Item #7 333 Rosemary

Case # 635FSignificance & Compatibility

Review333 Rosemary

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item #7

September 12, 2016

CASE NO. 635F Consider a request of Elizabeth Haynes,Architect, representing Jack Dabney, owner, forthe significance and compatibility review of themain structure located at 333 Rosemary underDemolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April12, 2010) in order to encapsulate 100% of theexisting street facing façade to construct anaddition to the front of the existing singlefamily residence.

SUMMARY Encapsulate 100% of the existing street

facing façade

Construct an addition to the front of theexisting single family residence.

4

BACKGROUND

Zoned SF-A North side of Rosemary, approximately

200 ft. west of N. New Braunfels Ave.

5

6

LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 14,500 14,500Main House Footprint 1,405 3,884Front Porch 304 159Side Porch 1 52Side Porch 2Rear PorchGarage Footprint 400 400Carport FootprintShed(s) FootprintBreezewaysCovered Patio StructureOther Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 2,109 / 14,500 4,495 / 14,500Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 14.5% 31%

7

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 14,500 14,500Main House 1st Floor 1,405 3,884Main House 2nd Floor 256 256Garage 1st Floor 400 400Garage 2nd Floor

Other Structures

FAR / Lot Area 2,061 / 14,500 4,540 / 14,500

Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 14% 31%

8

POLICY ANALYSIS

28’in height (max 33’) - measured fromthe lowest point of the lot to the highestpoint of the structure (actual grade as the lot slopes more

than 10%).

9

POLICY ANALYSIS

Complies with all regulations concerningsetbacks, height, and loomingstandards.

Building Materials Hardie siding Stucco Standing seam metal Roof

10

POLICY ANALYSIS

Tree removal. 3 Trees to be removed 12” Anaqua, 12” Oak, and 24” Ash No heritage trees being removed

11

POLICY ANALYSIS The existing 1,405 sq. ft. home was built in

1929. No evidence that the home was built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance

12

EXISTING SITE PLAN

13

EXISTING STRUCTURE

14

EXISTING STRUCTURE

15

PROPOSED SITE PLAN

16

17

FRONT ELEVATION

18

REAR ELEVATION

19

RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION

20

LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

21

RENDERING

22

EXISTING STREETSCAPE

23

PROPOSED STREETSCAPE

24

ARB RECOMMENDATION

No significance in the existing structure

Addition is compatible

Approved as requested

25

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (5)

Oppose: (0)

QUESTIONS?