KALO.pdf

VIKRAM SOLAR PARK@ PENAKONDA270 MWp – POTENTIAL INSTALLED CAPASITY OF PV POWER PLANT

SERVISED SOLAR ENERGY PARK FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY ENTREPRENUER

Confidential 11/7/2011 0

Index

1. Background............................................................................................................. 1

2. Location................................................................................................................... 2

3. Solar Potential – radiation data review ................................................................. 3

4. Evacuation infrastructure- ..................................................................................... 4

5. Target customers- .................................................................................................. 5

6. Proposed Product and infrastructure components-........................................... 6

7. Energy Injected into 33 KV RMU by typical 2 MWp PV Power plant – i.e. Performance vis-à-vis project location and module technology. ................ 7

8. Land use statement-............................................................................................... 9

9. Development takeoff and typical pre marketing land development expenses......................................................................................................................... 10

List of Annexure- ANNEXURE 1 - Location and project perimeter on Survey of India Topo Sheet. ANNEXURE 2 – Site Photographs and Google images. ANNEXURE 3 – PVSYST 5.51 output- Vikram Solar park @ Penakonda vis-à-vis module type. ANNEXURE 4 – PVSYST 5.51 output- Gujarat Solar park @ Charanka vis-à-vis module type. ANNEXURE 5 – PVSYST 5.51 output- Pokhran Solar Feilds vis-à-vis module type. ANNEXURE 6 – Single Line Diagram – 100 MWp Pooling Station and downstream utility

270 MWp VIKRAM SOLAR PARK @ PENAKONADA Project Concept by Mr. Anirban Choudhury (PGDPlanning SP-CEPT Ahmedabad; BE Civil RIT Jamshedpur) A project development professional having more than 16 + years experience in development of infrastructure and real estate projects (concept to post take-off) like eco-industrial parks, townships and logistics hub. Since January 2009, he has been working with SPV Power project proponents in conceptualizing appropriate PV system of MW scale grid linked Power Plant and also integration of SPV with LEED Rated realty projects. He is also into M & A and transaction advisory in realty and clean energy sector. Starting June 2010, he headed for a year, the business development function of Solar business Unit of ICOMMTELE Pvt. Ltd. Energy & PV Power Plant modeling; energy simulation using appropriate tools; customized solutions for solar field vis-à-vis need for land use and civil works optimization; layout plan in synergy with plant functional & site ecological requirements; work planning & development are his strengths. He has also worked in project design & development management functions for realty projects. Email- [email protected] [email protected] Website- www.atut.co.in Linkedin- http://in.linkedin.com/pub/anirban-choudhury/11/b63/143

VIKRAM SOLAR PARK@ PENAKONDA270 MWp – POTENTIAL INSTALLED CAPASITY


Confidential Page 1 11/7/2011

1. Background Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar mission (JNNSM) of Ministry of New and renewable energy resources (MNRE) is promoting development of Megawatt Scale PV Power Plant through directly subsidized higher PPA with NVVN (NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam)

Outside the JNNSM , state governments of Rajasthan, Gujarat, Chattisgarh and Karnataka is encouraging this sector through “State Solar Policy” based initiatives, i.e. subsidized PPA with local distribution companies.

On the other hand CERC and state regulatory authorities have made it mandatory for conventional power produces and local distribution companies to progressively go for a renewable resources based power starting with 0.25 % of power generated/ traded in FY 2011-12, i.e. Renewable Energy Purchase Obligation (REPO).

30 x 5 MWp PV Power Plant capacity allocation under JNNSM 1st Phase was done through reverse bid method. As a result of this reverse bid, the PPA went down and is in the range of Rs 11.55/ KWh to Rs 12.79/KWh, becoming the benchmark range for long term PPA under REPO . Thus the PPA signed between Reliance Power and NVVN for its upcoming 100 MWp PV power plant in Rajasthan happens to be Rs 11.97/KWh (Avg of bottom 3/5th ).

Today the EPCC cost of PV Power Plant works out to be Rs 10.60 Cr/MWp1 to Rs 9.85 Cr/MWp. Developers & investors looking for reasonable return of equity of around 16% are able to offer conservative reverse bid value within the range of Rs 10.78/KWh to Rs 11.47/KWh. The aggressive bid value will be in the range of Rs 10.46/KWh to Rs 11.18/KWh, i.e. average of PPA under REPO will be around Rs10.82/ KWh. On the other hand end users of power like tenants of commercial real estate, pays Rs 15/KWh to Rs 20/KWh, i.e. payment to maintenance team fill diesel and operate the DG, excluded capitalization of DG sets.

CERC has fixed Solar REC Forbearance price is Rs 13.40/KWh and Floor price is Rs 9.3/KWh, but there is negligible availability of solar REC in last 10 months of trading (i.e. 1 buy bid and zero sell bid in India energy exchange http://www.iexindia.com ) as most of the operational PV power plant are under long term subsidized PPA with negligible surplus to trade.

It can be concluded that Solar PV power tariff will achieve grid parity in the near future. Secondly there is a huge requirement of peak power, whose daily duration is in synergy with solar PV power plant daily power production cycle. Therefore, Solar PV Power plants are the best renewable energy option for taking care of peaking power demands of major consumption centers in the country. Salient features of the site proposed for development of 270 MWp Solar PV Park is follows-

1 CdTe modules @ 0.92 USD/Watt, ASi Module @ 0.77 USD/Watt; Vectron Bonfiglioli Central inverter, 33 KV BOS & evacuation

infrastructure, fencing, nominal grading of land and all civil work. It excludes cost of interconnection to nearest 132/33 KV GSS, around 4 KM away and cost of multi circuit latticed tower based transmission line. EPCC using ASi module is Rs 9.85Cr/MWp.

The spot price of has changed by – 6.9% for CdTe between Sept 2008 and Sept 2011. During same period the spot price of ASi module has changed – 9.6%. Assuming placement of procurement order in Q2-2012 and same module pricing trend, the price of CdTe module in Q2-2012 will be 0.856 USD/Watt, i.e. EPCC cost of Rs 10.28 Cr/MWp. Similarly cost of ASi Module will be 0.70 USD/Watt, i.e. EPCC cost of Rs 9.5 Cr/WRp.




2. Location

Latitude 13.989538 Deg North; Longitude 77.657861 Deg East; AMSL 702 M. Located at Petakunta; P.O Somandepalli, Ananthapur District; AP

Bangalore International Airport

trumpet flyover

24 Km Chickballapur DC Office

49 Km Bagehalli Toll Gate (on AP & Karnataka Border on NH7)

23 Km Palasamudram Northern Bank (Start of property)

The estate measures around 1827.42 Acre and in possession of a Bombay based business family since 1949. The property is an arid revenue land and has a unit to extract SISAL Fibers & estate management office. It is around 96 Km from “BIAL Airport Trumpet Flyover on NH7”, i.e. 120 Km north of Bangalore; 20 Km West of Hindupur and 80 Km from district headquarters Ananthapur. The above location map also gives a clearer picture of its command area. The proposed Solar City being developed by APIIC @ Kadiri is around 50 Km, 70.350 North East of the site, National Highway 7 (NH7) diagonally divides the property almost equally into two flanks- East and West. The property is enjoying around 7.5 Km frontage. The Western Flank of the property starts from the northern bank of Palasamudram, a perennial water body. The property also has a water body within, suitable for tank irrigation. The site has well graded land, rolling terrain and some rocky outcrops. The slopes varies from 5% (2.80 ) to 20 % (110 ) and above. The western flank (around 900 Acres) has some rocky outcrops and the highest point of western flank is the North West end, sloping gradually towards east and south east. The Eastern Flank (balance 900 Acres) is well graded, gently sloping towards the south east.




The site geology (metamorphic rock like granite and other weathered rock strata ) is ideal for establishing molten salt based heat storage system, increasing the availability of power after sun set.

3. Solar Potential – radiation data review Monthly Averaged Radiation Incident On An Equator-Pointed Tilted Surface (kWh/m2/day)

parameters Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Average

Vikram Solar Park @ Penakunta (Latitude 13.989538 Deg North; Longitude 77.657861 Deg East; AMSL 702 M)

SSE HRZ 5.35 6.13 6.61 6.53 6.12 5.03 4.55 4.61 4.96 4.62 4.53 4.76 5.31

K 0.63 0.65 0.65 0.61 0.57 0.47 0.43 0.43 0.48 0.48 0.52 0.58 0.54

Diffuse 1.33 1.42 1.67 1.99 2.14 2.30 2.33 2.35 2.19 1.97 1.68 1.42 1.90

Direct 6.86 7.42 7.27 6.45 5.68 3.94 3.19 3.19 3.99 4.06 4.75 5.84 5.21

OPT 6.60 6.85 6.75 6.42 6.04 4.98 4.48 4.53 4.93 4.83 5.20 5.93 5.62

OPT ANG 40.0 31.0 17.0 1.00 9.00 11.0 9.00 0.00 9.00 23.0 35.0 42.0 18.8

Gujarat Solar Park @ Charanka (Latitude 23.884520 Deg North; Longitude 71.180386 Deg East; AMSL 18 M) and

SSE HRZ 4.20 4.80 5.67 6.36 6.68 6.17 5.05 4.80 5.19 4.87 4.23 3.92 5.16

K 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.60 0.60 0.55 0.45 0.45 0.53 0.57 0.58 0.59 0.56

Diffuse 1.14 1.41 1.69 1.94 2.12 2.35 2.46 2.32 1.96 1.55 1.24 1.08 1.78

Direct 6.01 5.95 6.26 6.48 6.55 5.48 3.71 3.58 4.91 5.58 5.67 5.77 5.49

OPT 5.59 5.82 6.06 6.31 6.65 6.14 5.03 4.70 5.31 5.58 5.50 5.44 5.68

OPT ANG 48.0 39.0 26.0 10.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 18.0 34.0 46.0 50.0 22.9

Pokhran Solar Field of Rajasthan (Latitude 26.887025 Deg North; Longitude 71.929836 Deg East; AMSL 229 M )

SSE HRZ 3.91 4.59 5.33 6.21 6.67 6.62 5.81 5.47 5.36 4.66 3.95 3.56 5.17

K 0.59 0.59 0.57 0.59 0.60 0.58 0.52 0.51 0.56 0.56 0.57 0.58 0.57

Diffuse 1.05 1.31 1.68 1.94 2.13 2.26 2.39 2.22 1.84 1.48 1.16 1.01 1.71

Direct 5.92 5.96 5.89 6.36 6.58 6.29 4.95 4.76 5.48 5.54 5.57 5.49 5.73

OPT 5.51 5.77 5.79 6.20 6.64 6.59 5.78 5.46 5.58 5.50 5.26 5.22 5.77

OPT ANG 51.0 42.0 28.0 13.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 22.0 37.0 48.0 53.0 24.9 Source: NASA Surface meteorology and Solar Energy database (http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/sse) NOTE: Diffuse radiation, direct normal radiation and tilted surface radiation are not calculated when the clearness index (K) is

below 0.3 or above 0.8. Where the parameters compared are SSE MAX - The monthly average amount of the total solar radiation incident on a horizontal surface at the

surface of the earth for the year that has the most, or maximum, monthly averaged value in the 22-year period (Jul 1983 - Jun 2005).

Clearness Index (K) - The monthly average amount of the total solar radiation incident on a horizontal surface at the surface of the earth for the year that has the most, or maximum, monthly averaged value in the 22-year period divided by the monthly average incoming top-of-atmosphere insolation for that month.

Diffuse - The monthly average amount of solar radiation for a given month incident on a horizontal surface at the surface of the earth under all-sky conditions with the direct radiation from the sun's beam blocked by a shadow band or tracking disk for the year that has the least, or minimum, monthly averaged value in the 22-year period.




Direct Normal - The monthly average amount of direct normal radiation incident on a surface oriented normal to the solar radiation for the year that has the most, or maximum, monthly averaged value in the 22-year period.

OPT - The monthly average amount of total solar radiation incident on a surface tilted at the optimum angle relative to the horizontal and pointed toward the equator.

OPT ANG - The angle relative to the horizontal for which the monthly averaged total solar radiation is a maximum.

Units – SSE MAX, Diffuse, Direct Normal, and OPT in kWh/m2/day ; OPT ANG in degrees ; K is dimensionless

In the above table, comparison of radiation data of Vikram Solar Park @ Penakonda vis-à-vis existing solar parks in the country like (a) Gujarat Solar Park @ Charanka and (b) Solar Fields of Pokhran in Rajasthan is made. Its observed that the Penakonda site has potential for establishment and functioning of PV Power Plants.

4. Evacuation infrastructure- A 132/33 KV is being developed at Penukonda to evacuate power generated from upcoming NEDCAP supported projects at Tallacheruvu, Alankanarayanapeta and Nallakonda near Penukonda .

The 50.4 MW Nallakonda windfarm under construction is owned by CLP Power Hong Kong and ENERCONINDIA is the EPCC.This sub-station will be 14 Km north of the site on NH7.

The 400 KV national transmission line of GRIDCO, part of SRLDC linking Hoody (Bangalore East) and Gooty (130 Km from site via Penakonda on NH7), passes within 10 Km from the site. Therefore there is a possibility of Open access trading directly through the national grid and evacuation at in site 400/ 66 KV-GSS, developed through PPP mode.




5. Target customers- Investors and developers of PV power plant of around 40 MWp to 60 MWp in phases at a single location. They are looking for economy of scale and ease in management from city like Bangalore vis-à-vis solar parks in Gujarat & Rajasthan. These projects are going to have long term PPA with national level power traders like NVVN and other IPP under REPO.

Surplus power remaining in the solar park pool will be traded, i.e. open access trading through nearby national grid. It will be similar to tramping ship on spot charter market.

When the market is booming, the winner deploys his existing fleet on long-term charter, pays bonus to shipyards to divert additional tonnage i.e. adds tonnage within short time, if needed through time charters from investors/ pool fleet owners for redeployment at spot rates. During down turn, ships owned continue to be on long-term charter with oil companies or operating agencies like Wallem & Barber Ship management e.t.c. Tramping tonnage on time charter is returned back to investors/ pool owners and unviable/redundant tonnage is scrapped to generate additional fund for booking new capacity with shipyards on deferred payment, preparing for next boom. The target customers are PV Power plant owning companies run by technology driven hand-on team, minimum ownership at a given location of around 20 MWp to 40 MWp, managing assets of minimum 50 to 60 MWp through direct ownership, suppliers credit in EPC and O & M. i.e. enterprise value prior to listing of around Rs 450 to 600 Cr. This segment of PV Power Plant owner would have following traits-

Going to retain capacity with long term PPA and sell assets 8 to 10 years old. The average age of asset owned, won’t be more than 7 years old, and would be disposed before the 9th year of operation.

Gains experience of working on multiple module technology and agro-climatic zone, diversifies into EPCC, project investment through deferred payment & suppliers credit route and play the role of project development manager. The supplier’s credit given for EPC projects with long term PPA should preferably be converted into equity to aid organic renewal of assets.

To diversify the risks in operation, maintenance and power generation; minimize the cost of aggregate asset insurance, the PV Power Plant location has be throughout the country i.e. in Gujrat, Rajasthan, Penansular India, East & Central India.

The assets will also be neutral in terms of module technology, i.e. diversified mix of Si-poly/Mono, CdTe, A-Si, CIGS e.t.c. The assets will be having a mix of deployment or revenue streams like - long term PPA, short term open access trading.

Vikram Solar Park site has comparable plant output for all the three major PV module technology vis-à-vis upcoming solar parks in the states of Gujarat & Rajasthan. i.e. possibility to have a risk diversified sub-product portfolio in a single location in terms.

Lower operational cost due to ready availability of industrial work force at nearby hubs like Bangalore, Hindupur and Ananthapur. The O & M cost will be low due to lower dust and inventory level at site.




6. Proposed Product and infrastructure components- 6.1. The park developer will sell serviced land, suitable for development of 20 MWp PV

Power Plant blocks. Refer ANNEXURE 6 – SLD of 100 MWp pooling station and downstream utility.

6.2. There will be Plots of 800 m x 600 m to develop 20 MWp Solar PV Power Plant block that will accommodate

6.2.1. Solar Array aggregating 5 x 4 MWp & inter array access 6.2.2. 5 x 4 MWp inverter room , BOS including 33KV/415 V transformer to evacuate into 33 KV

20 MWp HT Control Room and link to 33 KV RMU. 6.2.3. Paths Perpendicular to array (ROW 5.5 m; Carriageway 3.5m) 6.2.4. Water tank to store treated de-mineralised water and pressurised cleaning system. 6.2.5. Dust abating landscape/ hedge along the perimeter fencing using RO waste.

6.3. Each block will be accessible through 18 M ROW Flexible pavement of IRC standard and there will be Security and surveillance- Perimeter Road (ROW 7m; Carriageway 5.5m).

6.4. These 5 x 2 x 2 MWp blocks will be linked to a 33 KV underground ring main units. The HT building of 20 MWp PV Power Plant Block with indoor 33 KV switch gear to connect 5 x 2 x 2 MWp solar fields, owned by project developer but built by the solar park management .

6.4.1. From the 20 MWp HT building, power will be wheeled to a 33 KV 100 MW pooling station. The wheeling infrastructure and 100 MW pooling station will be owned by Solar Park management.

6.4.2. Power from 100 MW pooling stations will be exported at 220 KV to nearest 400/220 KV GSS established along the GRIDCO regional grid between HOODY & GOOTY.

Refer attached pooling station SLD for reference.

6.4.3. The 20 MWp Blocks would be established on bulk plots of 600 m frontage and 800 m depth, measuring around 118.61 Acre. The access to these bulk plots will have 18 m ROW and concrete cable trenches along the carriageway kerb to accommodate the 33 KV RMU cables, interconnection points e.t.c.

6.4.4. Some of the 20 MWp plots will be earmarked for development of serviced plots of 4 MWp for small project owners.

6.5. Plots aggregating 30 Acre is earmarked along NH7 for following services- 6.5.1. Estate management and amenity like business centre, leased office spaces, secondary

medical with emergency unit, 6.5.2. Petrol pump, motel with wayside amenities and a 3 star hotel. 6.5.3. Warehouses – It will have bonded as well has non bonded mechtronic warehouses to

store project cargo. These warehouses, accessible through road (NH7 linking Bangalore & Hyderabad) and air ( BIAL 96 Km South; Puttapathy -40 Km east for project cargo and charters); would become regional logistics hub catering to the needs of solar & other manufacturing sectors after implementation of unified GST throughout the country.

6.6. Water body and water works. The potable water requirement of the Solar Park will be around 14 lakh Lts/Day. A part of this requirement can be met through surface water sources like existing water body of 6.2 acre and rain water harvesting structures within the estate. Options of infiltration wells along existing surface water sources like perennial tank at Papireddipalli (northern perimeter of project) and Palasamudram (southern perimeter of the project) and up gradation (desilting and intake point development in PPP) will also reduce dependence on ground water.




Therefore the water works will be an integral part of site grading and landscaping development strategy, prepared after geo- hydrological analysis of the site. Area earmarked for water body and rain water harvesting system is 25 Acre.

6.7. Solar park level landscaped area – The Solar park landscape established on 79.3 acre of land is meant for dust abatement, bringing in positive change in site micro-climate and generating additional non power revenue to be shared between power plant and estate management. Using the waste from water softening plant in dust abatement landscape consisting of water

raceways to grow suitable species of micro algae and or species like Simmondsia chinensis (JOJOBA) as hedges along project perimeter.

Use of softened water from module washing containing diluted phosphate free detergents to cultivate medicinal crops, herbs and vegetable below the arrays.

50 Acre out of total 79.3 acre of dust abatement landscape will be developed as 15 M wide green belt along 13.5 Km long security and surveylance road (7 M ROW & 5.5 M carriageway). The balance 29.3 acre will be scattered throughout the Solar park. The benefits from Solar Park level dust abatement landscaping are as follows- Reduce the carbon foot-print and adds to the green quotient of the project Reduce the O & M cost (Module cleaning & cost of water is 44 % of total O & M cost in the

first year of operation). Generate additional revenue from sale of JOJOBA seeds, vegetables and generate

additional unskilled employment in the neighborhood. Bring about positive effects on site micro climate like reduction in average site ambient

temperature and its variation without affecting the solar radiation. Reduce losses in power generation due to soiling of modules. (Ref ; http://greenurbanrenewal.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/opportunity-from-cost-centre-grid-linked-pv-power-plant-o-m-in-india/)

7. Energy Injected into 33 KV RMU by typical 2 MWp PV Power plant – 2 MWp PV Power Plant Output in MWh vis-à-vis Location and module technology.

PENAKONDA2 CHARANKA3 POKHRAN4

Module5 Si-Poly CIGS CdTe Si-Poly CIGS CdTe Si-Poly CIGS CdTeJAN 285.51 302.90 313.40 261.50 277.10 281.40 262.30 275.00 277.70FEB 272.91 293.90 305.20 238.90 255.70 262.80 243.78 258.40 264.50MAR 300.45 325.90 339.90 277.30 299.00 310.60 266.57 287.50 298.60APR 273.18 294.90 309.80 266.00 288.50 302.10 263.44 287.50 301.10MAY 254.82 273.60 288.70 265.30 287.20 302.60 265.91 290.80 306.60JUN 204.95 217.10 231.90 237.10 253.30 268.30 248.81 270.10 285.50JUL 193.43 204.80 219.20 206.90 219.00 233.90 235.33 252.70 268.80AUG 205.13 216.00 231.20 207.00 219.60 234.20 234.38 251.70 266.80SEP 221.51 234.80 248.90 233.10 249.70 262.30 242.74 264.00 276.20OCT 224.48 237.40 250.50 252.30 271.40 282.00 246.63 267.10 277.00NOV 228.44 240.60 251.70 238.00 255.60 262.20 236.28 252.20 257.50DEC 260.67 274.20 283.70 247.30 263.50 267.00 243.49 255.50 257.50Annual 2925.47 3116.10 3274.10 2930.70 3139.60 3269.40 2989.65 3212.50 3337.80PR6(%) 73.20 78.00 81.90 72.30 77.40 80.60 72.70 78.10 81.20

2 Vikram Solar Park @ Penakunta (Latitude 13.989538 Deg North; Longitude 77.657861 Deg East; AMSL 702 M) 3 Gujarat Solar Park @ Charanka (Latitude 23.884520 Deg North; Longitude 71.180386 Deg East; AMSL 18 M) 4 Pokhran Solar Field of Rajasthan (Latitude 26.887025 Deg North; Longitude 71.929836 Deg East; AMSL 229 M ) 5 Si-Poly MBPV CAAP BB 240Wp of Moserbaer India.; CIGS SF145-L of Solar Frontier Japan.; CdTe FS 277 of First Solar

USA.




The Graph and detailed monthly energy out put is computed for all the three sites and three types of modules using PVSYST 5.51 Simulation tool. It’s a standard tool for system design and energy computation . From the graph and detailed plant out put of 2 MWp PV power plant that Power output from

CdTe Thin film modules are the highest.

CdTe modules performs better than CIGS Thin Film modules.

Si-Poly cells based modules have proven long duration performance record, but plant output was the least due to higher temp coefficient of power. Secondly CdTe & CIGS thin film modules works in diffused radiation..

Its observed that PV Plant output is the maximum in Penakunda due to – Lowest average

ambient temperature and minimum variation between highest and lowest temperature i.e losses due to temperature is minimum.

Secondly Penankonda is the least dusty, low albino coefficient.

6 PERFORMANCE RATIO – collated from PV SYST 5.51 output




8. Land use statement- 8.1. 20 MWp PV Power Plant Plots / BLOCK

Total Sl.No Land Use :20 MWp - PV Power Plant Nos

Unit Ar. (SqM) SqM Acre %

1.00 SOLAR FIELD 273373.72 67.55 56.95%1.10 Array - 77 x (6+6+6+6) x (2x2) M Wp 2706 73.51 198910.48 49.15 1.20 Inter array space 2705 27.53 74463.24 18.40

2.00 CONTROL ROOM 1200.00 0.30 0.25%2.10 4 MWp LT 5 200.00 1000.00 0.25 2.20 20 MWp HT 1 200.00 200.00 0.05

3.00 BOS 20 25.00 500.00 0.12 0.10%4.00 WATER TANK 20 23.76 475.17 0.12 0.10%5.00 ACCESS 143249.76 36.70 30.94%

5.10 Axis Paths array (ROW & Carriageway 3.5 m) 31 4400.00 136400.00 33.71 5.20 Perimeter Rd (ROW 5.5 m Carriageway 3.5 m) 1 12100.00 12100.00 2.99

6.00 OTHERS - dust abatement green contingency 61201.35 15.12 12.75%

7.00 TOTAL 480000.00 118.61 100.00%

8.2. Solar Park – 270 MWp

Total

Sl.No Land Use Statement Unit Nos

Unit Area SqM SqM Acre %

0.00 Total Project area 7395249 1827.42 100.00%

1.00

20 MWp PV POWER PLANT BLOCK CONSISTING Solar Array aggregating 5 x 4 MWp & inter

array access Control Room, BOS including 33KV/415 V

transformer to evacuate into 33 KV RMU. Paths Permendicular to array (ROW 5.5 m;

Carriageway 3.5m) Perimeter Road (ROW 7.5m; Carriageway

5.5m) Water tank to store treated de-mineralised

water and pressurised cleaning system. Dust abating landingscape/ hedge along the

perimeter fencing using RO waste. Nos 13.5 480000 6480000 1601.26 87.62%

2.00

Access to 20 MWp PV Power Plant Block - 18 M ROW flexible pavement of IRC standard M 5400 18 97200 24.02 1.31%

3.00

Perimeter Surveylance Road - 7 M ROW flexible pavement of IRC standard M 13576 7 95029 23.48 1.29%

4.00

220/33 KV GSS - Pooling at 33 KV and Transmission at 220 KV Station - Plot measuring 272 x 160 SqM (6 Ha) Nos 3 59840 179520 44.36 2.43%




Total

Sl.No Land Use Statement Unit Nos

Unit Area SqM SqM Acre %

5.00

Amenity distributed along the NH7 Estate management and amenity like

business centre, leased office spaces, secondary medical with emergency unit,

Petrol pump, motel with wayside amenities and a 3 star hotel.

Warehouses – It will have bonded as well has non bonded mechtronic warehouses to store project cargo. Future regional logistics hub catering to the needs of solar & other manufacturing sectors after implementation of unified GST throughout the country. LS 121405 30.00 1.64%

6.00

Water body, rain water harvesting system and solar park level water works. Solar park level landscaping and dust abatement system. LS 422095 104.30 5.71%

6.77 Acre/MWp (Gross land allocation) 5.93 Acre/MWp (Net land allocation)

9. Development takeoff and typical pre marketing land development expenses The property owner does the revenue and topographical survey in tandem with land conversion process. The converted land is transferred to the SPV. The existing estate office is renovated and used as project development and marketing office. The project master and development plan is prepare and following initiatives are taken to make the product marketable- 9.1. Site grading and development of rainwater harvesting system. 9.2. Estate roads, surface water drainage and RCC cable trenches for 33 KV RMU. 9.3. Estate boundary wall and link chain fencing of saleable 20 MWp Power Plant Plots.

Sl.No ITEM Unit Rate Quantity Amount

1.0 Earth Work, Site Grading & RWH Structure Dev.

1.1

Clearing of Jungle including uprooting of rank vegetation, grass, bush-wood, trees, & samplings of girth up to 30 cm, measured at a height of 1 m above ground level & removal of rubbish up to a distance of 50 m outside the periphery of the area cleared. SqM 5.28 6,851,748.99 36,205,121.29

1.2

Grading & Surface dressing of the ground including removal of vegetation, inequalities not exceeding 15 cm in depth & disposal of rubbish, lead up to 50 m & lift up to 1.50 m. SqM 9.08 6,851,748.99 62,196,203.32

2.0 Road Works

2.10

WBM - Laying, spreading and compacting stone aggregate of specified size to WBM specifications including spreading in uniform thickness, handpicking , rolling with three wheeled road/vibratory roller 8-10 tonne in stages to proper grade and camber, applying and brooming requisite type of screening/ binding material to fill up intrices of course aggregate , watering and compacting to the required density.





2.01

Subbase with stone aggregate 90mm to 45mm including stone screening 13.2mm size. [1ST LAYER; 150 mm Thick;(1/2 the total thickness)] Cum

1244.29

28834.35 35878157.42

2.02

Base course with 63mm to 45mm size including stone screening 13.2mm size [2nd LAYER; 75 mm Thick.(1/4 the total thickness)] Cum

1279.09

14417.17 18440877.83

2.03

Base course with 53mm to 22.4mm size includingstone screening 11.2mm size.[3rd LAYER; 75 mm Thick.(1/4 the total thickness)] Cum

1335.13

14417.17 19248745.63

2.20

PREMIX CARPET 25 mm premix carpet surfacing with 2.25 cu.m and 1.12 cu.m. of stone chippings of 13.2mm and 11.2mm size respectively per 100 sq.m.and 52 kg. and 56 kg. of hot bitumen per cu.m. of stone chippings of 13.2 mm and 11.2 mm size respectively including a tack coat with hot straight run bitumen including consolidation with road roller of 6 to 9 tonne capacity etc. complete: (tack coat to be paid for separately) using paving Asphalt 80/100 heated and then mixedwith solvent at the rate of 70 grams per kg of asphalt. SqM

133.57

150265.64 20070357.26

2.21

SEAL COAT - Providing and laying seal coat over prepared surface of road with bitumen heated in bitumen boiler fitted with the spray set spraying using 98 Kg of bitumen of grade 80/100 and blinding surface with 0.90 CuM of stone aggregate of 6.7 mm size (passing 11.2 mm seive and retained on 2.36 mm seive) per 100 SqM of road surface including rolling and finishing with power road roller all complete SqM

66.55

150265.64 10000178.01

3.0 Surface Water Drain and 33 KV RMU Cable Ternch - RCC

3.1

RCC Cable trench for 33 KV RMU (Excludes hardwares and cable hangers) (dimension in mm; 1200 depth x1000 width x 150 mm thick M20 RCC) Providing and laying 150 mm thick factory made cement concrete saucer of M20 grade (machine made, vibratory compaction) of approved size, design/shape, laid in pattern over and including 50 mm thick bed of course sand, filling the joints with course sand e.t.c all complete as per the direction of Engineer in Charge. m

6535.21

10800.00 70580268.00

3.1

RCC Surface water drain (Avg dimension in mm; 1200 depth x1000 width x 150 mm thick M20 RCC) Providing and laying 150 mm thick factory made cement concrete saucer of M20 grade (machine made, vibratory compaction) of approved size, design/shape, laid in pattern over and including 50 mm thick bed of course sand, filling the joints with course sand e.t.c all complete as per the direction of Engineer in Charge. Cum

6535.21

26186.29 171132882.05





3.2

PCC SAUCER DRAIN (500 mm wide) along and perpendicular to PV ARRAY BAY in 600 x 800 SqM Plots. Providing and laying 60 mm thick factory made cement concrete saucer of M20 grade (machine made, vibratory compaction) of approved size, design/shape, laid in pattern over and including 50 mm thick bed of course sand, filling the joints with course sand e.t.c all complete as per the direction of Engineer in Charge. M

5656.75

4866.75 27529988.06

3.3

STEEL REINFORCEMENT Providing and cutting bending, hooking, laying in position and tying HYSD bars for reinforcement as per detailed drawings for R.C.C.work.

Ton 60,000.00

3698.63 221917719.60

4.0 Solar Park Security Boundary wall and individual plot chain link fencing

4.1

Solar Park Security Boundary wall - 3.5 M high with RRM and 750 mm Barbed wire fencing M 6643.83 21124.24 140345834.97

4.1

20 MWp Project Plot Perimeter Fencing – 150 mm Plinth, 2100 mm Structural steel posts 2400 mm c/c and steel wire mesh fencing M 3275.30 37800.00 123806371.92

Total (Rs) 957,352,705.36

Total (Rs Lakh) 9,573.53

Total (Rs Lakh/Acre) 5.24

ANNEXURE 2

Page 1 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

PALASAMUDRAM LAKE; ABUTING OUTSIDE THE SOUTH WEST PROPERTY BOUNDARY

ANNEXURE 2

Page 2 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

WESTERN FLANK OF THE PROPERTY - FROM NH - BETWEEN PALASAMUDRAM AND ESTATE OFFICE IN THE NORTH

Anirban

Polygon

Anirban

Callout

PROPERTY BOUNDARY IN THIS IMAGE

Anirban

Text Box

NH 7 RIGHT OF WAY

ANNEXURE 2

Page 3 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

BEGINING OF WESTERN FLANK OF THE PROPERTY

Anirban

Polygon

Anirban

Callout

BOUNDARY PILLAR

Anirban

Callout

PROPERTY BOUNDARY IN THIS IMAGE

ANNEXURE 2

Page 4 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

ESTATE OFFICE AND SISAL FIBRE EXTRACTION UNIT - BSFL

Anirban

Callout

ESTATE OFFICE BUILDING CLUSTER

Anirban

Callout

BOUNDARY PILLAR

Anirban

Line

Anirban

Text Box

NH 7 ROW

ANNEXURE 2

Page 5 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

NORT OF ESTATE OFFICE WITHIN WESTERN FLANK OF THE PROPERTY- BETWEEN HILLOCKS BEYOND WEST BOUNDARY AND NH.

Anirban

Polygon

Anirban

Text Box

NH 7 RIGHT OF WAY

ANNEXURE 2

Page 6 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

NORTHERN MOST PART OF WESTERN FLANK OF THE PROPERTY- BETWEEN HILLOCKS BEYOND WEST BOUNDARY AND NH.

Anirban

Polygon

Anirban

Text Box

NH 7 RIGHT OF WAY

ANNEXURE 2

Page 7 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Polygon

Anirban

Text Box

NORTHERN MOST BOUNDARY OF WESTERN FLANK

Anirban

Text Box

NH 7 CARRIAGE WAY

ANNEXURE 2

Page 8 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

VIKRAM SOLAR PARK - REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE

ANNEXURE 2

Page 9 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

VIKRAM SOLAR PARK AND ITS NEIGHBOURHOOD VIEW FROM SOUTH

ANNEXURE 2

Page 10 of 10 21/9/11

Anirban

Text Box

ESTATE OFFICE VIKRAM SOLAR PARK - VIEW FROM WEST

Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51

Grid-Connected System: Simulation parameters

Project : VIKRAM SOLAR PARK POLY

Geographical Site VIKRAM SOLAR PARK Country India

Situation Latitude 14.0°N Longitude 77.7°E

Time defined as Legal Time Time zone UT+5 Altitude 702 m

Albedo 0.18

Meteo data : VIKRAM SOLAR PARK, Synthetic Hourly data

Simulation variant : New simulation variant

Simulation date 19/09/11 12h51

Simulation parameters

Collector Plane Orientation Tilt 16° Azimuth 0°

Horizon Free Horizon

Near Shadings No Shadings

PV Array Characteristics

PV module Si-poly Model MBPV CAAP BB 240WpManufacturer MoserBaer

Number of PV modules In series 20 modules In parallel 463 strings

Total number of PV modules Nb. modules 9260 Unit Nom. Power 240 Wp

Array global power Nominal (STC) 2222 kWp At operating cond. 1972 kWp (50°C)Array operating characteristics (50°C) U mpp 542 V I mpp 3635 A

Total area Module area 15242 m² Cell area 13521 m²

Inverter Model RPS 450-560 TL Manufacturer Vectron

Characteristics Operating Voltage 425-875 V Unit Nom. Power 500 kW AC

Inverter pack Number of Inverter 4 units Total Power 2000 kW AC

PV Array loss factorsThermal Loss factor Uc (const) 20.0 W/m²K Uv (wind) 0.0 W/m²K / m/s

=> Nominal Oper. Coll. Temp. (G=800 W/m², Tamb=20°C, Wind velocity = 1m/s.) NOCT 56 °C

Wiring Ohmic Loss Global array res. 2.5 mOhm Loss Fraction 1.5 % at STC

Array Soiling Losses Loss Fraction 3.0 %

Module Quality Loss Loss Fraction 1.5 %

Module Mismatch Losses Loss Fraction 2.0 % at MPP

Incidence effect, ASHRAE parametrization IAM = 1 - bo (1/cos i - 1) bo Parameter 0.05

User's needs : Unlimited load (grid)

ANNEXURE 3

Page 1 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box

Si-Poly MBPV CAAP BB 240Wp of Moserbaer India

Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51

Grid-Connected System: Main results



Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 16° azimuth 0°PV modules Model MBPV CAAP BB 240Wp Pnom 240 Wp

PV Array Nb. of modules 9260 Pnom total 2222 kWpInverter Model RPS 450-560 TL Pnom 500 kW ac

Inverter pack Nb. of units 4.0 Pnom total 2000 kW acUser's needs Unlimited load (grid)

Main simulation resultsSystem Production Produced Energy 3250 MWh/year Specific prod. 1462 kWh/kWp/year

Performance Ratio PR 73.2 %

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]

Normalized productions (per installed kWp): Nominal power 2222 kWp

Yf : Produced useful energy (inverter output) 4.01 kWh/kWp/dayLs : System Loss (inverter, ...) 0.08 kWh/kWp/dayLc : Collection Loss (PV-array losses) 1.39 kWh/kWp/day

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P

RPerformance Ratio PR

PR : Performance Ratio (Yf / Yr) : 0.732

New simulation variant

Balances and main results

GlobHor T Amb GlobInc GlobEff EArray E_Grid EffArrR EffSysR

kWh/m² °C kWh/m² kWh/m² MWh MWh % %

January 165.8 22.70 194.4 189.2 323.4 317.2 10.91 10.70

February 171.6 25.60 191.2 186.1 309.1 303.2 10.61 10.40

March 204.9 28.50 212.5 206.6 340.3 333.8 10.51 10.31

April 195.9 28.40 190.1 184.4 309.4 303.5 10.68 10.47

May 189.7 27.40 175.2 169.4 288.7 283.1 10.81 10.60

June 150.9 25.20 138.3 133.1 232.3 227.7 11.03 10.80

July 141.1 24.50 131.1 126.4 219.6 214.9 10.99 10.75

August 142.9 24.60 137.2 132.6 232.6 227.9 11.13 10.90

September 148.8 25.10 150.2 145.7 251.1 246.1 10.97 10.74

October 143.2 24.40 151.3 147.0 254.5 249.4 11.03 10.81

November 135.9 22.90 152.9 148.7 258.7 253.8 11.10 10.89

December 147.6 22.00 174.0 169.2 295.2 289.6 11.13 10.92

Year 1938.4 25.10 1998.5 1938.2 3314.9 3250.2 10.88 10.67

Legends: GlobHor Horizontal global irradiation

T Amb Ambient Temperature

GlobInc Global incident in coll. plane

GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings

EArray Effective energy at the output of the array

E_Grid Energy injected into grid

EffArrR Effic. Eout array / rough area

EffSysR Effic. Eout system / rough area

ANNEXURE 3

Page 2 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51

Grid-Connected System: Loss diagram






Loss diagram over the whole year

Horizontal global irradiation1938 kWh/m²

+3.1% Global incident in coll. plane

-3.0% IAM factor on global

Effective irradiance on collectors1938 kWh/m² * 15242 m² coll.

efficiency at STC = 14.62% PV conversion

Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)4318 MWh

-2.9% PV loss due to irradiance level

-14.3% PV loss due to temperature

-3.2% Array Soiling loss

-1.6% Module quality loss

-2.1% Module array mismatch loss

-1.1% Ohmic wiring loss

Array virtual energy at MPP3315 MWh

-2.0% Inverter Loss during operation (efficiency)

0.0% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. power

0.0% Inverter Loss due to power threshold

0.0% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. voltage

-0.0% Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold

Available Energy at Inverter Output3250 MWh

Energy injected into grid3250 MWh

ANNEXURE 3

Page 3 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : VIKRAM SOLAR PARK CIGS




Albedo 0.18









PV module CIS Model SF145-LManufacturer Solar Frontier K. K.




Total area Module area 16940 m²












ANNEXURE 3

Page 4 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box

CIGS SF145-L of Solar Frontier Japan

Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 15° azimuth 0°PV modules Model SF145-L Pnom 145 Wp






1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 165.8 22.70 193.0 187.7 308.9 302.9 9.45 9.26

February 171.6 25.60 190.3 185.2 299.7 293.9 9.29 9.11

March 204.9 28.50 212.4 206.5 332.2 325.9 9.23 9.05

April 195.9 28.40 190.8 185.1 300.7 294.9 9.30 9.12

May 189.7 27.40 176.4 170.5 279.1 273.6 9.34 9.16

June 150.9 25.20 139.3 134.1 221.7 217.1 9.39 9.20

July 141.1 24.50 132.0 127.3 209.2 204.8 9.36 9.16

August 142.9 24.60 137.7 133.1 220.6 216.0 9.45 9.26

September 148.8 25.10 150.4 145.8 239.6 234.8 9.41 9.22

October 143.2 24.40 151.1 146.7 242.2 237.4 9.46 9.28

November 135.9 22.90 152.1 147.8 245.4 240.6 9.52 9.34

December 147.6 22.00 172.7 167.8 279.5 274.2 9.55 9.37

Year 1938.4 25.10 1998.3 1937.6 3178.8 3116.1 9.39 9.21









ANNEXURE 3

Page 5 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51























-0.0% Inverter Loss due to power threshold





ANNEXURE 3

Page 6 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : VIKRAM SOLAR PARK CDTE




Albedo 0.18









PV module CdTe Model FS-277Manufacturer First Solar
















ANNEXURE 3

Page 7 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box

CdTe FS 277 of First Solar USA

Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 15° azimuth 0°PV modules Model FS-277 Pnom 78 Wp






1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 165.8 22.70 193.0 187.7 319.7 313.4 8.91 8.74

February 171.6 25.60 190.3 185.2 311.3 305.2 8.80 8.63

March 204.9 28.50 212.4 206.5 346.5 339.9 8.78 8.61

April 195.9 28.40 190.8 185.1 315.9 309.8 8.91 8.74

May 189.7 27.40 176.4 170.5 294.4 288.7 8.98 8.81

June 150.9 25.20 139.3 134.1 236.6 231.9 9.14 8.96

July 141.1 24.50 132.0 127.3 223.9 219.2 9.13 8.94

August 142.9 24.60 137.7 133.1 236.0 231.2 9.22 9.04

September 148.8 25.10 150.4 145.8 254.1 248.9 9.09 8.91

October 143.2 24.40 151.1 146.7 255.6 250.5 9.10 8.92

November 135.9 22.90 152.1 147.8 256.7 251.7 9.08 8.91

December 147.6 22.00 172.7 167.8 289.3 283.7 9.01 8.84

Year 1938.4 25.10 1998.3 1937.6 3340.0 3274.4 8.99 8.82









ANNEXURE 3

Page 8 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51



















+0.9% Spectral correction for amorphous







0.0% Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold



ANNEXURE 3

Page 9 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : GUJRAT SOLAR PARK POLYCRYSTALLINE

Geographical Site CHARANKA DUJRAT SOLAR PARKCountry India



Albedo 0.20

Meteo data : CHARANKA DUJRAT SOLAR PARK, Synthetic Hourly data








PV module Si-poly Model MBPV CAAP BB 240WpManufacturer MoserBaer
















ANNEXURE 4

Page 1 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51










1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 130.2 21.90 174.4 169.7 266.6 261.5 11.15 10.93

February 134.7 24.00 162.9 158.6 243.5 238.9 10.90 10.69

March 175.8 28.70 192.7 187.6 282.7 277.3 10.70 10.49

April 190.8 31.40 188.7 183.1 271.3 266.0 10.48 10.28

May 207.1 32.10 189.5 183.0 270.8 265.3 10.42 10.21

June 185.1 30.70 165.2 159.5 242.0 237.1 10.68 10.46

July 156.6 28.70 143.0 138.0 211.5 206.9 10.78 10.54

August 148.8 28.40 143.0 138.2 211.6 207.0 10.79 10.55

September 155.7 29.40 161.9 157.1 237.9 233.1 10.71 10.50

October 151.0 30.00 175.9 171.2 257.5 252.3 10.67 10.46

November 126.9 27.10 163.2 159.1 242.5 238.0 10.83 10.63

December 121.5 23.40 166.7 162.3 252.1 247.3 11.03 10.81

Year 1884.1 28.00 2027.0 1967.6 2989.9 2930.6 10.75 10.54









ANNEXURE 4

Page 2 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




























ANNEXURE 4

Page 3 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : GUJRAT SOLAR PARK CIGS




Albedo 0.20

























ANNEXURE 4

Page 4 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51










1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 130.2 21.90 174.4 169.7 282.6 277.1 9.57 9.38

February 134.7 24.00 162.9 158.6 260.7 255.7 9.45 9.27

March 175.8 28.70 192.7 187.6 304.8 299.0 9.34 9.16

April 190.8 31.40 188.7 183.1 294.2 288.5 9.20 9.03

May 207.1 32.10 189.5 183.0 293.0 287.2 9.13 8.95

June 185.1 30.70 165.2 159.5 258.5 253.3 9.23 9.05

July 156.6 28.70 143.0 138.0 223.9 219.0 9.24 9.04

August 148.8 28.40 143.0 138.2 224.3 219.6 9.26 9.07

September 155.7 29.40 161.9 157.1 254.8 249.7 9.29 9.11

October 151.0 30.00 175.9 171.2 276.8 271.4 9.29 9.11

November 126.9 27.10 163.2 159.1 260.5 255.6 9.42 9.25

December 121.5 23.40 166.7 162.3 268.6 263.5 9.51 9.33

Year 1884.1 28.00 2027.0 1967.6 3202.7 3139.8 9.33 9.14









ANNEXURE 4

Page 5 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




























ANNEXURE 4

Page 6 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : GUJRAT SOLAR PARK CDTE




Albedo 0.20

























ANNEXURE 4

Page 7 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51










1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 130.2 21.90 174.4 169.7 287.0 281.4 8.86 8.69

February 134.7 24.00 162.9 158.6 267.9 262.8 8.85 8.68

March 175.8 28.70 192.7 187.6 316.7 310.6 8.85 8.68

April 190.8 31.40 188.7 183.1 308.1 302.1 8.79 8.62

May 207.1 32.10 189.5 183.0 308.8 302.6 8.77 8.60

June 185.1 30.70 165.2 159.5 273.7 268.3 8.92 8.74

July 156.6 28.70 143.0 138.0 239.0 233.9 8.99 8.80

August 148.8 28.40 143.0 138.2 239.2 234.2 9.00 8.81

September 155.7 29.40 161.9 157.1 267.6 262.3 8.90 8.72

October 151.0 30.00 175.9 171.2 287.7 282.0 8.80 8.63

November 126.9 27.10 163.2 159.1 267.2 262.2 8.81 8.65

December 121.5 23.40 166.7 162.3 272.2 267.0 8.79 8.62

Year 1884.1 28.00 2027.0 1967.6 3335.2 3269.4 8.85 8.68









ANNEXURE 4

Page 8 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51



















-0.1% Spectral correction for amorphous










ANNEXURE 4

Page 9 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : POKHRAN SOLAR FEILD POLY

Geographical Site POKHRAN SOLAR FEILD Country India



Albedo 0.20

Meteo data : POKHRAN SOLAR FEILD, Synthetic Hourly data








PV module Si-mono Model MBPV 140Manufacturer MoserBaer
















ANNEXURE 5

Page 1 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 25° azimuth 0°PV modules Model MBPV 140 Pnom 140 Wp






1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 121.2 16.20 169.4 164.8 281.5 276.2 10.05 9.86

February 128.5 18.60 160.9 156.8 261.7 256.7 9.83 9.64

March 165.2 24.40 183.5 178.6 286.2 280.7 9.43 9.24

April 186.3 28.80 186.5 180.9 282.8 277.4 9.17 8.99

May 206.8 31.50 190.6 184.5 285.6 280.0 9.06 8.88

June 198.6 31.30 177.0 170.9 267.4 262.0 9.13 8.95

July 180.1 30.00 164.6 159.0 252.9 247.8 9.29 9.10

August 169.6 29.00 163.4 158.0 252.0 246.8 9.32 9.13

September 160.8 29.00 171.2 166.3 260.7 255.6 9.21 9.02

October 144.5 27.50 172.1 167.5 264.9 259.7 9.30 9.12

November 118.5 22.70 158.4 154.3 253.5 248.8 9.67 9.49

December 110.4 18.10 157.9 153.6 261.3 256.4 10.01 9.82

Year 1890.4 25.62 2055.6 1995.3 3210.7 3148.1 9.44 9.26









ANNEXURE 5

Page 2 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 25° azimuth 0°PV modules Model MBPV 140 Pnom 140 Wp





















0.0% Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold



ANNEXURE 5

Page 3 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : POKHRAN SOLAR FEILD CIGS




Albedo 0.20

























ANNEXURE 5

Page 4 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51










1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 121.2 16.20 169.4 164.8 280.3 275.0 9.77 9.58

February 128.5 18.60 160.9 156.8 263.3 258.4 9.66 9.48

March 165.2 24.40 183.5 178.6 293.3 287.5 9.43 9.25

April 186.3 28.80 186.5 180.9 293.2 287.5 9.28 9.10

May 206.8 31.50 190.6 184.5 296.5 290.8 9.18 9.00

June 198.6 31.30 177.0 170.9 275.5 270.1 9.19 9.01

July 180.1 30.00 164.6 159.0 258.0 252.7 9.25 9.07

August 169.6 29.00 163.4 158.0 256.9 251.7 9.28 9.09

September 160.8 29.00 171.2 166.3 269.3 264.0 9.29 9.10

October 144.5 27.50 172.1 167.5 272.5 267.1 9.35 9.16

November 118.5 22.70 158.4 154.3 257.0 252.2 9.58 9.40

December 110.4 18.10 157.9 153.6 260.5 255.5 9.74 9.55

Year 1890.4 25.62 2055.6 1995.3 3276.4 3212.5 9.41 9.23









ANNEXURE 5

Page 5 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51




























ANNEXURE 5

Page 6 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 1/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51


Project : POKHRAN SOLAR FEILD CDTE




Albedo 0.20

























ANNEXURE 5

Page 7 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 2/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51










1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Norm

aliz

ed E

nerg

y [

kW

h/k

Wp/d

ay]




0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Perf

orm

ance R

atio P







January 121.2 16.20 169.4 164.8 283.2 277.7 9.00 8.82

February 128.5 18.60 160.9 156.8 269.6 264.5 9.01 8.84

March 165.2 24.40 183.5 178.6 304.6 298.6 8.93 8.76

April 186.3 28.80 186.5 180.9 307.0 301.1 8.86 8.69

May 206.8 31.50 190.6 184.5 312.8 306.6 8.83 8.66

June 198.6 31.30 177.0 170.9 291.3 285.5 8.85 8.68

July 180.1 30.00 164.6 159.0 274.4 268.8 8.97 8.79

August 169.6 29.00 163.4 158.0 272.4 266.8 8.97 8.79

September 160.8 29.00 171.2 166.3 281.9 276.3 8.86 8.69

October 144.5 27.50 172.1 167.5 282.6 277.0 8.84 8.66

November 118.5 22.70 158.4 154.3 262.4 257.5 8.91 8.75

December 110.4 18.10 157.9 153.6 262.5 257.5 8.95 8.78

Year 1890.4 25.62 2055.6 1995.3 3404.5 3337.9 8.91 8.74









ANNEXURE 5

Page 8 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


Evaluatio

n Mode

Page 3/319/09/11PVSYST V5.51



















-0.1% Spectral correction for amorphous










ANNEXURE 5

Page 9 of 9 09/21/11

Anirban

Text Box


ANNEXURE 6

KALO.pdf

Documents

store treated

synthetic

local distribution

plane effective

global effective

leased office

performance

bos including