K mark dyer_peoplefriendlycitiesdatarichworld

TU1204 People Friendly Cities in a Data Rich World

Drafted by

Professor Mark Dyer Professor Mary Lee Rhodes Trinity College Dublin

Brian Evans, Mackintosh School of Architecture, Glasgow

Dick Gleeson, City Planner, Dublin City Council

Professor Michael Goodsite, Aarhus University, Denmark

Professor Kevin Leyden, NUI Galway & West Virginia University, USA

Dr Francesco Rizzi, Scoula Superiore San’ Anna, Pisa

Dr Yves de Weerdt, VITO, Belgium

THREATSUnemployment

Ageing Society

Social Exclusion

Urban Sprawl

Ecosystem Disrupted

OPPORTUNITIESCreativity & Innovation

Connectivity

Energy & Water Efficiency

Social Cohesive

Environmental Protection

CHALLENGESHolistic Model

Social-Economic-Spatial

Co-Production

Place-People Approaches

Solid Knowledge Base

SENSORSSmart Meters

Smart Phones/Tablets

GPS Devices/CCTV

Weather Sensors

Building Sensors

ANALYTICSAlgorithims

Closed-Loop Systems

Optimize Consumption

Location Sensing

SERVICESLocation Services

Crowd Sensing

Traffic Management

Smart Electric Grid

Disaster Management

Security

(Naphade et al 2011)

Data Rich World

�Smarter: Focuses most on Technology, Data, ICT solutions, and System modeling and management. Smarter Cities function more effectively and efficiently. Typically the focus is upon the systems that make cities work (e.g., transportation, energy, water, and government services).

�Liveable: Focuses more on Urban design/Planning, Architecture, Aesthetics, Public Policy, and more effective government. Livability is about creating attractive, sustainable, and healthy places that are good for people and the environment.

Rethinking Cities ?

TU1204 COST

Hardware and Software

TU1204 COST

Cities for People

Exploring Interconnections at Each Scale

citizen

building

neighbourhood

city

City: Sustainablity Indicators

Neighourhood:Asset Mapping

Building: Accessibility

Efficiency

Citizen:Happiness Index

Well being

COSTTU1204

Implementation : Working Groups

Working Groups

City Sounding Board [What needs to work?]

Knowledge Platform [What do we know already?]

Living Laboratory [What do we already do?]

Framework Collaborative Urbanism [What is our model?]

Roadmap & Research Strategy [What don’t we know?]

TU1204 COST

The City Sounding Board is the central idea is to generate an agile resource that will help bridge the gap between traditional City Governance, research, and the citizen.

The City Sounding Board would operate within a set of Character Areas, representing a coherent expression of local diversity across the social, economic, and cultural spheres. The spatial areas they cover range from 10 hectares to 25 hectares.

The process will comprise sequential workshops will focus on the following tasks[a] establish the collective value system for the character area [b] express a long term vision/shape of success[c] articulate qualities that would evidence this [d] what are the disconnects/issues that block the achievement of this future.

City Council

Business

University

Community

Cultural Sector

City Sounding Board

COSTTU1204

Knowledge Platform

Online MediaWiki Page I Facebook

Web Site I Podcasts

SoA ReviewsGovernance, User Needs and

Attitudes, Urban Design, Public

Health, Enterprise, and Digital

Data Sources/Technology

Museums, Libraries,

SchoolsDesign Exhibitions, Science

Gallery, School Projects

ConferencesEuropean & International (ASEAN)

TU1204 COST

Knowledge Platform

Source: Dr J Little Think Smart TechnologiesSource: http://www.andrewwrightassociates.com

Connections and Disconnections –Design and Data.

1. Economic prosperity & livelihood

2. Health & well being

3. Integrated spatial & infrastructure planning

4. Movement & transport

5. Climate change & energy

COST

Living Laboratory

TU1204 COST

Living Lab: Design Process

KonkylieCity of Sounds

TU1204 COST

Framework for Collaborative Urbanism

Key Performance Indicators: Process and Outcomes

• KPIs to assess progress of the design

process in partner cities

• An evaluation of public input and

measureable interface between

stakeholders.

• A record about new solutions and ideas

and whether there were meaningful

efforts to connect technological solutions

with public policy, services or

infrastructural change.

• A measure of the effect of policy change

if it in fact occurs.

COSTTU1204

Implementation

Resources and Dissemination

Diverse Skills

Partner Cities

Associated Programmes

Academy of Urbanism

Network Expertise

Arts and HumanitiesMedia Studies

Political Science

Sociology

Business Administration

DesignArchitecture

Design

Town Planning

Urbanism

Science and Technology Data Analytics

Engineering and Transportation

GIS

ICT

TU1204 COST

Partner and Candidate Cities

Partner CitiesAarhus

Dublin

Galway

Glasgow

Lucca

Candidates Cities

Copenhagen

Delft

Leuven

Lisbon

Krakow

Munich

Oslo

Stuttgart

Strasbourg

Tampere

TU1204

Wider Goals: Linking with C40 Cities

COST

‘Victimless Leather’ by Oron Catts and Ionat Zurr

Interdisciplinary research in action at MOMA NYC