Structure risers have elevated rot


Disclaimer:



Page 235 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Suggest users should manage the water at the approaches more actively.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 236 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K921 K921 West Pavilion 2015/06/20



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Leon Cr 47.15 48.00 2018/06/20


Steel I-beam


10.6

10 572615 5650186

Ron Peace 1988

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings The #1 upstream is covered in gravel


FairBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 237 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


FairNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Requires attentioin

PoorRunning Planks Worn , rotten failed sections see photo

FairSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

3.1

0.5 5.5

Large tree across creek just upstream of bridge


1 $4,800.00 Deck is worn and rotten, failed sections. Will require 1,346 Bf of 3"

decking. Bridge is skewed so there may be wasteage cuting skew

HighRequired

2 $200.00 Clean bearing and girder flangeLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Tree across creek upstream of the bridge, remove or monitor

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 238 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Deck is poor, rot and worn.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 239 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Watson Bar 68.61 77.80 2018/06/20



Concrete Concrete

6.4

10 564299 5658541

Ron Peace 1991

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings





GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 240 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Loose curb bolts

GoodDeck Joints


FairHardware Loose curb bolts



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.7

0.3 4.0


1 $300.00 Tighten Loose curb boltsLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

appear to have new curbs, but they are loose


Disclaimer:



Page 241 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 242 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Watson Bar Cr 0.00 83.10 2017/09/01


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Gravel

8.6

10 568323 5662278

Jeremy Araki 1991

1

On IR #1. High bar band, not a public road. Forward copies, Brian Novosel at INAC. Take spur leading east at 74 km on the

West Pavilion FSR. Located 5 km off of the West Pavilion FSR. MRF 05/2014

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings rubber bearing strip on cast in place concrete


UnratedBallast Wall no ballast wall, structure is a slab bridge on cast in place

GoodConcrete Cast in Place


UnratedCaps or Sills no cap beam

FairFill Fine grained but stable



Not ApplicableRiprap bedrock channel


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



NoneFender Condition none


FairRoad Surface very silty, will be bad when wet


Disclaimer:



Page 243 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1


FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts some decay but intact. LT: excessive debris up against curbs promoting rot.


UnratedGrout Pockets gravel over

FairGravel Surface a bit silty

GoodHardware


FairOverall Deck Condition LT: excessive debris up against curbs promoting rot.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

1.0 1.0


1 $2,000.00 consider adding approach barriersLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

delineator fixed, curbs fair.

LT (2014/12/22): reviewed. Rejected due to missing abutment inspection data.

LT (2015/01/29): Accepted.


Disclaimer:



Page 244 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 245 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


South French Bar Cr 93.28 102.00 2019/06/15


Steel I-beam


10.3

10 551871 5669723

Ron Peace 1993

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Not pinned to lock blocks


FairBallast Wall Not connected to superstructure



PoorCaps or Sills No sill, ribber pads on lock blocks

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 246 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts The curbs have hi rot values and will require replacement soon. Some impact

damage at the upstream side of #1, the metal riser is now resting on a cracked tie.

This can be remedied when replacing the curbs by moving riser to undamaged tie.


GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Some rot pockets, generaly good

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies With the exception of 2 damaged by curb impact at the #1 approacg upstream side,

see photo

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

PoorBracing Mid span bottom horizontal is bent see photo

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.2 45.3


Disclaimer:



Page 247 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






1 $2,000.00 The curbs have hi rot values and will require replacement soon. Some

impact damage at the upstream side of #1, the metal riser is now resting

on a cracked tie. This can be remedied when replacing the curbs by

moving riser to undamaged tie. Curbs consist of 2- 16' and 2-18' 10x10"

timbers on metal risers

LowRequired

2 $150.00 Brush out bridgeLowRequired

3 $2,000.00 Replace damaged bottom chord angle at mid span location. CWB

certified company and welder required. Documentation of repairs and

welder qualification to be sent to RSI engineering branch.

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor lack of connection to lock blocks at bearing

2 Bent horizontal braceMO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The curbs have hi rot values and will require replacement soon. Some impact damage at the upstream side of

#1, the metal riser is now resting on a cracked tie. This can be remedied when replacing the curbs by moving

riser to undamaged tie.

Note we have no drawings on file for this installation. I've set the load rating to unknown, still safe for industrial

hauling. Requires more detailed inspection. Full measure up required and evaluation required.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





See footnote

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 248 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


French Bar 103.36 112.00 2018/06/20


Steel I-beam


20.0

10 547088 5675564

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface Low at both approaches

DECK

Span 1



Disclaimer:



Page 249 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.3 5.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 250 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 251 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K918 K918 W. PAVILION-LEON CRK 2016/06/15



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Leon Cr 7.57 60.00 2018/06/15


Log Stringers


6.0

10 569678 5647779

Ron Peace 1983

1

Access:

5.9

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings Rotten at #1


GoodBallast Wall


PoorCaps or Sills The #1 crib has a log on top of the crib as a sill and it is rotten and failing

FairFill Sink hole at the #1 upstream corner




FairRiprap

FairTie-backs Some crushing and checking

FairWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Junction at the #1 approach, tight corner at #2


NoBrushing Required




5Posted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 252 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1

GoodCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Large cabled logs


GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


FairTies

STRINGERS

Span 1


(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

1 All strunger have a relatively solid outer shell, on

this stringer #2 end is rotten and #1 has core rot

Yes 620 0 0 Fir620

2 goodYes 0 0 0 fir600

3 #2 end rotted through and extensive core rot on #!Yes 600 0 0 fir600

6 4 and 5 are good 6 has core rot on #1 endYes 400 0 0 Fir590

7 Rotted through on #1 endYes 590 0 0 Fir590

8 goodYes 0 0 0 fir610

9 Rotted through on #1 endYes 610 0 0 fir610

GoodLog Curbs Large logs supporting 2 needle beams

GoodNeedle Beam(s) and Shims Shimmed and cabled not tight

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.3 4.8


RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 253 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

1 Monitor #1 sill for rot and failure

2 Monitor stringers for failureMO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This structure has had double needle beams, set in front of each crib, they are solid and secure as well as

supported by large curb logs. The stringers have outer relatively solid shells. Stringers 1,3,7and 9 are rotted

through at bearing. Extensive core rot on 1, 3, 6 @#1 abutment. The sill on #1 is rotten and crushing, it is just

a log laid on top of the crib.

This structure has a limited life, consider closure or replacement

Professional inspection required to determine closure or not. Safe for pick up traffic until that point.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 254 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K564 K564 W. PAVILION-PONY VLY 2016/06/15



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Pony Valley Cr 6.99 7.00 2018/06/15


Log Stringers


10.0

10 542798 5673115

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

9.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


FairBallast Wall Some punkness and rot on the #1 abutment, which is constantly wet from the

approach run off


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill




GoodRiprap

GoodTie-backs

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

PoorAlignment Grade steep down onto bridge from High Chain.






10Posted Load Rating Posted at this inspection as requested by DA


Disclaimer:



Page 255 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





PoorRoad Surface Surface water from spring in road is running onto the bridge. The road has been

deactivated beyond the bridge, waterbarred

DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware Cabled curbs


FairNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Will require new deck for industrial haul

PoorRunning Planks Very dirty and punky, continuious water running onto the bridge, 2x10" only

PoorSub Deck Rotten and failing, dirty 2x6 only

FairTies 6x6" ties on 255 mm centers

STRINGERS

Span 1


(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

3 Heavy check, cored no rotYes 0 0 0 fir560

7 no rotYes 0 0 0 fir570

8 No rotYes 0 0 0 fir565

FairLog Curbs Some rot in Downstream, minimal

FairNeedle Beam(s) and Shims Shimmed and cabled but not tight

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.3 2.8


1 $3,200.00 Will require new deck for industrial haul, deck is 14.5' x 33'HighRequired


3 $1,000.00 Reslope road or water bar if not usedHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 256 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The bridgde was posted at 10 tonnes as requested.

Eronious previous inspections indicate few ties in actuallity there are many ties but they are stagered from

upstream to downstream under the deck. The ties are 6x6" and spaced approximately 255 mm apart +/-

The deck is however in poor condition with one failed spot (see photo) between the run strips. Deck planks are

2x10 and 2x6" sub deck.

Stringers appear to be sound, #3 is heavly checkede and was core sampled but is sound as well 7&8 sampled

and no rot. there are 8 stringers not 7 as noted in previous inspection. :(

The stringers seem to be doing well, so if users decided to re-deck this bridge, I would estimate they could get

another 4 years at the 41 tonnes load rating. As is right now maintain the 10 tonnes posted load restriction. I

would utilize a 406mm o/c spacing at the same 8"X8" tie size but with 4"X10" sub decking.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





10

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 257 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001D

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K629 K629 WEST PAVILION BR 14 2009/10/08



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Ward Cr 0.22 95.10 2011/10/08


Box Log

600 600

0.0

8.0 1,300 5,750

10 557735 5666009

Chris Cole 2004

Deactivated by BCTS 2010. DA.Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




PoorRoad Surface deactivated, waterbars

WOODBOX CULVERT

Stringer # Stringer Rot Depth Diameter Stringer Species Comments

1 Stringer Species: All unpeeled and no signs of rot0 500 Fd

GoodFill

GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet

GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls




Disclaimer:



Page 258 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001D

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K629 K629 WEST PAVILION BR 14 2009/10/08



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.2

0.1 1.5

Upstream town bank is vulnerable as the creek turns hard at the culvert, but there is no scouring.


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There is no debris or scouring occuring from concerns noted in previous inspection.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





0

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 259 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1140 K1140 MAKA-MURRAY 2015/06/15



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 19.87 19.50 2018/06/15


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

9.6

10 641019 5522950

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

PoorRiprap Steep and unstable at the #2, pinched creek


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 260 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Steep and unstable at the #2, pinched creek

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.5

0.1 1.6

Some scour at the toe of upstream corner of #2 abutment.


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Steep and unstable at the #2, pinched creek, some failure at toe.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The curb components are nearing end of life, 3 yr. max

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 261 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 262 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K915 K915 LOWER MAKA 2014/07/16



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Maka Cr 0.56 18.00 2017/07/16


Steel I-beam


21.3

10 640100 5524554

Jean-Guy Bernat 1999

1

Access:

20.7

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall minor chip LT: No photos

PoorCorrosion Protection steel post not painted LT: No photos

UnratedCaps or Sills none

GoodFill minor settlement at bridge ends, could use some gravel LT: No Photos

UnratedHardware not visible

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required minor and some at left bridge ahead sign




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck minor chips LT: No photos


Disclaimer:



Page 263 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts some rot in blocks, few bolts slightly loose LT: No photos

UnratedDeck Joints LT: changed to unrated due to formwork still in place.

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

Not ApplicableHardware wleded assembly


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.8

0.3 13.0

Monitored tree in channel upstream. NOt a concern for now


2 $600.00 LT: Consider painting steel posts with xymax to resist corrosion.LowRequired

3 $500.00 LT: remove formwork from underside of deck.MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Fill has not been added on the approaches at the bridge ends. Tree in channel upstream monitored and OK

for now.

LT (2014/12/17): No photos to show deficiencies noted by inspector. Approach photos taken too far away.

Repair added: paint steel posts with xymax to resist corrosion, remove formwork from underside of bridge deck

joints.


Disclaimer:



Page 264 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 265 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K715 K715 MAKA-MICHAEL 2016/06/27



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Debbie Cr 3.85 4.00 2019/06/27


Concrete Box Beam

Gravel Gravel

9.0

10 641338 5517577

Ron Peace 1994

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing



GoodCaps or Sills Some chipping along the top

FairFill Does not extend to the base of the sill, this has allowed the sink hole to develope



FairRiprap Round and some movement has occured


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner at the #2 and a unnessary jog at the #1







FairRoad Surface Does not extend to the base of the sill, this has allowed the sink hole to develope

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 266 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






0Gravel Deck Depth (metres)



GoodHardware


GoodOverall Deck Condition Some chipping and wear at the bridge ends

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.2 2.4


1 $350.00 Fill small sink hole at the #2 approach, see photoHighRequired


PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor rip rap

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Fill sink hole at the #2 approach

The loss of material at the road surface is due to the poor riprap construction. A permanent fix is to add 300

mm minus angular rock below the base of the cap beams. Then backfill and compact the approach materials.

This rock can be hand placed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 267 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 268 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K350 K350 STEMWINDER-HEDLEY MT 2016/07/05



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:McNulty Cr 1.63 16.90 2019/07/05



3,000 3,000

0.0

37.0 3,000 3,000

10 709038 5483615

Ron Peace 1991

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




FairCoating Some rust minimal


GoodFill

FairFloor The comments related to the covert invert in pipe #1 could be a rock in the culvert.

No access due to water levels


GoodHead Wall


Disclaimer:



Page 269 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodInlet There is considerable debris collected on the #1 culvert inlet, it should be removed

before more can collect.

GoodOutlet

GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.0

0.4 8.0

There is considerable debris collected on the #1 culvert inlet, it should be removed before more can collect.


1 $400.00 There is considerable debris collected on the #1 culvert inlet, it should be

removed before more can collect.

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There is considerable debris collected on the #1 culvert inlet, it should be removed before more can collect.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 270 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 271 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Texas #1 0.23 0.20 2018/06/30


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

21.6

10 582865 5601115

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

21.6

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 272 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.9

1.2 7.0


1 $500.00 Install both bridge ahead signsMediumRequired


PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 273 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 274 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K569 K569 MURRAY-LALUWISSIN CK 2015/06/24



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Murray #1 2.72 4.80 2018/06/24



Concrete Concrete

13.6

10 613966 5588327

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 275 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts One curb section and 2 risers have recently been replaced. Many of the remaining

have extensive rot, (see photo)

GoodDeck Joints



GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.2 4.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 One curb section and 2 risers have recently been replaced. Many of the remaining have extensive rot and should be

monitored, (see photo)

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

One curb section and 2 risers have recently been replaced. Many of the remaining have extensive rot, (see

photo)


Disclaimer:



Page 276 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 277 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Murray #2 2.88 4.90 2018/06/24



Concrete Concrete

13.6

10 613801 5588314

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 278 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some of the curb components where replaced, many of the remaining have high rot

values and loose

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.1

0.3 3.6

Woody debris collecting at bridge


1 $250.00 Clear Woody debris collecting at bridgeMediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Some of the curb components where replaced, many of the remaining have high rot values. Mat require replacement

soon

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Some of the curb components where replaced, many of the remaining have high rot values


Disclaimer:



Page 279 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 280 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Murray #3 3.10 5.20 2018/06/24


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

13.6

10 613595 5588372

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 281 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive will require replacement soon

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.3 3.2


1 $100.00 Brush out around bridgeLowComplete

2 $4,500.00 All curb components have extensive rot. Requires 1284 Bf. of 10x10"

timber which includes 12-24" and 12-36" riser blocks

MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Bridge will rerquire new curbs and risers soon


Disclaimer:



Page 282 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





These curb repairs should be completed as soon as feasible. Note this structure is a good candidate for HSS

retro-fit rail replacement and would decrease long term maintenance costs.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 283 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K570 K570 MURRAY CREEK WEST 2015/06/24



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Murray Cr North 1.70 18.00 2017/06/24


Steel I-beam


6.2

10 604880 5595752

Ron Peace 1970

1

Access:

5.4

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings No bearing pads


GoodBallast Wall


FairCaps or Sills Indivual lock block on their sides

FairFill



FairRiprap Some erosion has occured


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 284 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Two sections at the #2 approach have high rot values


GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks

FairSub Deck

FairTies Some new treated and some old have been rolled over

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Dirt on flanges



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.3

0.1 2.6



2 $900.00 Two section of curb timber have high rot, Requires 2-6'x10x10" curb

timbers

MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 285 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

curb replacement is required prior to industrial hauling. Structure will be downgraded if not completed by the

next routine inspection

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 286 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K563 K563 MURRAY CREEK N-WEST 2016/06/16



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 5.20 7.00 2018/06/16


Log Stringers


6.2

10 603690 5600841

Ron Peace 1997

1

Road is deactivated for the last 4.5 km. The structure is still accessible by pickup. 2010 inspection infoAccess:

6.2

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Treated timber sill


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills Treated timber

GoodFill



FairRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface At bridge only road to structure is waterbared and many trees down

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 287 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:







GoodHardware


FairNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Soon to be traffic hazard

PoorRunning Planks Rotten and failing, see photo


FairTies

STRINGERS

Span 1

FairLog Curbs Elevated rot


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.9

0.1 1.5


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor failing deck

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Stringer rot was additionally noted in the very ends and core rot of Both ends of #1 and #2 end of stringer #3.

Stringer #7 is very rotten. The deck is failing see photo. The road is heavily waterbared.Consider load rating

and or closure.

Redecking this structure is likely not warranted.


Disclaimer:



Page 288 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Post 10 tonnes load restriction due to structure age and progression of rot in stringers and decking.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





10

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 289 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1488 K1488 ME7469.02 2016/07/09



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Simen Cr 0.50 6.50 2019/07/09


Steel I-beam

Concrete Removable Concrete

15.2

10 694115 5512360

Ron Peace 2009

1

Access:

14.7

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Junction at the #2 approach


NoBrushing Required



Heavily shot up(approaching structure)



PoorRoad Surface The #2 approach has water flowing onto the bridge, previous waterbaring has failed

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 290 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck



GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.4 3.3


1 $2,000.00 The #2 approach has water flowing onto the bridge, previous waterbaring

has failed. Reestablish

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The #2 approach has water flowing onto the bridge, previous waterbaring has failed


Disclaimer:



Page 291 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 292 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K445 K445 PASAYTEN RIVER 2016/07/05



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Similkameen R 0.27 0.30 2019/07/05


Glulam Girder


32.0

10 674855 5446590

Ron Peace 1982

1

Access:

32

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall

GoodCorrosion Protection Creosote

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

FairPiles or Posts The #7 pile on the #1 abutment is rotted through

GoodRiprap

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 293 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some impact damage @ the #1 upstream, see photo


FairHardware


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition Dirty and worn

PoorRunning Planks Worn and deteriorated on plank ends, dirty. Two run strips 1.3 wide with 3" planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Ground inspection only

GoodHardware

GoodUnder Trussing

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.7

1.2 21.2


1 $300.00 Clean the deckMediumRequired

2 $300.00 Repair impact damage to curb, see photoMediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor the running plank deterioration

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The #7 pile on the #2 abutment is rotted through


Disclaimer:



Page 294 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 45 Design Vehicle Config.: Other


63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 295 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Pasayten R 20.39 21.00 2018/06/26


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

30.5

10 679462 5433116

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

29.9

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





PoorRoad Surface Low at both approaches, grader could raise material

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 296 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.7

1.1 15.5


1 $300.00 Low at both approaches, grader could raise materialHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 297 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 298 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Peeve Cr 20.79 21.30 2018/06/26


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

15.2

10 679528 5432771

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Brush out arount the bridge





FairRoad Surface Low fill at the #2 approach

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 299 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.4 3.5


1 $200.00 Brush out arount the bridgeMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 300 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 301 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Upper Peeve Cr 24.79 25.50 2019/07/07


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

15.2

10 681832 5431695

Ron Peace 2005

1

May need quad on next inspection due to brush if not brushed out. Jan 2014 DA.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment The grade at the #2 is 14%

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing The #1 is missing and the #2 has fallen over

NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Surface water likely flows onto both ends of the bridge

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 302 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts One riser has failed see photo, the curbs and some risers have significant rot.

Minimum replace the failed riser consider full replacement of curbs and risers.

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.3 8.1


1 $300.00 One riser has failed see photo, the curbs and some risers have

significant rot. Minimum replace the failed riser consider full replacement

of curbs and risers.

Requires 1-2' 10x10" riser block

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor curb deterioration

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

One riser has failed see photo, the curbs and some risers have significant rot. Minimum replace the failed riser

consider full replacement of curbs and risers.


Disclaimer:



Page 303 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Most likely all the curbs will need to be done shortly. But as mentioned, I would replaced the failed riser block

prior to any industrial use.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 304 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K512 K512 YALAKOM RIVER 2014/09/08



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Binwall

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom #1 1.67 0.10 2017/09/08


Steel I-beam


16.4

10 553487 5640370

Jeremy Araki 1988

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings erosion not yet under bearings on left. LT: debris appears to have accumulated

around steel bgr area.

FairBinwall fill sucked out on left


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

PoorFill due to left fill in bin

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment steep and tight on right


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 305 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Add wear surface before you damage the sub deck!

UnratedRunning Planks there are none! Running on treated sub deck

GoodSub Deck treated

GoodTies treated

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.5 9.0


1 $2,000.00 add approach barriersLowRequired

2 $5,000.00 Add running planksHighRequired

3 $500.00 Clean debris from bearing areas.MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor fill in bin on left

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 306 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Add running planks before you damage the treated sub deck!!!!!!

LT: (2014/12/22): Debris appears to have accumulated in bearing areas although photos are not that

conclusive.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 307 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Shulaps Cr 4.41 2.80 2017/09/08



Concrete Gravel

12.6

10 551999 5642063

Jeremy Araki 1996

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

PoorCorrosion Protection posts not coated

GoodCaps or Sills minor concrete damage, likely hit during construction

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment tight corner on left


NoBrushing Required


cannot replace due to rotten guardrail(approaching structure)


NoneFender Condition none


GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 308 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts rotten. LT: damaged. excessive gravel graded up against curbs.



GoodGravel Surface

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.8

0.3 5.0


2 $2,000.00 add approach barriersHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

guardrails not replaced, spalling minor and likely construction damage, riprap seems okay

LT (2014/12/22): Reviewed. Curb/Block replacement required. Excessive gravel up against curbs, curbs

beginning to fail.


Disclaimer:



Page 309 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 310 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom #3 9.22 7.70 2018/06/20


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

20.0

10 549323 5645116

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

19.4

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Rubbers are compressed and bulging out the front

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Traffic is damaging curb @ the #1 approach, there is lots room to make the turn

without hitting the curb.


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 311 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Impact damage @ #1 approach

FairDeck Joints Some cracking and dropping out from the bottom, does not appear to be open to

deck top

GoodGrout Pockets

FairHardware Curbs are loose



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.4

0.5 11.9


1 $2,000.00 Impact damage at the #1 approach upstream side. still functional.

Requires 3-36" and 2-24" risers and tighten all curbs

MediumRequired

2 $5,000.00 recommend addition of no-post approach barriers to deter users from

contacting end of curb rails. Align with inside edge of curb rails.

MediumRequired

3 $4,000.00 Add new deck joint seals, either para-seal or compression seals are

recommended. User should measure deck gap sizing, then discuss with

Rapid span or engineering branch to determine appropriate replacement

product.

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 312 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

1 Some of the deck joints have cracked and fallen out, does not appear to extend to the top.

2 Bulging compressed rubber bearing padsMO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Some of the deck joints have cracked and fallen out, does not appear to extend to the top. Curbs require

attention

I think this structure is a candidate for deck joint (non-composite deck panels) replacement to ensure less

sedimentation to the channel. See detailed repair item #3.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 313 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Junction Cr 9.86 8.20 2018/06/20



Concrete Concrete

10.6

10 548910 5645493

Ron Peace 1999

1

UTMs converted from Lat/Long- check in field.Access:

10

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 314 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Impact damage and rot @ the #2 approach upstrea side.

GoodDeck Joints


FairHardware Loose curb bolts



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.2 4.1


1 $2,500.00 Impact damage and rot @ the #2 approach upstrea side. Requires 2-36"

and 2-24" and 1- 11' 10x10" timber. Curbs also need to be tightened.

HighRequired

4 $10,000.00 change out the timber rail for an HSS retro fit rail. This will decrease

maintenance cost in the long run.

Add approach no-post barriers, with transitions and bullnose. Ensure

these are placed in line with the inside edge of the curb system.

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 315 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





See repairs listed regarding rail works. These concrete slab girders are good candidates for HSS rail retrofits.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 316 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom #6 26.04 24.80 2017/09/08


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

18.6

10 537689 5653632

Jeremy Araki 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment tight corner


NoBrushing Required soon





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 317 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts soft but intact. LT: drill results? percent rot?

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.3 7.0


1 $2,000.00 add approach barriersLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

some rails replaced.

LT (2014/12/22): Reviewed. Previous inspection (2011) noted to replace curbs and rails. Spot repairs were

completed. Inspector should drill and indicate % rot on remaining sections.


Disclaimer:



Page 318 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 319 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom #7 28.32 26.90 2017/09/08


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

20.3

10 537203 5654882

Jeremy Araki 1996

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

FairCorrosion Protection some rust showing through

GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts can only see right

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment drain onto deck, LT: difficult to see from photos, consider grading? or waterbar?


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 320 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts silt rails rotten

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

1.0 5.0


1 $1,000.00 add downstream guidelogsHighComplete

2 $500.00 replace silt curbsHighComplete

3 $500.00 LT: clean accumulated debris from LBUS bearing area.MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

deck panel moniter is fine.

LT (2014/12/22): repair added: remove debris from LBUS bearing. Photos appear to be mixed up. Check with

inspector.


Disclaimer:



Page 321 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 322 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom Cr 30.69 29.50 2017/09/08



Concrete Gravel

11.4

10 535902 5656745

Jeremy Araki 1996

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

UnratedBracing cannot see

GoodBallast Wall

Not ApplicableConcrete Cast in Place assuming cap is precast

UnratedCorrosion Protection cannot see

GoodCaps or Sills can only see concrete cap and then riprap

GoodFill

UnratedHardware cannot see

UnratedPiles or Posts cannot see

FairRiprap movement at right bank but all still functioning and seems stable


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required LT: light brushing required, beginning to obscure signs and growing over deck.





FairRoad Surface potholes


Disclaimer:



Page 323 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

UnratedConcrete Deck gravel over, LT spoty coverage, recommend complete removal to inspect joints.

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts risers starting to decay

UnratedDeck Joints gravel over, looks okay from under


FairGravel Surface potholes

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.0

0.1 2.0


2 $1,000.00 LT: suggest to remove spotty coverage of gravel deck to inspect slab

connectors and joints.

LowRequired

3 $500.00 LT: light brushing required. Beginning to grow over deck and obscure

signs.

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: monitor RB rip rap.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

riprap not fixed or changed.

LT (2014/12/22): Light brushing required - beginning to obscure signs and growing over deck. Deficient gravel

wearing surface. Consider complete removal to inspect joints.


Disclaimer:



Page 324 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 325 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom #8 38.71 37.50 2017/06/20



Concrete Gravel

11.0

10 531024 5662040

Ron Peace 1996

1

Access:

10.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1



Disclaimer:



Page 326 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some rot , minimal in risers

Not ApplicableDeck Joints Covered in gravel


GoodGravel Surface

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



Not ApplicableWelded/grouted shear connectors Covered in gravel

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.4 4.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 327 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 328 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Beaver Dam 16.65 57.00 2019/06/14



Concrete Concrete

10.6

10 544287 5648568

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

10

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill


GoodPiles or Posts

PoorRiprap Low velocity creek, the toe of the fill has not been protected. Very little placed


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Not aligned well vertically, fill was used to blend the road grade to the bridge







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 329 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck Where visible at the #2 end

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some impact damage and elevated rot values in risers and curb rail

GoodDeck Joints


FairHardware 2 bent curb bolts


FairOverall Deck Condition Will require repair soon

GoodRunning Surface Grade of deck gravel goes from 12" @ the #1 to 0 at the #2 approach

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors Only visible at the end of the bridge#2

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

2.6

0.2 3.6

Creek channel very grown in and brush and woody debris collecting under the bridge. Some scouring along the

toe of fill.


1 $3,200.00 The structure has some curb issues and rot values vary through out.

Some impact damage at the downstream side #2 end. Still functional but

should be repaired. Best advice replace all.

616 BF of 10x10" curb rail and 416 BF of riser blocks

HighComplete

2 $300.00 Brush out bridgeHighComplete

4 $1,000.00 Replaced damaged curbs, bracket and riser blocks for one side.

Including grader strip replacement.

MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The structure has some curb issues and rot values vary through out. Some impact damage at the downstream

side #2 end. Still functional but should be repaired. Best advice replace all.

Fill is used to blend the grade of the road to the bridge, 12" at the #1 end to 0 at the other end.


Disclaimer:



Page 330 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Don't forget the grader strip will need replacement.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 331 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K838 K838 -BURKHOLDER B 2016/06/14



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Yalakom B 0.05 0.00 2019/06/14


Steel I-beam


16.0

10 540522 5651615

Ron Peace 1994

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Poor gradation at the #2 and steep @ #1


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Junction at the #1 or low chain approach

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing The #2 has a sign, the #1 likely does not require one






FairRoad Surface Small sink hole at the #2, a grader could fill it in.

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 332 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Not ApplicableConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot particularly on the downstream side



GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface Gravel, pushed up on side to a max depth of 200 mm

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.3 9.3


1 $4,000.00 The riser blocks are in poor condition partly due to gravel running surface.

Consider replacement soon. Will require 1900 BF to replace all with

10x10" timber

HighRequired


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The riser blocks are in poor condition partly due to gravel running surface. Consider replacement soon


Disclaimer:



Page 333 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Shop drawings not on file yet but record dwgs requested from RSS and WCP. As built information on file notes

L75 GA design and PO.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 334 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:WO 3470 K1586 YALAKOM-LAKE LA MARE 2014/09/08



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Shulaps Cr 1.30 2017/09/08


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

15.2

10 551100 5642017

Jeremy Araki

1

Access:

15

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment steep on left onto bridge. LT: sediment is being carried onto bridge deck.


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface potholes and some erosion

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 335 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware


FairOverall Deck Condition LT: excessive sediment deposited onto bridge deck from LB approach.

FairRunning Surface LT: excessive sediment deposited onto bridge deck from LB approach.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

FairBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.3 6.0


1 $2,000.00 add approach barriersLowComplete

2 $1,000.00 LT: grade LB approach or install waterbar to control sediment being

carried onto bridge deck. Clean debris off deck.

MediumCompleteRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

bearing pads look fine.

LT (2014/12/22): repair added to control LB runoff to prevent sediment being deposited onto deck. Clean deck.


Disclaimer:



Page 336 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 337 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K351 K351 SALMON RIVER 2014/09/19



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Salmon R 0.14 27.60 2017/09/19



Concrete Concrete

6.0

11 288943 5578248

Ben Pellett 1983

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

UnratedBearings Not visible





GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill




GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 338 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck




GoodHardware


GoodOverall Deck Condition LT: Fair - Sand and gravel accumulated on deck.

GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.1 5.0

LT: Gravel bar in the middle of upstream channel. Few debris upstream of LB abutment.


1 $1,000.00 Clean deckLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Gravel to be removed from deck.

LT (2014/12/17) Reviewed.


Disclaimer:



Page 339 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 340 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K637 K637 KINGDOM LAKE BR 01 2016/06/13



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hawthorn Cr 5.20 14.40 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


14.0

10 520416 5621255

Ron Peace 2004

1

Access:

13.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 341 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Punky and rot pockets, will likely not take much industrial haul.

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.9

0.7 7.0


1 $3,200.00 Punky and rot pockets, will likely not take much industrial haul. Full deck

will require 1794BF of 3" pplanks

LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Will soon require running decking replacement, if used for industrial Haul


Disclaimer:



Page 342 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 343 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Piebiter Cr 0.00 19.10 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 524112 5618370

Ron Peace 2004

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







FairRoad Surface Settled at both approaches , grade up would fix

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 344 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition Will require at minimum a patch of failed run planks, recommend new top deck

PoorRunning Planks Some have failed others with high rot values, consists of two 5' running strips

FairSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.3 5.2


1 $100.00 Settled at both approaches , grade up would fixMediumRequired

2 $2,800.00 Some have failed others with high rot values, consists of two 5' running

strips. Full replacement would require 1500 BF of 3" planks

HighRequired


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 345 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Structure labeling is WO 1628 McGillvary 15.24 m. L-75 Mar98

Bridge requires deck repairs

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 346 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 25.28 24.00 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 525404 5614432

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Superstructure is not pinned to the sill or blocks


GoodBallast Wall

GoodConcrete Precast Lock Blocks


FairCaps or Sills None on the #2 and the #1 is only resting on a single timber

GoodFill



FairRiprap

GoodWing Wall Lock blocks

APPROACHES

PoorAlignment The bridge is not well aligned vertically to the approaches, the bridge is unnessarily

sloped down toward the high chain approach, #1







FairRoad Surface Uneven at bridge ends


Disclaimer:



Page 347 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.9

0.4 5.3

Some woody debris upstream of the bridge



2 $500.00 Install bridge ahead signsLowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 348 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 349 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Cadwallader Cr 25.71 24.40 2018/06/17


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 525227 5614038

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings No connection girder to lock block


PoorBallast Wall Not connected to the girders

PoorConcrete Precast Lock Block abutment, blocks supporting the girders are independant of the oposing

bearing. The supporting block is resting on a block that is length ways to the creek,

which in turn is resting on two blocks perpendicular to the creek. Resulting in 3

blocks per bearing. They are settling and uneven.


PoorCaps or Sills None

PoorFill Silty unstable



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner at the High chain

2Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Requires signs

NoBrushing Required




20Posted Load Rating Bridge was posted at this inspection


Disclaimer:



Page 350 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PoorRoad Surface Drop from deck to settled road .3 m.

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Loose, one missing washer

FairDeck to Girder Bolts Angleiron along flange and J clips through the deck planks

FairHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.5

0.3 6.0

Large tree has fallen onto deck.


1 $30,000.00 Bridge should be removed and rebuilt for industrial haulLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Lock Block abutment, blocks supporting the girders are independant of the oposing bearing. The supporting block is

resting on a block that is length ways to the creek, which in turn is resting on two blocks perpendicular to the creek.

Resulting in 3 blocks per bearing. They are settling and uneven. (see photo)MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 351 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

None of the issues mentioned in the previous inspections appear to have been addressed. Posted @ 20

tonnes this inspection, structure should likely be removed and rebuilt for industrial haul.

maintain the load restriction posting and PEng to determine appropriate abutment design for structure rebuild if

required for industrial hauling.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





20

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 352 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Cadwallader Cr 0.70 11.20 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


27.4

10 517993 5622074

Ron Peace 1997

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Unknown connection to lock blocks


FairBallast Wall Not connected to the super structure

GoodConcrete Precast Lock blocks


PoorCaps or Sills None

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Structure located in two curve transition, limited visibility


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 353 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Flange dirty

GoodHardware Inspected from ground visually only


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

2.2

1.0 16.1

Some woody debris collecting under the bridge



RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Some woody debris collecting under the bridge

2 THe #1 upstream corner of the bridge may have settled, 5mm on a 1 m. hand level on the box diaphramMO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 354 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Unknown connections girder bearing plate to lock blocks and structure has no sill. It appears that the structure

has settled or perhaps was built with the #1 abutment lower on the upstream side by 5 mm on a 1m. hand

level. Perhaps a survey of the structure could more closely determine the levelness.

continue to monitor left abutment for further settlement, but no significant issues at this time with the bearing.

Therefor safe for industrial use.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 355 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Crazy #1 1.25 12.50 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


14.0

10 518378 5621673

Ron Peace 2003

1

Turn @km 11.2 onKingdom Lake FSR, go.0.7 km and cross K1023 then go 0.6 km to Crazy #1 then 0.1 to Crazy #2Access:

13.4

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Girders are resting on the ends of the treated timber sills


FairBallast Wall Not connected to the girders


GoodCorrosion Protection Creosote

FairCaps or Sills Short only extend to girder edges

GoodFill

FairHardware Girders pinned on outside edges to limit movement


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




nonePosted Load Rating g

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 356 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

2.4

0.2 4.0

Woody debris collecting upstream


1 $250.00 Clean girder bearing and flangesLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor woody debris upstream

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 357 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 358 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Crazy #2 1.43 12.60 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 518430 5621620

Ron Peace 2003

1

Turn @km 11.2 onKingdom Lake FSR, go.0.7 km and cross K1023 then go 0.6 km to Crazy #1 then 0.1 to Crazy #2Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Compressing rotting planks at bearing particulaly #2 abutment, see photo


PoorBallast Wall Not stacked well or connected to the superstructure



PoorCaps or Sills High rot values and untreated sills, stacked 2 ( 3x12") planks, has caused some

compression

GoodFill

FairHardware


FairRiprap

GoodWing Wall Lock block at #2

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Limited vissibility @ #1


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 359 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some gaps up to 11cm at panel joints


GoodHardware


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition Limited life for industial haul

FairRunning Planks Punky sections and rot pockets, may not perform well under heavy industrial haul


FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

FairBracing First diaphram from #1 has a bent diagonal brace, see photo

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.5

0.2 3.0


1 $500.00 Bent diagonal brace on superstructureLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 High rot values and untreated sills, stacked2 ( 3x12") planks, has caused some compression

2 Deck deteriorationMO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 360 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

users should plan on replacing the untreated timber sill with a proper size and treated timber sill.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 361 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Plutus Cr. 1.53 14.10 2019/06/13


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 519762 5620710

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Not conected to sills, rebar drifts through sill maybe into blocks?


FairBallast Wall No conection to girders

PoorConcrete Lock Blocks Appears to only be 3 per side and not well centered under girders


FairCaps or Sills not bearing flat at the #1 abutment, see photo, due to settling of block.

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Road ends across bridge

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Incomplete road

NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 362 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Not bevel cut on ends


GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.2 9.8


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor settling of lock block, specifically upstream #! abutment

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 363 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The road ends at this bridge. The lock block abutment appears to be 3 blocks per side. The upstream of the

#1 has rotated out of level back toward the approach, see photo. This has caused uneven bearing at this

location.

Appears new decking has been installed.

Structure has not seen much industrial traffic. Items identified are fine for monitoring at this time. Safe for

industrial use.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 364 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1345 K1345 KINGDON-CHISM BR 05 2014/08/29



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Chism Cr. 0.53 12.60 2017/08/29


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 521596 5619900

Jeremy Araki 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

UnratedAlignment left is fine, right not built


NoBrushing Required


install when finishing crossing(approaching structure)


NoneFender Condition install when finishing crossing


UnratedRoad Surface good on left, not built on right

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 365 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


FairNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition rot

PoorRunning Planks totally rotten


FairTies fair to poor, some will require replacing

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.0

0.2 3.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

not sure that this is 1345, the coordinates are correct and this was the one inspected last time but it is a 60'

not a 50' as in the summary.

Right approach is still not built, when you come to finish the crossing add guide logs or some type of approach


Disclaimer:



Page 366 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





barriers and delineators on the right side, replace the deck and likely 30% of the ties. I did not add this as a

repair because the crossing is not yet completed.

LT (2014/1219) Reviewed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 367 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Cadwallader Cr 0.20 16.00 2017/06/17


Steel I-beam


24.4

10 521714 5620201

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Not pinned to the sill log.


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill




GoodRiprap

GoodTie-backs Cabled


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 368 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.1

1.3 11.7


2 $400.00 Lag bridge to log crib.

Talked with P.Eng and since bridge hasn't moved since installation, then

not required.

MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 369 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Structure is still not pinned to the log crib

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 370 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K541 K541 TRUAX CREEK 2016/06/11



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 8.45 8.70 2019/06/11


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

10.6

10 521821 5633617

Ron Peace 2001

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

2Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Road has been deactivated on the main and the branch road is unused and

overgrown






GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 371 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


FairDeck Joints Joints are not filled but little material is falling through at this time. If the bridge use

increases perhaps filling may be required, minimal risk or damage


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.3 4.0


1 $200.00 If bridge and road become active install bridge ahead signsLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Past inspections noted concern that deck joints should be sealed, it is this inspectors opion that if any

material is falling through it is very minimal. Given that the road is now deactivated on one branch and unused

on the other further diminishes the reported problem.

The road into this structure is overgrown with numerious small slides and material ravling onto the road.


Disclaimer:



Page 372 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





The repair commented on by the inspector, is already listed as low priorityPEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 373 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Truax Cr 10.05 9.70 2016/08/30


Log Stringers


10.5

10 521769 5632102

Jeremy Araki 1993

1

to be deactivated in 2013. DA

Deactivated in 2015. SS

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings


FairBallast Wall


FairCaps or Sills

GoodFill

FairHardware

FairLog/Timber Cribs still intact



FairTie-backs

FairWing Wall downstream side only

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment






0Posted Load Rating Posted as 0 and closed

FairRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 374 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts rotten

FairDeck to Girder Bolts

PoorHardware loose and old


FairNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition rotten

PoorRunning Planks rotten


PoorTies rotten

STRINGERS

Span 1

PoorLog Curbs rotten

PoorNeedle Beam(s) and Shims rotten, there are three, not toughing all stringers

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.5

0.2 3.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Posted as closed already. Stringers 1, 4, and 7 have failed in shear atright abutment. Bridge is still upright.

Still poses a risk of failing if someone ignores the signs. Suggest removing for liability. Not much

environmental liability since its all wood with no gravel fill. I did not put any of the missing signs or anything as

a repair or monitor because the bridge is to be removed. Since it is already failing I suggest to remove it soon

or it will be in the creek if someone drives on it. It is not blocked off. If nobody drive on it it will likely fail in

winter under snow load. Not sure when that will happen but it could be 1-10 years out??


Disclaimer:



Page 375 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





LT (2014/12/22): Agree with inspector's recommendation to remove bridge for liability.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): Design Vehicle Config.:


0

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 376 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K995 K995 SWAKUM-HELMER 2016/09/16



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Clapperton Cr 1.09 1.00 2019/09/16


Elliptical Corrugated Steel

2,300 2,500

0.5

9.0 1,100 2,200

10 666925 5576249

Ron Peace 1989

Culvert is located approximately 1 km. from the Helmer interchange off the Coquihalla hwy. Culvert is approximately 200 m.

below the Helmer Lake dam.

Access:


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT



GoodCoupled Connections No access into culvert



GoodFill

GoodFloor


FairHead Wall Not a lot of erosion protection, some erosion of head fills to road edge

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 377 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K995 K995 SWAKUM-HELMER 2016/09/16



GoodOverall

FairRiprap More rip rap on the outlet than the inlet. controlled flows

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.7

0.3 2.1


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor head wall erosion

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 378 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K539A K539 SLIM CREEK 2014/08/30



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Roxey Cr 9.33 9.30 2017/08/30



Concrete Concrete

15.6

10 504540 5640514

Jeremy Araki 2013

1

Access:

15

ABUTMENTS

ExcellentBearings good gap btwn slabs and cap

UnratedBracing cannot see and bracing

ExcellentBallast Wall integrated cap/wall

Not ApplicableCorrosion Protection onlt concrete showing

ExcellentCaps or Sills

PoorFill due to failure on left downstream corner, see comments


Not ApplicablePiles or Posts can't see if its an inverte T or has posts and pads

PoorRiprap good other than the failure


APPROACHES

PoorAlignment bad corner


NoBrushing Required



ExcellentFender Condition new no posts barriers


GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 379 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





ExcellentConcrete Deck

ExcellentCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts new HSS

ExcellentDeck Joints grouted seams


ExcellentHardware


ExcellentOverall Deck Condition

ExcellentRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



ExcellentWelded/grouted shear connectors

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes No Yes No

0.0

0.3 4.0

steep bouldery stream with low clearance bridge


1 $5,000.00 Build retaining wall on left downstream side, see commentsHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Newish install. Riprap failure on right downstream side at corner of bridge. Really steep down into creek.

One boulder and some fill went into the creek. Some riprap left hanging. Suggest small GRS wall. Bring 5

forms and half a roll of Armtec855 to fix.

LT (2014/12/22): Updated load rating to 64 according to BCL-625 bridge label. I agree with inspector's

recommendation to install a retaining wall at RBDS corner.


Disclaimer:



Page 380 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 381 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1311 K1311 SLIM CREEK 2014/08/30



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Erin Creek 18.71 18.80 2017/08/30



300 400

0.0

0.0 1,500 1,500

10 500845 5643183

Jeremy Araki 1982

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



did not install as the road is not narrowed and there is no place to put them anyway(approaching structure)



FairRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT



FairCoupled Connections LT: Poor - Separating, Water flowing through and underneath culverts. (from

previous inspection)

FairCoating some corrosion on bottom, but not bad


PoorFill too shalllow over culverts

FairFloor minor corrosion LT: Separation is allowing water to flow through. (from previous

inspection)




Disclaimer:



Page 382 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





PoorInlet LT: creek alignment to inlet is poor.

FairOutlet has drop so I hope this is not a fish creek

PoorOverall LT: Poor installation greatly decreased lifespan (previous inspection)

GoodRiprap

PoorRoof both dented from rocks

PoorSide Walls LT: Poor - dented (previous inspection)




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

0.3

0.3 1.0

comes in at tight angle


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: Monitor crown for failure if used for industrial haul. Caution graders regarding shallow fill over culvert.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The roof of both culvert 1 and 2 are damaged. Likely from rocks during construction. They both have about 1'

of fill over their crowns so the monitor item about crushing once its active here again is valid.

LT (2014/12/23) : Monitor crown for failure if used for industrial haul. Caution graders regarding shallow fill over

culvert.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 383 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 384 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:PS-024 K540 SLIM CREEK 2014/09/09



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Slim Cr 24.02 24.30 2017/09/09


Steel I-beam


21.3

10 492966 5640720

Jeremy Araki 1985

1

Access:

21.3

ABUTMENTS

ExcellentBearings


ExcellentBallast Wall New


ExcellentCaps or Sills New, 2 logs high with 4 tiebacks

GoodFill LT: Sand on log sill visible on one photo.

ExcellentGeneral Abutment Condition new

GoodHardware crib pinned


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment tight curve on left and road unfinished, right has steep ramp onto bridge


NoBrushing Required



GoodFender Condition logs

43.5Posted Load Rating See pic for axle weights.

FairRoad Surface to poor, finish road, see repair


Disclaimer:



Page 385 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1

ExcellentCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts New

ExcellentDeck to Girder Bolts New

ExcellentHardware New


ExcellentNails New

ExcellentOverall Deck Condition New

Not ApplicableRunning Planks New

ExcellentSub Deck New

ExcellentTies New

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


FairGirders LT: L45 girders not bolted to ballast walls.

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

0.5 10.0


1 $5,000.00 Finish left approach and build up right approachHighRequired

2 $400.00 LT: Bolt ballast wall to girders.LowRequired

3 $100.00 LT: Clean sand on log sills to prevent rot.LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 386 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

New install with road not yet complete

LT (2014/12/22): Updated load rating to 43 tonnes according to bridge label L-45. Repairs added: Bolt ballast

wall to girders. Clean sand from sills to prevent rot.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





43

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 387 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K966 K966 ARRASTRA CREEK 2014/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Blakeburn Cr 2.57 2.70 2017/06/26


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

18.0

10 663046 5483364

Ben Pellett 1998

1

Access:

17.6

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

FairCorrosion Protection good on left, none on right LT: No photos.

UnratedCaps or Sills n/a

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap LT: Good angular riprap, steep slope on right bank downstream beside bedrock

outcrop.

GoodWing Wall

APPROACHES

FairAlignment LT: Curves at both approaches.


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 388 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck

ExcellentCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts new timber curbs & risers

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

ExcellentHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.2 9.0



RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor riprap at RBDS.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No site ID tag

LT (2014/12/11): Recommend to monitor riprap at RBDS due to steeper slope. No photos of deck.


Disclaimer:



Page 389 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 390 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Newton Cr 5.48 5.30 2019/07/07



Concrete Concrete

12.6

10 663827 5481495

Ron Peace 2000

1

The Bridge is at 5.3 km. by markers.Access:

12

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap Smaller angular


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Very tight corner requires full use of the road width.


NoBrushing Required


Damaged bracket and shot up.(approaching structure)



n0nePosted Load Rating

PoorRoad Surface The low chain (#1) has a soft shoulder and muddy filled ditch.


Disclaimer:



Page 391 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Insect infestation

GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.3

0.3 4.1


1 $10,000.00 Stabilize and reditch the #1 approach. To negotiate on and off the bridge

requires full use of the road width at both approaches. The exposed and

actively sloughing bank at the #1 approach which has a number of small

springs has filled the ditch line and saturated the road shoulder. Water is

running down and across the bridge.

Stabilizing and reditching is required to alieviate this issue.

Lock block wall may be required.

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 392 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

To negotiate on and off the bridge requires full use of the road width at both approaches. The exposed and

actively sloughing bank at the #1 approach which has a number of small springs has filled the ditch line and

saturated the road shoulder. Water is running down and across the bridge.

Stabilizing and reditching is required to alieviate this issue.

The works required are mostly road approach works and water management. This can most likely be

completed by technical staff, whom can request Eng Branch assistance if required.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 393 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Arrastra Cr 14.81 14.60 2019/07/07


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

18.3

10 661172 5475631

Ron Peace 2000

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required


Damaged mounting angle bracket(approaching structure)




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 394 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck



GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.3 7.2


1 $100.00 Replace angle bracket to delineatorHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 395 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 396 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:TKA008 K1609 ARRASTRA CREEK 2016/07/07



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Trib to Arrastra Cr 19.10 19.10 2019/07/07



Concrete Concrete

9.6

10 658121 5473033

Ron Peace 2013

1

From Coalmont, turn left onto Main St., then right onto Bettes Ave and follow across bridge (Tulameen River). Turn left onto

Blackburn Rd road and follow to the 6km board. Turn left onto Arrastra FSR and follow to 19.1km.

Access:

9

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall Some cracks on the top edge at the #2 upstream


GoodCaps or Sills

PoorFill The fill does not extend to the base of the sill, this is causing sink holes to develope

at all 4 corners of the bridge


GoodPiles or Posts

PoorRiprap Steep, the creek is pinched


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Tight corner, but a wide approach from both


NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition The #2 downstream has settled and is leaning over


GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 397 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck Many patched locations

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts One missing bolt mid span upstream side due to girder concrete repairs

GoodDeck Joints


FairHardware One bent delineator bracket at the #2 upstream



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.7

0.1 0.0


1 $500.00 Fill and compact sinks at all bridge cornersMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor settling and leaning fender at the #2 downstream

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The outside concrete girders have been chipped up and repaired. This patching has resulted in one bolt

missed at the mid upstream curb riser.

The creek has been pinched to 0 and is steep.


Disclaimer:



Page 398 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Approach repairs are required or damage may occur to end of girders. Place and compact in more fill and

manage water at a approaches. Channel is not encroached, it has just greened up with vegetation.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 399 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:WO2125 K1610 ARRASTRA CREEK 2016/07/07



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Arrastra Cr 19.50 19.50 2019/07/07


Steel I-beam


15.2

10 657676 5473072

Ron Peace 2000

1

Princeton, travel north to Coalmont. Turn left onto Main St., then right onto Bettes Ave and follow across bridge (Tulameen

River). Turn left onto Blackburn Rd road and follow to the 6km board. Turn left onto Arrastra FSR and follow to 19.5km.

Access:

14.6

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 400 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck to Girder Bolts Clips and some are lagged

GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.3 8.1


1 $200.00 move no-post approach barriers to line up with inside edge of the timber

rails.

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The structure components match the shop drawings supplied


Disclaimer:



Page 401 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





move no-post approach barriers to line up with inside edge of the timber rails.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 402 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K528 K528 BRIDGE RIVER 2015/06/17



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Ault Cr 5.11 5.00 2018/06/17


Concrete I/T Beam


28.5

10 506236 5629114

Ron Peace 1987

1

Access:

27.5

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Couvered in gravel


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills Some ravelling at sill faces

GoodFill

GoodHardware


Not ApplicableRiprap Steep rock canyon


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Brush out the #1 approach




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 403 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

15.0

1.0 4.0


1 $200.00 Clean bearings of bridgeMediumRequired

2 $150.00 Brush out the #1 approachMediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This was a ground inspection only, no significant issues noted.


Disclaimer:



Page 404 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 405 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Paul Cr 8.00 7.90 2017/08/29


Steel I-beam


24.9

10 504236 5629909

Jeremy Araki 1998

1

Access:

24.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required LT: LB beginning to brush in and obscure signs.



GoodFender Condition concrete barriers

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 406 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






FairDeck Joints Minor cracks

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

4.0

0.3 4.0


1 $500.00 LT: Minor brushingLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Structure is in good condition.

LT (2014/12/18): Added light brushing.


Disclaimer:



Page 407 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 408 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K530A K530 BRIDGE RIVER 2016/06/12



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Cathy Cr 9.74 9.70 2019/06/12


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 502663 5630445

Ron Peace 2012

1

Access:

17.7

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Round and steep


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 409 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


FairDeck Joints Seal broken and small section damage to panel at bulkhead of #2 end see Photo.

May reqhire repair

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

0.4 3.3


1 $500.00 Seal broken and small section damage to panel at bulkhead of #2 end

see Photo. May reqhire repair

LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor oversteepened rip rap

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Seal broken and small section damage to panel at bulkhead of #2 end see Photo. May reqhire repair


Disclaimer:



Page 410 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Ensure gravel approach compacted and sitting at the same elevation or higher than the top of deck.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 411 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Jamie Cr 17.56 17.40 2018/06/17


Compo Girders

Concrete Concrete

27.0

10 496165 5630486

Ron Peace 1993

1

Access:

26.8

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

Not ApplicableRiprap Steep rock canyon


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 412 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairConcrete Deck The first deck panel is chipped and exposed rebar

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some of the bottom risers have high rot values

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodHardware

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.0

1.3 1.5


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor riser blocks, lower blocks have extensive rot

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

This was a ground only inspection, no significant issues noted. CBR issue caused this inspection to be

entered manually,

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 413 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 414 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


McParlon Cr 29.75 29.40 2019/05/12


Steel I-beam


36.0

10 485253 5629236

Ron Peace 1994

1

Access:

36

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings Buried, clear bearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts



APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 415 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts The lower risers are rotten, requires 28-3' 700 BF

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.0

1.0 12.0


1 $300.00 Clear BearingMediumRequired

2 $4,500.00 Replace the lower Risers 28 - 3' riser blocks 700 BFHighRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 416 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





If curb repairs are not completed after the next routine inspection, this structure will get a load restriction.

Replacement of bracket blocks and riser blocks with treated timber would remove this repair for a longer

timeframe in the future. Non-treated would work also.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 417 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K623 K623 TULAMEEN 2015/06/16



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Switchback Cr 3.75 3.30 2018/06/16


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

30.0

10 644502 5498490

Ron Peace 2000

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings The rubber bering pads are compressed and bulging

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required



NoneFender Condition Install concrete no post barriers

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 418 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Some rocks on flange

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

9.0

0.3 2.5


1 $5,000.00 Install concrete no post barriersHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 The rubber bering pads are compressed and bulging

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The no post barriers have not been installed.


Disclaimer:



Page 419 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 420 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Britton Cr 8.25 8.30 2017/08/07


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

16.0

10 645717 5494702

Ali Sadeghi 1998

1

Access:

15.4

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings

FairBracing

FairBallast Wall


UnratedCaps or Sills no caps or sills

FairFill

FairHardware

FairPiles or Posts

FairRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



NoneFender Condition room to install no posts barriers - bridge on a mainline

nPosted Load Rating not posted

GoodRoad Surface recently graded

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 421 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairConcrete Deck concrete comp

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts some damage to the rail from snow plower

FairDeck Joints

FairGrout Pockets

GoodHardware


FairOverall Deck Condition LT: Gravel on deck.

FairRunning Surface some track vehicle damage

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders

GoodHardware welded connections


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.2 5.0


1 $1,000.00 bridge ahead signsHighComplete

2 $1,500.00 no post barriersHighRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

structure sound

LT (2014/12/18): Inspector tends to rate all components fair without comments. More appropriate rating may

be good.


Disclaimer:



Page 422 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 423 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Eagle Cr 12.44 13.00 2017/08/07


Steel I-beam


27.4

10 648152 5491872

Ali Sadeghi 1997

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings


PoorBallast Wall gap between panels and ballast wall, damaging panels and surface drainage from

above is scouring the fill in front of the abutmnets


UnratedCaps or Sills no caps or sill

FairFill scour in front of of RB abutments

FairHardware

FairPiles or Posts

FairRiprap steep and long fill slope at 67% with little riprap at the toe of fill


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required



NoneFender Condition no fenders

naPosted Load Rating not posted

GoodRoad Surface recently graded

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 424 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

FairConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts one of the risers has been damaged from mechanical impact; remove 2008

monitor item

FairDeck Joints

FairGrout Pockets

FairHardware



FairRunning Surface some track vehicle damage LT: no photo evidence.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing


GoodGirders LT: Sand and gravel on flanges.

GoodHardware bolted connectors


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

10.0

0.2 2.0

in front of the abutments LT: Which one?


1 $300.00 bridge ahead sign on left approachHighComplete

2 $1,000.00 Replace 1 - 0.9m 10"x10" Fd riserMediumComplete

3 $1,000.00 seal the joint between ballast walls and end deck panelHighComplete

4 $3,000.00 Install no post barriers on both approaches.HighRequired

5 $600.00 LT: Clean sand and gravel from deck and from girder flanges.LowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 scour in front of the RB abutment

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 425 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

LT (2014/12/18) Clean sand and gravel from deck and flanges. No photo evidence of deck wear as indicated in

inspection. Changed adding no-post fenders as a high priority.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 426 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Illal Cr 18.35 18.50 2017/08/27


Steel I-beam


21.3

10 647454 5488482

Ali Sadeghi 1997

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


UnratedCaps or Sills no caps or sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

FairPiles or Posts pipe risers

FairRiprap installed steep LT: no photo showing LB rip rap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment on a tight hor curve

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing missing on right approach

NoBrushing Required



NoneFender Condition no fenders

naPosted Load Rating not posted

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 427 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts downstream left approach rail is damaged (1 -10' 10"x10" Fd)


GoodHardware


FairNails


GoodRunning Planks LT: New timber planks.

FairSub Deck treated timber

FairTies treated 8 x 10 - one cross tie has excessive check

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

UnratedDiaphrams no diaphrams

GoodGirders LT: Debris on girder flanges.

GoodHardware bolted connection


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.8

0.3 15.0


1 $500.00 bridge ahead signHighComplete

2 $1,500.00 Replace one section of the rail and riser:

1 - 10' 10" X 10" Fd

MediumCompleteRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: Monitor checking in ties.

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 428 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

LT (2014/12/18) Running planks were replaced in 2012. Monitor checks in ties. No photo showing LB rip rap

and RB rip rap photo does not show creek.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 429 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


McGee Cr 21.62 21.60 2019/07/08


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Gravel

9.6

10 648115 5486436

Ron Peace 1984

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



FairRiprap

GoodWing Wall No apparent movement

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner, some impact at the #2 downstream curb, still finctional


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 430 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairConcrete Deck 6 exposed plates that may catch when being graded. The plates connect the added

box girder


GoodDeck Joints



FairHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.5

0.2 4.3


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There are 6 plates on the deck connecting the box girder to the double T girder.


Disclaimer:



Page 431 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 432 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Jim Kelly Cr 27.20 27.00 2019/07/08


Concrete I/T Beam

Concrete Gravel

9.6

10 647019 5482334

Ron Peace 1984

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing Dewy dag

FairBallast Wall The center panel, bulkhead/sill has chipped edges upstream and down on the #1

abutment. Exposed rebar, see photo

FairConcrete Cast in Place


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap

FairWing Wall Unable to view any of the previous measurements of the wing walls. The #1

approach low chain u/s 131 d/s 173 mm. #2 148 u/s 115 mm. d/s

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner at #1 approach


NoBrushing Required






Disclaimer:



Page 433 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

FairConcrete Deck Chipped and worn

GoodCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts The short curb blocks only have one bolt

GoodDeck Joints


UnratedGravel Surface Now

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors Some chipping at welds

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

4.2

1.0 2.8


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor wing walls

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Unable to view any of the previous measurements of the wing walls. The #1 approach low chain u/s 131 d/s

173 mm. #2 148 u/s 115 mm. d/s

The center panel, bulkhead/sill has chipped edges upstream and down on the #1 abutment. Exposed rebar,

see photo


Disclaimer:



Page 434 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Curbs have been repaired

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 435 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Railroad Cr 31.21 30.80 2019/07/08


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Gravel

6.1

10 644762 5479492

Ron Peace 1984

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



PoorRiprap Impeeding creek flow and not protecting the footing and abutment face

GoodWing Wall Cracks at the upstream side of #1, see photo

APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner at both approaches


NoBrushing Required





PoorRoad Surface The bridge requires fill at both approaches, grader could fix this problem.


Disclaimer:



Page 436 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairConcrete Deck Welded and bolted tabs to secure added box girders are exposed to damage from

graders. 4 clips are visible on the downstream side and 2 are not covered by gravel

on the upstream


GoodDeck Joints


FairGravel Surface some on upstream side of bridge

GoodHardware



SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



FairWelded/grouted shear connectors The tabs used to secure the added box girders are exposed to damage from the

grader

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

2.0

0.2 3.4

Scouring along the face of #2 abutment


1 $250.00 Fill in potholes at both ends of the bridge, grader could likely resolveHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor scour along face of #2 abutment

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 437 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

no water appears to be flowing onto the bridge. The bridge requires fill at both approaches, grader could fix this

problem.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 438 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Sutter Cr 33.61 33.20 2019/07/08


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 644014 5477600

Ron Peace 1988

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills #2 is covered in gravel

GoodFill



Not ApplicableRiprap Bedrock


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Potholed


Disclaimer:



Page 439 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Worn and dirty


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

4.0

0.3 2.3


1 $300.00 Clean the sillsLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 440 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The #2 sill is buried, clear debris from sill.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 441 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:



Elliptical Corrugated Steel

Precast Concrete Footing

750 1,100

0.0

18.0 1,500 2,000

10 642534 5475503

Ron Peace 1998

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT






GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet Some trees have fallen onto the #2 bank


Disclaimer:



Page 442 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

0.8

0.1 1.4

Some trees have fallen onto the #2 bank at the outlet, likely not an issue, should be monitored


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Some trees have fallen onto the #2 bank at the outlet, likely not an issue, should be monitored

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The cover depth is .75 m. at the inlet and 1.1 m. at the outlet

inlet and outlet cover depths are updated in CBR. Load rating set to CL-625.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 443 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Vuich Cr 37.65 37.20 2018/06/14


Steel I-beam


17.0

10 642488 5474658

Ron Peace 1999

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


FairBallast Wall The repair to the #2 downstream side of the concrete ballast wall has not been

done


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 444 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Rot values are starting to be significant, repair may be required in a year or two

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.4 4.2


1 $200.00 Install a bridge ahead for the #2 approachMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Rot values are starting to be significant, repair may be required in a year or two

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

The repair to the #2 downstream side of the concrete ballast wall has not been done


Disclaimer:



Page 445 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





concrete repair is pretty simple and users should complete as soon as possible. Contact the engineering

branch if more direction is required.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 446 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K463A K463 TULAMEEN 2016/07/08



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Podunk Cr 46.00 47.20 2019/07/08


Steel I-beam


24.4

10 641213 5467377

Ron Peace 2009

1

Access:

23.5

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




onePosted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 447 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

4.6

0.2 3.6


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Nicely built bridge.

10U 0641213 5467377

long 49 20 34.1 lat 121 03 21.5

Clear old repairs etc. from reg.


Disclaimer:



Page 448 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





repairs updated. GPS data updated. I believe the realigning of the no-post barriers to be in front of the HSS rails

is still not completed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 449 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Chan Cr 48.19 49.20 2019/07/08


Steel I-beam


18.3

10 643026 5467150

Ron Peace 2009

1

Structure was replaced by Tolko Sept 09

UTMs converted from Lat/Long- check in field.

Access:

17.7

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment #2 approach has a flare but traffic is hitting on on transition to straight, minimal


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Soft and punching out at the #1

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 450 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.0

0.2 4.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Structure location

UTM 10U 0643026 5467150

Lat 49 20 25.0 Long 121 01 51.7


Disclaimer:



Page 451 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 452 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


White Cloud Cr 50.96 52.00 2019/07/08



Concrete Concrete

12.6

10 645438 5468145

Ron Peace 2009

1

Structure replaced by Tolko Sept 09

UTMs converted from Lat/Long- check in field.

Access:

12

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts Buried

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment The #2 is narrow and potholed


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Potholed at the #2

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 453 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.2

0.2 1.2


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 454 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 455 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Ugly Cr 53.93 53.00 2019/07/08



900 900

0.0

23.0 2,400 2,400

10 647785 5469617

Ron Peace 2001

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT






GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 456 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

0.1 1.2


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 457 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K466 K466 TULAMEEN-CHAMPION 2015/06/14



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Tulameen R 0.12 0.20 2018/06/14


Steel I-beam


28.0

10 648217 5483145

Ron Peace 1986

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Light rubber pads only 3/8" thick

GoodBracing Dewydag tie backs appear tight and working

FairBallast Wall The wooden planks have high rot and some at the #1 are broken



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap

FairWing Wall Cracks in the concrete

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 458 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:







GoodHardware


FairNails

FairOverall Deck Condition Will require repair soon

FairRunning Planks Some of the planks are failing on there ends, see photo

UnratedSub Deck No sub deck

FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Ground inspection only

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.6

1.2 4.5


1 $9,000.00 For a full deck replacement will require 5820 bf of 4" timber. The deck is

97' long and 15' wide.

Various planks may be replced until full redeck

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor wings.

There appears to be some discrepancies regarding the measurement of the concrete wing wall posible movement. It

does not appear that there is significant movement. Across the road flat face to flat face of the wing wall is @#2 4.827

m and @#1 5.083 m. Also measured at the #2 was from the flat face to the girder web, downstream was 1.045 m. and

upstream .98 m.

2 Failing bulkhead planks

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 459 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

There appears to be some discrepancies regarding the measurement of the concrete wing wall posible

movement. It does not appear that there is significant movement. Across the road flat face to flat face of the

wing wall is @#2 4.827 m and @#1 5.083 m. Also measured at the #2 was from the flat face to the girder web,

downstream was 1.045 m. and upstream .98 m.

The deck will require at a minimum some planks replaced soon and a full deck within a year or two

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 460 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K636 K636 OLIVINE 2015/06/14



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Tulameen R 3.25 25.00 2018/06/14


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

39.6

10 649979 5486107

Ron Peace 2003

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner on both approachs, traffic is hitting on the #2 downstream curb


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

PoorConcrete Deck damage to 1st panel D/S R/B deck panel to curb connection.


Disclaimer:



Page 461 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Requires curb repairsw at the #2 downstream. Requires 6 riser blocks (existing are

rotten) 3-27" 3-36" and 0ne 2.o m. and one 4.0 m. 10x10" curb timbers. As well as 3

bolts for riser to pa nel connection

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

FairHardware

FairHand Rails/Walkouts


GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.8

0.5 2.0


1 $1,500.00 Requires curb repairsw at the #2 downstream. Requires 6 riser blocks

(existing are rotten) 3-27" 3-36" and 0ne 2.o m. and one 4.0 m. 10x10"

curb timbers. As well as 3 bolts for riser to pa nel connection

HighComplete

4 $500.00 Concrete repair required as per Drew Alway prescription. 1St panel, D/S

R/B approach.

HighComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 462 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Requires curb repairsw at the #2 downstream

DA. See repair prescription for deck panel and approach barriers required by Drew Alway PEng.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L




Accepted By Drew Alway on 7/17/2015 1:15:57PM

68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 463 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Champion Cr 3.42 25.10 2018/06/14


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

36.6

10 650035 5486127

Ron Peace 2003

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Clear slump filling ditch and onto #2 approach, see photo


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface Clear slump filling ditch and onto #2 approach, see photo

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 464 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Some with elevated rot values

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

8.0

0.4 5.0


1 $200.00 Clear slump filling ditch and onto #2 approach, see photo. Grader can

complete.

MediumComplete

2 $400.00 Add two loads of fill to Left Bank Approach, to decrease deck damage to

first panel. DA.

MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Curb rot

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Clear slump filling ditch and onto #2 approach, see photo.

DA. A number of specific repairs and monitor items have been added based on professional inspection

completed by myself on June 19, 2014.


Disclaimer:



Page 465 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 466 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K033 K033 TULAMEEN-RAILROAD CR 2016/07/08



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Railroad Cr 3.83 3.00 2019/07/08



2,700 3,100

3.5

14.3 2,000 2,000

10 642727 5480607

Ron Peace 1995

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface Narrow

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet Woody debris collecting upstream of structure

GoodOutlet 200 mm. drop into large erosion pool


Disclaimer:



Page 467 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K033 K033 TULAMEEN-RAILROAD CR 2016/07/08



GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.1

0.2 1.2

Woody debris collecting upstream of structure


1 $250.00 Clear debris, Woody debris collecting upstream of structureHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 468 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K719 K719 DILLARD CREEK 2016/07/10



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Shrimpton Cr 10.88 11.00 2019/07/10


Concrete I/T Beam

Concrete Concrete

7.4

10 677702 5520210

Ron Peace 1988

1

Bridge is located at 11.0 km. by marker.Access:

6.6

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings No bearing pads just concrete to steel sill


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap Not much protection along the face of the abutments


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Sharp u turn


YesBrushing Required Clear out the channel downstream


Steel risers requires drilled or welded delineators(approaching structure)


One misssing(approaching structure)



FairRoad Surface Surface water off the #1 approach is running onto the #1 downstream corner and

eroding fill.


Disclaimer:



Page 469 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1


PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts The downstream curb has had impact damage, two of the welds have broken away.



FairHardware



FairRunning Surface Uneven potholed

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.1

0.3 3.2


1 $800.00 The downstream curb has had impact damage, two of the welds have

broken away.

Weld repairs to be completed.

HighRequired


3 $300.00 Waterbar or contour road to remove surface water from the road and

erodeding the downstream #1 corner

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 470 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The downstream curb has had impact damage, two of the welds have broken away.

Curb damage will require a welder.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 471 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1301 K1301 GALENA 2014/08/23



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Siwash #1 12.35 11.90 2017/08/23


Steel I-beam


18.0

10 687150 5521525

Donovan J. A. Melin 2004

1

0 km. is at the Loon Lake interchange from the Coquihalla Hwy. Okanagan Connector.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill LT: Grown in vegetation on abutment slopes.

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap LT: Good and angular, well graded.


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



GoodFender Condition concrete barriers w/o no posts

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts showing age


Disclaimer:



Page 472 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodHardware


FairNails showing age

FairOverall Deck Condition showing age LT: some gravel accumulated on deck.

FairRunning Planks showing age

FairSub Deck showing age

FairTies showing age

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.5 5.0


1 $800.00 LT: Brush vegetation on abutment slopes next to bridge.LowRequired

2 $200.00 LT: Clean gravel off deck.LowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: condition of timber components for rot.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Structure is in good condition.

LT (2014/12/12) Monitor all timber components for rot. May soon affect load rating. Repairs added: Brush

abutment vegetation next to bridge, clean deck gravel.


Disclaimer:



Page 473 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 474 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Siwash #2 13.06 12.30 2017/08/23


Steel I-beam


18.0

10 687607 5521046


1

The bridge is located at 15.2 km. by the markers. 0 km. is at the Loon Lake exit from the Coquihalla hwy. - Okanagan

connector.

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings LT: Rock resting on bearing plates.

FairBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



GoodFender Condition concrete barriers w/o noposts

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts showing age


Disclaimer:



Page 475 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodHardware


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition showing age LT: Some gravel accumulated on deck.

FairRunning Planks showing age

FairSub Deck showing age

FairTies showing age

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

FairGirders LT: Rocks on girder flanges.

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.5

0.2 6.0


1 $200.00 LT: Clean gravel from deck.LowRequired

2 $200.00 LT: Remove rocks from girder flanges and bearing area.LowRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: Monitor condition of timber components for rot. Will soon effect haul capacity.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Update gps coordinates to 49 48 42.3 x 120 23 32. Structure is in good condition.

LT (2014/12/12) Given the age, all timber components should be assessed for rot condition as it may soon

effect capacity to haul. Repairs added: Clean gravel off deck, remove rocks from girder flanges and abutment

bracing.


Disclaimer:



Page 476 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 477 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Siwash #3 15.90 15.20 2017/08/23


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

17.0

10 689844 5520012


1

The bridge is located at km. 18.0 by the markers. 0 km. is at the Loon Lake exit on the Coquihalla - Okanagan connector.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 478 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



FairRunning Surface LT: Sand and gravel accumulated on each side of deck, promotes rot in curb

blocks.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.5

0.3 4.5


1 $2,000.00 Consider installing 4 fenders - may have to widen road or pin logs to

ground.

LowRequired

2 $200.00 LT: Clean sand and gravel accumulated on deck.LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 LT: assess condition of curb blocks. given age and gravel against curbs rot may soon be an issue.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Update gps coordinates to 49 48 05.5 x 120 21 37.9. K1303 steel id plate has been installed. Structure is in

good condition.

LT (2014/12/12) Repairs added: Clean gravel of deck. Monitor rot condition of curb blocks


Disclaimer:



Page 479 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 480 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Elusive Cr 17.93 17.80 2019/07/10



500 900

0.0

18.0 1,500 6,000

10 691559 5518884

Ron Peace 2000

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Brus hout inlet



FairFender Condition


GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor

GoodFooting

GoodHead Wall

GoodInlet Grown in

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 481 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





GoodOverall

GoodRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

0.2 3.1


1 $300.00 Brush out inlet.LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There is some geotextile exposed of footing "rock sausage" but the creek is relatively centered and

functioning well.

2014 repairs do not appear to have been done.

Footing repairs are still required for long term stability.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 482 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Galena Cr 19.11 30.40 2019/07/10



2,000 3,000

7.0

24.0 2,000 2,000

10 692179 5518165

Ron Peace 1986

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Clear inlet channel





GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT



GoodCoupled Connections No access into culvert due water velosity

GoodCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


GoodHead Wall

FairInlet Grown in and consytricted from rip rap

GoodOutlet


Disclaimer:



Page 483 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





FairOverall

FairRiprap Some has shifted into channel at inlet, restricting flow a little

FairRoof Deflected downward

FairSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.0

0.3 2.2

Trees across the channel upstream of the culvert


1 $400.00 Clear brush and trees from inletMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor culvert deformation

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 484 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K634 K634 DILLARD CREEK BR 35 2015/06/12



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Galais Cr 4.72 4.00 2018/06/12



500 500

0.0

0.0 2,000 2,000

10 681082 5514796

Ron Peace 2002

Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Brush inlet and roadside




GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




Not ApplicableCoating


GoodFill

GoodFloor


FairHead Wall

PoorInlet There is a tree growing across the inlet which is collecting debris. It has built up .8

m. above the invert at the inlet.

FairOutlet Drop from invert to erosion pool approx. .6 m


Disclaimer:



Page 485 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K634 K634 DILLARD CREEK BR 35 2015/06/12



FairOverall

FairRiprap

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



FairWing Wall .

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.2

0.1 2.0

inlet is overgrown and debris is collecting on brush.


1 $300.00 There is a tree growing across the inlet which is collecting debris. It has

built up .8 m. above the invert at the inlet. Clear debris to alow bedload to

flush through

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 No significant change to outlet erosion.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There is a tree growing across the inlet which is collecting debris. It has built up .8 m. above the invert at the

inlet.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 486 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:930-B006 K1575 ELKHART-GALENA 2014/08/22



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Galena Cr 2.90 2017/08/22



Concrete Concrete

11.6

10 696188 5520813

Donovan J. A. Melin

1

BCTS takeback structure. MRF 2011Access:

11

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings LT: Bearing pads are not in contact with concrete slabs at both abutments.


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap LT: Good angular rock, but small and poorly graded. Monitor RB


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 487 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairConcrete Deck LT: Excessive sand and gravel accumulation on deck obscuring welded tab

inspection.


GoodDeck Joints LT: welded tabs



GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.9

0.1 3.0


1 $10,000.00 Consider reinstalling structure so that slabs will bear on bearing pads to

prevent severe concrete damage.

Repair was completed by Aspen planners. Note this was under the

supervision of Drew Alway. Bearing restored through multiple bearing

plates where required. Deck is un-even but fair. Repair should be fine for

5 years.

HighComplete

2 $200.00 LT: Clean gravel from deck.LowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

2 LT: Monitor RB rip rap. Appears small in photos.

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 488 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Left bearing pad is not in contact with slabs for the last metre from the upstream side. Right bearing pad is in

NO contact with slab (except for where the gap has been filled with dirt). The entire bearing pad is loose. No

repairs have been completed since previous inspections. Structure is in poor condition due to lack of bearing

and should be reinstalled prior to active use.

LT (2014/12/11): P.Eng inspection required to assess bearing condition and determine cause of uneven

bearing. Could be due to inconsistent cap grade compared to superstructure grade. Recommend to download

rate to 5 tonnes until structure is reviewed by P.Eng.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 489 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:930-B007 K1577 BRANCH 62 2015/06/12



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Galena Cr 2.30 2.30 2017/06/12



Concrete Concrete

7.6

10 697575 5521807

Ron Peace

1

BCTS takeback structureAccess:

7

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings



FairCaps or Sills Some top rot

FairFill


FairLog/Timber Cribs Single log sill, some top rot


PoorRiprap Large round and poorly placed, pinched creek and no toe protection. One rock is

resting on a stump and the bottom of the concrete deck.



APPROACHES

FairAlignment Bridge and #1 approach not well aligned


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface Some erosion at bridge corners, minimal

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 490 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

0.8

0.1 2.0

Sawn logs under bridge


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 rock pinched between stump and underside of concrete deck

2 Debris under bridge

3 Monitor sill logs for future rot as per planned inspection comment.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Approach and bridge grade are not well aligned. There are no fender/noposts. This structure is resting on

single log sills and may have settled slightly.


Disclaimer:



Page 491 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 492 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1031 K1031 MELLIN LAKE 2015/06/13



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Spahomin Cr 11.04 9.80 2018/06/13


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

14.4

10 706812 5548281

Ron Peace 1998

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




FairRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 493 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts One section of timber has high rot values and may require replacement prior to next

inspection

GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.3

0.3 6.9


1 $1,000.00 One section of timber has high rot values and may require replacement

prior to next inspection. Requires a 13' 2" 10x10. Some of the risers have

elevated rot values as well

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

One section of timber rail has high rot values and may require replacement prior to next inspection


Disclaimer:



Page 494 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 495 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1033 K1033 RED CREEK 2014/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hayes Cr 0.27 0.20 2017/06/26


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

20.0

10 687293 5494066

Ben Pellett 1998

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall

UnratedCorrosion Protection n/a

UnratedCaps or Sills n/a

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required



replaced(approaching structure)



FairRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 496 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



FairRunning Surface LT: gravel accumulated on deck surface.

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

FairGirders slight warp in tension flanges



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.0

0.5 19.0

LT: Tall snag in creek along LB.


1 $500.00 LT: remove accumulated gravel from deck surface.LowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No site ID

LT (204/12/17): Reviewed.


Disclaimer:



Page 497 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 498 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


unamed 10.40 10.40 2017/06/26



Concrete Concrete

11.0

10 692556 5488819

Ben Pellett 2013

1

Proposed FIA culvert replacement, currently not a major culvert. GA design approved in 2010. DAAccess:

10.3

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


UnratedBallast Wall n/a



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment poor visibility





ExcellentFender Condition


GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 499 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors good- d/s most stopped

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.5

0.2 2.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No site ID tag

LT (2014/12/17): Reviewed. Could use more photos taken under bridge facing abutments.


Disclaimer:



Page 500 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 501 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


unkown 19.00 19.00 2017/06/26



Concrete Concrete

8.6

10 698359 5490326

Ben Pellett 2010

1

FIA 2010 installAccess:

8.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall integrated


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts n/a

FairRiprap rounded, steep on right u/s half

GoodWing Wall integrated

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 502 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


FairDeck Joints no filler, LT no photos


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



Not ApplicableWelded/grouted shear connectors none. LT: ?? can't confirm from photos.

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No Yes

1.2

0.2 3.0

Scouring into right u/s corner, meanders u/s.


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Significant meandering u/s. No name plate.

LT (2014/12/17): Reviewed. No deck photos.


Disclaimer:



Page 503 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 504 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K408A K408 RED CREEK 2014/08/23



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Alaric Cr 36.88 38.60 2017/08/23



Concrete Concrete

12.6

10 708979 5496829


1

Access:

12

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts can't see

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition LT: Large boulders used as fenders.

GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

ExcellentConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 505 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodDeck Joints no epoxy.


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.7

0.4 3.5


1 $2,000.00 Consider installing 4 real fenders (log or concrete barriers) as a visual for

drivers to keep onto the bridge. The rocks are good for keeping vehicles

out of the creek but lack the visual that the road is narrowing.

LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Deck joints have not yet been filled with epoxy. No damaged block could be found so it must have been

replaced as per previous inspection. Structure is in good condition.

LT (2014/12/17): Reviewed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 506 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 507 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unknown 36.80 39.00 2019/07/09



Concrete Concrete

10.5

10 709961 5492141

Ron Peace 2009

1

Access:

10

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 508 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.7

0.3 4.2


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 509 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 510 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


McNulty Cr 40.23 41.90 2019/07/09



Concrete Concrete

12.6

10 710351 5495298

Ron Peace 2001

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts Covered

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





FairFender Condition 3 logs placed


GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 511 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Two risers have failed, see photo. the rest of the wood components have elevated

rot values

FairDeck Joints


GoodHardware


FairOverall Deck Condition Requires new curbs

GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1



GoodWelded/grouted shear connectors Girders have many hair line cracks

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.4 3.0


1 $4,000.00 Full curb replacement requires 4- 18' and 2- 8' ft curb rails. 12- 2' and 12-

3' riser blocks, all 10x10 " timber. 1234 BF

DA: This bridge is a good candidate to move the curbs from a CL-1

timber curb to a CL-2 HSS rail as it has good alignment and this would

eliminate the requirement for curb maintenance in the future.

HighComplete

2 $300.00 Install both bridge ahead signsMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor hair line cracks in the girders

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 512 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

the curbs have not been replaced.

This structure is restricted to 5 tonnes gvw, (post asap) traffic due to lack of curb maintenance. This bridge is a

good candidate to move the curbs from a CL-1 timber curb to a CL-2 HSS rail as it has good alignment and this

would eliminate the requirement for curb maintenance in the future.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 513 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


McNulty Cr 40.59 42.30 2019/07/09


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

12.6

10 710299 5495092

Ron Peace 2001

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment Junction at the #1 approach


NoBrushing Required






GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 514 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts May not make to the next inspection

FairDeck Joints Some open.


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

1.1 6.0


1 $4,000.00 May require replacement prior to next inspection. Full curb replacement

requires 4- 18' and 2- 8' ft curb rails. 12- 2' and 12- 3' riser blocks, all

10x10 " timber. 1234 BF

LowRequired

2 $350.00 Install bridge ahead signsMediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor curbs rot

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

May require curbs and risers prior to next inspection


Disclaimer:



Page 515 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 516 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1500 K1500 RED-ISINTOK BR 04 2016/07/09



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 24.80 2019/07/09



Concrete Concrete

11.4

10 702858 5492260

Ron Peace 2009

1

Access:

11

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills It appears that the #1 might be leaning slightly toward the creek

GoodFill


UnratedPiles or Posts Buried

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required







GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 517 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints


GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.4

0.3 4.5


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Slight lean of the #1 sill toward the creek

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 518 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





91

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 519 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:WO4622 K1485 ME8614.06 2015/06/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Red Cr 2017/06/26


Steel I-beam


9.1

10 700596 5489429

Ron Peace 2010

1

Access:

8.7

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings No rubber bearing pads, bearings are bolted directly to individual lock bkocks.


GoodBallast Wall

GoodConcrete Lock Blocks one for each bearing only


PoorCaps or Sills No cap or sill

FairFill Light erodable material

GoodHardware


FairRiprap At corners of old crib only


APPROACHES

FairAlignment

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing #2 approach missing

NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition The downstream side #2 approach has been pushed off the road grade


FairRoad Surface Some erosion at the corner of #2, downstream side


Disclaimer:



Page 520 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No Yes No

1.6

0.1 1.6

lots of woody debris upstream of bridge


1 $500.00 The downstream side fender log #2 approach has been pushed off the

road grade

MediumRequired

2 $250.00 Install a bridge ahead sign at the #2 approachLowRequired

3 $2,000.00 Add rip rap and fill, Some erosion at the corner of #2, downstream sideLowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor woody debris upstream of bridge

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 521 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

This structure has no tag.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 522 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed Cr 0.40 0.40 2017/06/26


Steel I-beam


7.6

10 698144 5491429

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

7.2

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


FairBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills 19x19" timber

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

1Bridge Ahead Signs Missing The #1 sign has fallen over, requires a post as well

NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition


GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 523 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Impact damage at the #1 approach has split the first curb timber.


GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks A hole has been punched into one plank


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.0

0.1 1.0


2 $300.00 The #1 sign has fallen over, requires a post as wellMediumRequired

3 $300.00 A hole has been punched through one of the planks, requires 2-10'x4x10"

planks

MediumRequired

4 $500.00 Impact damage has split the first section @#1 approach downstream

side. Requires 1-10'x10x10" timber

HighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 524 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The deck and curb need repair. No tag on this structure

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 525 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K842 K842 GRANT CREEK 2016/07/09



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hayes Cr 0.16 0.20 2019/07/09


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

16.0

10 691034 5501071

Ron Peace 1995

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment






5Posted Load Rating

PoorRoad Surface Overgrown grass trail

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 526 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Rotten

FairDeck Joints

PoorGrout Pockets There now appears to be 10 of the deck grout pockets that have some degree of

degeneration. It doesnt help that as the concrete disitergrates the pockets are

continuesly full of water. Recommend removal of disintergrating concrete assess

depth and refill if satifactory from a structural standard.

GoodHardware


PoorOverall Deck Condition Requires curbs and grout pocket assessment.

GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.8

1.4 10.0


1 $2,000.00 There now appears to be 10 of the deck grout pockets that have some

degree of degeneration. It doesnt help that as the concrete disitergrates

the pockets are continuesly full of water. Recommend removal of

disintergrating concrete assess depth and refill if satifactory from a

structural standard.

HighRequired

2 $4,500.00 Curbs have extensive rot. Required materials: all 10x10" timber.

6-13' 2-20' and 20- 2' , 20-3' riser blocks

HighRequired


RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 527 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

There now appears to be 10 of the deck grout pockets that have some degree of degeneration. It doesnt help

that as the concrete disitergrates the pockets are continuesly full of water. Recommend removal of

disintergrating concrete assess depth and refill if satifactory from a structural standard.

The bridge is now posted @ 5 tonnes and the curbs have not been replaced. The road is overgrown and

appears to be only used by a private residence.

It looks like a new power line has been placed directly over the middle of the deck

I've professionally inspected this bridge in 2012 and developed a detailed repair prescription at that time. The

works are still not completed. There the structure as planned will move to a 5 tonnes load restriction and will

continue to be downgraded if at minimum, curb works are not completed. If curbs are not completed by the

next inspection in 2019, structure will be closed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 528 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K683 K683 POTHOLE CREEK 2015/06/12



Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:

Next Inspection Date:Pothole Cr 0.49 0.30 2018/06/12



800 1,000

0.5

13.0 2,400 2,400

10 680227 5530792

Ron Peace 1987

UTMs converted from Lat/Long- check in field.Access:


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment

GoodAlignment



NoBrushing Required

NoBrushing Required







0Posted Load Rating Not posted

GoodRoad Surface

GoodRoad Surface

CULVERT ELEMENT




GoodCoating


Disclaimer:



Page 529 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:






GoodFill

GoodFloor


FairHead Wall No erosion protection

FairInlet Not much rip rap protection, creek makes a sharp turn into the inlet. This is causing

some erosion of the #1 bank

GoodOutlet

GoodOverall

FairRiprap Very little placed, very little degadation over the years

GoodRoof

GoodSide Walls



GoodWing Wall

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

0.7

0.4 1.2

Not much rip rap protection, creek makes a sharp turn into the inlet. This is causing some erosion of the #1 bank


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to monitor inlet erosion. has not deteriorated substantially.

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

No significant change to inlet erosion, continue to monitor if not repaired.


Disclaimer:



Page 530 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001C

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 531 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K666 K666 JULIET CREEK 2015/06/16



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 3.43 3.40 2018/06/16



Concrete Concrete

8.0

10 639895 5511244

Ron Peace 1994

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings




GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


GoodPiles or Posts

FairRiprap Round and does not extend to base of sill allowinf to ravel through


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment






GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1

GoodConcrete Deck


Disclaimer:



Page 532 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot and failing risers

GoodDeck Joints





GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

1.2

0.1 2.0

Minor scouring


2 $3,500.00 Replace curbs and risers. Requires 933 Bf of 10x10 timber, includes

10-24" and 10-36" risers

HighComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Round rip rap does not extend to base of sill allowinf to ravel through

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Curb repairs have not been done.

curb repairs were completed after this inspection was done.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 533 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 534 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Juliet Cr 3.69 3.60 2018/06/16


Steel I-beam


16.3

10 639665 5511116

Ron Peace 1990

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Dirty


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Junction at the high chain #2 as well as a cattle guard just off the bridge

2Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Install one at each branch at The #2 approach





5Posted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 535 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot requires replacement


GoodHardware


GoodNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Both deck and curbs have extensive rot

PoorRunning Planks Extensive rot and failing sections

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.7

0.5 12.0


1 $12,000.00 Deck rot is very high and failing. Will require 3224 BR of 3x10" deck

planks

MediumComplete

2 $3,000.00 requires 1010 BF of 10x10" curb timberHighComplete


4 $100.00 Clean bearingsLowComplete

5 $250.00 Install two bridge ahead signs at the two branches off #@ approachLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 536 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Bridge requires deck and curb components.

Running deck and curbs already replaced after this field inspection was completed. Load restriction removed.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 537 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 6.71 6.60 2018/06/16



Concrete Concrete

6.0

10 636868 5510924

Ron Peace 1990

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


UnratedBallast Wall No wall other than girder ends



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Road very grown in as wellas bridge




5Posted Load Rating

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 538 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

Not ApplicableConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Curbs have extensive rot values and some risers are rotten



GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.5

0.1 2.6


1 $150.00 Brush out bridgeLowComplete

2 $2,500.00 Curbs have extensive rot values and some risers are rotten

Requires 750 Bf total of 10x10 timber. 8- 24" and 8-36" riser blocks

HighCompleteRE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Structure is still load rated @ 5 Tonnes and curbs have not been repaired


Disclaimer:



Page 539 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





curb repairs were completed after this inspection. Load restriction has been lifted.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 540 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K532 K532 HOPE CREEK 2015/06/18



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


West Hope Cr 8.13 8.50 2017/06/18


Steel I-beam


10.7

10 502747 5607292

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings


FairBallast Wall Not connected to the superstructure


FairCaps or Sills Some rot

GoodFill




FairRiprap

FairTie-backs


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


YesBrushing Required Brush out




GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 541 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Straffed and damaged by snow cat tracks


GoodHardware


PoorNails Bent and exposed

PoorOverall Deck Condition Requires new deck.

PoorRunning Planks Rotten failing

GoodSub Deck Treated

GoodTies Treated

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

FairBracing Bent bottom brace

FairDiaphrams Bottom cross brace is bent (see photo)

FairGirders Flanges are dirty



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.1

0.2 5.0



2 $400.00 Install bridge ahead signs 2LowRequired


4 $3,500.00 Requires 1122 Bf of 3x10" deck planksHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 542 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Measured up the bridge, see photo. This structure appears to be used by snow cats which is damaging the

curbs as it crosses the bridge.

Evaluation completed based on Ron's measure up. Safe for CL-625 64 tonnes loading.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





64

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 543 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K533 K533 EAST HOPE CREEK 2016/06/12



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hope Cr 0.28 7.30 2018/06/12


Steel I-beam


12.3

10 503018 5607903

Ron Peace 2005

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings Girders not pinned to tne sills


GoodBallast Wall


FairCaps or Sills High rot values from the end into bearing on the upstream of #2

PoorFill Scoured from behind #! crib


PoorLog/Timber Cribs Some settling of the #1 crib upstream end and scouring along its face.


PoorRiprap Large round poor gradation

PoorTie-backs Rotten and crushed


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





PoorRoad Surface Sink hole at the bridge end @#1 approach


Disclaimer:



Page 544 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


PoorNails Exposed heads

PoorOverall Deck Condition Requires new running surface

PoorRunning Planks Rotten and failed

GoodSub Deck Creosote

GoodTies Creosote

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes No Yes No

1.5

1.1 7.0

The creek is running hard onto the #1 rip rap and abutment, there is a high water escape/overflow to the south of

the armoured bank, see photo. Scouring has removed fill from under most of the #1 crib and caused it to settle. 6

m. along the face of a 8.5 m. wide crib. A debris dam has built up just below the bridge.


1 $3,500.00 Full running deck required 1560 BF of 3" planksHighRequired

2 $1,500.00 Fill in #1 approach sink holeHighRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor rot and settling or failure of crib

2 Fill erosionMO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 545 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The creek is running hard onto the #1 abutment and rip rap, armouring of the upstream bank has been

successful to this point but the large poorly graded rip rap under the bridge and along the crib face has allowed

the fill to be come scoured. This has caused some settling of the upstream corner and a sink has developed in

the #1 approach fill.the crib face is scoured 6 m. of a 8.5 m. wide crib. This bridge may have to be longer in

length or shifted to the #1 approach. Elevated rot in the crib logs and sill as well as crushed rotten tiebacks

rotten deck planks all culminate in structures life.

Consider replacement of structure for industrial haul

Please post 5 tonnes load restriction due to scour on left abutment. Superstructure is in fair condition, but the

bridge appears to be too short for this crossing location and the channel migration that is occurring. Suggest a

GA design for replacement is required prior to industrial hauling activities.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 546 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 0.63 7.50 2018/06/12


Steel I-beam


12.3

10 503248 5607835

Ron Peace 1995

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

PoorBearings #2 has extensive rot, monitor closely


GoodBallast Wall


PoorCaps or Sills The #2 is rotten from both ends the upstream rot extends into the bearing area

GoodFill

GoodHardware



GoodRiprap

FairTie-backs


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment





NoneFender Condition Consider if used for industrial haul


GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 547 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails

FairOverall Deck Condition Lower deck components are creosoted, running deck untreated full deck

PoorRunning Planks If used for industrial haul will require redecking

GoodSub Deck Creosote

GoodTies Creosote

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.8

0.5 5.2


1 $3,500.00 Requires deck of 3" planks 1560 bf.MediumRequired



RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 The #2 is rotten from both ends the upstream rot extends into the bearing area. The #1 sill has les rot

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 548 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Bridge requires bridge ahead signs and brushing. For industrial haul running deck will deteriorate quickly. The

#2 sill log is rotten from both ends primarily on the upstream end. This rot extends into the bearing area. The

#1 sillis less so.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 549 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K914 K914 HOPE CREEK BR 05 2015/06/18



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Hope Cr 0.59 9.80 2017/06/18


Log Stringers


10.0

10 502378 5605808

Ron Peace 1995

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill


FairLog/Timber Cribs THe #1 crib is settled at the upstream end


FairRiprap

GoodTie-backs

PoorWing Wall Rotten

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




10Posted Load Rating Posted at inspection

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 550 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Cabled log only cabled at curb ends, 300 mm. of top rot


GoodHardware


FairNails

PoorOverall Deck Condition Will not take industrial haul and will deteriorate quickly if use increases

PoorRunning Planks Rotten, dirty and failing

FairSub Deck

PoorTies Some are rotten and failing at both ends of the bridge

STRINGERS

Span 1


(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

1 Stringer has rot at both ends that extends throug

the stringer, at mid span top rot is 200mm.

Yes 600 600 200 fir600

7 Rotted through on both ends and rot to core at mid

span. Those not noted had no significant rot. (see

Photo)

Yes 600 600 600 fir550

FairLog Curbs Cabled at both ends only, 300 mm. of top rot


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

1.3 8.0



3 $40,000.00 survey and design for replacement if required for industrial useHighRequiredRE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 551 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Notified Region of structure condition, Drew offered to notify the district and concerned users.Posted tructure

@ 10 tonnes.

structure already downgraded. Added repair for survey and design for replacement if required for industrial use.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 552 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K1392 K1392 NOEL CREEK 2015/06/17



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Noel Cr 0.47 0.80 2018/06/17


Steel I-beam


21.3

10 513928 5623997

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1



Disclaimer:



Page 553 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck Treated

GoodTies Treated

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.2

1.0 11.2


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:


Disclaimer:



Page 554 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 555 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Noel Cr 5.01 5.40 2017/06/17


Steel I-beam


27.4

10 513943 5620244

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodLog/Timber Cribs Lefrt in place from old structure, for erosion controll only


GoodRiprap

GoodTie-backs


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Tight corner at The #1 approach, steep down onto the bridge as well






FairRoad Surface Rough and rutted at the #1


Disclaimer:



Page 556 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.7

1.0 10.0


1 $100.00 Brush around bridgeLowComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Road at top of hill at the high chain is rough and a small slump has blocked the ditch and flowed onto the road.

Continue to monitor unstable terain.

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 557 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Road at top of hill at the high chain is rough and a small slump has blocked the ditch and flowed onto the road

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 558 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Noel Cr 7.44 7.90 2018/06/12


Steel I-beam

Timber - Treated Not Available

27.4

10 513853 5618488

Ron Peace 2006

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Steep and very sharp corner at the #2 approach


NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition Unsecured logs but very large


GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 559 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

3.3

1.3 11.1


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 560 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





63

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 561 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:PS-029 K1300 NOEL CREEK-WEST 2016/06/12



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Noel Cr 0.14 8.30 2018/06/12


Steel I-beam


20.0

10 513944 5617873

Ron Peace 2014

1

Access:

19.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills Treated Timber

GoodFill

GoodHardware


FairRiprap


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Steep at the #1 approach with a slight curve as well


NoBrushing Required



FairFender Condition Unsecured logs


FairRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 562 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1


GoodDeck to Girder Bolts Clips

GoodHardware


GoodNails


FairRunning Planks Some rot pockets near through, if used extensively will require at a minumum 6 - 10'

4x10" planks


FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

FairGirders Extensive rusting and spall of flang and web, up to 5 mm.



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.9

0.9 6.2


1 $500.00 Some rot pockets near through, if used extensively will require at a

minumum 6 - 10' 4x10" planks

MediumRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 563 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The structure is posted @ 20 Tonnes. The rust and spall of the web and flange is up to 5 mm. deep

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





20

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 564 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K490 K490 UPPER COLDWATER 2016/06/27



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Coldwater R 1.40 1.40 2019/06/27


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

15.0

10 642165 5501153

Ron Peace 1991

1

Access:

14.4

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings





GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill



FairRiprap Some erosion, seems to be functioning well


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required


INstalled at inspection(approaching structure)





FairRoad Surface May require fill at the #2 downstream corner, material has been pulled down by

ATV's


Disclaimer:



Page 565 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1

UnratedConcrete Deck Covered in gravel




GoodHardware



FairRunning Surface Potholed and uneven

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.8

1.3 6.0


1 $1,000.00 May require fill at the #2 downstream corner, material has been pulled

down by ATV's

LowRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Continue to momitor rip rap

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

May require fill at the #2 downstream corner, material has been pulled down by ATV's


Disclaimer:



Page 566 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Reviewed fabrication details, noted accurate loading. GMC sign off on installation.PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





55

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 567 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 6.48 4.90 2019/06/27


Steel I-beam


11.0

10 639154 5500723

Ron Peace 1987

1

5.6 by km. markers.Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings Covered in gravel


GoodBallast Wall

UnratedConcrete Precast None


FairCaps or Sills Covered in debris and gravel

GoodFill

GoodHardware


PoorRiprap A shallow layer was placed over geotextile, some has slipped off


APPROACHES

FairAlignment Surface water off the #1 approach flows onto and over the bridge


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface Surface water runs onto the bridge


Disclaimer:



Page 568 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware Curb bolts not countersunk


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders Dirty flanges



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No Yes No No No

2.0

0.2 2.6

A shallow layer was placed over geotextile, some has slipped off


1 $1,000.00 Water bar or reslope the #1 approach to remove surrface water from the

bridge

MediumRequired

2 $350.00 Clean sills bearing and girder flangesHighRequired

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Monitor rip rap erposion, appears stable from last innspection

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 569 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

This structure has been redecked

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





55

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 570 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:


Concrete Precast

UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Little Douglas Cr 5.44 6.60 2019/06/27


Steel I-beam


16.3

10 637692 5500482

Ron Peace 1992

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall



GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware


GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment







GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 571 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





DECK

Span 1



GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders



CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.3 6.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 572 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Structure has been redecked recently

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





55

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 573 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K659 K659 COPPER CREEK FSR 2015/06/25



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper Cr #1 2.68 4.30 2018/06/25


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

18.4

10 674723 5452032

Ron Peace 1993

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 574 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck


GoodDeck Joints

GoodGrout Pockets

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.7

0.3 9.9


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Newer curbs and risers, curb bolts not countersunk


Disclaimer:



Page 575 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 576 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K658 K658 SUNDAY SUMMIT 2015/06/25



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Copper Cr #2 18.61 18.00 2018/06/25


Steel I-beam

Concrete Concrete

18.0

10 668754 5451484

Ron Peace 1993

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

GoodFill

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required





FairRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 577 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GoodConcrete Deck

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot failing

FairDeck Joints See repair item

FairGrout Pockets Two of the grout pockets at the #1 end, upstream side are deficiant, see photo

GoodHardware



GoodRunning Surface

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.2 9.0


1 $200.00 Fill four of the grout pockets at the #1 end, upstream side are deficiant,

see photo

LowComplete

2 $6,500.00 Curbs and risers have extensive rot, some risers failing. in total 1783 Bf

of 10x10" timber, includes 18-24" and 18-36" riser blocks

HighComplete

3 $200.00 Brush out bridge - Completed by Deverell Contractin Ltd.MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 578 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

Four of the grout pockets at are deficiant, see photo. the curbs and risers are in poor condition.

DA I professionally inspected this structure in July 2014 and provided a repair prescription for the grout pocket

issues to BCTS. Works still to be completed.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 579 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Unnamed 22.81 23.00 2018/06/25


Concrete Box Beam

Concrete Concrete

12.0

10 666768 5448329

Ron Peace 2002

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

PoorFill Settled nad sink hole at the #2 approach, likely due lack of compaction


GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

PoorAlignment Grade of bridge does not match well with approaches. Junction at the #1 approach.


NoBrushing Required





PoorRoad Surface Have grader bar or shape appraoches to divert surface water from eroding fill at

bridge corners

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 580 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

FairConcrete Deck


FairDeck Joints


GoodHardware



FairRunning Surface Some surface damage from equipment track ice lugs

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1




CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

2.5

0.1 2.5


1 $1,000.00 Fill Settled sink hole at the #2 approach, likely due lack of compaction -

Completed by Deverell Contracting Ltd.

HighComplete

2 $500.00 Install bridge ahead sign at high chainLowComplete

3 $200.00 Have grader bar or shape appraoches to divert surface water from

eroding fill at bridge corners. - Completed by Deverell Contracting Ltd.

(excavator).

DA requires at minimum four loads of fill placed at all four corners of the

ballast walls.

MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 581 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

This structure is on a 4-5% grade roughly matching the #2 approach (low chain) but the grade rises up off the

bridge at 6%. the bridge requires approach fill.

DA I inspected this structure in July 2014. Recommend that approaches have water bars installed when not

industrial hauling. As surface water management is a problem for this structure. The structure also requires at

least four loads of approach fill added to all four corners of the wing-walls, which have either eroded away or

settled.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 582 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:WO-1871 K1482 RESERVOIR 2015/06/12



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Reservoir Lake Crk 0.56 3.53 2018/06/12


Steel I-beam


15.3

10 701193 5531063

Ron Peace 2010

1

Access:

14.8

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings

GoodBracing

GoodBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills

FairFill Light easily eroded

GoodGeneral Abutment Condition

GoodHardware

GoodPiles or Posts

GoodRiprap


APPROACHES

GoodAlignment


NoBrushing Required




GoodRoad Surface

DECK

Span 1


Disclaimer:



Page 583 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:






FairDeck to Girder Bolts No lag washers

GoodHardware


GoodNails


GoodRunning Planks

GoodSub Deck

GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.6

0.2 6.7


1 $200.00 Clean bridge flangesLowRequired

2 $500.00 repair damaged culvert end at the #1 approach see photo. The cross

drain culvert at the#1 approach has a crushed end, which has caused the

culvert to silt up and not run freely. It appears that concerns from the

previous inspection were addressed with exception of the fore noted.

MediumRequiredRE

PA

IRS

# Description

1 Approach culvert siltation

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 584 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment:

The cross drain culvert at the#1 approach has a crushed end, which has caused the culvert to silt up and not

run freely. It appears that concerns from the previous inspection were addressed with exception of the fore

noted. The structure does not have a tag.

PEng's

Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 585 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Tommy Cr 0.62 1.50 2014/10/19


Steel I-beam


23.6

10 533550 5632230


1

Barge across Carpenter LakeAccess:

0

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Heli access


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 586 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:









68

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 587 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001D

File:





Inlet Cover (mm):


UTM Northing:

Opening Width (mm):

Culvert Material:

Outlet Cover (mm):

Gradient (%):

UTM Easting:


UTM Zone:

Footing Type:

Culvert Type:

Inspector Name:

KM:

Project File ID #:

User km:

Br.

Crossing Name:

Forest District:



Box Log

1,000 1,000

0.0

10.0 2,000 4,000

10 533649 5629658


Access:


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

0.0

0.0 0.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Heli access required MRF 2011


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 588 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001D

File:









0

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 589 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K552 K552 TEXAS CREEK 2007/07/12



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Texas #2 2.03 2.20 2008/07/01

R15756 233.1 Cascades Natural Resource District

Log Stringers


10.6

10 582330 5599688

Ron Peace 1983

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS

Not ApplicableBracing No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

FairBallast Wall No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

FairCaps or Sills No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

FairFill FILL: At the low chain downstream corner of the bridge the fill has stress cracks to

the edge of the road due to failing wing wall. Failure is due to rot and erosion..

COVERFILL: No Comment Available -Converter.RSI.

PoorTie-backs The low chain top crib log (sill) has no tiebacks.

PoorWing Wall The low chain downstream is rotten and failing.

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing no bridge ahead signs, bridge is posted @ 2 tonnes

YesBrushing Required No Comment Available -Converter.RSI


The low chain downstream and the high chain upstream are missing.(approaching structure)


The low chain downstream and the high chain upstream are missing.(approaching structure)

no bridge ahead signs, bridge is posted @ 2 tonnesPosted Load Rating no bridge ahead signs, bridge is posted @ 2 tonnes

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Extensive rot.

Not ApplicableHardware HW: No Comment Available -Converter.RSI. RIV: No Comment Available

-Converter.RSI.

GoodNails No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

GoodRunning Surface No Comment Available -Converter.RSI


Disclaimer:



Page 590 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Not ApplicableRunning Planks No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

FairTies Fair to rotted through.

PIERS

Not ApplicableConcrete No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

PoorCribs The low chain crib appears to be eroded in behind the crib, high water limits

access. Fill on the downstream corner low chain is being eroded


-Converter.RSI.

PoorOverall Failed sections

PoorOverall Eroded crib and rotten failing stringers, Closure is recommended.

FairRiprap No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

STRINGERS

Span 1


(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

1 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end.

MIDTHIRD: t200. #2BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end.


Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end.


F F F

2 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: 180good then cor

rot. #1THIRD: core rot 200 good. #2BEAR: core rot

110good

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: 180good then cor rot.

#1THIRD: core rot 200 good. #2BEAR: core rot

110good

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: 180good then cor rot.

#1THIRD: core rot 200 good. #2BEAR: core rot

110good

F F F

3 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: core rot 210 good.

#1THIRD: core rot 300 good. #2BEAR: core rot 210

good. #2THIRD: core rot 300 good

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: core rot 210 good.



Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: core rot 210 good.



F F F


Disclaimer:



Page 591 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





4 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru. #2BEAR:

b70 dry rot. #2THIRD: sound

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru. #2BEAR:


Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru. #2BEAR:


F F F

5 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru.

#1THIRD: core rot 300 good. #2BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru. #1THIRD:

core rot 300 good. #2BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru. #1THIRD:

core rot 300 good. #2BEAR: rotted thru

F F F


#2BEAR: core rot 150 good. #2THIRD: core rot 200

good



good



good

F F F


#1THIRD: core rot 250 good. MIDTHIRD: dry punky.

#2BEAR: 150 good rotten core. #2THIRD: core rot

300 good


core rot 250 good. MIDTHIRD: dry punky. #2BEAR:

150 good rotten core. #2THIRD: core rot 300 good


core rot 250 good. MIDTHIRD: dry punky. #2BEAR:

150 good rotten core. #2THIRD: core rot 300 good

F F F


#2BEAR: core rot 150 good





F F F


#2BEAR: rotted thru


#2BEAR: rotted thru


#2BEAR: rotted thru

F F F

10 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: 150 good rotten core

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: 150 good rotten core

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: 150 good rotten core

F F F


Disclaimer:



Page 592 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:






#1THIRD: t60. MIDTHIRD: t50. #2BEAR: rotted thru


t60. MIDTHIRD: t50. #2BEAR: rotted thru


t60. MIDTHIRD: t50. #2BEAR: rotted thru

F F F

PoorNeedle Beam(s) and Shims BEAM: Cabled. SHIM: Not shimmed tight..

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes No No No

5.4

1.5

HighW: Fill is being eroded at both sides of the low chain crib, it is likely that water is flowing under and behind

the crib.. Scour: Fill is being eroded at both sides of the low chain crib, it is likely that water is flowing under and

behind the crib..


1 $0.00 Deck: Repair not warrantedMediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Overall: Eroded crib and rotten failing stringers, Closure is recommended.. Region: GMc Feb 14/08 This bridge

should be closed to vehicular traffic. Stringer: Stringer #1 is failing at the high chain end..


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L




Accepted By Converter.RSI on 5/1/2008 10:23:25PM

0

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 593 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Texas #3 2.77 3.00 2008/07/01


Log Stringers


10.6

10 582402 5599115

Ron Peace 1983

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS


GoodBallast Wall No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

PoorCaps or Sills The low chain abutment is only a log sill. The log is rotten and scoured.

GoodFill FILL: No Comment Available -Converter.RSI. COVERFILL: No Comment Available

-Converter.RSI.

PoorTie-backs rotten.

Not ApplicableWing Wall No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

APPROACHES


0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Only signs are, posted @ 2 tonnes.

YesBrushing Required Overgrown.


No Comment Available -Converter.RSI(approaching structure)



Only signs are, posted @ 2 tonnes.Posted Load Rating Only signs are, posted @ 2 tonnes.

DECK

Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts The downstream curb is rotten


-Converter.RSI.

GoodNails No Comment Available -Converter.RSI



Disclaimer:



Page 594 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:






PoorTies Extensive rot.

PIERS


FairCribs Limited access due to high water. Crib is scoured ands appears unstable.


-Converter.RSI.

GoodOverall No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

PoorOverall Stringers are in poor condition, but the determining factor in this structures life is the

failing low chain sill log. Consider closure.

PoorRiprap No crib face protection.

STRINGERS

Span 1


(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

1 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end

F F F

2 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru

F F F

3 Rot Depth (Bottom): No Comment Available

-Converter.RSI

Rot Depth (Side): No Comment Available

-Converter.RSI

Rot Depth (Top): No Comment Available

-Converter.RSI

F F F

4 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru

F F F

5 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: core rot

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: core rot

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: core rot

F F F

6 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: dry rot

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: dry rot

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: dry rot

F F F


-Converter.RSI


-Converter.RSI


-Converter.RSI

F F F


Disclaimer:



Page 595 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:






-Converter.RSI


-Converter.RSI


-Converter.RSI

F F F

9 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: t100

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: t100

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: t100

F F F

10 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end

F F F

PoorNeedle Beam(s) and Shims BEAM: Cabled. SHIM: Not shimmed..

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes No No No

5.4

1.3

Debris: Tree across creek just above the bridge.. Scour: The high chain crib.


1 $0.00 Abutment: Monitor for failureMediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Overall: Stringers are in poor condition, but the determining factor in this structures life is the failing low chain

sill log. Consider closure.. Region: GMc Feb 14/08 This bridge should be closed to vehicular traffic. Stringer:

Stringers are in poor condition, sampling was not done as the rotten failing sill log is the determining factor in

the life of this structure..


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





0

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 596 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Texas #4 4.16 4.40 2008/07/06


Log Stringers


9.5

10 582232 5597870

Ron Peace 1983

1

Access:

0

ABUTMENTS


GoodBallast Wall No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

GoodCaps or Sills No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

FairFill FILL: Low due to crib erosion and lose of fill behind.. COVERFILL: No Comment

Available -Converter.RSI.

FairTie-backs No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

PoorWing Wall Wings are eroded and exposed.

APPROACHES


0Bridge Ahead Signs Missing Only signs are bridge posted @ 2 tonnes.

YesBrushing Required No Comment Available -Converter.RSI





Only signs are bridge posted @ 2 tonnes.Posted Load Rating Only signs are bridge posted @ 2 tonnes.

DECK

Span 1

PoorCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Rotten.


-Converter.RSI.

PoorNails Exposed heads.



Disclaimer:



Page 597 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:






FairTies No Comment Available -Converter.RSI

PIERS


FairCribs The low chain is scoured.


-Converter.RSI.

PoorOverall extensive rot.

PoorOverall Failure may occur, consider closure or removal.

PoorRiprap No erosion protection to the low chain crib.

STRINGERS

Span 1


(Bottom)

Rot Depth

(Side)

Rot Depth

(Top)

Wood

Species

CommentsDiameter

or

Width X Depth

1 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end.

MIDTHIRD: t200. #2BEAR: rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end.


Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: rotted thru on end.


F F F

2 Rot Depth (Bottom): . #2BEAR: core rot

Rot Depth (Side): . #2BEAR: core rot

Rot Depth (Top): . #2BEAR: core rot

F F F


-Converter.RSI


-Converter.RSI


-Converter.RSI

F F F

4 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: sound

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: sound

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: sound

F F F

5 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: s60. #2BEAR: core

rot on end

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: s60. #2BEAR: core rot

on end

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: s60. #2BEAR: core rot

on end

F F F

6 Rot Depth (Bottom): . #2THIRD: s110

Rot Depth (Side): . #2THIRD: s110

Rot Depth (Top): . #2THIRD: s110

F F F


Disclaimer:



Page 598 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





7 Rot Depth (Bottom): . #2BEAR: dry core rot

Rot Depth (Side): . #2BEAR: dry core rot

Rot Depth (Top): . #2BEAR: dry core rot

F F F

8 Rot Depth (Bottom): #1BEAR: t140 s100. #2BEAR:

rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Side): #1BEAR: t140 s100. #2BEAR:

rotted thru on end

Rot Depth (Top): #1BEAR: t140 s100. #2BEAR:

rotted thru on end

F F F

Not ApplicableNeedle Beam(s) and Shims BEAM: No Comment Available -Converter.RSI. SHIM: No Comment Available

-Converter.RSI.

CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

Yes Yes No No No

7.2

2.2

HighW: May further eroded abutment..


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Overall: Failure may occur, consider closure or removal.. Region: GMc Feb 14/08 This bridge should be closed

to vehicular traffic. Stringer: Due to high water access is limited, appears that #1 stringer at the high chain is

close to failure..


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





0

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 599 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:


Structure #: Site #: Road Name: Inspection Date:K546 STORE 8 2013/09/26



Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Lillooet 2013/07/21

Cascades Natural Resource District

Steel I-beam


19.0

Jeremy Araki 1989

1

BCTS Yard Lilloet AirportAccess:

0

ABUTMENTS

GoodBearings


GoodBallast Wall logs


GoodCaps or Sills Timber sills on cross timbers

FairFill fill eroding slightly on right upstream corner


UnratedLog/Timber Cribs Timber sills on cross timbers


GoodRiprap

Not ApplicableTie-backs Timber sills on cross timbers


APPROACHES

FairAlignment high crest on left


NoBrushing Required



PoorFender Condition missing on downstream side

75Posted Load Rating Posted as "75 Tonne GVW

GoodRoad Surface


Disclaimer:



Page 600 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





DECK

Span 1


GoodDeck to Girder Bolts tabs

GoodHardware


GoodNails

GoodOverall Deck Condition new in 2012

GoodRunning Planks


GoodTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1

GoodBracing

GoodDiaphrams

GoodGirders

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

1.5

0.8 7.0


RE

PA

IRS

# Description

MO

NIT

OR

S


Disclaimer:



Page 601 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001B

File:





GE

NE

RA

L Inspector's

Comment: Inspector completed this inspection for the wrong site. DA.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L



Current Inspection Load Rating: Design Load GVW (tonnes): 5 Design Vehicle Config.:See footnote

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



Page 602 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Inspector Name:

UTM Zone:



Project File ID #:

KM:

Br.

User km:

Forest District:



UTM Easting:

# Spans:



UTM Northing:


Lillooet 2014/10/24

Cascades Natural Resource District

Glulam Girder


37.0

R. Veitch, M. Horner 1968

1

BCTS Yard Lilloet AirportAccess:

0

ABUTMENTS

FairBearings


FairBallast Wall


GoodCaps or Sills Debris accumulation on top of caps.

FairFill

FairHardware

UnratedPiles or Posts No access


FairWing Wall Camp end - Upstream wingwall Pile 2 75mm shell then void, downstream wingwall

Pile 1 80mm shell then void, Pile 2 very wide vertical split. Woods end - Upstream

wall Pile 3 40mm shell then void.

APPROACHES

GoodAlignment




Camp end upstream delineator incorrect.(approaching structure)



GoodRoad Surface

DECK


Disclaimer:



Page 603 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





Span 1

FairCurb Rail/Blocks/Posts Minor impact damage at several locations.


FairHardware

FairHand Rails/Walkouts

FairNails


PoorRunning Planks Planks are heavily worn at ends with pockets of rot.

FairSub Deck

FairTies

SUPERSTRUCTURE

Span 1


GoodDiaphrams

PoorGirders Girder 2 has extensive checking in both flanges and rot in the bottom flange.

Several existing checks on all girders marked with nails and letters less than

50mm deep not noted below. Checking noted at deck clips.

GoodHardware


CH

AN

NE

LH

AZ

AR

DS




Comment:

No No No No No

11.0

0.6 5.0


1 $0.00 Post a 5 tonne load restriction until a load rating has been completed.

Bridge Replaced. Now MOTI.

HighComplete

2 $0.00 Schedule the bridge for replacement. Bridge Replaced. Now MOTI.HighComplete

3 $0.00 Place correct delineator on camp end upstream corner. Bridge Replaced.

Now MOTI.

MediumComplete

RE

PA

IRS


Disclaimer:



Page 604 of 604



Database: PROD

Report Id: CBR001A

File:





# Description

MO

NIT

OR

SG

EN

ER

AL Inspector's

Comment:

Found rot in one girder, so recommended immediate downgrade to 5 tonne GVW until a detailed analysis is

done or the structure is replaced.

Structure currently being replaced. DA.


Comment:

GE

NE

RA

L





5

GE

NE

RA

L


Disclaimer:



KCONWAYB Database: PROD Permanent Bridge Inspection …

Documents