I I 'Ii' I i 1 lLS. Of HJS1WE 11 : ! , I I lAW ENFORCEMENT ASSiSTANCE NATiONAL CRIMINAL JUSTiCE REfERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20531 I.,': I 1 J " ] . (BNE-DAY/ @NE-TRIAL JURY COMPUTER DOCUMENTATION AS IMPLEMENTED IN WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
I I
'Ii'
I
i 1
lLS. OtPt\Rl~~Hn Of HJS1WE
11
:
!
, I
I
lAW ENFORCEMENT ASSiSTANCE ADMINISTRATW['~ NATiONAL CRIMINAL JUSTiCE REfERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20531
I.,':
I
1
J
" ] . 1"~' ~
(BNE-DA Y / @NE-TRIAL
JURY SY~STEM
COMPUTER
DOCUMENTATION
AS IMPLEMENTED IN
WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.
]
J ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
1 1
COMPUTER
DOCUMENTATION
ONE-DAY / ONE-TRIAL
JURY SYSTEM
"";', '" ~ f:'"....-~ n ~ t:i; ~ '~N9
M/\R
WAYNE COUNTY, MICHIGAN
·~~.~~-~ '- -======_ ...... -Q
PREFACE
The One-Day/One-Trial Jury System Computer Documentation
is one of four publications of the Jury Reorganization Project
of the Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan. It is meant
to provide detai led data processing information for those
experienced in that field.
This manual, along with the Sequential Plan of Implementa-
tion, The Case StuQ.y, and Peers, Venires and Juries: An
Attitudinal Evaluation of the One-Day/One-Trial Pilot Project,
is intended as a guide for other courts desiring to learn about
this new jury plan. Hopef u I I y they can avo i d substi'lnt i a I p ro-
gramming costs by +aking advantage of these efforts of Wayne
County, Michigan.
September, lC)76
Raymond C. Hudy Systems Analyst
Da vi dE. Ka sun i c Project Coordinator
Athene C. Grabow Communications Manager
'rbis llrofect wa.! s1tpported by Grant No. 18454-2 awarded by the Law Enforcement Assist~'1c.e Admil~istratio-n, U. S. Department of J1,s~ice, throl~gh the Michigan Office of Cmnmal JustIce Programs 1mder the Omnibus Crime Control alld Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended. Points of view or opinions stated in this dOCU1Ili!11t are those of the authors fwd do 110t necessarily represent the official position or policy of the U. S. Department of ]1Ist1ce.
I: I~
I: I~ 1--
I~
I: I: I~'
I:~
I: (
I: I: I: I~
I: I~
,.
(~ I
t
]
J ]
]
] TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
] Definition of Terms. i v
Background
] Installation Resources 6
J :ob Descriptions 8
File Layouts and Specifications 1 1
] System Codes 1 8
] Appendices 22
Exhibits
] Flow Charts 24
] Print-Out Reports • 31
]
]
1 1 ]
]
'] iii
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
CHAINED - A method whereby internal reference pointers are used to locate records contained on a 'TOTAL' file. Thus, a Mas~er record contains a pointer to the first variable record "chained" to it. This variable record in turn contains a pointer to the next variable record, etc. The last variable record on a chain contains a pointer back to the Mas+er record.
DISTRICT - Generally, a numerical designation of a municipality wi thin Wayne County. Thus, the number 28 represents Bellevi lie, the number 29 represents Dearborn, etc. Because the City of Detroit is lal"ge, it has district number 03 through 26.
JURAT - A geographical representation of prospective jurors based upon population, i.e., the more people in a particular municipallty, the more representation they get in the jury selection process.
.JUROR NUMBER - A unique nine-digit number assigned by the computer to all prospective jurors so that they can be accessed in a random manner. (See Appendix B.)
KEY-NUMBER SYSTEtJ! - A ,nethod whereby prospective jurors are selected from the Voter Registration Tapes to receive a questionnaire. (See Appendix A.)
MASTER FILE - A file of 'single entry' records having a unique Key allowing alreCI access.
SERVICE DATE - That date on which the uror is scheduled to report for jury service.
SUMMONS NUMBER - A unique six-digit number assigned by the computer to each accepted juror selected for service. This number becomes the payrol I number. (Also known as the group number. )
TOTAL - A data base management system using master and variable fi les. All retrieval of data is accompl ished through "calls" to specific input/output CI/O) routines contained in the management system.
V A R I A B L E F I L E - A f i leo f m u I tip Ie e n t r V r e cor d s c h a i ned 0 r lin ked to associated' Master recordCs).
VOTER TAPES - A I I reg i stered voters in Wayne County. A I so known as the Master Voter Registration Tapes.
iv
I: ]
Ie J I.,' ]
I.,]
I, ]
I" ] I~ ] I.' ]
I~ ] I .. J I~ ] I ,,' ]
". ~. -..- .
I~ ] I
j
]
I J ]
I J )
IJ 1
I,··~ I ~.' } .
-1-
BACKGROUND
The One-Day/One-Trial Jury System, as implemenred in the
Wayne County Courts, was made possible through a grant from
the LEAA. There were +wo (2) phases to this grant:
I. A feasibi I ity study (Completed June 30, 1975)
II. Implementation (Completed June 30, 1976)
In the feasibi I ity stag~ consideration was given to:
1. Review of the old jury selection process
2. Cost/Manpower requirements for the new system
3. Compatabi I ;ty in the existing computer systems
4. Desirable by-pr0ducts or IIspinoffs" froIT, the new system
Some progr3mming was required during this first phase.
When it was reasonably certain that the recommendation of the
feasibi I ity study would be adopted, a programming contract house
was engaged so that the nacessary programming expertise would
be avai lable for the future.
Programming for the implementation period began July 1,
1975. The first Juror Personal History questionnaires were
mailed August 8, 1975 and the jurors were scheduled to report
on September 22, 1975. Although this implementation phase offi-
cially ended June 30, 1976, fine-tuning of the system continues.
I j
i
J I
-2-
Purpose of the System
In Wayne County the Jury Selection process really involves
three (3) areas of concern:
1. Supply of jurors for the Wayne County Circuit, Probate, Juvenile, and Common Pleas Courts
2. Supply of jurors for District Courts
3. Supply of jurors for "Grand Jury" duty
The main programming effort went to point (1) above but as
a "spin-off" point (2) was sufficiently covered. Point (3) only
has minimal programming since the volume In this, category is
very smal I and it was previously determined that it would be
done on a manual basis as much as possible.
After the system had been implemented, a fourth area of
concern emerged which was anticipa'~ed but not included in the
grant. This was the regeneration of the Master Voter R6gistra-
tion tape required on an annual basis.
How the System Works
Prospective jurors are selected from the Master Voter
Regis,ration tape according to the Key-Number designation.
(See Append ix 11 A" .) If a person is "struck," the Master Voter
Registration tape is updated to ~how that the person has been
selected to receive a questionnaire, and a master Juror file (JROR)
disl< record is built, employing a juror number which is unique
I~ ] I: J I~ ] I:~ ] (" ]
I~. ] l~ ]
I, 7. . J
I ]
I. ] I~ ] ( -' ']
,--t _
I .. ] I~ J (~ 1
I.~ ] [~ 1
-3-
for each person selected. (See Appendix "B".)
If the prospective juror is prohibited or disqualified
from Jur' service, the JROR record is updated and no further
processing occurs for this person. If the prospective juror
is accepted for jury, the JROR record is updated and this fact
is entered on the Accepted voters' fi Ie CACPT). Only persons
receiving a questionnaire and classified "accepted" for jury
service can appear on the ACPT fi Ie.
When it is determined that jurors are needed for service,
the ACPT fi Ie is scanned and a grouping of jurors is bur It
according to geographical location -- the "Jurat." All jurors
comprising a Jurat have their respective ACPT entries deleted,
and at the same time, have an entry created on the summoned
voters file (SUMM). Hence, only jurors who have received a
questionnaire, have been accepted for jury service, and have
been placed lnto a Jurat can appear on the SUMM ff Ie. This
logical dependency is mentioned at this time since.2.!llY. jurors
appearing on thiS SUf.."M fi Ie wi II be paid. After the Jurats have
been bui It, they a~e put into a random-draw program which assigns
specific service dates to each juror in the Jurat. The SUMM
record is then updated to reflect this service date.
When jurors report on their date 01 service, their names
-4-
are matched against a Check-In list, which is produced from
the SUMM fi Ie.
When jurors are empaneled for a trial, an entry is made
on the CASE master fl Ie containing all the jurors for that
particular trial. As the trial progresses day by day, the
CASE fi Ie is updated and each particular juror SUMM record is
also updated, showing each day the juror served.
Once a week, the SUMM f i I e I s scanned and payro I I records
are generated for those jurors who have bben in service. When
a trial has ended or if the jurors have served for only the one
day without being selected for a trial, and they have been on
a payroll, thl3n H-, SUMM records for these jur0rs are deleted.
Overall System Flow
Objectives of the system:
1. Print and mai I questionnaires to prospective jurors
2. After evaluation of the questionnaire by the Jury Commission, store the results of the evaluation on the computer along with pertinent and historical Information
3. Build geographical representation of acceptable jurors (Jurat)
4. Randomly select jurors from the Jurat and assign them service dates; then print and mal I summons
5. Check In and monitor jurors as they report for service
6. Record and report the progress of jury trials
7. Pay the jurors after completion of their service
IBM-370, model 135 DOS system wit~ 256K (since upgraded to 512K) 3330-1 disk storage (7-spindle) Tape Drives (2) 1403 Printer 25~0 Read/Punch unit Display Station and Keyboard
NOTE #1 - The 256K was divided between background processing
and foreground processing. Tele-processing was run
in the foreground and normal production work was
run in the background. There was approximately
80K reserved for the background. Some program seg-
mentation was necessary.
NOTE #2 - Although 7-spindles were avai lable, they were used
mainly to "spread ll the data to a'loid head-contention.
(See page 10 for actua I space used).
NOTE #3 - After the One-Day/One-Trial system was implemented,
a 3741 diskette unit was installed with the 2540 read/
punch unit being replaced with a 2501 Card Reader and
a 3540 diskette read/write unit. Some program modifi-
cation was needed since the punch unit was no longer
avai lable.
NOTE #4 - The display station and keyboard was used for inquiry
purposes only throughout the system.
I.~ ] I~ ] I~ ]
I~]
I. 1 (:,1 I:]
-7-
'TOTAL' - A data base management system
'ENVIRON/1' - A terMinal display management system compatible with 'TOTAL'
'DSOURCE' - a source program I ibrary management system
Personnel
Systems Analyst (1)
System Programmer (1)
Programmer (3)
A contract programming house was employed so that after
all the start-up programs were written, the personnel could be
released with no co~tinuing costs. Current program maintenance
is accompl ished through regular staff programmers.
Pro~ramming
14-20 Main-Line Programs
10-15 Support and ~1iscel taneous Programs
6-10 Maintenance to Voter Registration tape programs
Display Station Inquiry program
All the above programs were written in COBOL (Common Business
Orientated Language) with the exception of the display station
program which is wriTten in TEBOl (Teleprocessing BUSiness Orient~,ted
Language). There is one ASSEMBLER program in the system (a random
number generator)~
-8-
JOB DESCRIPTIONS
There are three Job categories:
1. Main-Line JOBS
2. Support JOBS
3. MisceJ laneous JOBS
Jobs arG nothing more than the grouping of programs and/or
uti I ities into a logical sequence to accompl ish a specific task
in a system.
Main-Line jobs are those jobs which are essential to
making the system work and some are act'lally required due to
unique practices of the Wayne County Jury Commission (e.g. Jurat
Bu i I d) •
Support jobs are those jobs which feed the main-I ine jobs.
Miscellaneous jobs are those jobs which can be thought of
as "whistles and bells ll to the system.
JCA100
JCA200
Main-Line JOBS,
Selects prospective juro~s from th~ Master Voter Registration Tape and produces questionnaires to be mai led to them.
Accompl ishes the p'rimary "maintenance" to the system. It processes questionnaires evaluation, summons responses, name and address changes, as wei I as any exceptions or processing that may arise. In addition, Examination Notices and Excused Notices are generated f rom he re.
l~ ]
I ]
I ] (. ]
(~ ]
I ] I ] I ] I. ] I~' :1 I~]
I, '1;
, j
I ] I ] I "I
1.1 [, ]
JCA300
JCA350
JCA400
JCA450
JCA480
JCA6C'O
JCA010
J CJl.020
J CA 1 10
JC.1500
JCA505
JCA510
JCA520
-9-
Groups accepted jurors into jurats to be used in the random draw.
Randomizes accepted jurors and assigns service dates to them.
Performs the necessary maintenance to all the fi les affected by the random draw. In addition, the "Minutes" nf the drawing are produced as wei I as the printing of summons forms.
Produces "secondary" summons forms for those jurors who have been granted a deferment from their original service date.
Produces the da i I Y check- i n pane I ! i st.
Proresrfls all jury trial empanelments as well as d ,1 1- t c - d i3 Y cas e act i v i t Y •
Produces the payrol I check register and the payrol I tape.
_Supportive JOBS
Accomp I i shes m i sce I I aneous f i Ie adj ustments due to extraordinary processing conditions.
Produces miscellaneous fi Ie reports of all data in the system.
Lists the voters contained on the Master Voter Registration tapes.
Selects al I acceptable jurors for district court drawings.
Randomly selects jurors for district court service.
Performs the necessary maintenance to all the files affected by the random drawing of district court jurors. In addition, the "Minutes" of the drawing are produced.
Processes rhe maintenance to district court jurors as r.ported by the district courts.
JCA550
JCA750
JCA025*
JCA028
JCA029
JCA030*
JCA036
JCA037
JCA060
JCA710
JCA800*
-10-
Produces secondary and tertiary questionnaire for those prospective jurors who have not responded to a previous mai ling.
Produces a I isting and a "dot" gr,..aph of juror usage on a day-to-day basis as wei I as a case monitor report.
Miscellaneous JOBS
Unload the DIST/PRCT (District/Precinct) fi les and reset counters to zero ("initial ize ll
).
Adds, deletes, and changes records on the zip code fi Ie.
Extracts data from the juror Haster Fi Ie and produces one to five reports for Jury Commission use.
Bui Ids new CALD (Calendar) records for future years.
DIST comparison report.
Summarizes CALD records by week, month, or year.
Produces a s t a ti 5 i I c a I report s how i n g month! y counts of various ac~i~ities relating to Jury Commission activity.
Produces a statistical report I isting juror occupations obtained from the returned questionnaires and indicating number summoned and served on trial.
Removes " o bsolete ll jurors from the data base.
JCA810 Removes obsolete SUMM records.
JCA900 - AI I jobs in this series relate to regenerating the JCA999 Voter Registration tapes.
JCA910* Unloads the JROR file.
* Mainly year-end jobs
\:
I~ ] I ] I, ] I~ ] [~ ] [~ ] V
[~ ]
I, -, ] , ,.
I ] ( ]
I ] I ] I~ ] I ] [ ]
[ ]
[,1
(, 'I
-11-
FILE LAYOUTS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Following is a I ist of the fi les used in the system
and a short description of how each file is used. The space
requirements shown were "guestimates" based upon anticipated
volume and activity and have prove~ quite accurate.
FILE NAME
J ROR
PERS
DESCRIPTION/USAGE
Juror Master Fi Ie
A record of this type is generated for each prospective juror receiving a questionnaire. Through "status and reason" codes contained on this fi Ie, a juror is "tracked lf through the system. Pertinent information contained on this file include:
1. Name, Address, clnd Zip Code 2. Social Security Number 3. Status Code and Reason Code 4. Juror Occupation 5 . Pay ro I I n u m b e r 6. Total days paid
Personal Fi Ie - "chaineo" to the JROR Fi Ie
Records on this file contain information which mayor may not be needed for each juror, I.e.:
1. Spous~;s name and occupation 2. Number of chi Idren 3. Dates served on trial (if juror sfts
on a trial) 4. Historical entries recording all actions
happening to a juror; i.e., every time the Status/Reason Code changes on the JROR fi Ie, an entry is made on i-his fi Ie.
----"~--- - '.~~-.~----- ---........ ------. __ ' ..... lilll .... m l ..... ~"""~R'Q'''Ui'ib'1J!
I ]
n j
~1
~ ~ " I
U n "Q
" I
" I
n r j j:
U n u
il ''j
b
'1 It 11 n ti
n K " U, J
n f .. " TI
n a 11
[j .~ 11 t ,~
g n
H ~ !1 ~ U
r n TI
H ~
n ]
i ]
- --.~---" ~--- ---.------- - .. -- ',_._-.-
FILE NAME
SUMM
CALD
ZIPP
-14-
DESCRIPTION/USAGE
The Summoned Juror Fi Ie - "chained" to JURY, DtST, JROR, AND CALD
Each record on this fi Ie represents a juror who has received a summons. Once a juror has completely finished his service (whether on a case or not), and has been paid, the record is removed from this file. Entries in each recol~d on 'this file assure a maximum of 12 pay dates per pay-period. Jurors cannot bp paid unless they have a record on this filE::.
The Calendar Fi Ie
Th i s f i I e has records correspond i ng to the days of the year. As each juror is given a service date, the SUMM record is added and chained to the corresponding date record on this file, and from this date record, the check-in panel list is printed. Also, deferred summons are printed from the date record on this file. As an additional feature, counts are recorded on each date record showing:
1. How many summons were printed 2. How many jurors are scheduled per day 3. Day of the Week Codes and hoi iday
designation 4. How many questionnaires were mailed and
on what dates, etc.
Zip Code Fi Ie
Rather than carry the full city, state, and zip code designation on each JROR record, a 3-character alpha-numeric representation is stored. When the full city, state, and zip code is needed, this 3-character alpha-n4meric is used to access the records on this fi Ie which contains the city, state, and zip code.
------
(0 ]
I ]
[" ]
I ] [.1
[ ]
[ .. ]
1".1 ( 1 I,]
(~ ]
[.J (.]
( )
[ 1 [ J 1.1 [:1
---------~ --------
-15-
FILE NAME DESCRIPTION/USAGE
SLNK Statistical Link File - tlchained" to STAT
These are detai led activities that are I inked to the "JURY SYSTEM" record defined above. Monthly counts can be obtained for:
1 • Number of j u ro r s empaneled 2 . Number of questionnaires ma i [ed 3. Number of accepted j u ro r s orocessed 4. N lImbe r of "'xcuses granted, etc.
Besides being divided into MASTER and VARIABLE file
types, the fi les can be further categorized into three types
by usage. They are:
1. Expand i ng - records are cont i nua II y added ( E)
2. Contracting - records are added and deleted (C)
3. Fixed - number of records are relatively constant (F)
The expanding fi les require separate maintenance programs to
remove old records, usually on an annual basis.
Of the shared files, the CASE and Hisi'ory (HIS;) files, as
use d b Y the J u r y S Y s t em, act u a I I Y use 0 n I yap p ro x i mat ely
1/100th of the space listed.
!~ ~
-16- I" ] -17 -
] DATA BASE LAYOUT
(, I-KO\ :JuRY J"'~cpR
I: ] ,:reA Do
I J / LKol LOGICAL
FILE # TRfl,CKS # RECORDS FILE USE RECORD l J NAME ALLOCATED CAPACITY ORGANIZATION LENGTH
J ROR 2,000 159,980 MASTER E 151 [ ] PERS I ,900 273,564 VARIABLE E 87
[ ] LJ<o'l-
ACPT 38 13,590 VARIABLE C 35 {-::."
I ] SUMM 133 13,806 VARIABLE C 120 B 'Dr ST Li<I::Id,.
DJOR 19 6,375 VARIABLE C 37 I' ~ ] DIST 3 88 MASTER F 392
I 1 Ll<qg L J(Od-,
PRCT 4 I ,965 VARIABLE F 24
ZIPP 3 798 MASTER F 41 * I,: ] E:J LKo3 QALP JURY 140 MASTER F 72
(J :rc. .qi)o\
JUDG* 19 3,525 MASTER F 67
CASE* I ,045 200,592 MASTER 65 U<,ol
E ( ]
HIST* 15,352 2,226,011 VARIABLE E 86
[ ] -* CALD* 76 3,939 MASTER F 237 STAT
STAT* 38 2,265 MASTER F 210
I S LN K-lt
[ . -LJ<o~ 38 4,379 VARIABLE F 108 Lf{o I
* S hare d with other systems '1 I _~
['J CASE *. I
II J [I] "* = S Ht1l<,£]) F.tL£ S
-18-
SYSTEM CODES
The following is a I ist of StaTus Cude<s and Reason Codes
as used in the system. These Status/Reason Codes are used to
II t r a c kilt h e j u ro r t h r _~ ugh the s y s t em.
There are four (4) broad categories of these codes:
Some overlapping of the codes exist; i.e., a particular
code can be used in the Circuit Court category and also in the
Trial category.
These Status/Reason Codes are ma i nta i ned on the J ROK f i I es
and ale continually changing as jurors prugress through the
system with new codes overlaying the previous codes. I n order
to maintain a historical profi Ie of the jurors, dupl icate entries
are made on the PERS files which are not overlayed.
Status Codes and Explanation - General
EV This status is used for jurors at the evaluation stage. The juror remains in this status unti I an evaluation is made by the Jury Commission as to The \/oter's qualification or disqualification for jury service. As a guide to the various situations existing at this stage, the following Reason Codes are applicable:
01 - received the first questionnaire, but has not responded
-.-,
1 ] I: ]
I ] I ] [ J [ ]
I ]
[ ]
I ]
1.1 ( J I ]
. 1 [ -.
1.1 [ I [ J
AC
EX
JD
55
OF
EX
$$
-19-
02 - received the second questionnaire, but has not yet responded (There could be a r;U, etc. if additional contact is desired.)
El called in for a personal
E2 - called in for a personal the second time
examination
examination
~J11 - t1 e d i c a I forms we r email e d to the voter:, for completion by their doctor
Upon evaluation of the questionnaire, personal interview, or medical report, the Jury Commission has accepted the voter for jury duty.
Upon evaluation of the quesTionnaire, personal interview, or medical report, the Jury Commission has determined that the voter is exempt from jury duty, or an excuse should be recommended. At this time, a reason for the exclusion is also recorded:
OA - old aqe PR - prohibited NO - not qualified, etc.
The juror has been selected into a jurat but has not yet received a service date.
The Juror has been assigned a service date and a summons has been mai led.
The juror requested and was granted a deferment from the original service date. The juror wi II report for service on some date in the future. A Il coun ter" is associated with this code which records the number of deferments a particular juror has been granted.
The juror has been excused from juror service after receiving a summons. The "Reason" Code is used to differentiate between jurors excused at the evaluation stage and jurors excused after they have received a summons.
Juror has served and has been paid. This code may appear
SC
JE
to
AJ
DL
BL
BN
MS
JV
IN
DO
OS
-20-
more than once since +he juror may be on a lengthy trial and would be pa:d many times.
A "show cause" order was issued aga i nst the juror, for co~tinued disregard of questionnaires End summons.
Status Codes an.d Explanation - TI-ial
Juror is empaneled on a trial.
The juror is on a trial that is at 'e'ld-of-day'. The trial wi II continue the next day (or in the event of a week-end or a hoi iday, the nex+ working day).
The juror is on a trial "/"'hat has been adjourned to some date in the future.
The Juror is on a trial that is currently i' deliDeration.
The juror has been excused from the trial "by lot" end two alternates are emThey are excused prior
a drawing.)
is paid for that day. (One or paneled to hear the evidence. to del iberations by means of
The juror did not appear and was terminated frOM a trial and receives no further pay.
The juror has been on a trial which has been declared a mis-'rrial; the juror is excused. The trial mayor may not continue.
The juror has been 011 a tri a I that has gone to successful conclusion; a verdict was rendered and the juror is now excused.
The juror has been on a trial that has gone to conclusion but no verdict was rendered; the juror is now excused.
S t a-1.~~ 0 des and Ex p I a nat ion - D i s t ric t S e r vic e
The juror has been selected for a District Court drawing.
The juror has been selected to serve in a District Co~rt
.. ~~--- 4'
[']
I. ]
I, ]
(, ] Ia< ''\III
l J
[ I I I
['I
[ ]
(. 1
[ )
[ ]
("I
[ 1 [ J [ J [)
[,J J-
['1
[ll
OJ
EX
RD
PO
CG
TX
HO
-21-
and is currbnt!y on that assignment.
The juror serv~d in a District Court.
The juror has be0n excused from District Court service (NOTE: this is tl e third occurrence of the EX status code. To know how this code applies in a given situa-i;0n, it will be nel.essary to examine the historical entries .Ieading up tc the excusals).
The juror has been sel~cted for District Court service but has reques+ed and b&en granted a deferment for service unti I a later date.
Status Codes and Explanat~~'Jn - Miscellaneous
The juror has received some m"li led been returned by the Post Offi~e. at any stage, i.e., questiorrnalre,
matter~ but it has This code can appear summons, pay check, etc.
The juror has receivea d questior,naire at one municipa!iiY, but has i nth e mea n tim b m 0 v edt 0 ~? not her m u n i c i pal i t Y within the county. In this situat!on, a new juror number is generated and the old juror numb~r contains a reference to the new juror number.
The juror is temporari Iy excused pend, n9 action by the Jury Commission.
A hold is placed on all the juror information pending further action by the Jury Commission.
In addition to al I the above codes, there is a set of codes that are app I i cab I e on I y to Grand J u ro'~s.
-24-
QUESTIONNAIRE MAILINGS
S\jFFI:Cl:E/Jj
)<6,-----' ~\.lf\N_n:,..y'
"J\.ff.y pm MlSS;:Z,M
Re-.J::tr:..w
~1J';:.Sn.PN~£
/fi:-----1 f't1 c.~A(.E.
~<lF{:.~a"~r
~"'A,..,~ry'
1Il~!.T4"'tl~ SIC:L!:C.-n;.",,,,
Relltve,sT
.rCA /00
NArne us; <l>P i?l/'l"EI.£J) mtf7lcR,
EXHIBIT 1
,-","--",
I ~, ]
[ ::J r ',' &: •
I: I [ 1 [ J [ 'J [, ]
( ~ I [ I [ ]
I~ I [ I [ ~,I
I :~I [ 'I
[ ')
[-I r
eLI ~
LH3 j';:) ..., t. I'l (11
I'> ,., tJ Ll ",,-frH 1'1
CTJ 7'> ~ (I t;J~:l> -{
~ r- III t:::J
"e> ~
(".)i4 ~ f\::, .... ..s:.
'"~~ ~~~
Ii "'\
~ ~ \.!
't>-~
-?5-
J> () I-t () » Z' () ~<.oP
:I:>'l.)J."'" /1". r-.,.. -;:3
'" .c -I ;:j) '\> -\ ::t> r IT, '" t7 ~ ~
\-'I"'~n ~ -l::.~ III 4-1
~s:.~ -\ ~ jj '1>.4 !'1 t" rII H It) 7'> '-I I" r' H
~ ~ In Z.
~ m Z
"1:> s;:.
3S:-j
~~~~---I ~
() E> ., '" ()
~'b C "11\ ~ ~ ,,~~
C1l~ i:t ". III '1:) r-~ 1:. 'l.~$::
ti-& ~ \:I:!> '\ <;-1 -1m ..... :ra n. ("I:>
~ ~ II)
P\
'"' -c>-~
$1:>. If)
Jl) ,;:: ITJ .... "i \...J
~ z rrl z » z () m "T1 :;:0
o 3;:
o C m (fl
::! o Z Z » :;:0 m
Z Q (fl
-26-
JURAT BUILD
7Il'NW· of
F\ca(',. FC-----~ :rCA 300
VI/> Tf: RS
fA"7-~;'Ll R~c.cfK.'"b G ENE ~ f\-r.::n
:t&~<:'" Co ~ IJ It r &tfl'l. b Rtr¢lIJE S T
:r.NVI!N. <IF ACCE.fT~-----.....!!!'IoI .jQAS~C
WnRS.
.......--_-___ J
r¥\ f\')c''l' m ~ r'\ q, F (HE. vE.N
r---,----.,;;c:r~c.:._:¥ r, 'l ,,ef.\T :;l"3
J"I.j "AT #:l..
"J;LI~T"I1' I f E:. £.(1". f'l tv E N f' Rectt>~vs fop
"J IJ U. i C.p (t) (YI Z'£ s"Z ~ tJ
RE'DE/'I>SITE.b r-------~~ L%~~NG
'"/:)'::t S T~:r C T C (J 4~-r
R ~ crjl(t. 'D.s
, ,
~TC fiC:::o ')::t 51" 1:J 3
tllST tJ .2.
'PE. ~1(7l A rJ EtJ T R E c" 1<'1) S f, G=
"J~ « j C'IP M()1 r 5 S":t ~ ,J I'\ND
'l:t.sT~l'c:.-r ~~ve.,.s
I ] [ ]
I ,I (]
[ ]
[ I [ :1
[ ) ['I
I I [ ]
( I,
[I
( I [~I
['I
[ , I
[ ~I [ ',I
C~vi?T R,pr/J rY\ CASE LCPAl>
-27-
DRAWING OF JURORS
~~ft'l r--------.::Je~ P'lPll.SSLsI
~e.v:n: .,J
RAtvb4lM ~t:.N~AAT~ « ~11'\.:r,.., E
s-:rc;tJe,1) By :J'l4l1(F e.Lf..~K :r~ I. 'I e.p(YI ~""l,,' l:;" t/JWf( ~s