JUSTICE DELAYED IN INDIA By K.T.S.Tulsi Senior Advocate Supreme Court Bar Association August 24, 2004
Dec 13, 2015
JUSTICE DELAYED IN INDIA
ByK.T.S.Tulsi
Senior Advocate
Supreme Court Bar Association
August 24, 2004
COLLAPSE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
27,297
7,952
37,671
14,846
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
1986 1996
MurdersRapes
The instances of murder cases have increased by 38 % The number of Rapes have increased by 86.69 %
CRUSHED UNDER THEIR WEIGHT
2.4 crore Cases pending1.40 crore cases filed every yearMore than 3 cases filed every second when the court is openProperty matters of hundreds of crores pending for upto three decadesHundreds on death row waiting for final verdict for upto a decadeLife convicts serve out their sentence
Crushed under their weight
Tax liabilities of over a thousand crore pending in different courtsDetenues serve out the period before the most cherished value of liberty pronounced uponService disputes linger till past retirementsLandlord -Tenant jurisprudence acquires own economic logic and mafia
Red Light signal for Guardian Angel
Mental agony of litigants multiplied a thousand times86% Rape victims refuse to support charge during TrialBMW turns into a truckCivil cases sort themselves out by death of parties,or relief becoming irrelevant
CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY
1961 – Conviction Rate is 20 % of persons convicted out of those arrested.
1998 – Conviction Rate is 6.4 % Murder in India occurs every 13 minutes –
106 murders in every 24 hrs - If all accused are arrested, 100 out of 106 will be acquitted.
37 rapes in 24 hrs – If all rapists are arrested, 35 out of 37 will be acquitted.
CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY Ctd.
Law ceases have a deterrent effect, Crime becomes a high profit, low risk business, Corruption gallops and enters all fields from top
to bottom: - Food adulteration—Vegetables,pulses,milk—crossed
danger levels Pharmaceutical adulteration Piracy in films, Music, Automobiles parts and branded
goods jumps to 9,000 crores (1.8 Billion USD) Size of counterfeit industry swells to 46,600 crores (9.3
Billion USD) and threatens economy
Counterfeit currency, share certificates, stamp papers – reach new height (50,000 crores)
Recruitment scandals galore Education, health, judiciary, police, reek of
corruption, etc.
CHALLENGES
If such delay is not arrested democracy itself will be threatened
Primary obligation of state: - to protect lives and property – not performed Punish guilty and protect the innocent – not
discharged Rule of law loses efficacy - mafia takes over as
settler of disputes.
PRIMARY CAUSES OF DELAY
Not the law
Not the procedure
Not the paucity of judges
Sheer question of (mis)management
MALIMATH COMMITTEE REPORT
Right of Silence be abridged – preponderance of probabilities instead of beyond reasonable doubt.
Justice to Victims – legal representatives to be impleaded – Hearing to victim’s advocate – Right to produce evidence and argue at bail, etc.
Victim Compensation Fund. Separate criminal divisions in the Supreme
Court and the High Courts.
MALIMATH COMMITTEE REPORT Contd.
Investigation: - Separate wing Mindset Training in advance technology
National security commission: - Crime data Specialised squads Control over investigation wing Compulsory registration of crime Video recording of the statements of witnesses,
confessions and dying declarations Mobile forensic units
As per Justice Malimath committee –
Indian ---- Ratio 10.5 Judges per million
World ---- Ratio 50 Judges per million
JUDGE - POPULATION RATIO
Malimath Committee Report Contd.
MY VIEWThe crucial question is the Judge - Docket Ratio
and not Judge - Population Ratio
CASES FILED IN ONE YEAR (1999)
INDIA
13.6 Million (1,36,68,073) cases
USA93.81 Million cases
DOCKET’S PER JUDGE
987 per Judge 3235 per Judge
MY VIEWMY VIEW Contd.Contd.
Crucial question is Judge Docket Ratio and not Judge Population Ratio
DOCKET RATIO FOR PROPER MATTERS
INDIA525 per Judge
USA1335 per Judge
987 per Judge 3235 per Judge
DOCKET RATIO FOR BOTH PROPER AND MINOR MATTERS
CAUSES OF DELAY Long cause list
Half the time spent on adjournments Average two years for supply of documents Average six hearings for service of summons No “sessions” trials for Sessions Court Adjournments lead to slackness of I.O.’s,
prosecutors, defence counsel and witnesses Uncertainty for all including experts Results in overall decline in discipline
SOLUTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
Lord Justice Auld analysis:
Criminal Justice Board (3)Fixed penalty notices (12)Single IT System (111)Criminal Court design guide (111)Sentencing discounts – Earlier the plea
higher the discount (13)
MANAGEMENT IDEAS Dedicated bail court Dedicated summons Court Centralised registry Only ripe cases listed before sessions court - not more than five
in a day – 2 for charge and 2 for evidence – time for spill over Once session trial begins it must be heard day to day till
concluded Non-availability of witnesses or counsel – no ground for
adjournment Pursuit of perfection has led to over all collapse of the system Courts’ objective - no one can guarantee complete Justice –
the system must work
UNDERTRIAL JAIL
UNDERTRIAL JAIL
SESSIONS COURT
TRIAL COURTS
TRIAL COURTS
TRIAL COURTS
MAGISTRATE COURTS
REMAND COURTS
POLICE LOCK UP
POLICE STATION
HIGH TECH INTEGRATED COURT COMPLEX