Top Banner
NEW HANOVER COUNTY The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina. IsPOD Data Results Spring 2010
17

IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

Mar 29, 2016

Download

Documents

IsPOD Data Results Spring 2010 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved. 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved. ID School Name Grades 1-2 Grades 3-5 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved. 2 SPARK Trained? Using FG? 2009- 2010 ADM FG Response Rates # Staff Trained
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved.

NEW HANOVER

COUNTY

The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and

Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health

and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program

is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education

groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina.

IsPOD Data Results

Spring 2010

Page 2: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation

Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved.

New Hanover County

SPARK Training

Staff from New Hanover County began receiving SPARK training in the 2008-

2009 school year with the KBR Grant. New Hanover County has 33 K-8 public

schools. Of these 33 schools, 28 schools (or 85%) have received SPARK

training. At these schools, a total of 43 PE teachers and 3 coordinators have

been trained in SPARK. Table 1 shows the New Hanover County K-8 schools

that have received SPARK training and the number of staff trained. FitnessGram

Response Rates are also given for each of the K-8 schools.

Page 3: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

2

Table 1

New Hanover County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARK Training and FitnessGram Response Rates

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2009-2010 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

304 Bradley Creek Elementary 339 33% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

308 Carolina Beach Elem 428 16% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

309 Castle Hayne Elementary 415 NA YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

310 Charles P Murray Middle 843 0% YES 2 NO NA 0% 0%

312 R Freeman Engineering 348 0% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

316 College Park Elementary 380 100% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

320 D C Virgo Middle 285 74% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

323 Edwin A Anderson Elem 611 39% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

324 Edwin A Alderman Elem 279 58% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

325 Emma B Trask Middle 850 45% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

328 Forest Hills Elementary 462 66% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

332 Gregory Elementary 396 51% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

338 Heyward C Bellamy Elem 608 40% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

339 Holly Tree Elementary 489 26% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

341 John J Blair Elementary 610 39% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

345 Lake Forest Academy 37 92% YES 1 NO 0% 0% 0%

346 Mary C Williams Elem 400 86% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

348 Murrayville Elementary 627 41% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

350 M C S Noble Middle 887 27% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

351 Myrtle Grove Middle 962 32% YES 3 NO NA NA 0%

353 Dr Hubert Eaton Sr Elem 576 13% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

354 Lakeside 70 100% NO 0 NO NA NA 0%

356 Ogden Elementary 666 13% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

362 Pine Valley Elementary 553 39% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

364 Roland-Grise Middle 763 40% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

366 Dr John Codington Elem 528 14% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

368 Sunset Park Elementary 306 93% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

380 Walter L Parsley Elem 602 15% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

384 A H Snipes Acad of Arts 491 94% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

392 Williston Middle 600 74% YES 4 NO NA NA 0%

400 Winter Park Model Elem 336 75% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

404 Wrightsboro Elementary 470 57% NO 0 NO 0% 0% NA

408 Wrightsville Beach Elem 320 6% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

Page 4: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

3

New Hanover County

FitnessGram Response Rates

In spring 2010, none of the New Hanover County K-8 schools conducted

FitnessGram assessments and submitted their data. Table 2 shows the

FitnessGram Response Rates by grade for all New Hanover County K-8 schools

combined.

Page 5: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

4

Table 2

FitnessGram Response Rates

For 0 K-8 Schools in New Hanover County

Grade 2009-2010

Average Daily Membership

FitnessGram Response Rate

Number of FG Student Ids

Percent of ADM

1st 1970 0 0%

2nd 1883 0 0%

3rd 1925 0 0%

4th 1964 0 0%

5th 1786 0 0%

6th 1739 0 0%

7th 1761 0 0%

8th 1716 0 0%

Page 6: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

5

Body Mass Index (BMI)

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 56% 57% 937 528 884 500

2nd 55% 57% 1175 642 1209 689

3rd 57% 55% 9670 5556 10075 5558

4th 54% 52% 9624 5227 10103 5260

5th 53% 51% 9396 4961 9857 5043

6th 54% 50% 3528 1893 3550 1785

7th 57% 52% 3315 1897 3149 1644

8th 56% 54% 3174 1780 3321 1802

56%

55% 57%

54%

53%

54% 57%

56%

57%

57%

55%

52%

51%

50%

52%

54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 7: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

6

Body Mass Index (BMI)

New Hanover County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 0 K-8 Schools in New Hanover County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd NA NA 0 0 0 0

3rd NA NA 0 0 0 0

4th NA NA 0 0 0 0

5th NA NA 0 0 0 0

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

Page 8: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

7

PACER

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

4th 95% 61% 6952 6625 7321 4485

5th 82% 58% 6569 5398 6994 4047

6th 77% 54% 1882 1452 1936 1039

7th 68% 50% 1787 1222 1825 906

8th 58% 52% 1774 1036 1908 997

95%

82%

77%

68%

58%61%

58%

54%

50% 52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 9: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

8

PACER

New Hanover County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 0 K-8 Schools in New Hanover County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

4th NA NA 0 0 0 0

5th NA NA 0 0 0 0

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

Page 10: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

9

CURL-UP

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 83% 84% 917 759 879 742

2nd 78% 79% 1260 989 1300 1032

3rd 82% 82% 11285 9254 11683 9544

4th 80% 81% 11221 8954 11729 9512

5th 78% 80% 10865 8483 11370 9152

6th 86% 87% 3857 3316 3895 3373

7th 86% 87% 3477 2978 3427 2990

8th 84% 88% 3402 2869 3448 3029

83%

78% 82%

80%

78%

86%

86%

84%

84%

79% 82%

81%

80% 87%

87%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 11: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

10

CURL-UP

New Hanover County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 0 K-8 Schools in New Hanover County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd NA NA 0 0 0 0

3rd NA NA 0 0 0 0

4th NA NA 0 0 0 0

5th NA NA 0 0 0 0

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

Page 12: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

11

PUSH-UP

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 50% 63% 627 314 592 372

2nd 48% 62% 935 451 924 573

3rd 56% 70% 9157 5163 9527 6638

4th 52% 68% 9129 4713 9510 6475

5th 52% 66% 8900 4642 9309 6117

6th 68% 72% 3092 2093 3165 2272

7th 69% 72% 2768 1912 2742 1984

8th 68% 70% 2696 1830 2811 1965

50%

48%

56%

52%

52%

68%

69%

68%

63%

62%

70%

68%

66% 72%

72%

70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 13: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

12

PUSH-UP

New Hanover County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 0 K-8 Schools in New Hanover County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd NA NA 0 0 0 0

3rd NA NA 0 0 0 0

4th NA NA 0 0 0 0

5th NA NA 0 0 0 0

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

Page 14: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

13

SIT AND REACH

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 66% 64% 702 460 664 423

2nd 68% 66% 922 629 935 618

3rd 70% 69% 6371 4486 6681 4581

4th 69% 65% 6229 4292 6596 4319

5th 62% 62% 6219 3839 6558 4060

6th 58% 58% 2371 1376 2445 1413

7th 66% 65% 2197 1447 2134 1382

8th 66% 67% 2131 1411 2247 1510

66% 68%

70%

69%

62%

58%

66%

66%

64% 66% 69%

65%

62%

58%

65% 67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 15: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

14

SIT AND REACH

New Hanover County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 0 K-8 Schools in New Hanover County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd NA NA 0 0 0 0

3rd NA NA 0 0 0 0

4th NA NA 0 0 0 0

5th NA NA 0 0 0 0

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

Page 16: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

15

TRUNK LIFT

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 91% 88% 744 680 746 659

2nd 91% 92% 1063 963 1056 971

3rd 93% 91% 10281 9572 10608 9648

4th 84% 80% 10205 8587 10688 8573

5th 81% 77% 9821 7973 10336 8001

6th 83% 79% 3438 2859 3361 2646

7th 82% 77% 3231 2656 3086 2364

8th 84% 79% 3136 2631 3161 2492

91%

91% 93%

84%

81%

83%

82%

84%88% 92%

91%

80%

77%

79%

77%

79%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 17: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - NEW HANOVER 10OCT01

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

16

TRUNK LIFT

New Hanover County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 0 K-8 School in New Hanover County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd NA NA 0 0 0 0

3rd NA NA 0 0 0 0

4th NA NA 0 0 0 0

5th NA NA 0 0 0 0

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0