Top Banner
HABEMUS SUPERSTRATUM June 25, 2015 MASAKI SHIGEMORI (YITP Kyoto) ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015
36

June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

Jan 18, 2018

Download

Documents

Lauren Paul

Iosif Bena Jan de Boer Nick Warner Stefano Giusto Rodolfo Russo
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

HABEMUS SUPERSTRATU

M

June 25, 2015

MASAKI SHIGEMORI

(YITP Kyoto)

ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, IndiaStrings 2015

Page 2: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

MAIN MESSAGES

Black hole microstates involve complicated structure of branes called superstrata

Basic superstrata solutions explicitly constructed in sugra as smooth geometries

Page 3: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

Iosif Bena Jan de Boer

Nick Warner

Stefano Giusto

Rodolfo Russo

Page 4: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

MICROSTATE GEOMETRY PROGRAM:

How much of black hole entropy can be accounted for by smooth, horizonless solutions of classical

gravity?D1-D5-P BH:

no horizon,no singularity

Page 5: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

1915

Einstein: general relativity

1975

Hawking radiation

1996

Strominger-Vafa (field theory counting of 3-charge BH)

2001

Lunin-Mathur geometries (2-charge microstates) fuzzball conjecture, microstate geometry program

2006

Microstate geometries in 5D (3- and 4-charge microstates)

2010

Double bubbling & superstrata (into 6D)

2015

Explicit construction of superstrata

SOME HISTORY

This talk

Page 6: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

DOUBLE BUBBLING(OR MULTIPLE SUPERTUBE TRANSITION)

Page 7: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

7

SUPERTUBE TRANSITION

Spontaneous polarization phenomenon Produces new dipole charge Cross section = arbitrary curve

[Mateos+Townsend ’01]

new dipole charge𝑄2

polarize(“bubble”

)

𝜆arbitrary curve

𝑄1

(cf. Myers effect)

Page 8: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

8

SUPERTUBE: F1-P FRAMEF1 (9 )+P (9 )→F1(𝜆)

To carry momentum, F1 must wiggle in transverse

Projection onto transverse is an arbitrary curve

F1(9)

polarizeP

𝑥9

𝑥1𝑥8…

wiggly F1𝜆

compact

transver

seℝ 8 ℝ 8

Page 9: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

9

SUPERTUBE: D1-D5 FRAMED 1(5)+D 5 (56789 )→KKM (𝜆6789,5)

LM geometries (2-charge microstate geometries)

Arbitrary curve large entropy AdS/CFT dictionary well understood

D5D1polarize(“bubble

”) �⃗�=�⃗� ( 𝜆 )∈ℝ12344

KKM

𝜆arbitrary curve

[Lunin-Mathur ’01]

[Rychkov ’05][Lunin-Mathur ’01]

[Kanitscheider-Skenderis-Taylor ’06, 07]

Page 10: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

10

DOUBLE BUBBLING

BH microstates involve arbitrary surface = superstratum

Exotic and non-geometric in general () Arbitrary surface larger entropy ?

D5D1

P arbitrary curve:

supertube

𝜆arbitrary surface:

“superstratum”

𝜆𝜃

3-charge system: real BH

[de Boer-MS ’10, ’12][Bena-de Boer-MS-Warner ’11]

Page 11: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

ENDLESS BUBBLING?

A black hole is made of an extremely complicated structure (fuzzball) of

puffed-up branes.7

?

Courtesy of the National Human Genome Research Institute

Page 12: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

12

EXOTIC BRANES

exoticbrane

U-dualitymonodromy

“Forgotten” branes in string theory

Codimension 2 U-duality monodromy

(“U-fold”) Non-geometric

[de Boer-MS ’10, ’12]

[Elitzur-Giveon-Kutasov-Rabinovici ’97][Blau-O’Loughlin ’97] [Hull ’97][Obers-Pioline ’98]

generalization of F-theory 7-branes

Page 13: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

13

A GEOMETRIC CHANNELK KM ( 𝜆6789 ,𝜃 )

wigglyKKMwiggly

D1wiggly

D5D1

D5P

𝑥5

𝑥1 𝑥4…geometric

superstratum

=

Can use geometric intuition (smoothness) Dependence on is crucial 6 dimensions

[Bena-de Boer -MS-Warner ’11]

Page 14: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

SUMMARY: BH microstates involve double-

bubbled superstrata Geometric superstratum in 6D is

important for microstate geometry program

Page 15: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

EXPLICIT CONSTUCTION OF SUPERSTRATA

[Bena+Giusto+Russo+MS+Warner ’15]

Page 16: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

GOAL:Explicitly construct

“superstrata” = wiggly KKM in 6D

They must depend on functions of two variables:

Page 17: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

SUSY SOLUTIONS IN 6D

17

IIB sugra on Require same susy as preserved by D1-

D5-P[Gutowski+Martelli+Reall ’03] [Cariglia+Mac Conamhna ’04][Bena+Giusto+MS+Warner ’11] [Giusto+Martucci+Petrini+Russo ’13]

)

𝑒2Φ=𝛼𝑍1

𝑍 2

𝐹 1=𝒟( 𝑍4

𝑍 1)+(𝑑𝑣+𝛽 )∧𝜕𝑣( 𝑍 4

𝑍1)

𝛼≡𝑍1𝑍2

𝑍 1𝑍 2−𝑍42 𝒟≡𝑑4− 𝛽∧𝜕𝑣 ❑̇≡𝜕𝑣

Page 18: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

BPS EQUATIONS

18

1st layer

2nd layer

Give 4D base0th layer

□𝐶=𝐴𝐵

Linear if solved in the right order

Page 19: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

0TH LAYER

19

Give 4D base

□𝐶=𝐴𝐵

This is the base for: round LM

geometry(2-charge)

pure

round superstratumwith no wiggle

(yet) 𝑆3

Take flat

¿¿

Page 20: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

1ST LAYER

20

Give 4D base

□𝐶=𝐴𝐵

𝑆3

[Mathur+Saxena+Srivastava ’03]

Mode numbers: ( , )𝑘 𝑚 Take known linear solution

with P

Page 21: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

1ST LAYER (2)

21

Give 4D base

□𝐶=𝐴𝐵

Superpose modes to get function of 2 variables𝐴=∑

𝑘,𝑚𝑎𝑘 ,𝑚𝑌 𝑘 ,𝑚

¿+¿

Page 22: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

NL completi

on

2ND LAYER

22

Give 4D base

□𝐶=𝐴𝐵

Find as non-linear 𝐶solution Do it for pair of modes

Regularity fixes solution

Page 23: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

SUMMARY: Constructive proof of

existence of superstrata! Big step toward general 3-

charge microstate geometries

Most general microstate geometry with known CFT dual

Page 24: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

CFT PICTURE

Page 25: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

25

BOUNDARY CFT D1-D5 CFT

2D SCFT, , Target space: orbifold

Orbifold CFT Twist sectors represented by

component strings

𝑁………1 1 1 2 2 3 𝑘

Page 26: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

26

2-CHARGE STATES (1)

Round LM geom

1 1 1 ……… 11 1

NS vacuum

Page 27: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

27

2-CHARGE STATES (2)

General LM geom

Linear fluct around round LM

………1 1 2 3 5

𝑘 1 1 ……… 11 11

“single-trace” chiral primary

general chiral primary

[Lunin-Mathur ’01]

Page 28: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

28

KNOWN 3-CHARGE STATES P-carrying linear fluct around round LM

: momentum number State of a single

supergravitonwith quantum numbers

𝑘 ,𝑚 1 ……… 11 1

descendant of chiral primary

∼¿¿𝑘 ,𝑚

“known linear solution”

[Mathur+Saxena+Srivastava ’03]

Page 29: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

29

SUPERSTRATA General P-carrying fluct around round

LM

Various modes turned on with finite amp.

The most general microstate geometrywith known CFT dual

State of supergraviton gas(D1-D5 1/8-BPS version of LLM) descendant of non-chiral

primary

………

strings strings

𝑘1𝑚1 1𝑘2𝑚2… 𝑘1𝑚1 … … 1𝑘2𝑚2

Page 30: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

TOWARD MORE GENERAL STRATA

Page 31: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

31

WHAT’S MISSING Does this class of superstrata

reproduce ? Not yet These correspond to supergraviton gas = fluct around .Entropy parametrically smaller.

𝑆3

[de Boer ’98]

Page 32: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

32

MORE GENERAL SUPERSTRATA

Other backgrounds multiple ’s, orbifolds

CFT side: Need higher and fractional

modesof

multi-superstratu

m

𝑆3 𝑆3

𝑆3

𝐽−2+¿𝜎𝑘

++¿ ¿¿𝐽− 1𝑘

+¿ 𝐽− 2𝑘

+¿ 𝜎𝑘++ ¿¿¿ ¿¿¿ →

Next steps:

𝑆3/ℤ𝑘

Page 33: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

Page 34: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

CONCLUSIONS:Superstratum

Represents a new class of microstate geometries

Depends on functions of two variables Represents the most general

microstate geometry with known CFT dual

More general superstrata out there;Construct them. Can they reproduce ?

Page 35: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

STAY TUNED

Page 36: June 25, 2015 ICTS-TIFR Bengaluru, India Strings 2015.

Thanks!