Top Banner
IT Governance 2 nd . Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012
30

IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Corey Burke
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

IT Governance

2nd. Part

Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L

Universidad Regiomontana

Otoño-2012

Page 2: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Six Step Process for Alignment(Luftman & Brier, 1999)

Page 3: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Vertical & Horizontal AlignmentGuldentops (2003)

Page 4: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Vertical & Horizontal Alignment Benbya and McKelvey [ 2006].

• They defined a model which highlights the relevance of analysing the relationship between Business and IT (Horizontal Alignment) but also the need to reconcile the views at different levels of analysis (Vertical Alignment).

• Alignment is a continuous co-evolutionary process that reconciles top-down ‘rational designs’ and bottom-up ‘emergent processes’ of all components of Business/IT relationships at three levels of analysis:

• Strategic• Operational and• Individual

Page 5: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Cont. . . Vertical & Horizontal Alignment Benbya and McKelvey [ 2006].

Page 6: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Enablers & Inhibitors of Strategic Alignment

Page 7: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Value of IT at different levels of organization (Weill & Broadbent, 1998)

• This model considers 4 Dimensions:

Strategic D

Information D

Transactional D

Infrastructure D

considers the benefits for the organization (at strategic level) that the use of IT can bring: - competitive advantage, - strategic alignment and - better customer

relations

Page 8: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Value of IT at different levels of organization (Weill & Broadbent, 1998)

• This model considers 4 Dimensions:

Strategic D

Information D

Transactional D

Infrastructure D

deals with the value that IT brings to the organization as a result of the improved information, be it in terms of: - accessibility, - quality or - flexibility.

Page 9: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Value of IT at different levels of organization (Weill & Broadbent, 1998)

• This model considers 4 Dimensions:

Strategic D

Information D

Transactional D

Infrastructure D

explores the benefits that IT provides to the organization in: - operational transactions, - repetitive activities and - any activities that don´t require intellectual effort.

Page 10: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Value of IT at different levels of organization (Weill & Broadbent, 1998)

• This model considers 4 Dimensions:

Strategic D

Information D

Transactional D

Infrastructure D

deals with the benefits that investments in technological equipment related to the functioning of the IS bring to the organization, like: - personal computers, - printers, - operational systems etc l

Page 11: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Value of IT at different levels of organization (Weill & Broadbent, 1998)

Manage cost

Measure performance

Page 12: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Performance Measure

Page 13: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Risk Management in IT• Is Tthe business risk associated with the use,

ownership, operation, involvement, influence and adoption of IT within an enterprise.

• In other words: business value preservation.• ISO 27001 Information Security Management

Systems

Page 14: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

What are the questions?

Page 15: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Symptomatic

To Discover IT Issues. . .

• How often do IT projects fail to deliver what they promised?

• Are end-users satisfied with the quality of the IT service?

• Are sufficient IT resources, infrastructure and competencies available to meet strategic objectives?

• What has been the average overrun of IT operational budgets? How often and how much do IT projects go over budget?

• How much of the IT effort goes to firefighting rather than enabling business improvements?

Page 16: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

To Find Out How Management Addresses the IT Issues…

• How well are enterprise and IT objectives aligned?• How is the value delivered by IT being measured?• What strategic initiatives has executive management

taken to manage IT’s criticality relative to maintenance and growth of the enterprise, and are they appropriate?

• Is there an up-to-date inventory of IT risks relevant to the enterprise? What has been done to address these risks?

How do

they

manage!

Page 17: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

IT GovernanceStructures, Process &

Relational Mechanisms

Page 18: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Peterson Model (2003) of IT Governance Structures, Process & Relationship Mechanisms

ProcessStructural

Mechanisms

RelationshipMechanisms

IT GovernanceFramework

IT GovernanceOutcomes

Page 19: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

What are IT Governance Structural Mechanisms?

• IT organisation structure (including placement in the overall organization structure)

• Roles and responsibilities• IT strategy committee• IT steering committee• CIO and the Board • project steering committees• special advisory board• special task force

• IT organisation structure (including placement in the overall organization structure)

• Roles and responsibilities• IT strategy committee• IT steering committee• CIO and the Board • project steering committees• special advisory board• special task force

Page 20: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

What are IT Governance Process?

• Formal budgeting process• Evaluation methods• Balanced (IT) scorecards• Strategic Information Systems

Planning• COBIT, ITSM and ITIL• Service Level Agreements• Prioritization framworks &

information economics• Strategic Alignment Model• Business/IT alignment models• IT Governance maturity models

• Formal budgeting process• Evaluation methods• Balanced (IT) scorecards• Strategic Information Systems

Planning• COBIT, ITSM and ITIL• Service Level Agreements• Prioritization framworks &

information economics• Strategic Alignment Model• Business/IT alignment models• IT Governance maturity models

Page 21: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Communications & Relationship Mechanisms

• Active participation by principle stakeholders

• Collaboration between principle stakeholders

• Partnership rewards and incentives (important!)

• Business/IT position

• Active participation by principle stakeholders

• Collaboration between principle stakeholders

• Partnership rewards and incentives (important!)

• Business/IT position

• Shared understanding of business/IT objectives

• Active conflict resolution (‘non-avoidance’)

• Cross-functional business/IT training

• Cross-functional business/IT job rotation

• Shared understanding of business/IT objectives

• Active conflict resolution (‘non-avoidance’)

• Cross-functional business/IT training

• Cross-functional business/IT job rotation

Page 22: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

COBIT & IT Governance

Page 23: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

COBITControl Objectives for Information and related Technology• COBIT contains a framework responding to

management’s need for control and measurability of IT services, by providing tools to assess and measure the enterprise’s IT capability for the 34 COBIT IT processes.

• The tools include:– Performance measurement elements (outcome measures

and performance drivers for all IT processes)– A list of critical success factors,– Nontechnical best practices for each IT process– Maturity models to assist in benchmarking and

decision-making for capability improvements

Page 24: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

Framework IT Governance

Page 25: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

34 IT Process within COBIT 4.0

Page 26: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

IT Governance & COBIT Mappings

Page 27: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

COBIT, ITIL & IT-Gov

• Maping ITIL V.3 with COBIT 4.1 (available in Blackboard).

Page 28: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.
Page 29: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.
Page 30: IT Governance 2 nd. Part Fernando Edgar Díaz-Prado L Universidad Regiomontana Otoño-2012.

IT Strategy drives IT Process

• Different strategy, different important process (e.g. mining vs banking)

Value of IT

Different process of on

different organizations

Slide 39