Compliance of 32 th EAC Infra – II meeting dated 2 to 4 th July 2018 Item no. 32.4.19 case for Reconsideration for Environmental Clearance (IA/HP/MIS/30305/2015, 10-24/2015-IA-III) Proposed CETPs - 7MLD project at Kandrori by M/s Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited The Committee sought following additional information as given below, i. Submit Public Hearing proceeding duly signed by the District Magistrate-Annexure I ii. Revised influent standards including BOD and COD- Annexure II iii. Combined effluent characteristics of the proposed member units-Annexure III iv. Submit affidavit regarding restriction of member industry as per list given-Annexure IV v. Details of process design of CETP to be submitted-Annexure V vi. Effort should be made to recycle/ reuse the entire treated effluent. Detailed action plan to be submitted- Annexure VI vii. Plan for Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) as specified under Ministry’s Office Memorandum vide F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 1st May 2018 shall be submitted -Annexure VII viii. Submit Form-2 (Application for prior Environmental Clearance) as per MoEFCC’s OM No. 22-8/2018-IA-III dated 20 th April, 2018. Annexure VIII Providing above information in subsequent attachments.
81
Embed
Item no. 32.4.19 case for Reconsideration for ...environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/EDS/0_0_19_Sep_2018... · FILTERS (MGF & ACF): The disinfected water will then be
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Compliance of 32th EAC Infra – II meeting dated 2 to 4th July 2018
Item no. 32.4.19 case for Reconsideration for Environmental Clearance (IA/HP/MIS/30305/2015, 10-24/2015-IA-III)
Proposed CETPs - 7MLD project at Kandrori by M/s Himachal Pradesh State
Industrial Development Corporation Limited
The Committee sought following additional information as given below,
i. Submit Public Hearing proceeding duly signed by the District Magistrate-Annexure I
ii. Revised influent standards including BOD and COD- Annexure II
iii. Combined effluent characteristics of the proposed member units-Annexure III
iv. Submit affidavit regarding restriction of member industry as per list given-Annexure
IV
v. Details of process design of CETP to be submitted-Annexure V
vi. Effort should be made to recycle/ reuse the entire treated effluent. Detailed action
plan to be submitted- Annexure VI
vii. Plan for Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) as specified under Ministry’s
Office Memorandum vide F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 1st May 2018 shall be
submitted -Annexure VII
viii. Submit Form-2 (Application for prior Environmental Clearance) as per MoEFCC’s OM
No. 22-8/2018-IA-III dated 20th April, 2018. Annexure VIII
Providing above information in subsequent attachments.
Hemangin
Typewritten Text
Public Hearing proceeding duly signed by the District Magistrate-Annexure I
Scanned by CamScanner
Hemangin
Typewritten Text
Revised influent standards including BOD and COD- Annexure II
www.oxybeesolutions.com
OXYBEE SOLUTIONS
Effluent Characteristics of the proposed industrial unit
FILTERS (MGF & ACF):The disinfected water will then be passed through Multi grade filter(s) to
reduce suspended load and turbidity, BOD, colours, odour and fine particles. It finally polishes the
treated water and also reduces the residual chlorine.
The wastewater so treated can be utilized for gardening or for flushing and recycling.
The backwash from the filter unit will be fed back into the collection tank.
FILTRATION PROCESS(UF AND RO SYSTEM):-Membrane filtration can replace the
clarification, coagulation and flocculation steps of the water treatment process. Also, depending on the
pore size of membrane, filtration replace the initial disinfection step as well. Note that chlorination will
always be required in order to maintain disinfection beyond the water treatment plant. Membrane filters
typically consist of series of hollow polymer tubes inserted into the water. A vacuum process sucks the
water through the pores on the sides of tubes, removing the particles larger than the pore size. The
filtered water usually proceeds to the disinfection step, while the dirty water containing the filtered
solids is back-flushed from the system. This is a typical membrane process; however, the process
depends on the type and manufacturer of the membranes used.There are four varieties of filtration :-
Microfiltration only removes bacteria and cysts, but not viruses, it is not suitable as a
disinfection step, but rather its main use is in particulate removal.
• Ultrafiltration can be classified as both a clarification and initial disinfection step since it will
remove all microorganisms. Chlorination will still be required in order to maintain a residual.
• Nanofiltration is designed to remove multivalent cations such as calcium, iron and magnesium as
well as disinfection and clarification. Chlorination will still be required in order to maintain a
residual. Nanofiltration is a replacement for conventional iron and manganese removal methods
such as greensand filtration.
• Reverse-osmosis membranes are designed for salt removal especially as applied to seawater
sources. Their use for small-scale water treatment processes is currently limited. Chlorination will
still be required in order to maintain a residual.
TREATED WATER TANK:-The water treated from the UF and RO will be collected in
the treated water tank where there is a dosing of the disinfection system for microbial
disinfection and then the water can be used for the several purpose.
SLUDGE DISPOSAL:A proportion of sludge from the primary, Secondary and tertiary clarifier
and first chamber is pumped via the hydro cyclone into the sludge holding tanks/ Sludge drying beds
(SDB). Supernatant from the sludge holding tanks is decanted and returned to collection tank for re-
processing.
TREATMENT PROCESS
Primary Treatment:
The primary treatment consists of temporarily holding the effluent in a quiescent basin where
heavy solids can settle to the bottom while oil, grease and lighter solids float to the surface. The
settled and floating materials are removed and the remaining liquid after pH correction is
discharged or subjected to secondary treatment.
a) The raw effluent generated at various units is led from the last manhole to the screen of the Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP).
b) The Effluent pass through non-mechanized bar screen for removal of large floating
impurities, this process is known as screening.
c) After screening the effluent is led to Equalization Tank (Two Comportment).
d) From Equalization Tank effluent is pumped to Chemical Treatment System unit for removal of TSS and excess BOD, COD values.
e) The settled sludge from Chemical Treatment Process is led to SDB by gravity flow.
f) Outlet of the Chemical Treatment system is led to by gravity to flash mixer.
g) Flash mixer tank is provided for pH correctionby mixing required dosage of suitable Alkali/Acid solutions to maintain ideal pH requirement for secondary biological treatment.
Secondary Treatment:
Secondary treatment involves removal of dissolved and suspended biological matter. Secondary
treatment is typically performed by indigenous, water-borne micro-organisms in a managed
habitat. Secondary treatment requires a separation process to remove the micro-organisms from
the treated water prior to discharge. Due to high inlet COD two stages have been adopted
anaerobic and aerobic respectively.
Secondary Treatment (Biological Treatment) - First Stage:
a) After pH correction, the effluent is led to first compartment of existing acid phase reactor ,the Over flow of First compartment is led to by Gravity in Second compartment of Acid phase Reactor from where it is pumped to the Anaerobic reactor based on the Up flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor through UASB distribution grid place at the bottom of the reactor
b) The anaerobic digestion starts with Hydrolysis. c) Methane and carbon dioxide is generated by Methanogenesis by strict anaerobic
methanogenicbacteria. d) The gas generated from the digester is led to the flare stackthrough a gas holder.
NOTE:
1. If in case the flow of UASB feed pump is less than 17.5cum/hr backwash of the distribution grid is required.
2. If Sludge consistency is more than 25% v/v sludge drain to SDBs for dewatering and drying
prior to disposal required.
Secondary Treatment - Second Stage:
a) Supernatant overflowing from the anaerobic reactor is led to Aeration tank working on
activated sludge process (ASP) with extended aeration resulting in stabilisation of the soluble organic matter in presence of oxygen.
b) The mixed liquor from theaeration tank is then taken to the SecondaryClarifier for the
settlement of the sludge solids, which is re circulated to the Aeration tank to maintain the desired MLSS in the aeration tank. The excess sludge from the aeration tank is discharged to SDB.
The clear supernatant (treat diffluent) from the clarifier flows through a V-notch chamber rfor
manual flow measurement and further led to Existing Treated water Tank before final disposal/
The purpose of tertiary treatment is to provide a final treatment stage to further improve the effluent quality before it is discharged to the receiving environment (sea, river, lake, wet lands, ground, etc.). More than one tertiary treatment process may be used at any treatment plant. If disinfection is practised, it is always the final process. It is also called "effluent polishing."
Filtration
c) Sand filtration removes much of the residual suspended matter. Filtration over activated carbon, also called carbon adsorption, removes residual toxins.
Estimation of sand bed depth, L Q * D3* H/ (29323* B)
Q, Fitltration Rate, m3/m2/ Hour 9.00
Head loss in filter at the end of filter cycle, m 4.00
Break through index.
Response to coagulation. Value of B. Degree of
Poor. Pretreatment.
Average. 0.00 Poor
Average. 0.00 Average.
Average. 0.00 High.
Average. 0.00 Excellent
Sand Size, mm ( range 0.4-0.65) 0.55
Sand Bed Depth, m 0.51
Say 0.90 m
Gravels in inches / M.
k(Log. D + 1.4)
Numerical Value of coefficient, . 12.00
Size of gravels, In inches, D. Gravels Depth in Inches.
For 15mm or ½” 13.19
For 10mm or ¼” 9.58
For 5mm or 1/5” 8.41
Total Grave Depth, inches 13.19
Inches Say, m 0.40
Dimensions: -
Total Filter Bed Area, m2 34.72
Number of filters. 6.00
Each Filter Bed section Area, m2 5.79 a Diameter, M 2.80
HOS, M 1.75
Filter Inlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec. 0.09
Number of filters 5.00
Maximum Flow per filter, m3/Sec. 0.02
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe ɸ in m 0.10
Filter outlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec. 0.09
Number of filters section 5.00
Maximum Flow per filter, m3/Sec. 0.02
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.02
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe, ϕ, m per filter section 0.10
Backwash inlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec.: 0.06
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.06
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe, ϕ, m per filter section 0.20
Filter back wash outlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec.:a*2*36/3600 0.06
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.06
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe, ϕ, m, per filter section 0.20
Air Scouring inlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec.: 0.43
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.43
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 20.00
Pipe, ϕ, m per filter section 0.15
Pressure Vessel Design
Working Pressure, Kgf/ cm^2g 3.00
Design Pressure, Kgf/ cm^2g 3.00
Test Pressure, Kgf/ cm^2g 4.50
Design Code
Vessel, Non fored pressure vessels IS- 2825
Terrispherical, Dishends
IS- 4049
MOC, MS plates IS- 2062
Vessel Thickness
Formula, thickness t PDI/(200*f*j-P) 0.006129597
P Design Pressure 3
DI Inner Diameter in M 2.8
f Allowanle stress, 9.81
j joint factor 0.7
Corrision Allowence 1.5 mm 0.0015
Shell thickness, mm
0.01 Say 10 mm
Dishend thickness, mm
12 mm. Lining
Inner surface 2 mm thick rubber lining
Outer surface Epoxy
22 ACF 2 No
Flow Rate 175 M3/hr
Filtration Velocity 18 Cu/hr/sqm
DIA 3.5 M
HOS 1.8 M
MOC MSEP
Estimation of Carbon bed depth, L Q * D3* H/ (29323* B)
Q, Fitltration Rate, m3/m2/ Hour 9.00
Head loss in filter at the end of filter cycle, m 2.00
Carbon Size, mm ( range 0.8-1.2) 0.80
Bed Depth, M 1.40 m
Dimensions: -
Total Filter Bed Area, m2 34.72
Number of filters. 6.00
Each Filter Bed section Area, m2 5.79 a Diameter, M 2.80
HOS, M 2.52
Filter Inlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec. 0.09
Number of filters 5.00
Maximum Flow per filter, m3/Sec. 0.02
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe ɸ in m 0.10
Filter outlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec. 0.09
Number of filters section 5.00
Maximum Flow per filter, m3/Sec. 0.02
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.02
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe, ϕ, m per filter section 0.10
Backwash inlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec.: 0.06
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.06
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe, ϕ, m per filter section 0.20
Filter back wash outlet pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec.:a*2*36/3600 0.06
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.06
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 2.10
Pipe, ϕ, m, per filter section 0.20
Air vent pipe, ϕ in m
Maximum Flow, m3/ Sec.: 0.06
Maximum Flow per filter section, m3/Sec. 0.06
Maximum Velocity, m/sec 20.00
Pipe, ϕ, m per filter section
0.10
Pressure Vessel Design
Working Pressure, Kgf/ cm^2g 3.00
Design Pressure, Kgf/ cm^2g 3.00
Test Pressure, Kgf/ cm^2g 4.50
Design Code
Vessel, Non fored pressure vessels IS- 2825
Terrispherical, Dishends IS- 4049
MOC, MS plates IS- 2062
Vessel Thickness
Formula, thickness t PDI/(200*f*j-P) 0.006129597
P Design Pressure 3
DI Inner Diameter in M 2.8
f Allowanle stress, 9.81
j joint factor 0.7
Corrision Allowence 1.5 mm 0.0015
Shell thickness, mm 0.01 Say 10 mm
Dishend thickness, mm 12 mm.
Lining
Inner surface 2 mm thick rubber lining
Outer surface Epoxy
23 SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMP
Application To feed the Sludge Holding tank
Type. Centrifugal
Capacity 115 M3/hr
Quantity 3(2W+1SB) 3 Head, MWC 10.00-15.00 M
Material of Construction CI
Solid Handling 10 MM
24 TREATED WATER TANK
Flow 292 M3/hr
Hydroulic Retention time 5.4 Hr
Volume, V: M^3 1575 M3
Desired SWD, M 5 M
Length /Width/Height 21x15x5 M
MOC RCC
Quantity 1 No
25 TREATED WATER PUMP
Application For Irrigation
Type. Centrifugal
Capacity 175 M3/hr
Quantity 3(2W+1SB) 3 Head, MWC 50.00-55.00 M
Material of Construction CI
26 MIXED OXIDANT GENERATION SYSTEM
Application For Disinfection of the treated water
Type. Dosing
Capacity 300 Lit/hr
Quantity 2(1W+1SB) 2 27 AIR CALCULATIONS FOR
AREATION TANK 1 & 2
Flow
Inlet Parameters
COD
BOD
Descriptions
Aeration tank 1 Air required
BoD load
Oxygen Required for 1 kg BOD removal
Oxygen required
Oxygen % in the atmospheric air
Oxygen Transfer efficiency for tabular diffuser
sp.gravity of air
Actual requirement of air
7000
750
500
Desired Tank Volume
for (KL)
3500.00
2.00
7000.00
23.20
22.50
0.80
167624.52
KLD (24Hrs Operation)
mg/l
mg/l
Remark
kg/day
kg
kg/day
%
%
Kg/m3
Air required in Areation Tank 1
Air required in Areation Tank 2
Air required in Equalization tank (2187.5 m3)
Air required in sump tank (588 m3)
Total Air required
6984.36
1396.9
1750
470.4
10601.62605
cum/day
cum/hr
cum/hr
cum/hr
cum/hr
28 AIR BLOWERS FOR A1
Type Twin Type
Capacity 4400 M3/hr
Pressure .55 Kg
Quantity 4 No
29 AIR BLOWERS FOR A2
Type Twin Type
Capacity 1800 M3/hr
Pressure .55 Kg
Quantity 2 No
www.oxybeesolutions.com
Annexure VI: Detailed action plan for Recycle/ reuse the entire treated effluent
1. Total waste water for treatment: 7000 m3
2. Treated water: 6720 m3
3. Loss: Conveyance loss 4 % i.e. 280 m3
Treated water around 6720 m3 will be stored in treated water tank and then it will
be send to individual industrial unit for recycle and reuse through pipeline
Treated water for irrigation: 350 m3 treated water will be used for irrigation.
Treated water 70 m3 will be used for chemical dosing
Industrial effluent 6999.325 KLD
Total fresh water requirement 0.675 KLD through tanker (@45 per capita for 15 person)
Industrial Effluent 7 MLD
6300 KLD Industrial Effluent (90%) for recycle and reuse
350 KLD (5%) for irrigation
70 KLD (1%) for chemical Dosing
280 KLD (4%) for conveyance Loss
Irrigation Management Plan for Reuse of Treated Water from CETP
Industrial Area Green Belt : 54610.14 SQM. sq.m
CETP Green Belt Area : 11476.41 sq.m.
Total Green Belt : 66086.41 Sq.m.
Total Water required for green belt : 396518.46 lit.
Available Treated Water : 350 KLD (350,000 lit)
Micro irrigation facility will be provided for irrigation of green belt and landscape area.
Creation of green belt development using local species along the approach road, inside campus, open space, surrounding CETP Plant etc. will helpful for the aesthetic development of the area with sound ecological management. Proposed Green Belt Area is 11476.41 sq.m. Green Belt should be developed in the following areas
Approach roads Around CETP plant Open place inside the premises Periphery of the Parking
Criteria for Selection of Species The choice of vegetative species for planting is based on studies of the natural vegetation in the area and on the environmental conditions.
Plant species, which show higher adaptability to local climatic and edaphic conditions. Plants which show vigorous growth, and higher fodder value. Preferably indigenous, endemic and rare species. Plants that serve as nesting, feeding and breeding sites for fauna. Plants that enhance the aesthetics of the surrounding areas. Plants species having property of soil binding. Plant species with different good canopy and preferably evergreen. Tolerant to specific conditions or capacity to endure water stress and climatic
extremes after initial establishment. Economically important plant species.
List of Plant Species for Plantations
Sr. No.
Species Name Local Name Habit
1. Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr. Bel Tree
2. Azadirachta indica Linn. Neem Tree
3. Ziziphus jujuba L. Bor Tree
4. Butea monosperma L. Palas Tree
5. Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre Karanj Tree
6. Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. Sisoo Tree
7. Acacia catechu (L.f.) Willd. Khair Tree
8. Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels Jambhul Tree
Sr. No.
Species Name Local Name Habit
9. Tectona grandis L.f. Sag Tree
10. Phyllanthus emblica L. Avala Tree
11. Ricinus communis L. Erand Tree
12. Ficus benghalensis L. Wad Tree
13. Ficus religiosa L. Pimpal Tree
14. Ficus racemosa L. Umbar Tree
15. Caryota urens L. Fish Tail Palm Tree
16. Dendrocalamus strictus Nees Velu Herb
List of Some Hedge Plants
17. Justicia adhatoda L. Adulsa Shrub
18. Nerium indicum Mill. Kanher Shrub
19. Ocimum americanum L. Ran Tulas Herb
20. Vitex negundo L. Nirgudi Shrub
21. Agave cantula Roxb Ghayapat Shrub
Proposed CETP Green Belt Layout
Industrial area Layout
ANNEXURE VII
PROPOSED COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT (CETP-7 MLD) Plan for Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) as specified under Ministry’s Office Memorandum vide F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 1st May 2018 shall be submitted Total Cost of the Project: 4383 lakhs
CER plan cost: 87.66 lakhs
CER Activity Plan
CER activity 2019-20 (Lacs)
2020-21 (Lacs)
2021-22 (Lacs)
Total (Lacs)
Plantation in nearby area, community plantation
5 3.4 3.4 11.8
Road development 5 5 5 15
Providing solar panels for street lightening 5 5 5 15
Construction roads in the locality 5 5 5 15
Skill development programs 5 3 3 11
Drinking water facilities/storage tanks 3 3 3 9
Free health camps in the area 5 3 3 11
Total 33 27.4 27.4 87.8
1
Annexure
Form – 2
APPLICATION FOR PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
1 Details of Project
a. Name of the Project (s) : Proposed Common Effluent Treatment Plant
(CETP-7 MLD)
b. Name of the Company /
Organization
: The Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development
Corporation Ltd
c. Registered Address : New Himrus Building, Shimla-171001
a. Plot / Survey / Khasra No. : Malot -490, Bari -221/172/3, Kandrori -429/1,430/4,430/5
b. Village : Kandrori c. Tehsil : Indora
d. District : Kangra
e. State : Himachal Pradesh
f. Pin Code : 176402 g. Bounded Latitudes (North)
From : 32°10'45.53"N, 75°40'37.35"E
To : 32°10'39.49"N, 75°40'35.61"E
h. Bounded longitudes (East)
From : 32°10'44.71"N, 75°40'43.92"E
To : 32°10'38.88"N, 75°40'41.52"E
i. Survey of India Topo Sheet No. : 43P/11, 43P/12, 43P/15, 43P/16
j. Upload Topo Sheet File (Upload pdf
only)
: Attached as Annexure 1
k. Maximum Elevation Above Mean
Sea Level (AMSL)
: 317 m
l. Upload (kml) File (Upload kml only) : Attached as Annexure 2
m. Distance of Nearest HFL from the
project boundary within the study
area
: None
n. Seismic Zone (Zone: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5) : 5
5 Whether project is executed in
multiple States (Yes /No)?
: No
If Yes
a. Number of States in which Project
will be Executed (e.g. 1,2,3,4,5,6)
: 1
b. Main State of the Project : Himachal Pradesh
c. Other State (Multiple Entries
Allowed) (If the project to be
executed, does not belong to any
state, then state category could be
selected as ‘Other’)
: NA
State District Tehsil Village
- - - -
6 Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)
a. Whether ToR is mandatory for
submitting supplication (Yes / No)?
: Yes
If Yes
b. Date of issue of ToR / Standard ToR : No.10-24/2015-IA-III dated 29 Feb 2016
c. MoEF&CC /SEIAA File No. : File No.10-24/2015-IA.III
Proposal No: IA/HP/MIS/30305/2015
d. Upload ToR Letter (PDF only) : Annexure 3
7 Details of Public Consultation
a. Whether the Project Exempted from
Public Hearing (Yes/No)?
: No
If Yes,
Reason : -
b. Supporting Document (upload pdf
only)
: -
3
c. Whether details of Public Hearing
available (Yes/No)?
: Yes
If No,
d. Reason thereof : NA
Supporting Document (upload pdf
only)
: NA
If Yes,
e. Date of Advertisement of Public
Hearing
: 13.01.2017
f. Copy of advertisement in English
(Upload PDF only)
: Attached as Annexure 4
g. Whether Public hearing was presided
over by an officer of the rank of
Additional District Magistrate or
above (Yes/No)?
: Yes
If yes
h. Designation of Presiding Officer
(District Magistrate / District
Collector / Deputy Commissioner /
others – please specify)
: Additional District Magistrate
i. Copy of duly signed Proceedings of
Public Hearing in English (upload
pdf only)
: Attached as Annexure 4
j. Date of Public Hearing : 15.02.2017
k. Venue of Public Hearing : Project site
Village : Malot Bridge village, Dah Kulhara, Industrial area
Kandrori
Tehsil : Indora,
District : Kangra
State : Himachal Pradesh
l. Distance of Public Hearing Venue
from the Proposed Project (km)
: -
m. No. of people attended : 50+
n. If the multiple public hearings
conducted
: NA
Pl give the details of each PH as per
(e) to (o) above
: NA
8 Details of Project Configuration / Product (Multiple Entries Allowed)
a. Whether the project is New
(Yes/No?)
: Yes
If Yes,
b. Project Configuration : 7 MLD CETP
c. Product : Nil
Product/Activity(Capacity
area)
Quantity Unit Mode of transportation/transmission
of the product
Nil
Unit – Tons per annum(TPA),Maga Watt(MW),Hec(HA), kiloliters per day(KLPD), toms crush per day(TCD),
cubic meter per day (CMD), kilometer (km), Millions liter per day(MLD), Other
Mode of transportation,/ transmission of the product (Road, rail, conveyor, belt, pipe conveyor, Aerial ropeway,
combination of two or three modes, others)
9 If Expansion / Modernization / One Time Capacity expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion
under Clause 7(ii) / Modernization under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii))
a. Details of environmental clearance
granted earlier
: NA
(i) Date of issue of environmental
clearance
- -
(ii) MoEFCC / SEIAA File Number : -
4
(iii) Upload EC Letter : -
b. Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions
(i) Details of Regional Office of
MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB /
SPCB / UTPCC from which certified
report on compliance of earlier
environmental clearance conditions
obtained
: NA
(ii) Letter No : -
(iii) Status of Compliance : -
(iv) Certified report on compliance of
earlier environmental clearance
conditions (Including Monitoring
Report) (Upload pdf only)
: -
(v) Date of site visit : -
c. Details of Consent to Operate
(i) Whether consent to operate obtained
(Yes/No)?
: NA
If yes,
(ii) Upload Copies of all Consent to
operate obtained since inception
(Upload pdf only)
: NA
(iii) Date of issue : NA
(iv) Valid up to : -
(v) File No. : -
(vi) Application No. : NA
(vii) Upload Copy of Consent to operate
valid as on date (Upload pdf only)
: NA
d. Details of Capacity Expansion (Multiple Entries Allowed)
NA
e. Details of Configuration (Multiple Entries Allowed)
NA
10 Project Cost
a. Total Cost of the Project at current
price level (in Lakhs)
: Rs. 43.83 Crore
b. Funds Allocated for Environment
Management (Capital) (in Lakhs)
: Rs. 2 Crore
c. Funds Allocated Towards ESC
(Entrepreneur Social Responsibility)
(in Lakhs)
: -
d. Funds Allocated for Environment
Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring
per Annum) (in Lakhs)
: Rs. 50/- Lakhs
11 Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification
(Yes/No)? [provide name of WL/CPA/ESA/Interstate boundary / International boundary and
distance from the project
If Yes
a. Protected Area Notified Under the
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
: NA
b. Critically Polluted Areas as
identified by the Central Pollution
Control Board from Time to Time
: NA
c. Notified Eco Sensitive Areas : NA
d. Inter State Boundaries and
International Boundaries
: Yes( Punjab interstate boundary at distance in the 3.87 km W direction form the proposed project).
5
12 Whether project attracts the Specific Conditions specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification
(Yes/No)?
If Yes
a. If any Industrial Estate/Complex/
Export processing Zones/Special
Economic Zones/Biotech Parks/
Leather Complex with homogenous
type of industries such as Items 4(d),
4(f), 5(e), 5(f), or those Industrial
estates with pre-defined set of
activities (not necessarily
homogenous, obtains prior
environmental clearance, individual
industries including proposed
industrial housing within such
estates/complexes will not be
required to take prior environmental
clearance, so long as the Terms and
Conditions for the industrial
estate/complex are complied with
(Such estates/ complexes must have
a clearly identified management with
legal responsibility of ensuring
adherence to Terms and Conditions
of prior environmental clearance,
who may be held responsible for
violation of the same throughout the
life of the complex/estate
: NA
13 Raw Material / Fuel Requirement (Multiple Entries Allowed)
a. Details of Raw Material / Fuel Requirement
Raw
Material
/ Fuel
Quantity
per
Annum
Unit Source (in case of
import, please
specify country and
Name of the port
from which Raw
Material / Fuel is
received)
Mode of
Transport
Distance of Source
from Project Site (in
Kilometers) (In case of
import, distance from
the port from which
Raw Material / Fuel is
received)
Type of Linkage
(Linkage / Fuel
Supply Agreement
/ e auction / MoU /
LOA / Captive /
Open Market /
Others)
1 NA NA NA NA NA NA
In case of expansion proposals, total requirement of raw material / fuel shall be given - Unit: (tons per Annum (TPA), Mega Watt (MW), Hectares (ha), Kilo Litre per Day (KLD), Tons Crushed
per Day (TCD), Cubic Meter per Day, Kilometers (km), Million Liters per Day (MLD), Others)
- Mode of Transport/Transmission of Product (Road, Rail, Conveyor Belt, Pipe Conveyor, Arial Ropeway,
combination of two or three modes, Others)
b. Upload copy of Linkage / Fuel
Supply Agreement / e Auction /
Memorandum of Understanding /
Letter Of Allocation / Captive source
/ others.
: NA
14 Baseline Data (Air / Water / Noise / Soil / Ground water table / Others)
a. Period of Baseline Data Collection
From (DD/MM/YYYY) : February 2016
To (DD/MM/YYYY) : April 2016
b. Season (Summer / Pre-monsoon /
Post-monsoon / Winter
: Post -monsoon
c. No. of Ambient Air Quality (AAQ)
Monitoring Locations
: 10 Locations
d. Details of AAQ Monitoring (Multiple Entries Allowed)
6
Criteria
Pollutants
Unit Maximum Value Minimum Value 98 Percentile
Value
Prescribed
Standard
PM10 µg/m3 45.3 23.70 - 100
PM2.5 µg/m3 23.5 12.8 - 60
SO2 µg/m3 16.23 5.2 - 80
NOx µg/m3 19.40 9.5 - 80
- Criteria Pollutants: (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Other parameters specific to sector)
- Unit: (Micro Gram per Meter Cube, Nano Gram Meter Cube, Mili Gram per Meter Cube, NA)
e. No. of Ground Water Monitoring
Locations (Multiple Entries Allowed)
: 7 Locations
f. Details of Ground Water Monitoring
Attached As Annexure 5
- Criteria Pollutant: (pH, TSS, TDS, Total hardness, Chlorides, Fluoride, Heavy Metals, other
parameters specific to the sector)
- Unit: (mg/l, NA)
g. No. of Surface Water Monitoring
Locations
: 3 Location
h. Details of Surface Water Monitoring (Multiple Entries Allowed)
Attached in Annexure 6
- Parameter: (pH, DO, BOD, COD, other parameter specific to the sector)
i. No. of Ambient Noise Monitoring
Locations
: 10 Locations
j. Details of Noise Monitoring (Multiple Entries Allowed)
Station Name Unit Observation dB (A) 98th Percentile value Standards
Day Time Night Time Day Time Night Time
Project
Location dB (A) 48 40
- 75 70
Kandorori dB (A) 58.3 55.6 - 55 45
Naushenra
Nalbandan dB (A) 54 49.4
- 55 45
Balkhor dB (A) 55 45.1 - 55 45
Mangwal dB (A) 51.2 44.3 - 55 45
Dharwal dB (A) 57.1 51 - 55 45
Raja Khasa dB (A) 56.3 53.1 - 55 45
Phulra dB (A) 51.8 49.9 - 55 45
Damtal dB (A) 52.6 43.2 - 55 45
Indora dB (A) 54 44 - 55 45
- Parameter: (Leq (Day), Leq (Night)
- Unit: (A weighted decibels(dB(A))
k. No. of Soil Monitoring Locations
(Multiple Entries Allowed)
: 8 Locations
Attached as Annexure 7
l. Ground Water Table
i Range of Water Table Pre Monsoon Seasons (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)):
From : 1.56 To : 15.44
ii Range of Water Table Post Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)):
From : 0.48
To : 12.30
iii Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there (Yes/No)?
If Yes,
(i) Upload Copy of Central Ground
Water Authority Letter (Upload PDF
only)
: NA
(ii) Letter No. : NA
(ii) Date of Issue : NA
7
15 Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) (Multiple Entries Allowed)
a. Details
Source Quantity in KLD Method of water
withdrawal
Distance from
Source
Mode of
Transport
Water
tanker 0.675 CMD
NA - water tanker
- Source: Surface / Ground water / Sea / Others
- Mode of Transportation: Pipeline / Canal / Others
- Method of water withdrawal: Barrage / Weir / Intake Well / Jack well / Tube well / Open well/ Others
b. Upload Copy of Permission from
Competent Authority (Upload pdf
only)
: NA
c. Letter No. : -
d. Date of Issue : -
e. Permitted quantity : -
f. Whether Desalination is proposed
(Yes/No)
: No
If Yes,
(i) Desalination capacity (KLD) : NA
(ii) Quality of Brine (KLD) : NA
(iii) Mode of Disposal of brine : NA
16 Waste Water Management (During Operation)
Installation of 5 MLD CETP Plant for treatment of Waste water of various industries like Food based,
Paper based, Textile, Chemical, Detergent, Pharma, glass & ceramic, mechanical and allied product,
service establishment, engineering, steel furniture, steel wire, wooden furniture.
a. Total Waste Water Generation Expected flow from Industries 7000 cum/day
b. Total Discharged Water Nil
c. Total Reused Water 6720 CMD
17 Solid Waste Generation
Management (Multiple Entries
Allowed)
Bio sludge can be used as manure
Used oil will be sold to the registered dealer/vendor.
The chemical inorganic hazardous sludge will be
sent to the solid waste management facility for final
disposal. Discarded containers will be
decontaminated and given to the state authorized
vendor.
- Item: (Industrial waste, Municipal Solid Waste, Fly ash, Bottom Ash, Hazardous Waste (as per
Hazardous and Other Waste Management Rules 2016), E Waste, Bio Medical waste, Construction
& Demolition waste, Plastic Waste, Others)
- Unit: (Tons, Kiloliter)
- Mode of Disposal: (Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF), Authorized Re cyclers,
Landfills, Sanitary Landfills, Others)
18 Air Quality Impact Prediction (Multiple Entries Allowed)
NA
- Parameter: (PM10, PM, SO2, NOx, Other parameters specific to the sector)
- Unit: (Microgram per Meter Cube, NA)
19 Power Requirement
a. Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (KVA)) : 2,000 kW
b. Source : Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board
c. Upload Copy of Agreement (Upload
pdf only)
: NA
d. Standby Arrangement (Details of
DG Sets)
: 1000 KVA: 2 nos.
e. Stack Height (in m) : As per CPCB norms
20 Land Ownership Pattern (Prior to the project proposal) in Ha
a. Forest land : NA
b. Private Land : NA
c. Government Land : Yes
8
d. Revenue Land : NA
e. Other Land : NA
Total land :
21 Present Land Use breakup in Ha
a. Agriculture Area : -
b. Waste/Barren Area : -
c. Grazing / Community Area : -
d. Surface Water bodies : -
e. Settlements : -
f. Industrial : 72 Industrial development
g. Forest : -
h. Mangroves : -
i. Marine area : -
j. Others (Specify) : 3.477 Ha. Allotted for Proposed CETP
Total : -
22 Land requirement for various activities
(Multiple entries allowed) in Ha
The Department of Industries has acquired 72 hectares of Govt. land for development of Industrial area in
Pandoga, The project has earmarked about 34771 sq. m. for CETP
Land Description Area in (Sq.mt) Area in %
Process Area 20932.2 60.19
Ancillary / supporting buildings 177.36 0.51
Storage Area 215.62 0.62
Internal Roads Area 1797.97 5.17
Parking Area 77.36 0.51
Green belt /plantation 11476.41 33.0
Total area 34771 100
- Activity / Facility / Plant / Others include: Main Plant, Township, Greenbelt, Ash pond, Quarry area,
OB dump Area, Safety zone, Tailing pond, Landfill, Water reservoir, De salination plant, Area for
solid waste management, Built up area, others
23 Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km): WLS Wild Life Species; NPA Notified
Protected Area; ESAs Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs Eco Sensitive Zones
a. Details of Ecological Sensitivity:
Details of Ecological Sensitivity Name Distance from the Project (Km) Remarks
Sub: Proposed Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) of 7 MLD at Khasra No. Malot 490, Bari -221/172/3, Kandrori -429/1,430/4,43015 of Village Khandrori, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra(Himachal Pradesh) by Mis Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited _Terms of Reference (ToR) reg.
Ref.: Your online proposal no. IA/HP/MIS/30305/2015 dated 25.08.2015.
Sir,
Kindly refer your online proposal no IAlHP/MIS/30305/2015 dated 25.08.2015 alongwith projectdocuments including Form-I, Pre-feasibility Report and draft Terms of Reference' as per the EIANotification, 2006. It is noted that proposal is for setting up of the Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP)
I of 7 MLD at Khasra No. Malot 490, Bari -221/172/3, Kandrori -429/1,430/4,430/5 of Village Khandrori, TehsilIndora, District Kangra (Himachal Pradesh) by Himachal Pradesh State Industrial DevelopmentCorporation Limited.
2. Draft Terms of Reference (TOR) have been discussed and finalized by the 153rd and 2nd ExpertAppraisal Committee (Infrastructure -2) held during 18th _ zo" November, 2015 and zo" - 21st January,2016 respectively for preparation of EIAIEMP report. The Committee prescribed the following TOR inaddition to Standard TOR provided at Annexure-1 for preparation of EIA-EMP report :
i. Importance and benefits of the project.ii. A chapter on Quantification and Characterization of inlet characteristic including methodology
adopted.iii. Process flow diagram of the proposed CETP.iv. Layout plan of CETPv. Cost of project and time of completion.vi . Total area earmarked for CETP.vii. Method for conveyance of effluent from the individual industrial unit to CETP.viii. Reuse and Recycle option of treated effluent.ix. Environment Management Planx. Disaster Management Plan.xi. Layout plan of proposed Greenbelt.xii. Status of court case pending against the project.xiii. A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TORs.
xiv. Public hearing to be conducted and issues raised and commitments made by the projectproponent on the same should be included in EIAIEMP Report in the form of tabular chartwith financial budget for complying with the commitments made.
3. These 'TORs' should be considered for the preparation of EIA 1 EMP report for setting up of theCommon Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) of 7 MLD at Khasra No. Malot 490, Bari -221/172/3, Kandrori _429/1,430/4,43015 of Village Khandrori, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra (Himachal Pradesh) by HimachalPradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited in addition to a" the relevant information as perthe 'General Structure of EIA' given in Appendix "I and "IA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The EIA/EMP asper TORs should be submitted to the Chairman, HP Pollution Control Board, (SPCS ) for publicconsultation. The SPCB shall conduct the public hearinglpublic consultation as per the provisions of EIAnotification, 2006.
4. You are requested to kindly submit the final EIAIEMP report prepared as per TORs andincorporating all the issues raised during Public Hearing 1 Public Consultation to the Ministry for considering
/4tle proposal for environmental clearance within 3 years as per the MoEF a.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.1I (I)/ dated 8th October, 2014.
5. The consultants involved in the preparation of EIAIEMP report after accreditation with QualityCouncil of India 1 National Accreditation Board of Education and Training (QCIINABET) would need toinclude a certificate in this regard in the EIAIEMP reports prepared by them and data provided by otherOrganization(s)/Laboratories including their status of approvals etc. ,
kL-Copy to:
1. The Addl, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Central), Regional Office (Northern Zone), SayNo.24-25, Sector 31-A, Dakshim Marg, Chandigarh-160030.
2. The Chairman, Himachal Pardesh State Pollution Control Board, Him Parivesh, Phase-III, New Shimla-171009, Himachal Pradesh (INDIA)
(A.N. Singh)Scientist 'D'
7(~J: TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR COMMONEFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANTS (CETPs) INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT
i. Reasons for selecting the site with details of alternate sites examined/rejected/selected on merit withcomparative statement and reason/basis for selection. The examination should justify site suitability in termsof environmental angle, resources sustainability associated with selected site as compared to rejected sites.The analysis should include parameters considered along with weightage criteria for short-listing selectedsite.
ii. Details of the land use break-up for the proposed project. Details of land use around 10 km radius of theproject site.
iii. Details of member units, its production capacity, waste generation, characteristic and details of primarytreatment provided by the member units.
iv. Details on present treatment and disposal systems
v. Details of effluent collection system from member units level.
vi. Examine and submit details of-inlet characteristics.
vii. Details of the CETPwith design parameters. Layout plan of CETP.And open spaces.
viii. Details of the adequate power back up facility, to meet the energy requirement in case of power failure fromthe grid.
ix. Details of the usage of treated effluent for green belt development and horticulture.
x. Submit a copy of MoU made between the Member units.
xi. Details of storage facility available at the CETP.
xii. Examine and submit details of sludge / solid waste generated and method of disposal.MoU in this regard.
xiii. Details of water requirement, source and water balance chart.
xiv. Details of green belt
xv. Details of performance monitoring, lab facility with technical persons
Details of water meters for inflow and outflow monitoring etcxvi.
***
Page 3 of 3
Public Consultation
Public hearing (consultation) was conducted on 15.02.2017 at project site.
Glimpses of Public Hearing
Annexure
Ground Water Quality Analysis Results
Sr. Description Unit Damtal Montali Indora Ghaila Kulara Ghandran Kursan