Jefferson County Financial Analysis. Jefferson County, Alabama Population: 660 thousand Home-rule.

Jefferson County

Financial Analysis

Jefferson County, Alabama

Population: 660 thousand

Home-rule

53%42%

5%

Demographics (2010 Census)

White Black Other

Jefferson County, Alabama

Population: 660 thousand

Home-rule

Median Household 43 thousand

Per Capita 26 thousand

Below Poverty 16.5 %

Income (2010 Census)

Better than the state of Alabama average

Jefferson County, Alabama

Population: 660 thousand

Home-rule

In November 2011, filed for the most Expensive municipal bankruptcy

Jefferson County, Alabama

Population: 660 thousand

Home-rule

In November 2011, filed for the most Expensive municipal bankruptcy

4.1 billion. 3.1 billion relating to sewer work

Overview

• County historically enjoyed low financing costs• Financially stable county• High revenue stream due to taxes• Financial troubles due to sewer project

(1990s)– Corruption– Non-performing investments– Complex financial instruments

Revenue Sources (2010)

Taxes & Assess-ments55%

Licenses & Permits16%

Intergovernmental10%

Charges for Services6%

Miscellaneous13%

Interest & Investments1%

Revenue

Revenue Sources (2010)

Taxes & Assess-ments55%

Licenses & Permits16%

Intergovernmental10%

Charges for Services6%

Miscellaneous13%

Interest & Investments1%

Revenue

Sales Tax more than 10%

Expenditures (2010)

39%

16%6%

0%0%

0%1%

3%7%

28%

Expenditures

General GovernmentPublic SafetyHighway & RoadsHealth & WelfareCulture & RecreationEducation-OtherCapital OutlayIndirect ExpensesArbitage rebate paidDebt Service

Expenditures (2010)

39%

16%6%

0%0%

0%1%

3%7%

28%

Expenditures

General GovernmentPublic SafetyHighway & RoadsHealth & WelfareCulture & RecreationEducation-OtherCapital OutlayIndirect ExpensesArbitage rebate paidDebt Service

DEBT SERVICE IS HIGH BURDEN

High government cost

67% of expenditures for government costs and debt service

Current Ratio (Liquidity Ratio)

2006 2007 2008 2009 20100

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Liquidity ratio

Liquidity ratio

Current Ratio (Liquidity Ratio)

2006 2007 2008 2009 20100

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Liquidity ratio

Liquidity ratio

CRISIS

Debt to Total Asset Ratio (Leverage Ratio)

2006 2007 2008 2009 20100

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Leverage Ratio

Leverage Ratio

Debt to Equity (Leverage Ratio)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

Leverage

Leverage

FINANCIAL CRISIS

Times-Interest Earned (Coverage Ratio)

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

-18

-16

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

Coverage Ratio

Coverage Ratio

Return on Net Assets

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

Return on Investment

Return on Investment

POOR PERFORMANCE OF INVESTMENTS

Financial Troubles

• Expensive sewer overhaul related project started in the 1990s

• In 2003 take advantage of low financing costs and refinance sewer bonds from fixed rate to lower but floating rate

• Entered complex financial derivatives market to hedge against interest rate increase

• Bought complex financial instruments as their own investment

Financial Crisis• Investors lost confidence in county’s ability to

repay debt– Bond interest rates soared– County couldn’t refinance their debt

01234567

Liquidity ratio

Liquidity ra-tio

20062007

20082009

20100

0.4

0.8

1.2

Leverage Ratio

Leverage Ra-tio

DEBT SERVICE BURDEN

Financial Crisis• Investors lost confidence in county’s ability to

repay debt– Bond interest rates soared– County couldn’t refinance their debt

• Investments did not perform– Fees actually cost the county even more money

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

-10

-5

0

5

Return on Investment

Return on In-vestment

Financial Crisis• Investors lost confidence in county’s ability to

repay debt– Bond interest rates soared– County couldn’t refinance their debt

• Investments did not perform– Fees actually cost the county even more money

• County filed for bankruptcy– 4.1 billion dollars total– 3.1 billion related to sewer overhaul