IPTA TDWS ICAO Doc 9625 - Royal Aeronautical Society · •103 ICAO updates •>60% Concurrence •Several FUTURE items COUNT OF UPDATE ITEMS sum sum per regulatory body totals ICAO

IPTA TDWS&

ICAO Doc 9625

RAeS Flight Simulation ConferenceInnovation in Technology, Training

&

Impact of Regulatory Change

Itash Samani

Global Head of Regulatory Affairs - FSTD

London, UK – June 14th, 2018

AGENDA• ICAO Doc 9625 Overview/Primer

• Doc 9625 Structure & Purpose• Myths – What Doc 9625 Is & Is Not

• Summary of TDWS Activities 2017 /2018 / 2019• Updates to ICAO Doc 9625/ ICAO Annex 1• Formation of Technical Experts Groups• Promote Harmonization Effort

• Q&A ?

2

ICAO Doc 9625

Annex 1

MPL and Type Rating of multi-

crew aeroplanes + RP for CPL

Annex 6, Part I

OPS requirements for flight

crew training

PANS-TRAINING

Chapters to support Annex

requirements

Doc 9625 Structure

Doc 9625 Edition 4

Volume 1 Volume 2

Pilot TrainingTasks

FSTD Criteria

FSTDCriteria

(Training TypeDependent )

(FSTD FeatureDependent)

A Congruent & Harmonized Set of Global FSTD Standards

+ + = 100%

Evaluation

Handbooks

Doc 9625

FSTD StandardsDesign

Requirements

Document

= 100%

Flight Simulator Design and Performance Data Requirements

ARINC REPORT 450

PUBLISHED: December 1, 2016

Doc 9625 Myths

What Doc 9625 IS:

• Its The most current technical standard to support FSTD qualification• Includes requirements to address safety concerns

• Includes requirements to support use of current and future technologies

• Provides a basis for the mutual recognition of FSTD qualifications by ICAO states

• Helps provide access to training where devices are not available

• Increases value to the operator of the device

Doc 9625 Myths

What Doc 9625 IS NOT:

• Its not intended to replace the CAA regulation

• Its not intended for the body of the regulation, i.e. the normal operating requirements of the FSTD operations including the QMS.

Meeting Stakeholders Needs• FSTD Credits FSTD Technical Standards; cannot be delineated!

• Must have well defined FSTD technical standards• Based on what is trained

• Based on what industry is actually using/building

• Must have an Equitable system of device credits

• For optimum use of all device types/levels

• Generous & Based on Capability (not Hours)

• Must cater for qualified & non-qualified devices

19/06/2018 8

MPL, IR, PPL, CPL, TR, CR, RL , RO, Re, CQ, IO, ATPL, EBT, Etc.

Ultimate Goal: Single global standardFor FSTD Qualification

For FSTD Use in approved training

• Alignment of Global FSTD Standards => ICAO Doc. 9625 as the basis• Revise to meet todays training needs• Revise to modernize and futureproof• Ensure legacy devices protected through grandfathering• Technical Experts workgroups to support work

• Equitable system of Training Credits based on Device Fidelity• Training Capability Matrix – NGRS Matrix

• Updates of Edition 4• To include most current report from the SATCE Working Group

• ARINC Report 439: Guidance for Simulated Air Traffic Control Environments in Flight Simulation

• Annex I - correcting disparity on Type definitions• Alignment with FAA Part 60:

• Bounced Landing, Gusting X-Wind & Weight/CG for T/O and Landing

• Developed a process for stakeholders to submit requests for changes to Doc 9625

9

TDWS KEY OBJECTIVES 2017->2019

• TDWS Membership (Steering Committee)• Broad Representation from CAAs, OEMs, TDMs & Operators

• Invite more CAAs (Currently CASA, FAA,ANAC, +3…) – Associate Members

• Add/Replace positions vacated or to expand to areas not covered

• TDWS Technical Experts Groups (Technical & Training)• Visual Systems Requirements (VTEG)

• FTD Device Requirements (FTEG)

• RPAS Device Requirements (RTEG)

• Maintenance Training Devices (MTEG)*

• Others as required

*Proposed for TDWS consideration

10

TDWS Membership & Technical Experts Groups

VTEG Progress To Date

• Excellent contributions across VTEG, producing 121 update items for consideration.

• 60 EASA updates

• 103 ICAO updates

• >60% Concurrence

• Several FUTURE items

COUNT OF UPDATE ITEMS

sumsum per

regulatory body

totals

ICAO Aero 54 61

ICAO Helo 7

ICAO Both 0

ICAO, EASA Aero 6 42

ICAO, EASA Helo 3ICAO total

ICAO, EASA Both 33 103

EASA Aero 8 18

EASA Helo 8EASA total

EASA Both 2 60

ITEM STATUSConcurrence

Possible Concurrence Conflict

FUTURE

Display 31 10 19 2

IG 20 7 5 0

DB 5 1 0 0

HUD 1 1 2 0

NVG 1 0 0 0

VR/MR/AR 0 0 1 6

Latency 2 0 0 0

Misc 2 0 1 4

totals 62 19 28 12

Thank You.