Top Banner
HCI IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY: DESIGNING TO SUPPORT WORKER ADAPTATION Written By: KIM J. VICENTE University of Toronto Presented By: Najwa A. Baraka Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Faculty of Information Technology Information Technology High Studies Dept. Human computer Interaction First Semester: 2010/2011
27
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Kbe

HCI IN THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE-BASEDECONOMY: DESIGNING TO SUPPORT WORKERADAPTATION

Written By:

KIM J. VICENTE

University of Toronto

Presented By:

Najwa A. Baraka

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Faculty of Information Technology

Information Technology High Studies Dept.Human computer

InteractionFirst Semester: 2010/2011

Page 2: Kbe

2

OUTLINE Global Knowledge-based Economy

(KBE). KBE Contributors KBE From HCI Perspective The Future Demand For Adaptation The Relationship Between Adaptation

And Learning Cognitive Work Analysis(SWA) The Future: What Can We Be Sure Of? Summary

Page 3: Kbe

3

GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY

Page 4: Kbe

4

GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY Information and knowledge form the leading

edge of economic development, driving growth, creating jobs, and replacing traditional labor-intensive systems as the primary engine of wealth creation.

The technological developments of the 20th century have shifted advanced economies away from physically-based structures and toward knowledge-based systems.

Knowledge, science, and technology are now the key factors of production, and innovation has become the foundation of knowledge-based economies.

Page 5: Kbe

5

KBE CONTRIBUTORS The market is full of products based on recent advances in science

and Technology

These products are made all over the world, regardless of brand name

High quality is expected in the market, and is frequently being achieved

Today’s new high-tech products become tomorrow’s commodity products

The market for medium and low-tech goods is fiercely competitive

Everybody has to compete on price, so productivity improvement is key

Changes in demand and market conditions can be rapid and unpredictable

New knowledge appears in new goods and services at an increasing pace.

Page 6: Kbe

6

WHAT IMPLICATIONS DO THESE CHANGES HAVE FOR SUCCESS IN THE WORK-PLACE AND, THUS, FOR HCI?

Page 7: Kbe

THE FUTURE DEMAND

FOR ADAPTATIO

N

Workers

Managers

Organization

Page 8: Kbe

8

WORKERS

To meet the challenge to do “more with less” effectively, there will be A greater need

to design tools that help workers perform open-ended intellectual tasks that involve

discretionary decision making

Page 9: Kbe

9

MANAGERS

As one manager put it, “You need a strategic intent—but

within that context, you have to be totally opportunistic....

You can’t know what’s around the next corner, so construct

anorganization that is able to

adapt”

Page 10: Kbe

10

ORGANIZATIONS

An enterprise must adapt to itsEnvironment and give up on the

idea of stable solutions....It needs to be every bit as

adaptable as the economy in which it participates by continuous learning and adaptation to novelty ”

Page 11: Kbe

11

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADAPTATION AND LEARNING

Page 12: Kbe

12

The relationship between adaptation and learning Global knowledge-based

economy has created A strong need for adaptation to change.

This is equivalent to a call for learning to learn.

By adapting to disturbances, workers are, in effect, engaging in opportunities for learning.

“Each time operators

diagnose a novel situation, they

become learners, reconstructing

and reconfiguringtheir knowledge”

Page 13: Kbe

13

The relationship between adaptation and learning

Repetition Without Repetition.

Problems in KBE: More complex More variable Unique and unexpected Real-time

Generate a solution to a problem,Rather than following a

prepackaged procedural solution.

“dexterity” -- the capability to find “a solution for any situation and in

any condition”

Page 14: Kbe

14

COGNITIVE WORK ANALYSIS: A POTENTIAL PROGRAMMATICAPPROACH

Page 15: Kbe

15

COGNITIVE WORK ANALYSIS Objective: (designing for adaptation, or

equivalently, continuous learning) Approach: programmatic approach

which depends on Cognitive work analysis CWA

CWA: is a work analysisframework that can be used to create

computer-based tools to supportworker adaptation and continuous

learning.

Page 16: Kbe

16

A CONSTRAINT-BASED APPROACHConstraints: set of action possibilities.

represent the relevant degrees of freedom for productive action.

The constraint boundaries, and the constraint space, will change as a function of the context (e.g., the task being performed, the strategy being adopted, the competencies of the actor).

The constraint boundaries, and thus the available degrees of freedom, are situation-dependent and therefore dynamic.

Page 17: Kbe

17

A CONSTRAINT-BASED APPROACH By identifying these goal-relevant

constraints, designers can generate a set of information requirements that can be used to design a computer based tool.

That tool would provide workers with feedback and decision support as to the constraints that need to be respected, but it would not identify a particular path or trajectory through the constraint space.

It would be up to workers to decide which trajectory (i.e., set of actions) to take for a particular set of circumstances.

Page 18: Kbe

18

A CONSTRAINT-BASED APPROACH This constraint-based approach thereby

provides workers with continual opportunities for learning and the flexibility to adapt within the space of relevant action possibilities.

In one circumstance, workers may select one trajectory, whereas in another circumstance, they may have to select a different trajectory to achieve the same task goals by applying different ways .

The constraint space is also flexible enough to support individual differences between workers.

Page 19: Kbe

19

FIVE LAYERS OF CONSTRAINT

Work Domain

Control Tasks

Strategies

Social Organizational Structure

Worker Competenc

ies

Page 20: Kbe

20

MODELING TOOLS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS (1) Work Domain Layer:

•What information should be measured? (sensors)•What information should be derived? (models)•How should information by organized? (database)

“These insights can then be used to design a database that keeps track of the

relationships between variables, providing a coherent, integrated, and global

representation of the information ”

Page 21: Kbe

21

MODELING TOOLS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS (2) Control Tasks:

•What goals must be pursued, and what are the constraints on those goals? (procedures or automation)

“procedures that guide workers in achieving goals, orautomation that achieves those goals autonomously or

semi autonomously”

•What information and relations are relevant for particular classes of situations? (context-sensitive interface)

“ identify what variables and relations inthe work domain may be relevant for certain classes of

situations by context-sensitive interfacethat present workers with the right information at the

right time”

Page 22: Kbe

22

MODELING TOOLS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS (3) Strategies

•What frames of reference are useful? (dialog modes)“what strategies can be used for each control task provides some insight into what type of

human-computer dialog modes should be designed.”

•What control mechanisms are useful? (process flow)

“The strategies analysis also reveals the generative mechanisms (i.e., rules or algorithms)

constituting each strategy, which, in turn, helps specify the process flow for each dialog mode”

Page 23: Kbe

23

MODELING TOOLS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS (4) Social-Organizational

•What are the responsibilities of all of the actors? (role allocation)

“define the job content of the various actors including workers, designers “

• How should actors communicate with each other? (organizational

structure)“identify the authority and coordination

patterns that constitute a viable organizational structure.”

Page 24: Kbe

24

MODELING TOOLS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS (5) Worker Competencies

•What knowledge, rules, and skills do workers need to have?

“develop a set of specifications forworker training and selection, also

provide some insight into how information should be presented to

workers because some competencies may not be triggered unless

information is presented in particular forms”

Page 25: Kbe

25

SUMMARY

CWA framework tries to solve one of large class of HCI problems: how to design computer-based tools that help workers perform open-ended intellectual tasks that require discretionary decision making.

CWA tries to support these demands by adopting a flexible constraint-based approach by providing modeling tools that can be used to analyze each layer of constraint, and by linking each layer of constraint to a particular category of systems design interventions.

Page 26: Kbe

26

THE FUTURE: WHAT CAN WE BE SURE OF? Computer-based tools should be

deliberately and systematically designed to help workers effectively fulfill the rapid challenging needs of KBE.

The CWA framework is intended to be a programmatic approach to this practical problem.

But regardless of whether or not CWA itself succeeds in achieving its objectives

HCI in the new millennium should be, and will be increasingly concerned with systematically designing for worker adaptation.

Page 27: Kbe

27

Any Question??