Top Banner
Mechanically Assisted Dependent Transfer Mechanism Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston
11

Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Dec 19, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Mechanically Assisted Dependent Transfer Mechanism

Jessica SandovalMelissa Fredette

Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang

Chris Johnston

Page 2: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Technology• Transfer individuals with

disabilities• Self contained device• Simple operation• Patent pending• Functioning prototype

Page 3: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Existing Products Overhead devices Sling-based Manual transfers

Page 4: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Advantages

Non-invasive Operator and user

safety Simple operation Self contained Cost Increased mobility

Page 5: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Market Analysis Airline industry

− 20 major air carriers− 32 national air carriers− 89 regional and commuter air carriers− 517 commercial airports

Health care− 7569 Hospitals− New regulation regarding patient transfers− >16,000 nursing homes in US

Home care− Fastest growing market

− Escalating health care costs− Independence

Page 6: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Market Analysis 2.7 Million wheelchair users (2006) Robust, increasing demand

• “Baby Boomer” generation Prevalence of orthopedic impairments

Page 7: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Business ModelEvaluation Criteria

Start up capital

Overhead costs

Potential return (ST)

Potential return (LT)

Marketing costs

Time to market

IP protection

Threat fromcompetitors

Reqd. business functions

Potential for expansion

Quality control

Ease of market entry

Price level

Profit margin

Risk

BM Attributes

In house manufacturing

Outsource manufacturing Direct Selling LeasingDistributors License technology

Joint venture (partnership)

Page 8: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Porter’s Five Forces

Potential New Entrants• Patent pending

Buyers• Medium to high power

• Switching cost • Low frequency

purchase

Rivalry Among Competing Sellers• Haycomp lift

• Multiple competing products• New expanding market

Suppliers• Low power

• Many sources

Substitute Products• Manual Lifting

Page 9: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Major Hurdles Product cost vs. current state Required development Current economic situation

Page 10: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Keys to Success Minimize production costs Maintain a price competitive product Identifying customer benefit Efficient distribution channel Gain market awareness

Page 11: Jessica Sandoval Melissa Fredette Bryant Cornell Shih-Chung Chang Chris Johnston.

Viability Growing Market

• Niche • Underserved• Limited new products

Airline Industry• Competitors• Competitive advantage• Market definition

Expansion to additional markets

• Brand awareness