Top Banner
Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy
42

Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Dec 16, 2015

Download

Documents

David Sutton
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Japanese Internment During World War II

A Comparison of U.S. & CanadianInternment Policy

Page 2: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Historical Context• Japanese immigration to the U.S. and Canada began in

the 1860s and saw the greatest influx from 1900-1920• U.S. Japanese immigrants settled in California,

Washington, and Oregon. 90% in California. Most made their living in farming.

• In 1941, approximately 110,000 Japanese nationals lived in states along the Pacific. 150,000 lived in Hawaii. 62% were American citizens

• Canadian Japanese immigrants settled in British Columbia making their living in fishing.

• 1941, 22,000 Japanese nationals lived in British Columbia. Over 70% were Canadian citizens.

Page 3: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Racial Tension in the U.S.

• Prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor anti-Japanese (Chinese, Korean) sentiment grew as the immigrant population increased. For example:

• U.S., Asiatic Exclusion Leagues form to prevent Asians from joining labor unions

• Webb-Haney Act (1913), state law denying Asians the right to own land in California.

Page 4: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Racial Tensions in the US • U.S. Supreme Court rules in Takeo Ozawa v.

U.S. that naturalization is limited to "free white persons and aliens of African nativity,“ i.e. not Asians.

• Congress passes Cable Act (1922). “…any woman marrying an alien ineligible for citizenship shall cease to be an American citizen.” Repealed in 1932.

• Congress passes Immigration Exclusion Act (1924), barring all immigration from Japan

Page 5: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Racial Tension in Canada• Canadian election of 1935 was

marked by anti-Japanese smears, some candidates recommending forcing Japanese into ghettos like German Jews.

• Some believed that Japanese rural and coastal patterns of settlement was proof that they were part of a Fifth Column of spies and saboteurs placed strategically to aid in a possible invasion.

A fifth column is a group of people who undermine a larger group such as a nation from within.

Page 6: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Racial Tensions in Canada

• British Columbia began limiting the number of fishing licenses issued to Japanese

• Prime Minister McKenzie King did nothing to halt the rising discrimination. A clue to King’s feelings toward Japanese is quoted in his diary:– "It is fortunate that the use of the bomb should have

been upon the Japanese rather than upon the white races of Europe."

• Canadian Nisei were not allowed to vote in 1941

Page 7: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Internment in the U.S.

Los Angeles, Santa Fe Station, 1942

Page 8: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Dr. Seuss

Page 9: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

• Those of Japanese ancestry living on the West Coast were to be relocated.

• Internment refers to the forced imprisonment and relocation of a group of people.

Page 10: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

People Sent to Internment Camps

• 62% of the people relocated were Nisei, American-born with Japanese heritage, and Sansei, the children of the Nisei. They were American citizens.

• The rest (38%) were Issei, the Japanese-born immigrants.

Page 11: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

FBI Roundups• December 7th, 1941, Pearl Harbor attacked• Dec. 8th, Congress declares war on Japan. FBI arrests

736 Japanese nationals as security risks• Dec 11th- 2000 prominent Issei in Hawaii and are

imprisoned by the U.S. government

Page 12: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Pre-9066 Actions

• Lt. General John DeWitt, head of the Western Command, requested approval to conduct search and seizure operations to prevent alien Japanese from making radio transmissions to Japanese ships

• Department of Justice required probable cause & warrants

Page 13: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Lt. General John DeWitt• In congressional testimony, DeWitt

“I don't want any of them [persons of Japanese ancestry] here. They are a dangerous element. There is no way to determine their loyalty... It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen, he is still a Japanese. American citizenship does not necessarily determine loyalty... But we must worry about the Japanese all the time until he is wiped off the map.”

Page 14: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Executive Order 9066• Signed by FDR on Feb.19,

1942, allowed authorized military commanders to designate "military areas" at their discretion, as "exclusion zones”

• Exclusion was applicable to anyone that a military commander might choose, citizen or non-citizen

Page 15: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

U.S. Internment Camps

Page 16: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Post-9066March 1942: • Executive Order 9095 created the Office of the Alien Property

Custodian, giving it authority over all alien property. • Public Proclamation No.3 declares an 8 pm to 6 am curfew for "all

enemy aliens and persons of Japanese ancestry" in military areas.

May 1942: • DeWitt issued Civilian Exclusion Order No. 346, ordering all

people of Japanese ancestry, citizens or non-citizens, to report to assembly centers, where they would live until being moved to permanent "Relocation Centers."

Page 17: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

FDR’s Decision• In spite of the FBI reports that found no evidence of Japanese

disloyalty, FDR issued 9066 knowing that it would lead to internment. Why?

• In his book By Order of the President: FDR and the Internment of Japanese Americans, Prof. of History Greg Robinson argues – FDR had “unenlightened views of the Japanese” seeing them as

Japanese first, then American & shared the anti-Japanese prejudices of his age and class.

– FDR was content to leave the “Japanese question” to Lt. Gen. DeWitt• In, Magic: The Untold Story of US Intelligence and the Evacuation of

Japanese Residents From the West Coast During World War II, former Assistant Director of the NSA, David Lowman argues– FDR agreed to remove the Japanese from the Pacific Coast to avoid the

possibility of charging anyone with espionage because, an espionage trial would require that the government disclose evidence, i.e. that they intercepted and broken Japanese naval coded transmissions.

• Greed and Racism among California farmers– “White farmers can take over and produce everything the Jap grows.

We don’t want them back after the war either.” Austin Ansen, head of the Salinas Growers Association

Page 18: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Internment in Canada

R.C.N. officer confiscating the boat of a Japanese-Canadian fishermen, 1942

Page 19: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Confiscation of Vessels• Within hours of the Pearl

Harbor attack, the Japanese also invaded Hong Kong (part of the British Commonwealth)

• Municipal governments & newspapers in British Colombia called for the internment Japanese-Canadians.

• In spite of Canadian military assurances to the contrary, the public believed fishermen were mapping the coastline for Japanese Navy.

• Japanese fishing boats were first confined to port, & eventually, the Canadian Navy seized 1,200 vessels.

Boats corralled at mouth of the Fraser river

Page 20: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Internment of Japanese Men• Jan.1942, a 100 mile

exclusion zone was established along the B.C. coastline.

• All men of Japanese descent ages 18-45 were removed from the zone and taken to road camps in the British Columbian interior, to sugar beet projects on the Prairies, or to internment in a POW camp in Ontario.

• Canadian Pacific Railroad & other business fired Japanese employees.

• The Canadian government spent 1/3 of $ on internees than the U.S.

Page 21: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

War Measures Act ‘42• February 24, 1942 the War

Measures Act gave the federal government the power to intern all "persons of Japanese racial origin."

• Under Canadian "Custodian of Aliens" the government sold the possessions of Japanese Canadians without the owners' permission.– Auctioned off items, ranging from farm

land, houses possessions sold at prices below market value.

– Funds raised went towards the fees of realtors and auctioneers, and storage/handling charges, and Japanese owners rarely received much income from the sales.

Page 22: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Canadian Internment Camps

Page 23: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

King’s Decision• In spite of assurances that there was no evidence of Japanese

disloyalty or Fifth Column activity, King made no attempt to stop relocation via the War Measures Act. Why?

• In her book, The Politics of Racism: The Uprooting of Japanese Canadians During World War Two, Ann Sunahara describes Prime Minister King– King was an astute politician who often changed positions to suit popular

opinion. Thus he was swayed by the unfounded paranoia from B.C. & the racism of west coast politicians

– In a quote to Vancouver Sun MacKenzie declared "It is the government’s plan to get these people out of B.C. as fast as possible. It is my personal intention, as long as I remain in public life, to see they never come back here. Let our slogan be for British Columbia: ‘No Japs from the Rockies to the seas.”

Page 24: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Life in the Camps

WRA Relocation Center Manzanar, California

Page 25: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.
Page 26: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.
Page 27: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

U.S. Facilities

• War Relocation Authority (WRA) directed by Milton Eisenhower managed the ‘Relocation Centers.. Largest at Tule Lake, California held over 18,000. The most distant facilities were in Rohwer & Jerome Arkansas

• The Department of Justice operated ‘internment camps (aka detention centers’) which held those suspected of Japanese sympathies, causing trouble at relocation centers, or Japanese nationals rounded up and turned over to the U.S. by governments in Latin America (ex. Peru, Bolivia and Guatemala)

Page 28: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.
Page 29: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

U.S. Facilities

• Eventually 120,000 Japanese were settled into 10 War Relocation Centers. 2/3 were American citizens. In the largest forced migration in U.S. history

• Internees were housed in "tar paper-covered barracks of simple frame construction without plumbing or cooking facilities of any kind. Facilities met the requirements of Geneva Convention for POWs.

• Based on designs for military barracks, most of the buildings were poorly equipped for cramped family living.

• Heart Mountain War Relocation Center in Wyoming (above) was a barbed-wire-surrounded enclave with unpartitioned toilets, cots for beds, and a budget of 45 cents daily per capita for food rations.

Page 30: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Life in Internment Camps

• "In the detention centers, families lived in substandard housing, had inadequate nutrition and health care, and had their livelihoods destroyed: many continued to suffer psychologically long after their release" - "Personal Justice Denied: Report of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians"

Page 31: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

• "In desert camps, the evacuees met severe extremes of temperature. In winter it reached 35 degrees below zero, and summer brought temperatures as high as 115 degrees. Rattlesnakes and desert wildlife added danger to discomfort."- Personal Justice Denied: Report of the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians.

Page 33: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

U.S. Facilities• Armed guards were

posted at the camps, which were all in remote, desolate areas far from population centers.

• Internees were typically allowed to stay with their families, and were treated well unless they violated the rules.

• Some camp commanders were very lenient with security

Page 34: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.
Page 35: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

U.S. Facilities• The phrase shikita ga nai (translated as "it cannot be helped") was

commonly used to summarize the interned families' resignation to their current condition. Most internees cooperated to prove loyalty to the U.S.

• Internees were encouraged to form civic organizations within the camps and given responsibility to manage their communities.

• Activties like baseball leagues, traditional holiday celebrations like Shogatsu (New Year) were allowed in most of the camps that housed families.

Camp Manzanar California

Page 36: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Internment Ends

• December 18 Korematsu v U.S.: the U.S. Supreme Court rules that one group of citizens may be singled out and expelled from their homes and imprisoned for several years without trial, based solely on their ancestry.

• December 18 In ex parte Endo, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that WRA has no authority to detain a "concededly loyal" American citizen.

• The Japanese Americans were given $25 and a free ticket for a train ride back to their homes.

• Some migrated back to Japan, but most stayed to rebuild their lives.

Page 37: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.
Page 38: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Aftermath and Compensation of Internment

• Although compensation was paid for property losses, the ex-internees were still not able to fully recover their losses.

• Young Americans started the Redress Movement in 1960 for an apology.

• The Manzanar Camp was reformed into a National Historic Site to “provide for the protection and interpretation of historic, cultural, and natural resources associated with the relocation of Japanese Americans during World War II”

Page 39: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Civil Liberties Act

• In 1988, Under President Reagan, Congress implemented the Civil Liberties Act, apologizing on behalf of the nation for the "grave injustice" done to persons of Japanese ancestry.

• Congress declared that the internments had been "motivated largely by racial prejudice, wartime hysteria, and a failure of political leadership" and authorized $20,000 payments to Japanese Americans who had suffered injustices during World War II.

Page 40: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

Was the United States Government Justified in

Interning Japanese-Americans in 1942?

Page 41: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

• Arguments Supporting Internment:• The United States was suddenly attacked by

Japan.• These people’s presence on the West Coast

was a “Clear and Present Danger” to the nation’s security.

• The President as Commander and Chief has the Constitutional power and responsibility to defend the nation.

• Citizens may not have all their civil liberties in wartime.

• It was generally believed that Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor was made possible with help of ethnic Japanese.

• It is not useful to judge the events of that time with the knowledge we have today.

Page 42: Japanese Internment During World War II A Comparison of U.S. & Canadian Internment Policy.

• Arguments Against Internment

The evacuation of the Nisei was motivated by racial prejudice.No evidence was ever uncovered that these citizens were involved in espionage as a group.Executive order 9066 took away the citizenship of an entire group of people.German and Italian Americans were not relocated.These people were denied due process guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.