Kangil Ji_Work Sample (Spring 2014)

Work Sample Kangil Ji Works 2009-14Part I Architectural Works

Los Angeles as ArchitectureGSD Option Studio 2014, Michael Maltzan Architecture, LA

Ecologic UrbanismGSD Option Studio 2013

Evolutionary ContextK-Arts Option Studio 2010 (RIBA Part II)

Landscript ()K-Arts Option Studio 2009

Architectural InfrastructureK-Arts Option Studio 2006 (RIBA Part I)

Klarman Hall, Cornell Univ.Koetter Kim & Associates, Boston, 2013

OO Federal CourthouseSOM+AECOM, LA, 2013

Part II Urban Design, Landscape Architecture, and Design Research

Liminal NatureGSD Option Studio 2012

Seoul Urban Design Intl CompetitionPersonal Competition Work, 2013

Yongsan Park Intl CompetitionMetropolitan Arch. Research Unit, Seoul, 2012 Elements of ArchitectureGSD Option Studio 2013 at OMA, Rotterdam

Full-version on-line portfolio is accessible on

http://issuu.com/kangilji/docs/portfo-lio_-_140517_smaller_images__

Kangil Ji, Harvard GSD M.Arch II [email protected], +1.857.200.7573

Partial Model

Location: Sherman Oaks, LA, CASite Area: 14 acreBuilding Area: 16.8 acre

Program: Mix-used building

Compression of LA Experience into Architecture

As Los Angeles confronts the need to densification, this project propose a strategy to do so in a fashion that pre-serves and amplifies the experience of the city today, and makes good on its longstanding promise of a lifestyle of convenience and rich experience. This project observes that Los Ange-les is topographically complex, but feels flat from the perspective of the user because it is constructed on a continu-

ous paved surface, with little to no thresh-old between parking and the contents of its structures. This project also observe that the city strives towards the synop-tic view: the hillside house that frames the panoramic urban spread below. >

GSD option studio I Spring 2014 I Instructor: Michael Maltzan (FAIA), Mia LehrerLos Angeles as Architecture

0 30m

Flat ground, vertical buildings Vertical ground, at buildingsFlat ground, vertical buildings Vertical ground, at buildingsconventional idea on city- flat ground, vertical buildings

Los Angeles- vertical ground, flat buildings

Elevation Perspective (front view)

How LA works?

2

Section-perspective


SectionsLandscape and architectural components Daylight analysis

daylight analysis - ground floor

slab and envelope

in-between space

summer solstice- 12% CDA (500Lux)

winter solstice- 12.5% CDA (500Lux)

High

Low

Solar Radiance

Summer solstice

Curved Envelope Curved EnvelopeStraight Envelope

Daylight Amount Analysis Daylight Amount Analysis

Winter solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

High

Low

Solar Radiance

Summer solstice



Winter solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

High

Low

Solar Radiance

Summer solstice



Winter solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

High

Low

Solar Radiance

Summer solstice



Winter solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

High

Low

Solar Radiance

Summer solstice



Winter solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

Winter solstice

Summer solstice

typical envelope (straight)

summer summer

wintersummer

solar envelope (curved)

Summer solstice - 12% CDA (Continuous Daylight Autonomy), 500Lux

Winter solstice - 12.51% CDA (Continuous Daylight Autonomy), 500Lux

14

30

1713

33

8

8

2717

21

1825

12

177

22

13

13

824

17

9

918

3111

1017

2410

16

2410

2023

2314

35

119

9

39

20

25

195 6

17

139

2324

20

2225

29

30

25

23

11

21

30

2517

1629

912

18

38

20

2015

7

7

10

21

16

32

47

11

1026

38

20

13

24

17

16

9

25

25

25

1613

20

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

18

30

33

25

18

10

2126

1517

6

14

1432

20

17

34

1712

29

6

C

A

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

B

green roofs / sunken courtyards

folded multimodal spine

architectural islands: canopy infiltratio

ground permeability and circulation

channel cut

3

Section-perspective

0 50ft

Elevation Perspective

Location: Li-Wan, Guangzhou, ChinaSite Area: 110-acreBuilding Area: 6,000m2 (building footprint)Program: Mix-used building

Verticalized Street Life

Today, urban environment of the city of Guangzhou in Southern China is becoming more deteriorated, due to its skyscraper-oriented development without consider-ation on the citys climate and culture.The concept of ecologic urbanism pro-poses a new model of city development based on an alternative model of mid-dle-rise, mix-used building typology. This third typology mixes modernist con-cept of city (faster construction of city

based on Walter Gropius Torten Hous-ing) and local peoples communal life based on its street culture, while pro-viding diverse thermal properties in the building to generate varied urban activ-ities based on architectural typology.>

GSD option studio I Spring 2013 I Instructor: Ingeborg RockerPublication (pending): Ecologics: Refiguring the Civic Ground, Harvard GSDEcologic Urbanism

0 10m

0 30m

Elevation Perspective (front view)

Verticalization of street life

4


Model & Perspective

Section-perspective

0 10mresidentialoffice multi-purpose (education, entertainment, etc)commercial

5

K-Arts option studio I Fall 2010 I Instructor: Christian SchweitzerExhibited work at RIBA Presidents Medals Student Awards, RIBA, London, 2011

Second Floor Plan with Site Context

Evolutionary Context

Location: Seo Village, SeoulSite Area: 18,920m2

Building Area: 11,340m2

Program: Design Museum, ResidenceCommunity Park, Parking

New Architectural Typology from Korean Grid

In Korea, most habitation was made in val-leys as a finger-shaped leaf-structure pat-tern. The resultant land lot plan looks different from BAR code shaped west-ern cities (grid, axis), but looks more like a 3-dimensional QR code with more infor-mation. These are crucial factors gener-ating irregular cityscape of Korean cities. These spatial characteristics share com-mon elements with contemporary social-istic theories seek more complexity and

multiplicity. Amplifying this irregular cityscape through architectural process would reveal hidden context of this place.

Bar Code

= New York(Western Grid)

QR Code = Seoul

(Korean Grid)

0 100m

Section Perspective

6

30m0


Urban Landscape & Perspective

Design Process

urban

habitation pattern I I IIirregular urban structure Korean grid city = mountainapplication on site

rural

=

+

1912

1912 land map

1925 2010

2010, abstraction of 1912 map

7

K-Arts option studio I 2009 I Instructor: H-Sang Seung (Hon. FAIA)Exhibited work at STUDIOPLEX, UCLAs lab. for cross cultural studies, LA, 2010Landscript ()

Location: Junggyebon-dong, SeoulSite Area: 21,760m2


Program: Housing (330 units), Parking,Community Facility, Farm Landexisting building fabric new building fabric

Section

Ground Floor Plan with Previous Site Context

Landscript Urbanism

The life of our ancestors was deeply involved with the land on which they lived. Every land has its own figure. As we all have different fingerprints, a land has its own print. It is the history of nature itself, and sometimes a history of civ-ilization. Therefore, the landscape is a magnificent history book of our life and land: a landscript is an organism, a mass of energy that requires apposi-tional growth. Now, we start the archi-

tecture by listening to the land, and adding a poetic but modest gesture to it.

previous contour

>

0 50m

0 20m

8


combined facilities and nature

urban farm land

community & service facilities

living units

artificial grounds

Living Units - Space Variation System

Urban Landscape

Urban Framework

duplex type85m2

10 units

studio type39m2

124 units

2 beds type56m2, 79.5m2

168 units

SOHO type82.5m2

18 units

5m0

9

K-Arts option studio I 2005 I Instructor: Jongkyu Kim (ARB/RIBA)Hornorable mention, DO.CO.MO.MO Design Competition, 2008Architectural Infrastructure

0 50m

Location: Dangin-dong, SeoulSite Area: 129,700m2


Program: Urban Park & Convention Centerblot out previous boundary extension of urban structure

Elevation (Phase 2)

Ground Floor Plan

Architecture as Infrastructure

Dangin-ri power plant has been iso-lated from various urban contexts. Hence required transformation to large-scale public facility(urban park with cultural program) will continue to make colli-sion with surrounding low-density resi-dence area which does not have enough urban infrastructures. It is a plan of partly occupying the site by extending urban fabrics and transforming isolated power plant realm into a part of the city

by two stages. By doing so, this project attempt to incorporate such unpredictable events and future demands of the city.

>

10

0 30m


Land-Architecture Relation (Phase 2)

Isometric Drawing (Phase 2)

Perspective

11

0 30m

0 30m

Internship at Koetter Kim & Associates, Boston, MA I Jan 2013 Position: Draftsman (CD Phase 70% detail drawing)

Perspective

Klarman Hall, Cornell Univ. NY

Location: Cornell University, Ithaca, NYSite Area: 6,300m2


Program: Atrium, Lecture Hall, Office, etc

New in Old

The architecture of Klarman Hall is con-temporary while being respectful of an emergent and continuing architectural timeline that characterizes the East Ave-nue Corridor in Cornell University, NY. As the new building will be inserted in courtyard of the Goldwin Smith Hall, care-ful consideration has been given to the scale and character of Klarman Hall.I have worked as a draftsman of the proj-ect in 70% CD documents in the Archi-

tect of Record office, drawing details for several parts of its sections while cooperating with other designers.

Section Detail Drawings

Koetter Kim & Associates

Koetter Kim & Associates

main atrium

12

Location: Los Angeles, CA, USABuilding Area: 600,000 sq. ft.Program: Federal Courthouse

Transparent Courtroom

The architecture of OO Federal Court-house in Los Angeles proposes a new con-cept of courtroom - more transparent and light atmosphere filled with natural light. In achieving this goal, making new relation-ships between daylight and interior space was one of crucial design objectives.I have worked as a design intern of the project in 80% DD phase. One of my main tasks was finding out optimum design alternatives of the courtroom with

best sightline and comfort level through daylight analysis. I also participated in 1:1 mock-up courtroom design task.

Perspective: Interior

SOM-AECOM

Professional work at SOM-AECOM, LA, CA I May 2013 - Aug 2013 Position: Design intern (design development, daylight analysis, etc)OO Federal Courthouse

LA FEDERAL COURTHOUSE | Courtroom StudiesLos Angeles, CA 06.17.2013

1

Judicial Accent WallStudies - Option 01

Sectional Perspective Elevation - Eye Level

07:00 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice

March / September Equinox

Option #1 : Onyx (Full-Height) - East

07:00 AM

07:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM


1



07:00 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


07:00 AM

07:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


Option #2 : Onyx (14-Height) - East


8



07:00 AM

07:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

14


8



Option #2 : Onyx (14 - Height) - West

14

07:00 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


07:00 AM

07:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


Option #2-1 : Onyx (12-Height) - East

07:00 AM

07:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM


8



12

Option 05 (Metal Rod) Option 06 (Wood, Trapezoid) Option 07 (Wood, Flat)

Back Wall Daylight Study (West)

11:00 AM11:00 AM 11:00 AM

11:00 AM11:00 AM 11:00 AM

11:00 AM11:00 AM 11:00 AM

13:15 PM13:15 PM 13:15 PM

13:15 PM13:15 PM 13:15 PM

13:15 PM13:15 PM 13:15 PM

Option #2-1 : Onyx (12-Height) - West


8



12

07:00 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


07:00 AM

07:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

10:00 AM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

01:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

04:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

07:00 PM

Option 02 (Onyx 14ft)

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM13:15 PM

13:15 PM13:15 PM

13:15 PM13:15 PM

Option 04 (Onyx 12ft)

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM13:15 PM

13:15 PM13:15 PM

13:15 PM13:15 PM


Option #3 : Wood Trapezoid - East

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM


4



08:30 AM

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


Option #3 : Wood Trapezoid - West

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM


4




Option #4 : Metal Rod - East

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM


3



08:30 AM

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


Option #4 : Metal Rod - West

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM


3




Option #5 : Wood Flat - East

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM


5



08:30 AM

08:30 AM

08:30 AM

Winter Solstice

Summer Solstice


Option #5 : Wood Flat - West

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

09:45 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

11:00 AM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

13:15 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

14:30 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM

15:45 PM


5



courtroom design alternatives study based on daylight analysis

Perspective

front view

SOM-AECOM

courtroom design alternative samples with different types of back-walls

13

GSD option studio I Fall 2012 I Instructor: Paola ViganoPublication (pending): Inside a New Form of Dispersed Megalopolis, Harvard GSD

Fragmented Water and Open Space System (2010 GIS Data)

Territorialism

Location: Boston, MASite Area: 8x6Km (Neponset River)Building Area: N/AProgram: Water & Open Space Integration System

New Urbanity on Liminal Nature

The Neponset River, a liminal nature divid-ing urban & suburban, black & white, and rich & poor community has been margin-alized through history, and now became a forgotten space. On the other hand, many fragmented parks and open spaces were recently developed in the inland (due to the myth on nature), while not actively utilizing the riverfront with huge natu-ral/open space. This project aims to cre-ate a new urbanity along the forgotten

river while utilizing those problems and opportunities through an integrated water and open space management system.

waternatureopen spacerailwaycommercialindustrial

0 3 6 9 12 15Km

Section Perspective

>

Charles Eliot, Metro Park System (1894) New Urbanity on Liminal Nature (2012)

14


Situation

Strategy Perspectives

Physical Model

Charles River

watermain roadssubwayrailway

x

x

T&H DamCanal

Bakers Dam

Tide

demolition of the dam, restore tide

stormwater drainage + pedestrian way network

weave fragmented open/green, add wetlands

retrofit riverfront malls/parking lots

Neponset River

25% (polluted) water inflow for flooding control

Charles River

situation

15

Best prize I Exhibited work at 2013 Intl Space Syntax Symposium, Seoul, KoreaJury: Dominique Perrault, John Peponis , Renee Y Chow, etc

Waterway as agency of urban integration

SUD Intl Competition

Location: Jemulpo, SeoulSite Area: 5x2Km (Jemulpo road)Program: urban park, water reservoir

Hyper Landscape

This project finds opportunity of cre-ating future vision of the city from the such accumulated physical and meta-physical history of the site, and creates hyper landscape by string such features together in a successive way as below: 1) Rediscover and reconnect hidden water-ways to the site (Jemulpo-road) 2) Create park and amenities based on waterway. It also functions as a reservoir which pre-vent chronic flooding of the site 3) Induce

successive restructuring of the urban fab-ric according to the reconnected waterway 4) Consolidates strong interdepen-dency among urban elements and cre-ate new urbanity: Hyper Landscape.

Analysis of Regional Topography and Relevant Stream, Floodplain, and RiverFloodplain & River Proposed Corridor Jemulpo-gil

Hard Paving = 5% Soft Paving = 40% Water = 55%

Deten

tion P

ond_

Eco-

pond

Deten

tion P

ond_

Hyd

roph

yte Bo

tanic

Gard

en

Spor

ts Fa

cility

_ Wate

r Rete

ntion

Rain

Gard

en

Water

front

_ Can

al wi

th Si

tting

Wall

Wetla

nd_ W

etlan

d Shr

ub Fo

rest

Wetla

nd_ H

ydro

phyte

Shru

b Gard

en

Wetla

nd_ P

urify

ing W

etlan

d

Wetla

nd_ R

ice e

ld We

tland

Gree

n Fiel

d_ Re

creati

on Fi

eld

Water

Fron

t_ Flo

or Fo

untai

n

Water

front

_ Wate

r Plaz

a (wa

ter pl

aygr

ound

)

Water

front

_ Floo

r Fou

ntain

Water

front

_ Wate

r Plaz

a (wa

ter pl

aygr

ound

)Sp

orts

Facil

ity_ W

ater R

etent

ion

Rain

Gard

en

Rain

Gard

en

Rain

Gard

en

Rain

Gard

en

0 1Kmnew waterway lower area (flooding zone) express way (Jemulpo road)spatial depth

High Low

Section Perspective

1918Inter-dependent relationship

topography

localurbanity

water road

2013Disconnected relationship

topography

localurbanity

urbangrid

Jemulporoad

water road>

16

30m0


waterway green field (soft surface) pedestrian way/plaza new buildings

0 0.5 1Km

High

Low

Future Scenario: Utilization of Valley and Stream as New Green/Civic Corridor

Intelligibility, R2=0.0078


7

Con

nect

ivity

0.0633818 1.05598

0

Integration [P-value]

R = 0.00767959

0.0634031 1.05598

0

R = 0.0511315


Con

nect

ivity

32

Intelligibility Analysis, R2=0.0076 (Current Condition, Left)R2=0.0515 (Future Scenario, Right)

0 0.5 1Km


7

Con

nect

ivity

0.0633818 1.05598

0


R = 0.00767959

0.0634031 1.05598

0

R = 0.0511315


Con

nect

ivity

32

Intelligibility Analysis, R2=0.0076 (Current Condition, Left)R2=0.0515 (Future Scenario, Right)

0 0.5 1Km


2013 Urban Fabric

2033 Urban Fabric

Vision urban integration (comparison: degree of intelligibility)

as-found site map of topography and waterway

Design Process creation of new urbanity (hyper-landscape) by recovering waterway

1918Inter-dependency among urban elements

2013 (Phase 1)Recovery of waterway


2028 (Phase 2)Extension of waterway into urban fabric


2043 (Phase 3)Restructuring of urban fabric by waterway


17

3rd Prize I Professional work at M.A.R.U. I Project designerJury: Charles Waldheim (GSD), Christophe Girot (ETH), Julia Czerniak (Syracuse), etc

Land & Building Types

Masterplan (Phase IV)

Yongsan Park Intl Competition

flatland

ridge

gentle slope

Location: Yongsan Garrison, SeoulSite Area: 2,430,000m2

Building Area: 452,880m2(2017) to 129,706m2(2027)

Program: Park w/ indeterminate social use

Early Opening, Slow Completion

We seek an incremental and long-term approach afterwards. By monitoring the relationship between the park and city, and through sufficient social discussions and active involvements of the citizens, the park will be reorganized in terms of space and readjusted in terms of function. Since the process of a space becoming a place and a place becoming an attrac-tion takes a long period of time requir-ing strong public support and affection.

preservation

452,880m (building area)phase 1

350,037mphase 2

260,126mphase 3

188,445mphase 4

129,706mphase 5

0 500m

2012, U.S. Army Garrison : one plot for military use

2017, Yongsan Park : creation of urban plot for public use

>>

2027, Yongsan Park : plot removal & ecological restoration Building Types (Period of Use)

Land Types

18


Users Manual: Yongsan Park Social Rent Info System

Users Manual: Recommended Building Reuse Catalogue

parcel # Temp-187

parcel # Temp-189

parcel # Temp-190

parcel # Perm-56

parcel # L-Term-254

parcel # Temp-188

parcel # Temp-185

parcel # Temp-186

parcel # L-Term-253

temporary

building use period regulation land surface types

long-term permanent new pavement road soil road grass gardenfarm land wood land water

Users Manual (Part)- parcel specification

browsing & applyfor social rent

P2-N17/dmuseum

P2-N18/gpavilion

P2-N19 / aticket house

P2-N20 / dshop

P2-N21 / aticket house

P2-N22 / gpavilion

P2-136 / 7yard

P2-136 / 4bold facade restoration

0 4 7 8a b d g

P2-138 / 8entrance

P2-166 P2-160

P2-165

P2-133

P4-75 P4-79 P4-82

P4-74 P4-78

P4-73

P4-81

P4-84 P4-85P1-432

P2-154

P2-139

P2-162

P4-69 / 7yard

P4-68 / 8kitchen garden

P4-67 / 6, fobservatory

P4-27 / 4literature house

land type 2: gentle slope

land type 1: flatland

land type 3: ridge

P4-73 / 2, hcommunity room

P4-81 / 6, fharvest yard

P4-77 / 8harvest yard

P4-N12 / hworkshop

P4-30 / 3kiosk

P1-366 / 7, 8cityscape observatory

P4-25

0 2 6 7 8h

3 4 7 8

strolling down the nature walk on the ridge of the Mt. Dunji

looking down towards the orchard village

rambling around the Japanese military HQ area

202720172012

19

GSD option studio I Fall 2013 I Instructor: Rem Koolhaas, Stephan TrbyPublication: Rem Koolhaas, Elements of Architecture, Marsilio (August 12, 2014)Elements of Architecture

Corridor: Form of Connection, Separation and Escape

The corridors main function of speed is derived its etymology. In the 14th cen-tury, the corridor was not a place, but a person. From currere, to run, the cor-ridre first described a courier, and even-tually referred to the pathways above fortified walls, which enabled the trans-fer of messages. With the invention of the trace italienne fortification system in the 15th century, military leaders relocated troops to ditches at the bottom of the wall. The corridor followed. In the 17th century, architects interiorized the corridor. By The 19th century corridoio described a pas-sage within a building. The corridor ceased to be an urban element, but still main-tained a close relationship to the dimen-sions of the human body and the function of speed. But now it occurred within build-ings rather than between them. Architects gradually abandoned the corridor after its heyday in the 19th century. However, esca-lating building heights of the 20th century brought increasing demands exit corridor.

timeline corridor: ever-expanding element of architecture (from architecture to geography)

back cover of the book (working version)A corridor at Welbeck Abbey, Nottinghamshire, UK

20


19th century visual corridors vs. service corridors (China vs. UK)

17th century versatile corridors vs. secret corridors (Japan vs. France) 20th century device-fication of corridor (exit corridors)

21th century elements of corridor

21

Kangil Ji_Work Sample (Spring 2014)

Documents