Jennifer Gidley Video: Where to Tomorrow for Futures Studies?

Dr. Jennifer M. Gidley�President, World Futures Studies Federation�

��

Prepared for the�21st WFSF World Conference �

Bucharest, Romania, June 26th – 28th 2013

�Where to Tomorrow �for Futures Studies?�

Three Challenges for Futures Studies

1.  “Megatrends of the Mind” 2.  Complex Global-Societal Challenges 3.  Is Futures Studies Evolving as a Field?

Dr. Jennifer M. GIDLEY © 2013


²  Megatrends research in general has an external focus

²  Megatrends of the mind research has an internal focus

²  “Megatrends of the Mind” research (Gidley, 2010) refers to:

²  Evolution within scholarly disciplines ²  Evolution beyond disciplinary boundaries

²  Approaches that theorise paradigm change ²  Approaches that meta-cohere new knowledge

Paris, France June 2013 3 Dr. Jennifer M. GIDLEY © 2013

²  Evolution within Scholarly Disciplines ²  Evolution beyond disciplinary boundaries


Paris, France June 2013 Dr. Jennifer M. GIDLEY © 2013

Evolution within Scholarly Disciplines

Science:

²  Newtonian building block physics > quantum possibilities & open systems, machine human to creative human

Philosophy:

²  Modern analytic philosophy > postmodern & poststructural, comparative & global, synthesising & integral

Education:

²  Formal factory model education > Steiner, Montessori, Dewey, Aurobindo, 1970s alternatives & 2000s postformal pedagogies

Psychology:

²  Mechanistic, behaviourist psychology > humanistic & person-centred, transpersonal & postformal psychology.


²  Evolution within scholarly disciplines

²  Evolution beyond disciplinary boundaries ²  Approaches that theorise paradigm change

²  Approaches that meta-cohere new knowledge

Paris, France June 2013 Dr. Jennifer M. GIDLEY © 2013

Evolution beyond Disciplinary Boundaries

“In parallel with these disciplinary developments, disciplinary specialisation itself is being transcended via inter-, multi-, and

trans-disciplinary approaches.”

(Morin 2001; Nicolescu 2002).

“As knowledge breaks the disciplinary boundaries it also moves beyond old conceptions of time and space.”

(Gidley 2010)


Evolution beyond Disciplinary Boundaries

²  Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries: ²  Interdisciplinary, cross-disciplinary & transdisciplinary research

²  Expanding Concepts of Time: ²  Big history, macrohistory & futures studies

²  Expanding Concepts of Space: ²  From outer space to inner space & planetary consciousness


²  Evolution within scholarly disciplines ²  Evolution beyond disciplinary boundaries


Paris, France June 2013

© 2013. Dr. Jennifer M. Gidley


Approaches that Theorise Paradigm Change

²  Adult Developmental Psychology ²  Cultural History and Evolution

²  Evolution of Consciousness


²  Evolution within scholarly disciplines ²  Evolution beyond disciplinary boundaries ²  Approaches that theorise paradigm change

²  Approaches that meta-cohere new knowledge



11 Dr. Jennifer M. GIDLEY © 2013

Approaches that Meta-cohere new Knowledge

²  Postformal Psychology ²  Integral Studies

²  Planetary Consciousness

REFERENCE: Gidley, J. M. (2010) Globally Scanning for “Megatrends of the Mind”: Potential Futures of Futures-Thinking, Futures: The journal of policy, planning and futures studies, 42(10), pp. 1040-1048.


²  Knowledge is evolving within scholarly disciplines

²  Knowledge is leaking beyond disciplinary boundaries

²  Paradigm change (or new consciousness) is being theorised in evolution of consciousness, cultural history and adult development

²  New knowledge is being meta-cohered in several emerging fields: postformal, integral & planetary





What are the

complex global societal challenges

of the 21st century

that we must tackle

with our new thinking?


²  Environmental degradation & more dramatic climate conditions;

²  Over 3 billion people live in coastal cities at risk of rising sea levels (Copyright: Getty Images)


²  Post“GFC”: “Limits to Growth” values even more pertinent

² How sustainable are Chinese cities of 50 Million people?


²  Social and global justice are far from commonplace

²  An estimated 100 million people are homeless worldwide Source: United Nations Commission on Human Rights, 2005.


²  Cultural pluralism and the needs of the global south still require sustained focus;

²  But as we all know, the so-called north-south divide is no longer just between countries but within them.


²  The 19th century factory model of formal education is well past its “use-by-date” and needs to be postformalised.

²  Yet it is being imported around the globe – the main concession to the 21st century being the addition of laptops when affordable.



�

Predictive-empirical: originated USA in the 1960s Critical-postmodern: originated Europe in the 1960s & 70s Cultural-interpretive: post-colonial & feminist critiques 1980s & 90s Empowerment-prospective: global response to “disempowered futures” Integral-transdisciplinary: response to complex global-societal challenges.

*Sources: Gidley (2004, 2005, 2008, 2009)

An Integrative Framing of Futures Approaches*


�


The Empirical Approach: “Predicting the Future”

The predictive-empirical approach originated in the USA from US defence intelligence

Predictive methodologies still dominate the popular literature

Empirical trends suggest a (singular) “probable future”

Underlying assumption: “TREND IS DESTINY”

�


The Empirical Approach: “Predicting the Future”

Strengths:

²  Perceived objectivity and values neutrality.

Weaknesses:

²  Narrow in focus and lack of contextual awareness;

²  Implication that trends are inevitable.

�


The Critical-Postmodern Approach: �Deconstructing the “One (and only) Future”

The critical-postmodern approach originated in Europe out of a critical social theory tradition.

Critical futurists emphasised plural “futureS” and “preferred futures”

Underlying assumption is normative: TREND IS NOT DESTINY

This led to Mankind 2000 & the World Futures Studies Federation.

�


The Critical-Postmodern Approach: �Deconstructing the “One (and only) Future”

Strengths:

²  It makes explicit the—often tacit—contextual and values dimensions and thus questions ‘business as usual’.

Weaknesses:

²  Perceived subjectivity, which can sometimes

lead to excessive relativism.

�

OR


The Cultural-Interpretive Approach: �Towards Alternative, Feminist and Non-Western Futures

The cultural-interpretive approach sought to include non-Western cultures.

Cultural futurists emphasise the multitude of “possible futures”

Underlying assumption includes alternative civilizational futures.

This includes feminist and non-Western futures.

�

OR

Business as Usual

Feminist Futures

Youth Futures


The Cultural-Interpretive Approach: �Towards Alternative, Feminist and Non-Western Futures

Strengths:

²  Imagination, creativity and engagement with multiple perspectives.

Weaknesses:

²  Proposed alternatives may lack feasibility, or be overpowered by the more dominant empiricist approach.

�


The Empowerment-Prospective-Participatory Approach: �Participatory, Empowering and Transformative

The prospective-action research approach seeks to facilitate empowerment and transformation.

These futures could be referred to as “participatory futures”

Underlying assumption involves engagement and participation.

Early French futurists and later Swedish and Australian futurists.

�


Elise Boulding

The Empowerment-Prospective-Participatory Approach: �Participatory, Empowering and Transformative

Strengths:

²  It engages participants directly in projects,

²  It empowers them to question and act on alternatives.

Weaknesses:

²  If it does not also take account of relevant empirical research, it may lack legitimacy in the dominant positivist scientific circles.

�


The Integral-Holistic-Transdisciplinary Approach: �Long Term, Big Picture, Radical Change

The integral-holistic-transdisciplinary futures approach is the broadest and deepest approach to futures.

It can facilitate and enable “integral or planetary futures”

Underlying assumptions are complex, integrative & transversal

It is thought to be new but this must be contested.

�


The Integral-Holistic-Transdisciplinary Approach: �Long Term, Big Picture, Radical Change

Strengths:

²  Its breadth of scope enables integration of different methods for different contexts

Weaknesses:

²  Too much breadth may lead to a lack of depth

²  The ideological trap leads to contested claims about who is most integral (See two special issues of Futures).

�


FUTURES STUDIES as a field has developed over five decades.

² Multiple theoretical and methodological approaches;

²  Reflecting the evolutionary development in academic discourse;

²  From scientific positivism in the early 20th century

²  To transdiciplinarity of social sciences by the 21st century.

�

YES: Summary of Development


�

By Embracing The Megatrends of the Mind

² Quantum physics and open systems;

² Postmodern and comparative philosophies;

² Critical social theories;

² Postformal psychology and education;

² Systemic, holistic and integral theories;

² Inter- and transdisciplinarity.


�

By Tackling The Complex Global-societal Challenges

² Environmental degradation;

² The limits to growth;

² Social and global justice;

² The needs of the global south;

² The factory model of schooling.


Paris, France, June 2013


Jennifer M. Gidley, PhD

President: World Futures Studies Federation (UNESCO Partner)

Visiting Professor: Philosophy Department, Palacky University, Czech Republic

Adjunct Professor: California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco

Fellow: Botin Platform for Innovation in Education, Santander, Spain

Visiting Fellow: CERI, SciencesPo, Paris, France

www.jennifergidley.com

Jennifer Gidley Video: Where to Tomorrow for Futures Studies?

Documents