Top Banner
NISO Webinar January 13, 2016 Ivan Oransky Co-Founder, Retraction Watch, The Center For Scientific Integrity Vice President, Global Editorial Director, MedPage Today Distinguished Writer In Residence, NYU Journalism Institute @ivanoransky Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing’s Wild West
16

January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Apr 15, 2017

Download

Education

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

NISO WebinarJanuary 13, 2016

Ivan OranskyCo-Founder, Retraction Watch,

The Center For Scientific IntegrityVice President, Global Editorial Director, MedPage Today

Distinguished Writer In Residence, NYU Journalism Institute@ivanoransky

Retractions, Post-Publication Peer Review, and Fraud: Scientific Publishing’s Wild West

Page 2: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Is This Science Today?

Page 3: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Robots No Longer Considered Harmful

I.P. Freely, Oliver Clothesoff, Jacques Strap, Hugh Jazz, Amanda Huginkiss

Is This Science Today?

Page 4: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Is This Science Today?

Page 5: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Retractions on the Rise

http://pmretract.heroku.com/byyear

Page 6: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Post-Publication Peer Review On The Rise

Page 7: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

http://nautil.us

Page 8: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Most Retractions Due to Misconduct

PNAS online October 1, 2012

Page 9: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries
Page 10: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Which Journals Retract?

-Infection and Immunity 2011

Page 11: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

What Happens to Retracted Papers’ Citations?

-Assn of College & Research Libraries 2011

Page 12: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

What Happens to Retracted Papers’ Citations?

Budd et al, 1999: • Retracted articles received more than 2,000 post-

retraction citations; less than 8% of citations acknowledged the retraction

• Preliminary study of the present data shows that continued citation remains a problem

• Of 391 citations analyzed, only 6% acknowledge the retraction

Page 13: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Do Journals Get the Word Out?

Page 14: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Do Journals Get the Word Out?

“Journals often fail to alert the naïve reader; 31.8% of retracted papers were not noted as retracted in any way.”

Page 15: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

One Solution

Page 16: January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retractions, Scientific Reproducibility, and the Role of Publishers and Libraries

Contact Info/AcknowledgementsoransiØ[email protected]

http://retractionwatch.com

@retractionwatch

Thanks:

The MacArthur Foundation

The Arnold Foundation

The Helmsley Trust

Nancy Lapid, Reuters Health