Top Banner
J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?
44

J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Deborah Dixon
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

J. Havskov

Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Page 2: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Introduction• University of Bergen has been involved in many seismological network projects, training workshops etc, mostly in developing countries

• We have had an international MSc and PhD program in seismology for 20 years training seismologists from many developing countries

• We have helped to develop low cost hardware and software

Page 3: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Why seismology• High risk countries: They have a real problem with high seismicity, volcanic eruptions and obviously need to know about the risks involved and to be able to advice the public

• Low risk countries:

• Enhanced knowledge of seismology and other fields in science is always a benefit

• Encourage international cooperation

• Local knowledge of seismology will help understand problems related to oil exploration, effects of dams, landslides etc

Page 4: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Why seismology II

• Seismology is just one type of science but it relates to something many people have experienced and there is therefore a need for local ‘experts’ to explain to the public

• For volcanic monitoring, it is a simple way of forecasting eruptions

Page 5: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Plate boundaries, earthquakes (yellow) and volcanoes (red)

Seismic and volcanic activity in many developing countries

Page 6: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Basic seismology

The main purpose of a seismic network is to:

• Record earthquakes with seismic stations

• Find the location of the earthquake

• Calculate the magnitude of the earthquake

• Process and store the data for further scientific analysis

Page 7: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Seismic sensor

Mass

Damping

Spring

Measure of mass displacement

Principle behind the inertial seismometer

Page 8: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Seismic sensors

Broad band sensor, $15000

Geophone, $ 100Accelerometer, $3000

Page 9: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Geophone recording

Magnitude 5.5 earthquake at 300 km distance

Page 10: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Location

Page 11: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Magnitude

The simplest way of determining magnitude of a local earthquake is to measure the maximum amplitude (nm) on a displacement seismogram. A more general way is to make the displacement density spectrum of the P or S-waves. The magnitude can be determined from the spectral level.

Page 12: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Requirement to run a network

• Basic technical skills to physically operate network

• Seismological knowledge to process the data and inform the public

• Money

• People interested in running the network

Page 13: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Software

• Important to use a free, well tested software that can do all the routine operations required by the network of which the most important is: Local and global locations, calculate common magnitudes, correct for instrument response and store the data in a systematic way.

• The software should be able to be used on common computer platforms and use common formats.

• Training should be available

Page 14: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Equipment

• Before buying equipment, make sure main purpose of network is clear and that the funding for installation, operation and training is in place

• For a new network, the main purpose will be location and magnitude and there is no need for sophisticated instrumentation, simple and reliable is the main aim

• There will often be a push to install a broad band network, however accelerometers might do as well i order to get unclipped data, at a substantial lower price

Page 15: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Seismic field recorders

Geosig, ca $2000 with sensor

SARA ca $2000 with sensor

Nanometrics, ca $10 000 without sensor

Page 16: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

US volcano disaster assistance program

Page 17: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Tibet tectonics

Page 18: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Tibet project purpose

• Build and maintain a seismic network around Lhasa• Locate earthquakes and determine magnitude.• Advise the public about earthquakes occurring in the area.• Advise public authorities on all aspects of the local seismic risk and give general advice on earthquake related problems.• Calculate seismic hazard• Teach basic seismology and geophysics.• Build up a local database for research

Page 19: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Tibet station

Seismicity near Lhasa 2008. The number of recordings for this period is more than 2128, while 1837 of them fall in the above region. The stations are marked with blue.

A typical installation. The sensor to the left (small gray box), and the digitizer to the right.

Page 20: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Tibet monastery with seismic station

Page 21: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Lhasa station

Page 22: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

The Wenchuan earthquake (M8) record by Tibet University

Page 23: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

The magnitude 5.5 Tibet earthquake of 25 of August, 2004

Page 24: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Seismic hazard for Africa

From USGS

Page 25: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Uganda

• Uganda got a UNESCO grant to build one analog three component analog station in Entebbe, ca 1988.

• At this relatively high noise site, only few event could potentially be detected form the seismic area in the rift valley.

• For the same money 4 MEQ800 was bought instead, and 3 were installed, one was used as a spare. Local operators took care of the field stations. It was now possible to locate events and calculate magnitude.

• This network operated successfully more than 10 years (later with addition of digital stations) by the geological Survey of Uganda.

Page 26: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Sudan

Network around Khartoum

Sudan seismicity

Page 27: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

1990 -1991 earthquakes

One of the largest earthquakes ever recorded in Africa (surface wave magnitude Ms = 7.2) on 20 May 1990.

Four days later, two more large earthquakes (Ms = 6.4 and 7.0) occurred about 50 kilometers from the first event

The earthquakes are associated with two fault systems: one east of the Nile with azimuth southeast and one along the Nile Valley with azimuth north-northeast.

The activity alternated between the two fault systems

Page 28: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Sudan earthquakes 1900-2005

Data available at the International Seismic Center, ISC

Page 29: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Department of Earth Science, Geodynamics Group

Department of Earth Science, Geodynamics Group www.geo.uib.no

Juba Campus

Page 30: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Juba Geo-science labPurpose: Enhance knowledge in geo-scienceThe Juba geo-science lab will consists of 4 elementsGeologyMeteorologySeismologyPhysicsThe lab will have the following functions:Collect data on a daily basis for meteorology, seismology and physics (UV radiation)Do teaching in basic geo-science covering all 4 fieldsRegular public relation activity

Regular visits of schoolsGeneral information of recent earthquakes in the regionMeteorological information

Page 32: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Nigeria

Nigeria’s main objective

To create a database of the seismicity of Nigeria and neighboring countriesTo exchange data with countries To use collected data for realistic earthquake hazard assessmentTo acquire continuous seismic dataHowever: No software or training was given from company delivering hardware.

Page 33: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Earthquake creation !

Small Gulf country gets a turnkey system with broad band stations, high technology.

Local company does all maintenance so network operates well.

Instrument company provides simple software for local earthquakes, but many events are global so they are located inside country, suddenly the country has a lot of seismicity !

Clear example of too little money for training, compared to instruments.

School class visit

Page 34: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Jamaica

Page 35: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Venezuela, Cumana

Small local network, mostly free software and some non commercial hardware

Page 36: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

How it can go wrong• Large company delivers network

• System installed with licensed software

• License runs out, not money for renewal

• Not enough local training to take over operation with free software

Lesson: Too much money for too sophisticated equipment and no contract to make sure the data actually comes out the other end finally processed. The customer should have started with the processing-people end and then seen what was needed in terms of equipment. And instrument company might have painted their equipment and automatic processing it bet too rosy.

Page 37: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Seismological imperialism• International organization installs one or several seismic station in a country with little seismological expertise, either as a permanent station or a temporary network

• Data is transmitted directly to donor country and local access to the data either, nonexistent, offline or unreasonably complicated

• If software is provided for local use, it is often quite useless and made to ‘have done the duty’. The result is that local use of the data is very limited.

Lessons learned:

If outside organizations offer to set up a local stations with real time transmission to their organization, make sure the operation includes:

• Complete local access to data• A simple way to find and extract out local data• Clear guidelines and training in how to use the data and be able in a simple way of integrating it with possible local data.

Page 38: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Regional cooperation

• Some countries too small or have too few stations to make reliable locations

• Regional cooperation will then help to:– Provide more data– Provide help in operation and processing– Increase the awareness of the value of sharing which

often is a problem in developing countries

• In some regions, it can be politically difficult to share data and experience.

Page 39: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

East African Stations, 1992

Stations and countries cooperating in

seismology in 1993

Dindi et al, 1995, SRL 85, 364

Page 40: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

East African Seismic Network seismicity

PDE 5, EAF 70

Det. threshold 4.6 to 4.0

Page 41: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Central America

Seismic stations (138) in Central America, May 1998

Alvarenga et al, 1998, SRL 69

Page 42: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Central American seismicity, mb > 4.5, 1992-1997

Page 43: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Central America

• Main purpose was to improve network operations by making the best of existing infrastructure, set up regional cooperation and provide training.• Limited new station equipment: Three new broad band sensors. One accelerometer to each country.• Training was provided before any installation• Data from all countries collected in one data base• Duration of project: 10 years• Supported by the Norwegian Development Agency

Page 44: J. Havskov Seismology in developing countries, does it make sense ?

Conclusion• Seismology benefits:

• Gives good training in data collection and processing, we do not run out of earthquakes !• Enhances regional and global cooperation• Can provide useful information to the public• A local seismological data base will make research possible

• However, make sure:• There are local people interested • Resources is spent mainly on education and training• Avoid overkill in equipment purchases, upgrade existing equipment if possible