This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Measurement of Pedestrian Flow Parameters – Case study of Dakor,
Gujarat
Chhaya Brahmbhatt1, Dr. L. B. Zala2, Dr. Mukti Advani3
1 IInd Year M.Tech(TSE) Student, Civil Engineering Department, B V M Engineering College, Gujarat, India 2 Head of Department, Civil Engineering Department, B V M Engineering College, Gujarat, India 3 Scientist, Transportation Planning Division, Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------Abstract: - In India, for different religious reasons, people
walk to certain places for worship. On few specific events,
this gathering used to be very large and needs special
attention with respect to pedestrians’ facilities on road for
walking safely and comfortably. The design of a roadway/
highway facility is possible only when capacity is related
to the projected requirements of traffic. The design
features governed by capacity are the highway type,
number of lanes, width of lanes, intersections and weaving
sections. By comparing the present traffic volume with the
capacity of existing roadway networks, their adequacy or
deficiency can be assessed.
In this paper one such location of Kheda district of Gujarat,
‘Dakor’ was studied at the time of peak hours for Level of
Service offered by the road segment. The results were
compared with both National and International standards.
Using frequency distribution for data, the PLOS is decided
based on Maximum frequency for particular PLOS. The
data for the same are given in Table 5 and 6.
7.1.1 As per HCM 2000
Table 5 Frequency distribution wrt PLOS criteria for
Space and Speed at study location
While comparing with HCM 2000, PLOS at study stretch
ranges between ‘B’ and ‘C’ wrt Space.
In Speed, PLOS fluctuates between ‘E’ for maximum of
time, then ‘A’ and then ‘F’.
7.1.2 As per Rima Sahani and P.K.Bhuyan. ”Pedestrian LOS Criteria for Urban Off-Street Facilities of Mid-Size Cities using SOM and ANN”. Indian Highways. April- 2015.
Table 6 Frequency distribution wrt PLOS criteria for
Space and Speed at study location
The PLOS comes out to be ‘F’ wrt space in Indian context.
And it is fluctuating between ‘A’ to ‘F’ when considered
wrt Speed, with ‘A’ for maximum of times, then ‘D’ and
then ‘C’.
8. CONCLUSION
For the same space and speed, difference is observed in
the Pedestrian Service Levels at the selected location when
compared with both Indian and International standards of
PLOS measurements.
This demands a careful study with respect to the
comparison of various criteria available in literature for
measuring the LOS for pedestrians.
REFERENCES Books
[1] Highway Capacity Manual 2000.
Research Papers [2] Rima Sahani, P.K.Bhuyan.2015.”Pedestrian LOS
Criteria for Urban Off-Street Facilities of Mid-Size cities using SOM and ANN”. Indian Highways.April-2015.
[3] Rajat Rastogi, Ilango Thanirasu & satish Chandra. 2011. “Design implications of walking speed for pedestrian facilities”. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 137:687-697.
[4] Ye Jianhong & Chen Xianhong.2011.”Optimal
measurement interval for pedestrian traffic flow modeling”. Journal of Transportation Engineering.137:934-943.
[5] William H K Lam & Chang Yu Cheung. 2000.
“Pedestrian speed/flow relationship for walking facilities in Hong Kong”. Journal of Transportation Engineering.126:343-349.
[6] Jodie Y.S.Lee, P.K.Goh and William
H.K.Lam.2005.”New Level-of-Service Standard for Signalized Crosswalks with Bi-directional Pedestrian Flows”. Journal of Transportation Engineering.131:957-960.
[7] Muhammad Moazzam Ishaque and Robert B.
Noland.2009.”Pedestrian and vehicle flow calibration in Multimodal Traffic Micro simulation”. Journal of Transportation Engineering.135:338-348.
[8] Marwan Al-Azzawi and Robert Raeside.2007.”
Modeling Pedestrian Walking Speeds on Sidewalks”. Journal of Urban Planning and Development.133:211-219.
[9] Kotkar Kishor Laxman, Rajat Rastogi & Satish
Chandra.2010.” Pedestrian Flow Characteristics in Mixed Traffic Conditions”. Journal of Urban Planning and Development.136:23-33.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
[10] Maria Davidich, Florian Geiss, Hermann George Mayer, Alexander Pfaffinger, Christian Royer.2013.” Waiting zones for realistic modeling of pedestrian dynamics: A case study using two major German railway stations as examples”. Transportation Research Part C.37 (2013)210-222.
[11] Jiten Shah, G.J.Joshi, Purnima
Parida.2013.”Behavioural Characteristics of Pedestrian Flow on Stairway at Railway Station”.2nd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India.104:688-697.
and Manoj kumar biswala. 2013.”Modeling single file pedestrian motion across cultures”. 2nd Conference of Transportation Research Group of India.104:698-707.