Top Banner
1 JCDL 2013 Report Kazunari Sugiyama WING meeting 23 rd August, 2013
12

JCDL 2013 Report

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

sanam

JCDL 2013 Report. Kazunari Sugiyama WING meeting 23 rd August, 2013. Outline of JCDL13. Venue Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. X. JW Marriott. x Indianapolis. Outline of JCDL13. Review Process For each submission, (1) 3 reviewers read and rate for each paper, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: JCDL 2013 Report

1

JCDL 2013 Report

Kazunari Sugiyama

WING meeting23rd August, 2013

Page 2: JCDL 2013 Report

2

Outline of JCDL13• Venue

– Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

x Indianapolis

JW Marriott X

Page 3: JCDL 2013 Report

3

Page 4: JCDL 2013 Report

4

Outline of JCDL13• Review Process

– For each submission,(1) 3 reviewers read and rate for each paper, (2) Then each paper was read by 2 additional meta-reviewers

• Acceptance rate– 29.9% [50 / 167]

• Full paper : 28 / 95 (29.4%)• Short paper: 22 / 72 (30.6%)

• Future JCDL– 2014: London, UK

• 8-12 Sep., Joint with TPDL (Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries)– 2015, 2016: Tennessee or New York– 2017: European country

Page 5: JCDL 2013 Report

Nominees for Best Papers• W. Ke:

“Information-theoretic Term Weighting Schemes for Document Clustering”

• A. Hinze and D. Bainbridge: “Tipple: Location-Triggered Mobile Access to a Digital Library for Audio Books”

• P. Bogen, A. McKenzie, and R. Gillen: “Redeye: A Digital Library for Forensic Document Triage”

5

• K. Sugiyama and M.-Y. Kan: “Exploiting Potential Citation Papers in Scholarly Paper Recommendation”

Vannevar Bush Best Paper Award

Page 6: JCDL 2013 Report

Nominees for Best Student Papers• E. Momeni, K. Tao, B. Haslhofer, and G.-J. Houben:

“Identification of Useful User Comments in Social Media: A Case Study on Flickr Commons”• S. Ainsworth and M. Nelson:

“Evaluating Sliding and Sticky Target Policies by Measuring Temporal Drift in Acyclic Walks Through a Web Archive”• S. D. Torres, D.Hiemstra, and T. Huibers:

“Vertical Selection in the Information Domain of Children”• S. Tuarob and L. C. Pouchard, and C. Lee Giles:

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

6

Page 7: JCDL 2013 Report

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

[Outline]• Automatic annotation of metadata

7

Tag recommendation

Page 8: JCDL 2013 Report

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

[Approach]• TF-IDF• Topic model• Baseline:

– I. H. Witten et al.: “KEA: Practical Automatic Keyphrase

Extraction(DL’99)

8

Page 9: JCDL 2013 Report

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

[Experimental Data]• The Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive

Center (DAAC)• Dryad Digital Repository (DRYAD)• The Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity (KNB)• TreeBASE: A Repository of Phylogenetic Information (TreeBASE)

9

Page 10: JCDL 2013 Report

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

[Evaluation Measures]• Precision, Recall, F1• Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR)• Binary Preference (Bpref)

– A measure that can take the order of recommended tags into account

10

Page 11: JCDL 2013 Report

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

[Experimental Results]

11

Page 12: JCDL 2013 Report

“Automatic Tag Recommendation for Metadata Annotation Using Probabilistic Topic Modeling”

[Example of recommended tags]

12

15/207/20 2/20