Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016 Page 1 Introduction Here discuss about the biology that lead to studing the number of chromosome in the order tetudines and inheritance of the chromosomes in the offsprings and also studying of molecular structure and function of gene ,gene behavior of a cell or organism is the genetics And also studying gene distribution,variation in population Cytogenetic that is branch of genetics that considered with studing the structure and function of cell specially chromosomes it also give acloser and amore comprehensive studying on changes in structure and number of chromosomes from one organism to another and this fact was used in what is called cytotaxonomy. Cytotaonomy Is a branch of science that classifies the livinh organisms based on cytological studies (number of chromosomes meiosis behavior) Helps to stablish relationships between the different organism one of the methods of karyotyping Karyotype Is Method where total set of chromosomes of an organism is viewed under microsocope where the number of chromosome along with their length position of centromeres Banding pattern any differences between sex chromosomes and any others physical CHARACTERISTIC is observed (king, stansfield and mulligan 2006)
73
Embed
Karyological analysis of order testudines · 2016Karyological analysis of order testudines Page 11 have a more fusiform body plan than their terrestrial or freshwater counterparts
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 1
Introduction
Here discuss about the biology that lead to studing the number of
chromosome in the order tetudines and inheritance of the
chromosomes in the offsprings and also studying of molecular
structure and function of gene ,gene behavior of a cell or organism is
the genetics
And also studying gene distribution,variation in population
Cytogenetic
that is branch of genetics that considered with studing the structure
and function of cell specially chromosomes
it also give acloser and amore comprehensive studying on changes in
structure and number of chromosomes from one organism to another
and this fact was used in what is called cytotaxonomy.
Cytotaonomy
Is a branch of science that classifies the livinh organisms based on
cytological studies (number of chromosomes meiosis behavior)
Helps to stablish relationships between the different organism one of
the methods of karyotyping
Karyotype
Is Method where total set of chromosomes of an organism is viewed
under microsocope where the number of chromosome along with their
length position of centromeres Banding pattern any differences between
sex chromosomes and any others physical CHARACTERISTIC is
observed (king, stansfield and mulligan 2006)
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 2
kAIM OF WOR
Karyological data are available for 55% of all cryptodiran turtle species
including members of all but one family. Cladistic analysis of these data
as well as consideration of other taxonomic studies, lead us to propose
and phylogeny not greatly different from that a formal classification
suggested by other workers. Werecognize 11 families and three
superfamilies. The platysternid and staurotypidturtles are recognized at
the familial level. Patterns and models of karyotypic
evolution in turtles are reviewed and discussed.
RESONE FOR STUDING TURTLE
The history of where turtles are found is an
important record for conservation and
preservation efforts and an invaluable resource
for anyone interested in turtle research. If you
have ever wondered which turtles are found
where you live, you are interested in turtle
research.
this species of turtle and Because of diversity of
according to a lots of scientists that made research on order testudines
research that will disscuss in the following , so that I want studing this
Within the conversation community, turtles are considered to be in
situation , brought about by human activities {reviewed in van Dijk crisis
et al ., 2000; turte conversation fund 2002}
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 3
Currently , out of 200 species of fresh water turtle and tortoises listed by
iucn} in he conversation of nature {nion for te listed as the world wide u
e their red list {IUCN, 2006} , 24 ar
Listed as critically endangerd
HOWEVER, about 100 species of fresh water turtles are not listed by
either because they are mor common or have not IUCN in the red list ,
yet been evaluated for listing this mean that at least about 42% of
freshwater turtles and tortoises are considered to be facing a high risk
of extinction , and are in need of urgent conversation action
Turtles have been prized as pets or killed for commercial products and
although some of this trade is met by commercial farms illegal harvest
from the wild occurs on a broad scale
et al.,2000} In many {thorbjarnarson
Morphology and taxonomy Introduction of turtles
A turtle is an animal in armor. Much of its body lies within a protective
shell, which has openings for the turtle's four chunky legs, short tail,
and head. When danger threatens, many turtles pull legs, tail, and head
l. But unlike some animals that live in shells, such as hermit into the shel
crabs and snails, a turtle cannot crawl out of its shell. The shell is part of
the turtle's body.
All turtles belong to the class of backboned animals known as reptiles.
s snakes, lizards, and crocodiles. Turtles are the This class also include
oldest group. The first turtles crawled about on earth more than
250,000,000 years ago. Turtles have changed very little since that time.
the Turtles are found in almost all temperature and tropical regions of
world. Many turtles spend all or most of their lives in fresh water. They
may live in swamps, ponds, running streams, or even roadside ditches.
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 4
They come up on dry land to sun themselves or to lay eggs. Other
ers live in warm seas, sometimes turtles live completely on land. Still oth
following warm currents far northward.
The name "turtle" is often used to identify those animals that live in
water. The name "tortoise" frequently refers to a turtle that lives on land.
usually refers to small freshwater The American Indian name "terrapin"
turtles, especially those used for food. But these groupings are not
strictly scientific. In this article, all of these animals will be referred to
generally as turtles, though the proper name for a specific animal, such
Fig1as Galápagos tortoise, will be used.
Fig.1))
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 5
General characteristics (around300species)-
Rigid shell enclosing the soft organs
(Fig 2)
-Carapace= dorsal part
-Plastron= ventral part
-Shell is composed of dermal bony elements covered by keratinous
scutesor leathery skinthe shell incorporates ribs, vertebrae, portions of
pectoral girdle-Plastron can be rigidor hinged -Shell shape –ranges
from domed(in terrestrial species) Flat to hydrodynamic
shaped(aquaticand marine species
(fig3)
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 6
pads (terrestrial Absence of teeth (keratinous beakinstead)
-Freshwater species carnivorous, omnivorous, or herbivorous;
terrestrial usually herbivorous.
-Limb structure –flippers(marine species), webbing between digits
(freshwater species), stout limbs with thickened species)
which Synapsida and Diapsida evolved, making anapsids paraphyletic. It is however doubtful whether all anapsids lack temporal fenestra as a primitive trait, or whether all the groups traditionally seen as anapsids
truly lacked fenestra DeBraga, M. (1996)
Temple indicates the side of the head behind the eyes. The bone beneath the temporal bone as well as part of the sphenoid bone.
(Fig5)
Cryptodira is a suborder of Testudines ;Zug, G. R. 1966) that includes
most living tortoises and turtles. Cryptodira differ from Pleurodira (side-
neck turtles) in that they lower their necks and pull the heads straight
back into the shells, instead of folding their necks sideways along the
body under the shells' margins. They include among their species
freshwater turtles, snapping turtles, tortoises, soft-shell turtles, and sea
turtles.
Two circumscriptions of the Cryptodira are commonly found. One is
used here; it includes a number of primitive extinct lineages known only
from fossils, as well as the Eucryptodira. These are, in turn, made up
from some very basal groups, and the Centrocryptodira contain the
prehistoric relatives of the living cryptodires, as well as the latter, which
are collectively called Polycryptodira. (Gaffney, E. S. 1975)
In the nucleus of each cell, the DNA molecule is packaged into thread-
like structures Called Chromosomes.Each chromosome is made up of
DNA tightly coiled manytimes around proteins called histones that
support its structure. (Gorman, G. C. 1973)Chromosomes are not visible
in the cell’s nucleus—not evenunder a microscope—when the cell is not
dividing. However, the DNA that makes up chromosomes becomes more
tightly packed during cell division and is then visible under a
microscope. Most of what researchers know about chromosomes was
learned by observing chromosomes during cell division.Each
chromosome has a constriction point called the centromere, which
divides the chromosome into two sections, or ―arms.‖ The short arm of
the chromosome is labeled the ―p arm.‖ The long arm of the
chromosome is labeled the ―q arm.‖ The location of the centromere on
each chromosome gives the chromosome its characteristic shape, and
can be used to help describe the location of specific genes
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 16
(Fig 15)
what are type of chromosome?..
Metacentric Chromosomes Metacentric chromosomes have the centromere in the center, such that both sections are of equal length. Human chromosome 1 and 3 are metacentric.
Submetacentric Chromosomes Submetacentric chromosomes have the centromere slightly offset from the center leading to a slight asymmetry in the length of the two sections. Human chromosomes 4 through 12 are submetacentric.
Acrocentric Chromosomes Acrocentric chromosomes have a centromere which is severely offset from the center leading to one very long and one very short section. Human chromosomes 13,15, 21, and 22 are acrocentric.
Telocentric Chromosomes Telocentric chromosomes have the centromere at the very end of the chromosome. Humans do not possess telocentric chromosomes but they are found in other species such as mice.
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 17
(Fig 16)
romosomes from an individual’s A karyotype is a picture of all the ch
abnormalities. chromosomecells. A karyotype is a test used to check for
A picture of a person’s chromosomes is created by staining the
chromosomes with a special dye, photographing them through a
microscope and arranging them in pairs. A karyotype gives information
he structure of their about the number of chromosomes a person has, t
chromosomes and the sex of the individual
(Fig 17)
What bands of chromosome ?.........
Q-Banding
Quinacrine mustard, an alkylating agent, was the first chemical to band chromosomes viewed under a fluorescence microscope. Quinacrine dihydrochloride has subsequently been substituted by quinacrine mustard. The alternating bands of bright and dull fluorescence are
called Q bands. The bright bands are primary composed of DNA rich in adenine and thymine, while the dull bands are rich in guanine and cytosine.
Q bands are especially useful for distinguishing the human Y chromosome and various chromosome polymorphisms involving satellites and centromeres of specific chromosomes.
G-banding
Giemsa has become the most commonly used stain in human cytogenetic analysis. Unlike Q-banding, G-banding usually requires pre-treating chromosomes with either salt or a proteolytic (protein-digesting) enzyme. When chromosomes are pre-treated with the proteolytic enzyme trypsin the process is called GTG banding. Giemsa stains preferentially regions rich in adenine and thymine. Therefore, G bands correspond closely to Q bands.Standard G band staining techniques allow between 400 and 600 bands to be seen on metaphase chromosomes. With high resolution G-banding techniques, as many as two thousand different bands have been catalogued on the twenty-four human chromosomes.
R-banding Reverse banding (R-banding) involves the incubation of slides containing metaphase chromosomes in hot phosphate buffer and stained with Giemsa. The banding pattern that results is essentially the reverse of G bands. R bands are GC-rich. The AT-rich regions are selectively denatured by heat leaving the GC-rich regions intact. Fluorochromes that are GC specific also produce a reverse chromosome banding pattern. R-banding is helpful for analyzing the structure of chromosome ends, since these areas usually stain light with G-banding. C-Banding stains areas of heterochromatin, which is tightly packed and repetitive DNA. C-banding is specifically useful in humans to stain the centromeric chromosome regions and other regions containing constitutive heterochromatin - secondary constrictions of human chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and the distal segment of the Y chromosome long arm. NOR-banding
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 19
NOR-banding involves silver staining (silver nitrate solution) of the "nucleolar organizing region", which contains rRNA genes.
T-Banding
T-banding involves the staining of telomeric regions of chromosomes using either Giemsa or acridine orange after controlled thermal denaturation. T bands apparently represent a subset of the R bands because they are smaller that the corresponding R bands and are more strictly telomeric.
(Fig 18)
The nucleolus organizer region (NOR) or nucleolar organizer is
a chromosomal region around which the nucleolus forms. This region is
the particular part of a chromosome that is associated with a nucleolus
after the nucleus divides. The region contains several tandem
copies of ribosomal DNA genes. In humans, the NOR contains genes for
5.8S, 18S, and 28S rRNA clustered on the short arms of chromosomes
13, 14, 15, 21 and 22 (the acrocentric chromosomes).Nucleolus organizer
regions (NORs) are head-to-tail arrays of genes encoding the precursor
of the three largest ribosomal RNAs (18S, 5.8S and 25S in plants). NORs
include active rRNA genes, which give rise to secondary constrictions of
metaphase chromosomes, and silent rRNA genes, which are often
groupBsubtelocentric-telocentric macrochromosomes,and group C
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 25
microchromosomes. The A:B:C:formula is given after the diploidnumber
inFig. 19 and in the text.This paper represents a synthesis and
reanalysisof (mostly) published data. In reanalyzing the data we
employed cladistic methodology(Hennig, 1966) in which sister groups
were established by the determination of groups thatpossessed shared
derived characters (synapomorphies).Because banded karyotypes were
not available for the most appropriate outgroup
taxon (Suborder Pleurodira: Family Chelidae)we employed an "internal"
method of characterpolarity determination. Specifically, charactersthat
were shared among families considered tobe distantly related, known
from the fossil record to be early derivatives of the cryptodiraradiation,
or thought to be morphologicallyprimitive, were considered as primitive
(plesiomorphic)chromosomal characters. Because ofthe nature of
karyotypic variation in cryptodiresthe analysis was rather
straightforward. For example, dermatemydids are among the
mostprimitive living turtles and their fossil historyextends back to the
Cretaceous, as does the cheloniids
which are thought to be an early offshootof the cryptodiran line. These
two families possess species with apparently identical karyotypes. It is
highly unlikely that these two familiespossess a synapomorphy at this
level of the phylogeny. This would mean that these two familieswere
more closely related to each other than toany other families studied, an
arrangement thatappeared to conflict with every other line ofevidence in
the literature. We therefore considered this karyotype to be primitive, at
leastfor the non-trionychoid families, and the karyotypes of other
families were derived from this
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 26
(see below)
(Fig 19)
Fig. 19. G-band karyotype of a batagurine emydid (Chinemys reevesi, 2n
= 52). The chromosomes are arranged into group A (metacentric or
submetacentric macrochromosomes), group B (telocentric and
subtelocentric macrochromosomes), and group C (microchromosomes)
Results and Discussion
The following discussion is segmented intothe commonly accepted family groups. In general, we have accepted each of the families asdistinct entities and do not question their validity .
Emydidae
The two subfamilies of emydid turtles are characterized by different
karyotypes.The predominantly New World emydines have2n = 50 and
the predominantly Old World batagurinesmostly have 2n = 52 (Table 1).
A fewbatagurine species also possess 2n = 50 (Table1), including
Siebenrockiella crassicollis, the onlyemydid known to possess sex
chromosomes (Carrand ,etal 1981). Bickham and etal (1976a)concluded
that the primitive karyotype of theEmydidae was 2n = 52 and identical to
that ofSacalia bealei and other Old World batagurines.This has been
supported by recent findings that some testudinids have banded
karyotypes identical to those of Chinemys reevesi and other batagurines
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 27
(Dowler and etal, 1982). Fig. 19illustrates the karyotype of a batagurine
(Chinemys reevesi) that possesses the proposed primitive emydid
karyotype.The origin of the 2n = 50 emydine
is unclear (Bickham and etal, 1976a). There is no karyotypic evidence to indicate emydinesare at all closely related to Rhinoclemmys, the only New World batagurine genus (Carr, 1981).There may be some hint of the batagurine-emydine transition in the finding of several speciesof Asiatic batagurines with 2n = 50 (Table1). Any relationship of the emydines to the 2n =50 batagurines will require evidence from othercharacter systems in order to establish its existence.
Testudinidae.
The karyology of this family isnot as well studied as that of the Emydidae but
it seems certain that the primitive karyotype is2n = 52. Some species are known
to possess Gbandpatterns identical to those of certain batagurines including
Geochelone pardalis, G. elongate and G. elephantopus (Dowler and etal,1982).
C-band variation exists among species ofGeochelone, and the karyotypes of
Gopherusspecies differ from Geochelone species by themorphology and location
of the nucleolar organizing region (NOR) (Dowler and etal,1982). Although this
family is nearly world-wide
in distribution and morhpologically diverse, theavailable data indicate a high
degree of karyologicalconservatism.
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 28
Table 1
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 29
table 2
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 30
Table 3
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 31
Table 4
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 32
(Table 5)
Platysternidae.
The standard karyotype of thesingle species of platysternid
(Platysternon megacephalum) has 2n = 54 (Haiduk and Bickham,1982).
This species appears to have close affinities to the Emydidae but is
karyotypically distinct from all emydids thus far studied. BecauseP.
megacephalum and emydids do apparently havesynapomorphic
chromosomes that are notshared with chelydrids, Haiduk and Bickham
(1982) considered P. megacephalum to comprisea family distinct from
the Chelydridae (sensuGaffney, 1975b) and resurrected the
Platysternidae (Gray, 1870), a move also suggested byWhetstone (1978).
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 33
Staurotypidae. This group is usually considered to be a subfamily (Staurotypinae) of
theKinosternidae. Standard karyotypes of all three species in this group
are known (Table 1; seeespecially Bull et al., 1974). The two species of
Staurotypus are distinctive in possessing an XX/XY sex chromosome
system (Bull et al., 1974;Sites et al., 1979a). Claudius angustatus,
likenearly all other turtle species studied, does not possess
heteromorphic sex chromosomes but appears to be otherwise
karyotypically identicalto Staurotypus (Bull et al., 1974). Sites et
al.(1979a, b) report banded karyotypes of 5. Salvini and show that this
species possesses abiarmed second group B macrochromosome
that appears to be homologous to an identicalelement in emydids and
testudinids (and platysternidsbased on standard chromosome
morphology). This chromosome is acrocentricinchelydrids,kinosternids,
dermatemydids andcheloniids (Fig. 20). We conclude that the
biarmedcondition is derived. Centric fusion of the ancestral acrocentric
macrochromosome with amicrochromosome accounts for the presence
of a subtelocentric macrochromosome in the common ancester of the
Emydidae, Testudinidae,Platysternidae and Staurotypidae. This is
indicative of the staurotypids belonging to a cladethat does not include
kinosternids (Kinosternonand Sternotherus). This seems irreconcilable
with
(Fig 20)
Fig. 20. G-band patterns of the second group B chromosomes of (left to right) a staurotypid, an emydid,a kinosternid
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 34
and a cheloniid. The long arms ofall 4 taxa are identical; the short arms of the staurotypid and emydid are euchromatic and identical, however, the short arms of the kinosternid and thecheloniid are small and heterochromatic; see text forfurther discussion
Chelydridae.
The two extant species of thisfamily have been studied for both
standard (Table 1) and banded karyotypes (Haiduk and et al,1982).
Chelydra serpentina and Macroclemystemminckii both have 2n = 52 but
differ in themorphology of certain chromosomes. Haidukand et al (1982)
conclude that these two
species do not share any derived chromosomalcharacteristics with each
other or with any other families of Cryptodira. However, the karyotypeof
M. temminckii could be derived from that
of C. serpentina. The latter is considered theprimitive karyotype for the
family.
Kinosternidae
This family is comprised of twogenera and about 18 species and has been well
studied karyotypically (Table 1). Early, and apparently inaccurate, reports aside
(Table 1), allspecies thus far examined appear to possess2n = 56. Banded
karyotypes (Bickham and etal, 1979; Sites et al., 1979b) indicate all
speciespossess a large, subtelocentric macrochromosome
not found in any other group of turtles.Kinosternids do not share any derived
chromosomal characters with any other turtle family, including the staurotypids
with which they
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 35
are usually considered confamilial. An interesting variation was found in
this family by Sitesetal. (1979b). Heterochromatin that stains darkin both
G- and C-band preparations was found
in Sternotherus minor, Kinosternon baurii and K.subrubrum, but not
found in K. scorpioides. Thepresence of this type of heterochromatin
wasconsidered to be a derived character (it is not found in closely
related families) shared amongthe three species that possess it,
indicating that the genus Sternotherus has affinities with temperate
species of Kinosternon.
Dermatemydidae.
The single extant speciesofthis family (Dermatemys mawii) possesses 2n = 56
(Table 1). There are no uniquely derived elements and this species shares no
derived chromosomes with any other family.
Cheloniidae.
Members of this family possess2n = 56 (Table 1). Banding data indicate
cheloniidsand dermatemydids are karyotypicallyindistinguishable (Bickham et
al., 1980; Carr etal., 1981). Early reports of other diploid numbers and sex
chromosomes have not been substantiated by recent studies using current
techniques.
Trionychidae. Members of both subfamilies(Cyclanorbinae and Trionychinae) have 2n =66
(Table 1). Reports of other diploid numbershave been unsubstantiated in
subsequent studies. The report of 2n = 52-54 in Trionyx leithii(Singh et al., 1970)
was due to the misidentification
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 36
of this specimen (Kachuga dhongoka, Emydidae;Singh, 1972). The 2n = 66
karotype wasconsidered by Bickham et al. (1983) to be theprimitive karyotype
for the family. Banding comparisons between Trionyx and Chelonia revealed
little homology between the Trionychidae and Cheloniidae (Bickham et al.,
1983).
Carettochelyidae
The single extant species(Carettochelys insculpta) has 2n = 68 (Bickham et
al., 1983). Although no banding data have beenreported for this species, the
standard karyotype is very similar to the 2n = 66 karyotype of trionychids.
Taxonomy
The acceptability of using karyotypicdata in order to draw phylogenetic
inferences and erect a classification at the level offamily and higher is based
upon the conservatism of the karyotypic character system. Bycharacter system,
we refer to a suite of characters and character states which may be presumed to
be closely enough related to be withinthe realm of influence of the same set
ofevolutionary constraints. According to this line ofresasoning then, karyotypic
data constitute acharacter system separate from the charactersystems
associated with electrophoretic data orcranial osteology, etc. The level at which
characters are relatively constant within a group isthe point at which
thosecharacters are of systematic utility and those characters are said
tobeconservative (Farris, 1966). Our studies anda review of the
pertinentliteratureindicate thatfamily level groups within the Cryptodira
arecharacteristically karyotypically homogeneousand that the significant
variation (in the phylogenetic sense) is observable interfamilially. Itis upon these
premises that we propose the classification in Table 6 based upon our
cladisticanalysis of the karyotypic data.This classification is conservative in that
allfamilies commonly recognized are maintained,even though in two instances
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 37
there are familypairs which we cannot karyotypically distinguish [i.e.,
Cheloniidae-Dermatemydidae
Table 6
(Fig 21)
Fig 21. Cladogram showing the hypothesized relationships of the higher
categories of cryptodiranturtles. The diploid number and the number of
chromosome pairs in groups A:B:C (Fig. 19) in the proposedprimitive
karyotype of each family (and both subfamilies of Emydidae) are shown.
Because the trionychoidfamilies are so divergent, the A:B:C formulas
are notgiven (Bickham et al., 1983). Characters 1 -5 are listed
and discussed in the text. to recognize the Staurotypinae as a separate
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 38
family, the Staurotypidae. This conclusion is incongruentwith data from
other character systems. Many morphological studies report similarities
between the Kinosternidae andStaurotypidae (among these Williams,
1950;Parsons, 1968; Zug, 1971). Most such studieshave not attempted
cladistic analyses (two exceptions are Gaffney, 1975; et al, 1981). There
seems no obvious orsimple manner in which to reconcile the conflicting
data from the karyotypic character system and the overwhelming
amount of data fromvarious morphological character systems.
Inrecognizing the Staurotypidae, we have madeexplicit our prediction of
its relationships toother testudinoid families. Independent confirmation
or refutation of these relationships will determine the merit of this
move.The three superfamilies are all considered tobe holophyletic. Fig.
21 presents a cladogram that we believe best reflects the branching
sequence of the evolution of this group. The Testudinoidea and
Chelonioidea may be sistergroups but this is as yet unproved. The
primitive karyotypes of these two taxa are identical,2n = 56 (character 1
in Fig. 21), and very different from that of the Trionychoidea, 2n = 66-68
(character 2 in Fig. 21),but we do not yet know the polarity of these
character states(Bickham et al., 1983). All testudinoid and chelonioid
turtles possessat least seven group A macrochromosomes(character 1
in Fig. 21). Among the testudinoidfamilies, aclade that includes
Staurotypidae,Platysternidae, Testudinidae, and Emydidae canbe
identified by the presence of a biarmed second group B
macrochromosome (character 3in Fig. 21; Fig. 20). Another clade
includes thePlatysternidae, Testudinidae and Emydidae allof which
primitively possess nine group A macrochromosomes (Fig. 1; character
4 in Fig. 21).A clade including the Emydidae and Testudinidae is
characterized by a 2n = 52 9:5:12 primitive karyotype (Fig. 19; character
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 39
5 in Fig. 21).Species of the emydid subfamily Emydinae allpossess a
karyotype derived from the primitive9:5:12 arrangement (Bickham and
etal,1976a).
The Dermatemydidae, Kinosternidae andChelyridae possess no chromosomal
synapomorphiesand the branching sequence of these families is not obvious
from chromosomal, morphological or serological data. However, the
Chelydridae is usually considered to be mostclosely related to the Emydidae
(McDowell,1964; Zug, 1971;Frair, 1972; Haiduk and etal, 1982) and the
dermatemydids, morphologically one of the most primitive families ofturtles, are
considered closely allied to the Kinosternidae (Zug, 1971; Frair, 1972;
Gaffney,1975b).The Cheloniidae and Dermochelyidae areconsidered to comprise
the suborder Chelonioidea.There are no karyotypic data availablefor
Dermochelys coriacea so the relationship between this species and cheloniids
has yet to betested chromosomally. But, these two families are closely related
morphologically and serologically(Frair, 1979). We follow most other workers in
giving this group full superfamilialstatus, recognizing that they have invaded
anadaptive zone, the marine environment, that is distinctly different from that of
most other turtles. It must be emphasized that Chelonia mydas(Chelonioidea)
and Dermatemys mawii (Testudinoidea) appear karyotypically identical and
weinterpret this to be the primitive karyotype of these two superfamilies.The
superfamily Trionychoidea includes onlythe Trionychidae and Carettochelyidae.
Thesetwo taxa are closely related chromosomally as well as morphologically and
their karyotypesare distinctly different from those of species of the other two
superfamilies. Some workers haveincluded the Kinosternidae
andDermatemydidae in the Trionychoidea (Gaffney, 1975a).The chromosomal
data do not support such anarrangement because of the disparity in diploid
number and chromosome morphology between testudinoids (including
kinosternids and dermatemydids) and trionychoids (Bickhametal.,1983Historical
review of taxonomic relationships.—The primary subdivisions of the order
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 40
comprisingthe turtles have undergone a great many namechanges and
rearrangements over the last 100years. Cope (1871) presented an
arrangementof the families into suborders which is still widely accepted today.
Until Cope, the subordinal andsuprafamilial classification of turtles was primarily
based on differences in the digits amongthe sea turtles, the aquatic turtles
and/or theterrestrial tortoises. Hoffman (1890) and Kuhn(1967) present reviews
of the early classifications.Cope recognized the currently widely accepted
suborders Cryptodira and Pleurodira.Two major differences between these two
suborders are in the plane of retraction of the neck).and the relationship
between the shell and pelvic girdle. In the cryptodires ("hidden-necked"turtles),
the neck is withdrawn into the body ina vertical plane and the pelvis is not fused
toeither the plastron or carapace, whereas in the pleurodires ("side-necked"
turtles) the pelvicgirdle is fused to both the plastron and carapaceand the neck
is folded back against the body in
a horizontal plane. Cope's suborder Athecaeincludes only the
Dermochelyidaeand is nolonger recognized. Most authors
includetheDermochelyidae among the Cryptodira (Gaffney,1975a; Mlynarski,
1976; Wermuth andMertens, 1977; Pritchard, 1979).A few authors recognize
the Trionychoidea(sensu Siebenrock, 1909) and/or the Chelonioidea(sensu Baur,
1893) at a suprafamilialrank equivalent with the Cryptodira and
Pleurodira (Boulenger, 1889;Lindholm, 1929; Mertens et al., 1934).
The suborder Cryptodira isused here in the sense of Williams (1950) and
subsequent authors and includes all living nonpleurodiranturtles.The families of
the suborder Cryptodira arearranged in various superfamilies by several authors.
The Testudinoidea, Chelonioidea andTrionychoidea are superfamilies common
tomost of the recentclassifications (Williams, 1950;Romer, 1966;Gaffney,
1975a; Mlynarski, 1976).However, the limits of these taxa are not uniformly
agreed upon.The non-trionychoid freshwater and landcryptodiran turtles include
the Chelydridae,Kinosternidae, Dermatemydidae, Platysternidae,Emydidae and
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 41
Testudinidae and are usually placed in the Testudinoidea (Williams,
1950;Romer, 1966). Gaffney (1975a) includes the Kinosternidae and
HerpetologistsTrionychoidea. Mlynarski (1976) includes onlythe Emydidae and
Testudinidae in the Testudinoidea.
He recognizes the superfamily Chelydroideato include the Chelydridae,
Dermatemydidae,
Kinosternidae and Platysternidae.The Chelonioidea includes the Cheloniidae
and the Dermochelyidae (Baur, 1893; Gaffney,1975a). Williams (1950), Romer
(1966), and Mlynarski (1976) recognize a separate superfamily,the
Dermochelyoidea, for the familyDermochelyidae, and include only the
Cheloniidae in the Chelonioidea.The Trionychoidea usually includes both
theTrionychidae and Carettochelyidae(Mlynarski,1976), but Williams (1950) and
Romer (1966)recognize the Carettochelyidae separately
intheCarettochelyoidea.Most of the currently utilized family orsubfamily level
taxa have been commonly recognized since Boulenger (1889). However, thereis
no completeagreementregarding the level at which certain taxa should be
recognized. Parsons (1968) reviewed this confusing situationwith regard to the
Chelydridae, Staurotypidae ,Kinosternidae, Platysternidae, Emydidae and
Testudinidae, as recognized here. Not mentioned by him are the inclusion of
Platysternonin the Chelydridae (Agassiz, 1857; Gaffney,
1975b) and the recognition of the Staurotypidae (Baur, 1891,
1893;Chkhkvadze, 1970).The above discussion of the history of
cryptodirantaxonomy serves to illustrate the complexity of the relationships of
the inclusive taxa.The taxonomic confusion seems to result from:
1) extensive convergent evolution in certainmorphological traits
, 2) the failure of someworkers to distinguish between shared primitive and
shared derived character states and
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 42
3)the lack of a widely accepted phylogeny of turtles. Chromosomal data are
used in this paperin an attempt to solve some of the evolutionaryand
classificatory problems. Cytogenetic information seems useful at this level
because of the high degree of conservatism expressed in chelonian karyotypes
(Bickham, 1981). Additionally, the application of chromosome banding
techniques solves one of the most troublesomeproblems in phylogenyre
construction; namely,the determination of homologous characters.When two
chromosomes have identical bandingpatterns it can safely be concluded that
they arehomologous. It is sometimes difficult to determine homology among
morphological characters. For example, determination of homologiesamong the
plastral scales of various turtle families is difficult. The fact that a scale is in
thesame position in members of different familiesdoes not necessarily imply
homology (Hutchison and Bramble, 1981).
(Fig 22)
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 43
Testudindae 1) Karyotype ofGeochelone denticulate , male 2n =52 , with an 2:6:12
complement of groups A:B:C 2) karyotype of Geochelone carboaria , male 2n
=52, 9:5:12 (bickham and et al 1976b)
(Fig 23)
emydidae 3) karyotype of chryemys terrapin , male 2n =50 8:5:12
4) karyotype of chrysemys decorate, male 2n=50 , 8:5:12
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 44
5) karyotype of chrysemys stejnegeri vicina ,male , 2n =50, 8:5:12(Bickham and
BAKER 1976b)
(Fig 24)
Batagurinae 6)Karyotype of rhinoclemys pulcherrima ,female 2n= 52 , 6:5:15
7) karyotype of rhinoclemys puctularia female 2n=56 (BICKHAM AND BAKERb)
(Fig25)
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 45
kinostrenidae 8) karyotype of kinosternon scorpioides , female 2n = 56, 7:6:15 (Bickham an et
al 1976b)
(Fig 26)
dermatemydidae FlG. 26.—Standard karyotype of Dermatemys mawii with chromosomes
arranged into groups: (A) metacentric to submetacentric macrochromosomes, (B) telocentric to subtelocentric macrochromosomes, and (C) microchromosomes. The standard karyotype of D. mawii(2n = 56) is presented in Figure 26. Chromosomes are arranged according to Bickham(1975) into group A metacentric orsubmetacentric macrochromosomes,group B telocentric or subtelocentric macrochromosomes, and group C microchromosomes.There are 7, 5, and 16 pairs of chromosomes in groups A, B, and C, respectively. A heteromorphic pair ofsex chromosomes is not present in themale specimen examined.
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 46
(Fig 27)
Fig. 27 G- and C-banded metaphase chromosome karyotypes of female (a, c) andmale (b, d) A. spinifera, respectively. e Enlarged images of the highly heterochromatic microchromosomes in A. spinifera, indicating theWin female (Fem) and the heterochromatic microchromosome pair (m) in both females and males. A large block of the female-specific chromosome (W) is Giemsa faint and
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 47
C-positive. The arrow indicates the female-specific chromosomes with large C-positive block. Note that the Z is morphologically indistinguishable from several other microchromosomes with similar banding pattern. Scale bar=10 μm
Trionychidae 1972; BICKHAM ET AL. 1983). NINE PAIRS OF MACROCHROMOSOMES AND 24
PAIRS OF MICROCHROMOSOMES WEREIDENTIFIED, DIFFERING SLIGHTLY FROM THE
REPORT BYBICKHAM ET AL. (1983) OF EIGHT PAIRS OF MACROCHROMOSOMES.
THE MACROCHROMOSOMES IDENTIFIED HEREINCLUDED TWO PAIRS OF
METACENTRIC, FOUR PAIRS OF SUBMETACENTRIC,AND THREE PAIRS OF
ACROCENTRIC CHROMOSOMES(FIG. 27). THE CENTROMERE POSITION OF THE 24
PAIRS OFMICROCHROMOSOMES COULD NOT BE DETECTED ACCURATELYDUE TO
THEIR SMALL SIZE, WHICH IMPEDES THE UNAMBIGUOUSPAIRING OF SOME
MICROCHROMOSOMES WITH THEIR GBANDED
Fig 28
Chelonoidea
With the method described above, metaphases were identified with a good
distribution and number, allowing the identification of sets of chromosomes. The
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 48
non-banded mitotic chromosomes were visualized by Giemsa staining.
Chelonoidis carbonaria revealed a diploid number of 2n = 52
chromosomes, in both sexes, divided into three groups (A, B, C). Group
A was composed of 28 chromosomes (3 metacentric pairs, one
acrocentric and 10 submetacentric pairs), group B consisted of seven
pairs of acrocentric chromosomes, and group C showed five pairs of
microchromosomes (Figure 1A,B). Sex chromosomes were not
observed.
SUBORDER PLEURODIRA INTRODUCTION of pleurodira
Turtles of the suborder Pleurodira are divided into two families, the
Chelidae and the Pelomedusidae, which are clearly separated by both
morphological (Gaffney, 1977) and molecular (Shaffer et al., 1997)
features. The Chelidae consists of nine genera, five of which are found
in Australia and New Guinea and four in South America (Ernst and
Barbour, 1989). Conflicting phylogenies have been proposed for the
Chelidae, but recent phylogenetic analysis based on molecular markers
(Seddon et al., 1997; Fujita et al., 2004) support the monophyly of the
Australian/New Guinea and South American chelid turtles. The chelid
genus Hydromedusa (commonly known as snake-necked turtles)
consists of two species of semi-aquatic turtles that have an extremely
long throat: H. maximiliani, restricted to the southeast region of Brazil;
and et al, distributed throughout southern and southeastern Brazil,
northeastern Argentina, Uruguay and southeastern Paraguay.
The chromosomes of birds, fishes and some reptile groups are highly
variable in terms of size and morphology, and are characterize by
bimodal or asymmetric karyotypes composed of macro and
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 49
microchromosomes. Turtle karyotypes show two general tendencies
based on the presence or absence of microchromosomes but there is
much variation between groups. For example, the chromosome number
in the order Chelonia ranges from 2n = 26 in Podocnemis
dumeriliana (Ayres et al., 1969) to 2n = 96 in Platemys platycephala (Bull
and Legler, 1980; Bickham et al., 1985). Also, while karyotypic studies
have frequently been published for turtles from the suborder Cryptodira,
information about Pleurodires is scarce and fragmented and mainly
based on conventional staining techniques.
In this paper describe the almost complete karyotypic characterization
of Hydromedusa tectifera using several staining techniques and in
situ Fluorescence Hybridization (FISH).
SUPERFAMILY PELOMEDUSIDAE
Pelomedusids have low diploid numbers and few microchromosomes
(2n = 26–36); the five largest chromosomes are homologous in the
three genera.
The big-headed side-neck river turtle, Peltocephalusdumerilianus
(Schweigger, 1812), occurs in the Amazonregion and belongs to the
superfamily Pelomedusoides (approximately24 living species), which
comprises the families
Pelomedusidae, with two living genera: Pelomedusaand Pelusios
represented by one, and at least 15 species, respectively;and
Podocnemididae, with three living genera:the monotypic Erymnochelys
and Peltocephalus, andPodocnemis comprising six species (Ayres et al.,
1969;Vitt and et al, 2009). In Podocnemididae cytogeneticdata are scarce
and based mostly on conventional staining.The Podocnemis and
Erymnochelys species (P. erythrocephala,P. expansa, P. lewyana, P.
sextuberculata, P.unifilis, P. vogli and E. madagascariensis) present a
diploidnumber (2n) of 28, with a karyotype composed of
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 50
fivemacrochromosomes (M) and nine microchromosomes (m)(Ayres et
al., 1969; Huang and Fred Clark 1969; Rhodin etal., 1978; Bull and Legler,
1980; Fantin andet al, 2011;Gunski et al., 2013). The exception is
Peltocephalus
dumerilianus that presents 2n = 26 with 4 M and9m, the lowest diploid
number in Testudines (ranging from
2n = 26 to 2n = 96) (Ayres et al., 1969; Bull and et al,1980). The available
cytogenetic data for this species report
a karyotype that is similar to those of other Podocnemididae,in which
differentiated sex chromosomes are absentand a conspicuous
secondary constriction is observed
the karyotype of P.dumerillianus was characterized for the first time
using routine differential techniques, such as GTG, CBGbandingand Ag-
NOR staining (Seabright, 1971; Sumner,For all individuals, at least 20
metaphases were analyzedfor determining the 2n = 26 and FN = 52
karyotype,as described by Ayres et al., 1969, with a conspicuous
secondary constriction on pair 1 (Figure 1A). GTG-banding
patterns allowed the identification and the pairing of allchromosomes
(Figure 1B). CBG-bands were tenuous at thepericentromeric region of
most pairs, except for pair1
(Fig 29)
Figure 29- Karyotype (A and B) and metaphases (C-E) of Peltocephalus dumerilianus, 2n = 26 and FN = 52. (A) Conventional staining. Inset, pair
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 51
1 from other metaphase showing the conspicuous secondary constriction. (B) GTG-banding pattern. (C) CBG-banding pattern. Note the conspicuous C-positive bands on pair 1. Inset, pair 1 bearing positive Ag-NORs.
probes. Positive signals (green) are seen at the termini of all chromosomes. (E) Mapping of 45S rDNA. Positive FISH signals (red) are at the secondary
constrictionregion of pair 1.
FAMILT PODOcnemis
To determine karyotypes we counted 35 cellsin each individuals from each species. Our resultsshowed that the karyotypic number forboth species of Podocnemis is 2n = 28 chromosomes,consisting of 5 pairs of macrochromosomesand 9 pairs of microchromosomes, with the following morphologies: 16m + 2sm + 10aand NF = 46 (Figure 1). Silver-nitrate staining All species of the genusPodocnemis present a chromosomal number of2n=28, which is extremely low compared withkaryotypes described for other species. Few karyotypic studies have been conductedon the genus Podocnemis
(AYRES et al. 1969;RHODIN et al. 1978; BULL and et al1980; ORTIZet al.
2005), the work by Ayres et al. (1969)is the only one that presents
cytogenetic studies
for P. expansa and P. sextuberculata. However,there are still no studies
on chromosomal evolutionwithin the family Podocnemidae, nor arethere
any comparative studies of chromosomal
banding.This work describes the karyotypes and thelocalization of the
nucleolar organizer regions(NORs) in two species of the genus
Podocnemis
(Fig 30)
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 52
Fig. 30 — Karyotype of Podocnemis sextuberculata (above)microchromosomes and P. expansa with2n = 28.
Family chelidea
Chelids have high diploid numbers and many microchromosomes (2n =
50–64) and are similar in this respect to cryptodires (2n = 50–66).
(Fig 31)
Karyological analysis of order testudines 2016
Page 53
Fig 32
The chromosome complement of all our Hydromedusa
tectifera specimens was 2n = 58, of which 22 were macrochromosomes
and 36 microchromosomes (Figure 1a 33). It was possible to precisely
determine the position of the centromere in the macrochromosomes,
and we observed one submetacentric chromosome pair, one
metacentric pair and nine pairs of acrocentric chromosomes, giving a
total of 62 chromosome arms. No sex chromosome heteromorphism
was observed. This diploid number agrees with the study of Bull and