JEREMIE implementation with a Regional Development Agency - The case of Andalucía: challenges, achievements and perspectives Francisco Jiménez- Stefan Mathesius Agencia IDEA Brussels, 30 th November 2010
Mar 27, 2015
JEREMIE implementation with a RegionalDevelopment Agency - The case of Andalucía:
challenges, achievements and perspectives
Francisco Jiménez- Stefan MathesiusAgencia IDEA
Brussels, 30th November 2010
2
Index
Situation analysis of Andalusia
Strategy, Organization and Implementation
Investment Strategy and Objectives
JEREMIE’s implementation milestones
Operative management model
Andalusia bases its future model on reimbursable instruments
JEREMIE structure and operations
Structure of JEREMIE Fund Andalusia
Leverage Mechanism of JEREMIE
Financial instruments
Target group: late start-up, growth, expansion
Viable projects vs. suitable projects
Results and impacts
Lessons Learned
3
Situation Analysis of Andalusia
GEOGRAPHIC SITUATION CARACTERISTICS OF ANDALUSIAN ENTERPRISES
“Convergence objective” Unemployment rate: 28% Employment rate: 42% GDP: -0,1% CPI: 2,1% Trade deficit : -11,5% (national) Domestic deficit: -9,8% (national) Income per capita: 79% of European level
*ratio between total number of employees and population over 16 years and older)
“Family companies” SME:
95% Micro enterprises (<10 employees) 99,9% SME 80% employment in SME Only 430 enterprises > SME
Main activity / employment Sectors: Tourism Construction Agriculture Public Administration
Strategic Sectors: Renewable Energies (thermo solar)/ Clean tech Agribusiness Aeronautics TIME Biotech
MACROECONOMIC DATA 2010
Population: 8,3 M
Surface 87.000 km2
Fuente: INE
4
Index
Situation analysis of Andalusia
Strategy, Organization and Implementation
Investment Strategy and Objectives
JEREMIE’s implementation milestones
Operative management model
Andalusia bases its future model on reimbursable instruments
JEREMIE structure and operations
Structure of JEREMIE Fund Andalusia
Leverage Mechanism of JEREMIE
Financial instruments
Target group: late start-up, growth, expansion
Viable projects vs. suitable projects
Results and impacts
Lessons Learned
5
Investment Strategy and Objectives
Competitiveness and globalization of Andalusian enterprises.
Creation of sustainable and qualified jobs
Catalization of change of the Andalusian economic model.
Facilitation of access to finance ; reactivation and normalization of the financial market
OBJECTIVES
Investment in companies with high growth potential.
Encourage consolidation process in key sectors to obtain “critical mass”.
Global validity of the business model and value proposition.
Financial instruments that facilitate co-financing mechanisms: Equity + Mezzanine capital
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
6
JEREMIE implementation milestones
24 Feb 2009
Financing agreementCEH (Regional Economy &
Treasury Ministry),CICE (Regional Innovation, Science & Enterprise Ministry):
• Creation Holding Fund JEREMIE 235 M€
• Holding Fund Manager = IDEA Agency*
24Jun 2009
Public tender:• JEREMIE
Multiinstrument 185 M€
• JEREMIE Risk Capital 50 M€
JEREMIE’s definition/design, objetives, programs/funds and structures.
Adjudication Intermediary: JEREMIE Multiinstrument:SOPREA
Adjudication Intermediary JEREMIE Risk Capital SGR:INVERCARIA SGECR
14Oct 2009
14 Oct 2009
Operative launch
5 Nov 2009
Constitution and operative launch
4 Oct 2010
Negotiation and closing private investment 25 M € (saving banks)
*Innovation and Development Agency of Andalusia
7
Operative Management Model
IDEA territorial Net + Intermediates (Technological and scientific parks/centres, Business schools,,
business associations, etc.)
JEREMIE Unit (IDEA)Holding Fund
SOPREA S.A.INVERCARIA
S.G.E.C.R.
Deal Flow Generation
Entry & Assignation
Analysis and investment
EquityDebt /Subordinated debt
8
Andalusia bases its future model on reimbursable instruments
T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4
2009 2010
JE
RE
MIE
Definition/ Design operativeJEREMIEMultiinstrument
JEREMIE Risk Capital FCR
Definition/ Design operative
Business Development Fund
Renewable Energy Fund
Sustainable Economy Fund
operativeDefinition/ Design
Total Funds und management (M €)
185 185 185 469 544
operativeDefinition/ Design
operativeDefinition/ Design
9
Index
Situation analysis of Andalusia
Strategy, Organization and Implementation
Investment Strategy and Objectives
JEREMIE’s implementation milestones
Operative management model
Andalusia bases its future model on reimbursable instruments
JEREMIE structure and operations
Structure of JEREMIE Fund Andalusia
Leverage Mechanism of JEREMIE
Financial instruments
Target group: late start-up, growth, expansion
Viable projects vs. suitable projects
Results and impacts
Lessons Learned
10
Structure of JEREMIE Fund Andalusia
ERDF
European Regional Development Fund
Ministry of Economy, Innovation and Science of
Andalusia
JEREMIEFUND
(Holding Fund)
FONDO JEREMIE Risk Capital FCR
(regulated by Spanish financial authority)
235 M €
50 M €
FONDOMULTIINSTRUMENTO
185 M €
30% 70%
Innovation and Development
Agency of Andalusia
Fund Manager:INVERCARIA
S.G.E.C.R.
Fund Manager:
SOPREA S.A.
Private Participants(savings banks)
Co-investors- ICO-AXIS
- VC-Funds
- Financial institutions
25 M €
11
Leverage Mechanism of JEREMIE
JEREMIE VENTURE CAPITAL FUND FCRMULTIINSTRUMENT FUND
30328
470
x 4,7
100
30% Andalusian Government
204
ER
DF
42
62
> 30% Co-Investment
MinimumLeverage (theoretical)
To
tal
inv
es
tme
nt
(RealLeverage)
To
tal
inv
es
tme
nt
100
30% Andalusian Government
ER
DF
42
74
33% PrivateParticiptaion(Sav. Banks)
x 5,4
> 30% Co-Investment
93
309MinimumLeverage (theoretical)
(RealLeverage)
540
324
12
Financial instruments: Risk versus Premium for Risk
Premium for risk
Risk
Riskless
Cost/ risk relation in an efficient market
highlow
Mezzanine capital/ Subordinated debt
Bankfinancing
VentureCapital
crisis
high
13
Financial instruments: Guaranties versus Premium for Risk
Pre
miu
m f
or
risk
Guaranties/collaterals
highlow
high
Mezzanine capital/ Subordinated debt
Bankfinancing
VentureCapital
Different analytic approaches
Upside-potential
Risk/guaranty
14
Target group: late start-up, growth, expansionst
ages
Cas
h f
low
tConcept
PrototypeCreation
Market entry Break even CF
IPO(potential)
Seed Start-upGrowth
(1st , 2nd round)Expansion(3rd round)
15
Index
Situation analysis of Andalusia
Strategy, Organization and Implementation
Investment Strategy and Objectives
JEREMIE’s implementation milestones
Operative management model
Andalusia bases its future model on reimbursable instruments
JEREMIE structure and operations
Structure of JEREMIE Fund Andalusia
Leverage Mechanism of JEREMIE
Financial instruments
Target group: late start-up, growth, expansion
Viable projects vs. suitable projects
Results and impacts
Lessons Learned
16
JEREMIE’s activity results (Nov 2009 – Oct 2010)
# Projects: applied: 204 approved: 22
Investment volume: applied: 670 M € approved: 68 M € Ø-investment: 3M €
Induced investment: 220 M € Leverage/Co-investment: 78%
(=> JEREMIE Multiplier x 4,6) Employment:
generated: 3.060 supported: 2.500
National venture capital market’s share (investment volume) :
Total: 8% Start up: 16% Expansion: 24% Transactions 1-10 M €: 11%
Ø-term of resolution: 10 weeks # Operations/professional:
JEREMIE: 2,8 per year Market: 0,3 per year
ACTIVITY RESULTS GENERATED IMPACT
SECTOR’S COMPARISONEFFICIENCY RESULTS
17
Index
Situation analysis of Andalusia
Strategy, Organization and Implementation
Investment Strategy and Objectives
JEREMIE’s implementation milestones
Operative management model
Andalusia bases its future model on reimbursable instruments
JEREMIE structure and operations
Structure of JEREMIE Fund Andalusia
Leverage Mechanism of JEREMIE
Financial instruments
Target group: late start-up, growth, expansion
Viable projects vs. suitable projects
Results and impacts
Lessons Learned
18
Lessons Learned
Selection of the fund manager (intermediate) is key for a successful implementation and execution of JEREMIE:
Fit-in of JEREMIE into regular activity of the Intermediate
Avoid conflict of interest between regular activity and JEREMIE (¡commission scheme!)
Close coordination and transparency between Holding Fund and Intermediates
Implementation of leverage mechanism:
Positioning: No competition with financial institutions (=> differentiation and complementarity: subordinated debt)
Enforce Co-investment by limiting level of financing (max. 70%)
Trade-off: Specific funds/mono-instrument versus macro funds/ multi-instrumental
Adapt risk levels to market’s necessities. (Who bears the risk? Guaranty requirement?)
19
APPENDIX
20
Instrument A: Mezzanine Capital (convertible loan/subordinated debt)
Debt
Req
uire
d p
rofit
abili
ty
Sen
iorit
y /
Prio
rity
Equity
PASSIVE
Mezzanine capital
Characteristics:• “Equity character” (=> loss support)
• Low collaterals (guaranty = business)
• Yield: fix + variable example: EURIBOR + 2% + variable(0-10%)
• High flexibility
• Convertible in capital
Advantages for the entrepreneur:• Improvement of the statement of financial position
with no dilution
• Keeps operative control
• Interests rates and amortization related to business evolution.
• No personal guaranties
• subordinated =>leverage capacity
21
Instrument B: Venture Capital
Debt
Req
uire
d p
rofit
abili
ty Equity
PASSIVE
Venture Capital
Characteristics :• Investment in Equity (=> loss support)
• Tailor-made
• Temporary stage (4-8 years) and minority
• Without collaterals (guaranty = business)
• High yield but 100% variable
• Exit scenario/ drag along option
Advantages for the entrepreneur :• Keeps management/operative control
• Stable financing (=> no cash exit )
• Added value (relations + management support)
• Without personal guaranties
• Image y reputation
• Leverage capacity
Sen
iorit
y /
Prio
rity
22
Key point for JEREMIE
Technology adoption model
Enthusiasts, Tekis
“Innovators”
Visioners “Early
Adopters”
Pragmatists“Early majority”
Conservatives “Late Majority”
Sceptics“Laggards”
“Chasm”