IS 788 12.2 1 IS 788 [Process] Change Management Lecture: Process Redesign for Supply Chain and E-business (Harmon, Ch. 14, 15) Detailed look at a real-world process change case (El Sawy, Ch. 6)
IS 788 12.2 1
IS 788 [Process] Change Management
Lecture: Process Redesign for Supply Chain and E-
business (Harmon, Ch. 14, 15) Detailed look at a real-world process
change case (El Sawy, Ch. 6)
IS 788 12.2 2
Web-driven process change Some heuristics and observations from the
field Two separate drivers:1. Customer driven (B2C; assisted C2C, i.e. e-
Bay, Craig’s list) Most people who have discretionary income
have PC’s and internet access Wi-Max will make mobile truly ubiquitous ( and
cheap) Information – to drive them to brick sites On-line purchasing
IS 788 12.2 3
2. Integration-driven (B2B) Most of the dollar volume resides here
currently, though B2C, G2C get the buzz Substitute for EDI
More flexible Less expensive Because – the internet is based on open
protocols that use cheap ubiquitous infrastructure (phone lines)
IS 788 12.2 4
Changes to processes
Customer focus Integration focus (supply chain,
intranets) Internal (information sharing, KMS)
driven
IS 788 12.2 5
Customer focused change
BAD process analysis starts with and focuses on activities and details, missing the broader scope of the organization.
GOOD process analysis starts with the CUSTOMER and works back into processes
IS 788 12.2 6
Customer focused change (2)
CRM systems Adopting a CRM system (or building one
in-house) can require radical process changes. A few examples: Empowering workers to better deal with
customers (authority shifts) New systems with accompanying new roles
and training Moving emphasis outside the department
(new measures and incentives)
IS 788 12.2 7
Customer focused change (3) Portals (what does the term mean to
you?) Main access point to an organization or
function (i.e. HR) An interface between customers,
suppliers or employees Portals change processes!
Even information-only portals (if properly accomplished) change customer behavior and may require significant process change “downstream” (Larry – COBA portal?)
IS 788 12.2 8
Portals and web sites
Refer to Harmon, pp. 336 and 339 – the Travel-Is-Us reservation process
A single process – making a reservation – requires an interface with multiple entities
As soon as the reservation process goes on-line it must be automated (to meet customer expectations)
IS 788 12.2 9
Web-enabling a process The multiple interfaces must in turn
be automated e.g. to airlines, hotels and (not mentioned in Harmon) credit card providers
The process redesign team should specify the functionality desired of the portal, but . . .
The portal, the automated reservation system and the interfaces are all IT responsibilities
IS 788 12.2 10
Process team involvementextends to screen sketchesand use-cases.
IS people in process teamsshould excel at this type of process design bridging between business function and enablingtechnology.
IS 788 12.2 11
Supply chain involvement in customer focused web processes
Widget Manufacturing (Harmon, p. 345)
Simple web ordering for a manufacturing company can extend the process through multiple functional areas (in real time – and this is the issue).
Look at the purchase and product inquiry processes (next ppt).
IS 788 12.2 12
These processes nowinstantaneously crossmultiple internal functionalareas.
Who owns them?
They always did involvemultiple areas but now all areas have to beautomated. Very significantIT consequences.
IS 788 12.2 13
Candidates for web-enablement by industry (Harmon, pp. 348, 49)
And the list goes on and on.
We all USE these functions, but who has thought through the process implications of web-enabling (and thus of necessity automating) them?
IS 788 12.2 14
Supply chain and internal e-business applications
Suppliers and subcontractors can be brought into play for customer enabled apps (ex. customer status or delivery inquiries)
But, e-coordinating supply chain actors has more significant benefits in its own right
All such integrations have enormous process change implications.
IS 788 12.2 15
Supply chain evolution Supply chain concern implies internal
manufacture of goods and/or services With the advent of global outsourcing
and virtual businesses a newer, more accurate term is “collaborative applications”. Essentially your organization serves as a prime contractor and must manage your subcontractors through these systems.
IS 788 12.2 16
Early ‘integrated supply chain’ exemplar
Wal Mart and Proctor and Gamble P&G stocks Wal Mart’s shelves and
then invoices Requires P&G have access to WM sales
and stock What are the implications for process
How many processes are changed? What are the changes? How many changes involve IT?
IS 788 12.2 17
Cherry picking (easy wins)
Almost all un-integrated supply chains contain 2X the stock necessary for an integrated supply chain.
Harmon speculates that in the future business competition will be between supply chains (alliances) rather than individual companies!
IS 788 12.2 18
Supply chain modeling
Primary foci: inventory, transportation, resources, locations
Inherent conflicts: Every manufacturer wants to produce in
large quantities. Retailers want to purchase only what
they need Inventory is the resultant compromise
(for either or both parties)
IS 788 12.2 19
Supply chain modeling (2)
Inherent conflicts (2): The least expensive transportation cost
is for large bulk shipments Retailers want to purchase only what
they need – ship on demand Inventory is the resultant compromise
(for either retailer or manufacturer) Intermediaries (distributors) are part of
the compromise
IS 788 12.2 20
The net result:
Negotiations, contracts, teams and processes that extend farbeyond the traditional organizational boundary.
IS 788 12.2 21
Satisfaction mechanisms:Examples: steel – worked chips – didn’t
How does this change the traditional process?
IS 788 12.2 22
Satisfaction mechanisms (2):
How does this change the traditional process? Public, private. What’s
the difference?
Harmon, fig. 15.5 illustratesa public process
IS 788 12.2 23
The effects of globalization
The process must includemeasures and checks onall individual suppliers and distributors but must include a consolidatedview as well. (Compare to the Western Digital example.)
IS 788 12.2 24
Process change (activity level) feedingmultiple ‘higher-level’processes.
Analysis at the ‘Setup Process’ levelfeeds KM, DSS and training processes.