James Nowotarski 04 May 2004 IS 553 Advanced Systems Development Practices.

James Nowotarski

04 May 2004

IS 553Advanced Systems

Development Practices

2

Course Map

Underpinnings. Introduction. Essentials

Content. Rational Unified Process. Agile

Implementation. Metrics. CMM. Distributed development. Tools & training

Briefings (Term Papers)

1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 115

Assignments

Quizzes

Week

(RUP) (Agile) (CMM) (Distr. Dev.)

3

Background on Continuous Improvement Understand basics of Software Metrics

ObjectivesDefining MetricsMetrics ProgramsMarket Players, Products, GurusSources/Links

Today’s Objectives

4

Topic Duration

Quiz 2 and Agile Recap 15 minutes

Software Metrics 60 minutes

*** Break 15 minutes

Current Event Reports 30 minutes

Software Metrics (cont.) 60 minutes

Today’s Agenda

5

Topic Duration






Today’s Agenda

6

Approach References

XP www.extremeprogramming.org

www.xprogramming.com

M. Marchesi et al, Extreme Programming Perspectives, Addison-Wesley, 2002.

Crystal A. Cockburn, Agile Software Development, Addison-Wesley, 2001

SCRUM K. Schwaber and M. Beedle, Agile Software Development with Scrum, Prentice Hall, 2001.

Adaptive Software Development

J. Highsmith, Adaptive Software Development, Dorset House, 2000.

FDD S. Palmer, A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development, Prentice Hall, 2002.

Agile - General http://www.agilealliance.org/home

http://www.agilemodeling.com

Agile/Lightweight Methods

7

Topic Duration






Today’s Agenda

8

Why Measure?

“You can’t control what you can’t measure” (Tom Demarco) “You can’t understand . . . “You can’t improve . . .

“Show me how you will measure me, and I will show you how I will perform” (Eli Goldratt)

9

Scope of our discussion

Director - IS/IT

Manager, Systems Development &

Maintenance

Manager,Computer Operations

FinancialSystems

ManufacturingSystems

Customer FulfillmentSystems

Our

focu

s

Sample IT Organization

10

Examples of systems development metrics

Category Metric Units of measureSpeed of delivery

Delivery rate

Elapsed months/Function point

Schedule reliability

Duration variance %

Schedule variance %

Software quality

Fault density

Faults/Function point

Productivity Productivity rate

Functions points/Staff month

11

Example: Speed of delivery

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000

Developed Function Points

Ela

pse

d M

onth

s

= Is a single project release (Average elapsed months =14.8, n=33).

Industry Average line is determined from Software Productivity Research

12

Function Points

Function Points (FP) are a language- and technology-independent measure of application size

Two flavors: Delivered size = total application size delivered, including

packages, assets, etc. Developed size = portion built for the release

Takes into account: Inputs Outputs Inquiries Table updates External interfaces

1 Function Point ≈ 100 lines of Cobol

13

Example: Schedule reliability

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000


Sch

edu

le V

aria

nce

abo

ve c

omm

itmen

t

= Is a single project release (n=33).

Industry Average line is determined from Software Productivity Research

14

Example: Software quality

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000


Fau

lts (

3 m

onth

s)

Faults reported over the first three months in operations (n=27) An estimated industry average for faults found in the first three months of operations. The assumption is that half the total faults are found in the first three months in operation. This average is one half of the industry average of the total faults from C. Jones, Applied Software Measurement, 1996, p.232.

15

Example: Productivity

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000


Fun

ctio

n P

oint

s pe

r S

taff

Mon

th

Is a single project release (n=33) Industry Average line is determined from SoftwareProductivity Research.

16

Objectives of Software Measurement

17

Hawthorne Effect

Famous study conducted in the Hawthorne plant of General Electric Corporation

Plant managers implemented changes in working conditions and recorded data on the plant’s production output

They found that production increased no matter what changes in working conditions they implemented!

What does this example reveal about how people act when they know that an experiment is being conducted?

18

Goal Question Metric

Goal 1 Goal 2

Question QuestionQuestion Question Question

Metric MetricMetric Metric Metric Metric

19

Goal Question Metric

Technique for identifying suitable measurements to collect Assumption: It is only worthwhile measuring

things to satisfy goals Goals are desired end states Questions identify the information needs

associated with goals, help determine whether or not goals are being met

Metrics are specific items that can be measured to answer the questions

20

GQM Example (High Level)

Improve systems delivery performanceGoal

What is the qualityof our deliverable? How predictable is

our process?How quickly do we deliver?

How efficient are we?

Question

MetricFault density Delivery rate Productivity rate Duration variance

percentage

21

Topic Duration






Today’s Agenda

22

Topic Duration






Today’s Agenda

23

Topic Duration






Today’s Agenda

24

Measurement and Continuous Improvement

Continuous Improvement Measurement

Focuses program objectives Enables tracking of improvement

progress Enables communication of program

benefit

Clarifies measurement’s purpose and role Clarifies which measures to collect Provides a mechanism for acting on

findings Enables top-to-bottom organizational

support

25

Continuous Process Improvement

Approach to Quality and Measurement

Plan

Do

Check

Act

1. Identify performance standards and goals

2. Measure project performance

3. Compare metrics against goals

4. Eliminate causes of deficient performance- fix defects- fix root causes

26

Metrics Program Change Plan

QUALITY MANAGEMENT

Enable

Change

Technology

Process

People

Metrics Awareness Education

Metrics Network

Vital Few Metrics Definitions Vital Few Metrics Implementation

Technology Strategy

KM Support for Measurement Community of Practice

Measurement Process Improvement

Large Project Network

Metrics Strategy Commitment / Ownership

Distributed Support Units

Metrics Repository and tools

Measurement Process Definition

Roles & Responsibilities

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Achieve-1

Change

Sustain

Change

Achieve-2

Change

Metrics Rollout Education/Training

Pilot Project Group

Ongoing Metrics Education / Training

System Building Improvement Goals

Metrics Definition & Implementation for Delivery Centers

Metrics Embedded in System Building Methods

Dashboard metrics Implementation

Pilot Selected Projectsand Selected Delivery Centers

Enable Large Projectsand Remaining Centers

27

Measurement Program Mortality

Most programs fail, usually within 2 years

Number of companies

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991

Year

Cumulative startsCumulative successes

28

Reasons for Metric Program Failure

Lack of executive sponsorship Lack of alignment with organizational goals Tendency to collect too much data Measures not calibrated, normalized, or

validated Not comparing apples-to-apples

Fear of [individual] evaluation Learning curve (e.g., function points) Cost overhead

29

Key Success Factors

Ensure that measurement is part of something larger, typically performance improvement “Trojan Horse” strategy Ensure alignment with organizational goals

Start small, iterate Strongly recommend doing a pilot test

Automate capture of metrics data Rigorously define a limited, balanced set of metrics

“Vital Few” Portfolio approach Comparability

Aggregate appropriately Focus should be on processes, not individuals

Obtain [visible] executive sponsorship Understand and address the behavioral implications

30

Increasingly, performance is judged on business metrics

Example: For a billing system implementation, metric is billing accuracy rates

Issue: Assessing IT’s contributions to business goals has always been difficult

31

How to Measure Software Size?

How many physical source lines are there in this C language program?

#define LOWER 0 /* lower limit of table */#define UPPER 300 /* upper limit */#define STEP 20 /* step size */

main() /* print a Fahrenheit-Celsius conversion table */{ int fahr; for(fahr=LOWER; fahr<=UPPER; fahr=fahr+STEP)

printf(“%4d %6.1f\n”, fahr, (5.0/9.0)*(fahr-32));}

32


Need standards to ensure repeatable, consistent size counts

Include Exclude

1. Executable 2. Nonexecutable3. Declarations 4. Compiler directives 5. Comments6. On their own lines 7. On lines with source

. . .

33


“Lines of code is a useless measurement in the face of code that shrinks when we learn better ways of programming” (Beck, p.42)

34

How to Measure Hours?

Include Exclude

OvertimeCompensated (paid)Uncompensated (unpaid)

ContractTemporary employees SubcontractorConsultant

ManagementTest personnelSoftware quality assurance

. . .

35

Other Quotes

“Count what is countable, measure what is measurable, and what is not measurable,

make measurable”

Galileo

36

Other Quotes

“Anything that can’t be measured doesn’t exist”

Locke, Berkeley, Hume (Beck, p.45)

37

Other Quotes

“In God we trust – All others must bring data”

W. Edwards Deming

38

Measurement and CMM

Measurement supports each maturity level

Pro

cess

mat

uri

ty l

eve

l

Pro

jec

tfo

cu

s

Pro

du

ct

foc

us

Pro

ce

ss

foc

us

Pro

ce

ss

imp

rov

em

en

tfo

cu

s

Optimizing

Managed

Defined

Repeatable

Initial

James Nowotarski 04 May 2004 IS 553 Advanced Systems Development Practices.

Documents