Top Banner
Is Television Culture? Well, Duh!
13

Is Television Culture?

Feb 26, 2016

Download

Documents

elan

Is Television Culture?. Well, Duh!. What sort of culture?. What is the most-watched television b roadcast?. Princess Diana’s Funeral? Moon Landing? Elvis: Aloha from Hawaii? Opening Ceremonies of the Beijing Olympics ? FIFA World Cup Final 2010?. By Country?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Is Television Culture?

Is Television Culture?Well, Duh!

Page 2: Is Television Culture?

What sort of culture?What is the most-watched television broadcast?

Princess Diana’s Funeral? Moon Landing? Elvis: Aloha from Hawaii?

Opening Ceremonies of the Beijing Olympics?

FIFA World Cup Final 2010?

Page 3: Is Television Culture?

By Country? USA: Super Bowl XLIV (New Orleans Saints vs.

Indianapolis Colts)--106.5 million Canada: Gold medal game of the Men's ice hockey

tournament at the 2010 Winter Olympics--16.6 million UK: 1966 FIFA World Cup Final--32.30 million Germany: FIFA World Cup (Germany vs. Italy)--57.66

million

Page 4: Is Television Culture?

On a weekly basis? PREMIER FOOTBALL

LEAGUE “League games are

broadcast to over 600m homes in 202 countries worldwide.”

“The potential is vast - an estimated audience of one billion watched Manchester United's match with Arsenal in November 2007.”

“Premier League going global,” By Chris Bevan and Jonathan Stevenson, BBC News, Thursday, 7 February 2008

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/7232378.stm

Page 5: Is Television Culture?

What’s Driving HDTV Sales?

Superbowls, Soccer, and PS3s

Page 6: Is Television Culture?

In 1947, Variety reported that the Dodgers-

Yankees World Series: “proved

conclusively that [TV] is better than

radio — and even better than a seat on

the first base line — when it comes to

dramatic moments.”

In the months following, the total

number of receivers doubled every four

months.Source:

Gary R. Edgerton, The Columbia History of American Television (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007), 86

Page 7: Is Television Culture?

The “Academy’s” Response

“Television has always been associated with the feminine, because of its position within the home and its historically greater appeal to female audiences. Part of its status as low other has to do with this association. Feminists fought hard to put television on the fi lm studies agenda. Work on soap operas, domestic sitcoms, and female-centered drama formed a crucial part of early television studies.”

--Michelle Hilmes

“Thus narratively complex television encourages, and even at times necessitates, a new mode of viewer engagement…Thus these programs convert many viewers to amateur narratologists, noting usage and violations of convention, chronicling chronologies, and highlighting both inconsistencies and continuities across episodes and even series...Narratively complex programming invites audiences to engage actively at the level of form as well, highlighting the conventionality of traditional television and exploring the possibilities of both innovative long-term storytelling and creative intraepisode discursive strategies.” –Jason Mittell

Page 8: Is Television Culture?

Number of television

textbooks with a full chapter

dedicated to sports

programming? Anyone want to guess?

Page 9: Is Television Culture?

On the other hand…A survey of television textbooks reveals an antipathy towards critical theory.

Page 10: Is Television Culture?

Generally discussed

Raymond Williams, Television

“Birmingham School” Cultural Studies

Communications Theory Formalism “Administrative” Social

Science Research Methods

Less-often discussed

Theodor W. Adorno, “How to Look at Television”

“Frankfurt School Cultural Studies

Post-Structuralism Non-formalist aesthetic

theory

Page 11: Is Television Culture?

A Provocation:“And the true middlebrow

may genuinely be mistaken in the small community for a genuine highbrow.”

Russell Lynes, “Highbrow, Lowbrow, Middlebrow” (1949)

Page 12: Is Television Culture?

A Provocation “The increasing strength of modern mass

culture is further enhanced by changes in the structure of the audience. The old cultured elite does not exist any more; the modern intelligentsia only partially corresponds to it. At the same time, huge strata of the population formerly unacquainted with art have become cultural ‘consumers.’ Modern audiences, although probably less capable of the artistic sublimation bred by tradition have become shrewder in their demands for perfection of technique and for reliability of information as well as in their desire for “services;” and they have become more convinced of the consumers’ potential power over the producer, no matter whether this power is actually wielded…

—Theodor W. Adorno, “How to Look at Television” (1954)

Page 13: Is Television Culture?

A Provocation “We propose to concentrate on issues

of which we are vaguely but uncomfortably aware, even at the expense of our discomfort's mounting, the further and the more systematically our studies proceed. The effort here required is of a moral nature itself: knowingly to face psychological mechanisms operating on various levels in order not to become blind and passive victims.”

—Theodor W. Adorno, “How to Look at Television” (1954)