Top Banner
Investigating Thinking Strategies 2013-2014
51
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Its draft[2]

Investigating Thinking Strategies

2013-2014

Page 2: Its draft[2]

Guiding Questions

How do we grow thinkers?

Page 3: Its draft[2]

Guiding Questions

What does it take to for students to engage in challenging intellectual

work that leads to understanding?

Page 4: Its draft[2]

Guiding Questions

How do the thinking strategies support readers, writers, speakers

and listeners to the meet the demands of the new standards?

Page 5: Its draft[2]

Through Comprehension Strategies

we:

• Become more reflective readers & thinkers

• Develop a common language of thinking• Teach deep level comprehension explicitly • Raise expectations & support for all kids• Emphasize reading with depth & focus• Teach the “reader” not just the text • Build a bank of content area knowledge

From: Comprehension Going Forward, “Comprehension Instruction Grows Up,” Keene, 2011

Page 6: Its draft[2]

Institute Outcomes . . .

1) Increased knowledge of metacognitive strategies that

proficient thinkers use to grow understanding

Page 7: Its draft[2]

Institute Outcomes . . .

2) Increased knowledge of how instructional techniques such as workshop model and gradually releasing responsibility support

thinking

Page 8: Its draft[2]

3 ) Increased knowledge of how intentional planning helps students meet rigorous standards such as

CCSS

Institute Outcomes . . .

Page 9: Its draft[2]

We Started With Research

P. David Pearson, Roehler, Dole, and Duffy, 1992. “Developing Expertise in Reading Comprehension.” What Research Has To Say About Reading Instruction. IRA

Duke, N.K., & P.D. Pearson. 2002. Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension.

Page 10: Its draft[2]

As a Participant….

• • Engage with research-based thinking

strategies that support understanding of texts across genres, content areas, and difficulty

• Design learning experiences that integrate

meaningful discourse

• Draft or refine unit plans that incorporate research-based thinking strategies that support understanding of texts across genres, content areas, and difficulty

Page 11: Its draft[2]

Essential Question

How do we grow thinkers?

Page 12: Its draft[2]

“Mix and Mingle”

1.Grab a quote, read it over, and mull it over.

2.Find a partner and share your quote and thinking.

3.Trade quotes and find a new partner & repeat.

Page 13: Its draft[2]

How Do we grow thinkers?

Create a working explanation… use words,

icons, metaphors, etc.

Page 14: Its draft[2]

Composing: Work Time

Read and annotate your text with your thinking… What are you doing as a reader?

“Leave Tracks in the Snow”

Page 15: Its draft[2]

Catch & Release

Find a Partner & Share Annotations

What did you notice about yourself as a reader of this type of text?

Page 16: Its draft[2]

ReflectionCheryl’s Classroom:

• What metacognitive strategies did you use to make meaning?

• How does annotating the text support understanding?

• How does discussing your thinking support understanding?

Page 17: Its draft[2]

Return by 10:30

Page 18: Its draft[2]

A film is made up of still images flashed in rapid succession to simulate movement… Slow down the film, and the movement and meaning slows and the film's impact is diminished. Viewers won't learn as much about the film as if it were shown at normal speed.

With reading the same thing can happen. When a person reads word by word, like frame by frame, they are not reading on the level of ideas. You need to read on some level that's more conversational and allows things to coalesce into ideas themselves.

Doug Evans, Institute of Reading Development

Page 19: Its draft[2]

What is it that proficient thinkers do?

Page 20: Its draft[2]

Surface vs. Deep Structures

Thinking Strategies in Theory, #4

Page 21: Its draft[2]

Surface Structure Systems

Provide the reader with visible and audible information about letters, sounds, words, and grammatical structure to identify words and read fluently:•Grapho-phonic System: sounds•Lexical System: sight words•Syntactic System: form and structure

Page 22: Its draft[2]

Surface Structure Systems

What thinkers know and are able to do when using surface structure systems:•Use decoding strategies•Recognize sight words•Use word analysis strategies (prefixes, derivations, etc.)•Skim/scan; reread (“does the word make sense?”)•Use text features such as bold, etc

Page 23: Its draft[2]

Deep Structure Systems

Page 24: Its draft[2]

Deep Structure Systems

Provide the reader with information about the meanings of words and longer pieces of text, the purpose for reading, and prior knowledge related to the text:

•Semantic System: Vocabulary•Schematic System: Organizing framework to Connect new to known•Pragmatic System: Social construction

Page 25: Its draft[2]

Deep Structure Systems

What thinkers know and are able to do when using deep structure systems•Apply cognitive thinking strategies flexibly and fluidly to develop understanding

Page 26: Its draft[2]

Cognitive Thinking Strategies

1.Activate, revise and apply schema (background knowledge)

2.Draw inferences

3.Ask questions

4.Determine importance

5.Synthesize

6.Evoke sensory images

7.Monitor for meaning and employ fix up strategies when meaning breaks down

Page 27: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers draw on schema or background knowledge.

We use our own background knowledge to understand the text as we readPearson, et al 1992., Gordon and

Pearson, 1983; Hansen, 1981.

Page 28: Its draft[2]
Page 29: Its draft[2]

Activating Schema Looks and Sounds Like:

• This reminds me of…

• How is this like…?

• How can I connect this to concepts I already know?

The Language of Thinking p.2

Page 30: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers draw inferences

We infer when we use schema and textual information to draw conclusions and form unique interpretations and when we make predictions, confirm them, and test them as we read. Anderson and Pearson, 1984

Aha!!!

Page 31: Its draft[2]

Why is this funny?

Page 32: Its draft[2]

Drawing Inferences Looks and Sounds Like:

Can I draw a conclusion?

Can I make a prediction?

I’m thinking that…

The Language of Thinking p.2

Page 33: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers ask questions.

We generate questions BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER reading which helps us focus our attention on important components of the text.

Andre and Anderson, 1979; Brown and Palincsar, 1985

Page 34: Its draft[2]

Asking Questions Looks and Sounds Like:

• I am wondering…• Why did that happen?• What is important?• How will my questions

help me understand?

The Language of Thinking p.2

Page 35: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers determine importance in text

We identify key ideas or themes as we read, distinguish important from unimportant information, and support our ideas with evidence from the text.Afflerbach and Johnston, 1984; Baumann, 1986;

Tierney and Cunningham, 1984; Winograd and Bridge, 1986

I found it!

Page 36: Its draft[2]

What is most important?

Page 37: Its draft[2]

Determining Importance Looks and Sounds Like:

• What is essential?• I’ll remember…• The big ideas are…

The Language of Thinking p.2

Page 38: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers synthesize information

As we read, we monitor the overall meaning, important concepts and themes. We are aware of how these elements fit together to create overarching ideas.

Brown and Day, 1983

Page 39: Its draft[2]
Page 40: Its draft[2]

Synthesizing Looks and Sounds Like:

• First I thought, but now I am thinking….

• Now I understand…

• Like putting a puzzle together, the pieces are…

The Language of Thinking p.2

Page 41: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers use sensory images and mental models

We use five senses to draw conclusions, create unique interpretations of

the text, clarify and enhance

comprehension, and give depth and dimension to

the reading. Keene and Zimmerman, 1996

Page 42: Its draft[2]

Evoking Sensory Images

Page 43: Its draft[2]

Tapping into your 5 senses

Imagine the taste, smell, texture, color, and sound of these red cherries. What does it make you think of? turn and talk

Page 44: Its draft[2]

Evoking sensory images

Durian

Page 45: Its draft[2]

Tapping into your 5 senses

Imagine the taste, smell, texture, color, and sound of durian…turn and talk

Page 46: Its draft[2]

DurianRegarded by many people in Southeast Asia as the "king of fruits", the durian is distinctive for its large size, strong odour, and formidable thorn-covered husk. The fruit can grow as large

as 30 centimetres (12 in) long and 15 centimetres (6 in) in diameter, and it typically weighs one to three kilograms (2 to 7 lb). Its shape ranges from oblong to round, the colour of its

husk green to brown, and its flesh pale yellow to red, depending on the species.

The edible flesh emits a distinctive odour that is strong and penetrating even when the husk is intact. Some people regard

the durian as pleasantly fragrant; others find the aroma overpowering and revolting. The smell evokes reactions from deep appreciation to intense disgust, and has been described variously as almonds, rotten onions, turpentine, raw sewage.

Page 47: Its draft[2]

Sensory images: Being there

• How do sensory images build understanding or interfere with understanding?

Page 48: Its draft[2]

Creating Sensory Images Looks and Sounds Like:

• In my mind, I can see/hear/smell/feel/taste…

• The movie in my head…

• I am experiencing…

The Language of Thinking p.2

Page 49: Its draft[2]

Proficient thinkers monitor their comprehension

We know when the text makes sense, when it does not, and what to do when meaning breaks down. We have effective and flexible strategies to repair confusions and revise interpretations.Duffy et al, 1987; Paris, Cross, and Lipson, 1984; Garner, 1987

Page 50: Its draft[2]
Page 51: Its draft[2]

Monitoring for Understanding Looks and Sounds Like:

• I am confused…

• I understand…

• I don’t get it…• This makes sense…

The Language of Thinking p.2