Top Banner
July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness
27
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

July 6th 2012 – The Belfry.Sustaining Competitiveness

Page 2: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Key Challenges affecting the Future of the West Midlands Economy

David Bailey & Nigel Berkeley

Page 3: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

The Challenge

“To boost the scale and pace of economic recovery in the region, create more new jobs and stimulate more demand for higher level skills, there is a need to up-skill the workforce in existing businesses, to improve their productivity and help them to exploit new market opportunities. In parallel it will be important to attract more businesses and jobs in higher skilled and value added clusters” The West Midlands Economy Post Recession: Key Issues and Challenges, West Midlands Regional Observatory, 2010; p.20

“The weak performance of the UK economy… the ongoing financial uncertainties in the Eurozone and the global economy, declining wages and cuts in the public sector mean supporting private sector growth and jobs in our cities is more critical than ever”.Cities Outlook, Centre for Cities, 2012; p.6

Page 4: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Set against a long-term poor track record

• Long-term underinvestment in infrastructure

• Ongoing process of deindustrialisation and a wider economic structure reliant on low growth sectors; lower proportion of high growth firms and lower rates of enterprise

• A relatively poor business and employment performance in the private sector • 2% employment growth 1998-2008 compared to 19% nationally

• Birmingham -7.7%; Stoke -16.4% (Newcastle +10.2%)

• Low rates of productivity a feature of several of the region’s key sectors (e.g. wholesale and retail; hotels and catering; and the public sector)

Page 5: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Set against a long-term poor track record

• A relatively poor education and skills record; dependence on lower value added sectors and clusters leads to relatively low skill levels and skills shortages

• Relatively poor performance in developing ‘knowledge economy’ sectors and in R&D spend

• Pockets of high levels of unemployment and worklessness; issues of high youth unemployment and long-term unemployment especially in Birmingham

• “There are over 32,000 young people claiming JSA in Birmingham - enough to fill Birmingham City FC’s St Andrews Stadium” (Centre for Cities, 2012); youth claimant rate 4th worst of UK cities

• Long-term unemployed accounted for 24% of Birmingham claimants by end of 2011; whilst long-term claimant rate second worst of UK cities

Page 6: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Poor track record in developing knowledge intensive jobs

Source: The Work Foundation, 2009

Page 7: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

Em

plo

ym

en

t In

dex 1

97

1=

10

0 South East

North East

East Midlands

West Midlands

Eastern

Yorks-Humber

North West

Long-term employment growth

Page 8: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

8

Contrasts in performance of region in recession; since late1990s relative deterioration in West Midlands

Source: ONS, Regional Claimant Count Rates

1971 Q1 1973 Q3 1976 Q1 1978 Q3 1981 Q1 1983 Q3 1986 Q1 1988 Q3 1991 Q1 1993 Q3 1996 Q1 1998 Q3 2001 Q1 2003 Q3 2006 Q1 2008 Q30

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

UK

West Midlands

East Midlands

North East

South East

Reg

iona

l Cla

iman

t C

ount

Rat

e (%

)

Page 9: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Widening GVA gap

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007£10,000

£12,000

£14,000

£16,000

£18,000

£20,000

£22,000

Regional Economic Performance (GVA per head)

West MidlandsEngland

Source: West Midlands Regional Observatory

Page 10: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Weak Industrial Structure

Sector/Cluster Industry / service

Emerging high value added private sector activities

Environmental technologies (£3bn GVA, 74,000 jobs)Medical technologies (£250m GVA, 7,000 jobs)Specialist business services (£5bn GVA) Digital media (£150m GVA, 9,500 jobs) Electricity, gas and water (£2bn GVA, 14,000 jobs)

Traditional private sector activities Transport technologies (£4bn GVA, 92,000 jobs)Building technologies (£11bn GVA, 220,000 jobs) Food and drink (£3bn GVA, 58,000 jobs)

Lower value added private sector activities Business services (£23bn GVA, 440,000 jobs) Wholesale and retail (£12bn GVA, 360,000 jobs)

Public Sector activities Education (£6bn GVA, 240,000 jobs)Health and social care (£7bn GVA, 277,000 jobs)

In GVA and employment terms high value added activities make relatively modest contributions to the regional economy

Source: West Midlands Regional Observatory, 2010

Page 11: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

West Midlands – Manufacturing GVA 1997-2009

Fell by 23%: worse than any other UK region

Over-valuation of sterling badly affected our auto and transport clusters

plus it wasn't until Mandelson arrived that Labour actually took industrial policy seriously.

Page 12: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

West Midlands: The Recession and Beyond

• Output drop and unemployment rise in West Midlands worse than other regions during early part of the recession (not a surprise)

• BUT bounce back more rapid – rebalancing effect: certain parts of manufacturing, exports (?), modest ‘onshoring’

• Rapid jobs growth – out performing other regions.• Region reasonably placed (Deloitte, 2011): public sector job cuts; tax rises and

benefit cuts; ‘revival’ in manufacturing; weakness in fin services; house price falls.• PMI: 55.3 (53.1 UK) last 12 months; 58.5 (53.9 UK) last 3 months; 56.3 (53.0) last

month

• Challenges around youth unemployment esp. in cities • Private sector job growth insufficient to offset public sector cuts

Page 13: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

West Mids Economic Performance

Page 14: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Not surprising given structure of West Mids economy

Page 15: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Exports

Page 16: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

… where to?

Page 17: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.
Page 18: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Upgrading the ‘middle’?

Some recent shifts:• ‘Personalised manufacturing’... Car industry?• ‘Functional’ to ‘hybrid’ goods: hybridity. Creative/design and service

element• Brands, market repositioning• Links ‘creative’ non ‘creative’ sectors – ‘platforms’ – see report by Lisa

De Propris and others for NESTA on mapping creative industries• Diversity / ‘serendipitous spillovers’ / related variety: ‘smart

specialisation’• Clusters and a regional approach

Page 19: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

And if we really want to ‘rebalance’ the economy...

Industrial Policy targeted at manufacturing• Capital allowances• Focus corporation tax cuts for manufacturing firms that increase

output• National insurance holidays for firms that take on workers• Better R&D tax credits• Better support for exporters• Manufacturing loan fund? (Automotive – Relocalisation /

Repatriation of supply chain)• Green Investment Bank? SME Bank?

Page 20: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Plus...

• Lessons from Germany: Part-time wage subsidies

• Takeover Law• Rebuilding fractured supply chains• Regional examples Smart specialisation• Other instruments: procurement policy

Page 21: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Policy: (How) can LEPs be effective RDAs?

‘Old’ system of RDAs not perfect BUT...

• Still not clear what regional growth drivers / levers LEPs will be able to influence

• What’s the Offer? Localism Act, RGF, Enterprise Zones, possibility for faster planning, Growing Places Fund, City Deals? ...

Page 22: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Recentralisation / Decentralisation

Recentralisation of policy to Whitehall Centralised industrial policy not likely to work LEPs: transport, housing, planning, enterprise (?) Skills? Business engagement? RGF big cut in funding – need scope for LEPs to

raise own finance (TIFs / Business Rates / bonds?) RDAs assets back to Whitehall / HCA. But, ‘City Deals’ a good first step?

Page 23: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Cont’d...

Risk of excessive fragmentation – functional economic geography? B’ham / Black Country?

Capability/capacity to make strategically informed decisions on economic development?

Need to retain key knowledge base built up by RDAs – RDA ‘Brain Drain’

• Need for ‘intermediate level’: Intelligence, monitoring, accessing EU funding, regional planning, clusters and innovation

Page 24: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Summary

• LEPs need genuine powers and the ability to raise funding: for some cities, govt listening?

• Right scale? Intermediate ‘join up’ of work of LEPs between local and national level critical to use public monies effectively – minimum: intelligence and info gathering base, pursuing effective cluster and innovation strategies and accessing EU funding

Page 25: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

Thanks for listening.

Comments, Questions welcome!

[email protected]

Page 26: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

July 6th 2012 – The Belfry.Sustaining Competitiveness

Page 27: July 6 th 2012 – The Belfry. Sustaining Competitiveness.

July 6th 2012 – The Belfry.Sustaining Competitiveness