Jennifer Friberg, Ed.D. Bradley University Fall Forum Keynote August 2015 Why SoTL? Why Now? The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as an Opportunity for Growth and Reflection
Jennifer Friberg, Ed.D.
Bradley University Fall Forum KeynoteAugust 2015
Why SoTL? Why Now?
The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning as an Opportunity
for Growth and Reflection
Define and explain the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL)
Contrast the concepts of good teaching, scholarly teaching, and the scholarship of teaching and learning
Explore the benefits of SoTL for individual courses, academic programs/departments, and the Bradley University community at-large
Goals for this morning:
Integration
TeachingApplication
Discovery
The Evolution of SoTL: Boyer’s Four Scholarships
(Boyer, 1990)
The Teaching Continuum (McKinney, 2007)
Good Teaching
Teaching that promotes student
learning and other desired
student outcomes
Scholarly Teaching
Teaching that is supported by a
body of research to
increase effectiveness
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Combination of reflection and
knowledge which yields
questions about teaching
for study
How might teachers at different points along this continuum handle the following situation:
In an introduction to psychology class at a large Midwestern university, the course instructor notices that her students tend to be reluctant to engage in
whole-class discussions.
What might the good teacher do?What might a scholarly teacher do?How could this be studied in a scholarly manner?
Working within the continuum
Poses a problem related to teaching and learning
Problem is operationalized into a research question
Problem is studied using methods appropriate for specific disciplinary epistemologies
Work is peer reviewed Results are applied to practice
(McKinney, 2007)
What is SoTL?
Contemporary Conception of SoTL
Scholarship of Teaching
and Learning
Systematic examination
Focused on improving
teaching or learning
Disseminated beyond
researcher
To develop a report on an aspect of one particular course
To describe the interaction of several courses or the student experience across courses
To reflect on teaching practices/pedagogical choices from teaching (perhaps over time)
To investigate interdisciplinary commonalities
To synthesize existing SoTL work To propose or test new learning theories
Why Engage in SoTL?
Why engage in SoTL: To improve PCK
Disciplinary Content
Knowledge
General Pedagogical Knowledge
(Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Schulman, 2004)
PCK
How to SoTL: Potential Data Collection Tools
Course portfolios Specific course artifacts (e.g.,
assignments/projects/assessments) Interviews Focus groups Questionnaires/surveys Content analysis Multi-method studies
SoTL is disseminated in ways consistent with your disciplinary expectations: Internal/external publications
traditional research papers/research notes book blog wiki creative endeavor
documentaryartistic representation
How is SoTL Disseminated?
To better understand how your students learn
To identify ways to deal with unique situational constraints
To determine the impact of an assignment, project, or assessment technique
To compare and contrast pedagogical approaches
Benefits of SoTL: Individual Course Level
Benefits of SoTL: The utility of teaching problems
Bass (1999) posits that teaching problems
aren’t shameful…
they are actually
opportunities for faculty.From Vanderbilt
University’s CFT Homepage
Curriculum review Curriculum development Accreditation Program review Formative/summative assessment
Benefits of SoTL: Academic Unit
B e n e fi t s o f S o T L : I n s t i t u t i o n a l L e v e l
1. SoTL needs to be a part of regular practices of teaching so that any/all pedagogical choices are evidence-based.
2. SoTL needs to be more integrated into institutional policies and agendas to ensure a greater impact into new and ongoing formative and summative assessment efforts.
3. SoTL needs to engage students, more fully, as research associates and collaborators to encourage a reflective/metacognitive focus up on their learning and the learning of their peers.
Future Directions For SoTL (Hutchings, 2015)
Bradley University Core Curriculum Implementation is plannedCore Outcomes can be measurable at class, program, or institutional levels Critical and creative thinking Effective communication Multidisciplinary integration Practical application Social awareness
Why Is Now A Good Time For SoTL?
Bradley graduates will think critically, independently and creatively, and will employ evidence-based decision-making to solve problems and build new knowledge.How can this outcome be measured?
Track problem solving processes over a semester or academic year for innovation
Measure the frequency that students access research to make evidence-informed decisions
Determine the level of critical thinking rigor required of students to complete core practice activities
Critical And Creative Thinking
Bradley graduates will be effective oral, written and non-verbal communicators as well as active readers and listeners.How can you measure this outcome?
Measure changes in peer-peer communications during collaborative activities
Measure changes in peer-teacher communications in structured and unstructured situations
Effective Communication
Bradley graduates will approach learning in an integrated manner, connecting knowledge and skills across multiple disciplines.How can this outcome be measured?
Assess how able students are to generalize information from one course to the next
Determine the success of cross-curricular projects
Ascertain student perceptions of how well integrated their curriculum is from their perspective
Multidisciplinary Integration
Bradley graduates will apply knowledge and skills from the classroom in real-world situations.How can this outcome be measured?
Measure how well students are able to apply some aspect of their course curriculum to solve a “real world” problem with the help of professionals outside academia
Determine the impact of engaging practicing professionals to teach critical aspects of a discipline
Practical Application
Bradley graduates will understand and act ethically upon their connections to larger communities.How can this outcome be measured?
Determine if case studies are impactful in teaching about professional ethics
Measure the impact of civic engagement in the development of a world knowledge, compassion, or learning
Social Awareness
Your View of the Possible…
Bass, R. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: What’s the problem? Invention: Creative Thinking About Learning and Teaching, 1 (1), 1-10.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ginsberg, S. M., Friberg, J. C., & Visconti, C. F. (2012). Scholarship of teaching and learning in speech-language pathology and audiology: Evidence-based education. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing learning though the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. S. (2004). Teaching As Community Property . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
REFERENCES