w w w w w w w w w . . . s s s c c c c c c r r r e e e a a a t t t e e e . . . o o o r r r g g g A personnel project funded by the SC Department of Education’s Office of Exceptional Children and Division of Educator Quality and Leadership Project CREATE: State-wide Partnership for Producing Highly Qualified Special Education Teachers ______________________ Joe P. Sutton Project Create Director and Primary Investigator Holly Pae University of South Carolina Upstate ______________________ 2012 OSEP Project Directors' Conference C enters for the R e-E ducation and A dvancement of Te achers in Special Education Our Mission To Grow a Highly Qualified Special Education Teacher Force in South Carolina CREATE of South Carolina States with Emergency/Temporary Teacher Licenses in Special Education (USDE, 2005) 43 of 50 States (24,458 of 386,522 teachers or 6.33% of national SpEd teacher force) Exceptions include Iowa, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma, Virginia, and Wisconsin Data reflect 2003-2004 year
5
Embed
Joe P. Sutton Project Create Director and Primary ... · Joe P. Sutton Project Create Director and Primary Investigator Holly Pae University of South Carolina Upstate _____ 2012 OSEP
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
wwwwwwwww...sssccccccrrreeeaaattteee...ooorrrggg
A personnel project funded by the SC Department of Education’s Office of
Exceptional Children and Division of Educator Quality and Leadership
Project CREATE: State-wide Partnership for
Producing Highly Qualified Special Education
Teachers ______________________
Joe P. Sutton Project Create Director and Primary Investigator
Holly Pae University of South Carolina Upstate
______________________
2012 OSEP Project Directors' Conference
Centers for the Re-Education and
Advancement of Teachers in
Special Education
Our Mission
To Grow a Highly Qualified Special Education
Teacher Force in South Carolina
CREATE of South Carolina
States with Emergency/Temporary
Teacher Licenses in Special Education (USDE, 2005)
43 of 50 States
(24,458 of 386,522 teachers or 6.33% of
national SpEd teacher force)
Exceptions include Iowa, Mississippi,
Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma,
Virginia, and Wisconsin
Data reflect 2003-2004 year
CREATE is a Re-Education Initiative
► Implemented in other states, e.g., Virginia (Kneedler & Sutton, 1987-1990)
► Found to be successful at preparing teachers
in new content areas (Adelman, 1986)
► Consistent with the concept of strengthening
and expanding partnerships among teacher
education institutions and local/state agencies,
for the purpose of increasing the number of
highly qualified teachers (USDE, 2005)
CREATE represents a consortium of SC
universities with NCATE/State-approved
teacher preparation programs in SpEd,
offering a range of add-on certification
courses reflecting CEC Standards in a
variety of course formats, including:
► On-campus courses
► Contract courses
► Satellite/distance courses
► Online courses
CREATE is Growing a Highly Qualified SpEd
Teacher Force From 4 Groups:
► SpEd teachers w/ restricted alternative
certificates (RAC)
► SpEd teachers in the State’s Program of
Alternative Certif. for Educators (PACE)
► SpEd teacher assistants (TA) wanting to
upgrade to full certification
► General Ed (GEN) teachers wanting to
become special educators
Participants Pursue Certification Through
4 Preparation Approaches:
► Add-on certification for RAC, GEN, and
TAs (that have GEN certification)
► Alternative certification for PACE
► Initial certification (MAT degree) for
TAs with non-education degrees
► Initial certification (BS degree) for TAs
with a minimum of 60 credits
Key Statistics for Project Create, 2003-2011 Project Year ►
According to CERRA (2009), Teacher-Administrator Supply and
Demand Report, no special education teachers are teaching on
provisional/emergency certificates, and only 52 (versus 114 in
2001) of the teacher vacancies are designated in special education, a
decrease from 36% to 25% over the seven-year period (CERRA,
2009).
By Creating a 11-college consortium CREATE has essentially
reduced the bureaucratic tendency of colleges and universities to be
territorial and, thereby, has enhanced their ability to collaboratively
address the critical teacher shortage needs for the purpose of
equipping local schools with qualified personnel.
Implications for Accreditation and Policy
CREATE is consistent with the concept of strengthening and
expanding partnerships among teacher education institutions and
local/state agencies, for the purpose of increasing the number of
highly qualified teachers (USDE, 2005).
Moreover, CREATE offers a model of how South Carolina has
positively changed the direction of its special education teacher
workforce to become fully credentialed despite the national critical
teacher shortage faced by the State and the high number of teachers
holding provisional certificates at the time
Success Factors of CREATE
Cooperation of
SDE, IHEs,
and LEAs Vision for
a Greater
Common Cause
Mechanism for
Touting Success
Efficient Data
Management
Shared Funding
Sources
Identification of
Competency
Needs of Tchrs.
Communication
and Promotion
Rigorous
Content
Preparation
Levels of
Project
Managers
University-
based Centers
Varied Course
Formats
Instructors with
Doctorates
References
Adelman, N. C. (1986). An exploratory study of teacher alternative certification and retraining programs. (Contract No. 300-85-0103). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Kneedler, R. D., & Sutton, J. P. (1987-1990). Central Virginia Retraining Institute for experienced teachers in special education. Personnel preparation project funded by the Virginia Department of Education, Richmond, VA to the University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Sutton, J. P. et al. (2007). Success of South Carolina Project CREATE: 2003-2006. Unpublished raw data.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). The Secretary’s fourth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Retrieved on April 8, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/ about/reports/annual/teachprep/2005Title2-Report.pdf