IPCRF presentation

IPCRF Preparation

Mariches E. BeginoSHT 1

What should be considered?Objectives should be SMART

SpecificIs the result achievable? Can a supervisor verify the

result?What would be the result look

like?

MeasurableQuantity QualityTimeCost Effectiveness

AchievableIs the objective achievable in the

available resource of time?Is the work within the individual

control or view? Is the objective appropriate to the

individual experience skill and work level?

Is it appropriate within a job description?

RelevantEmployees JobRatee’s Objective Unit ObjectiveOrganization Objective

Time Bound

Within an specific measure of time frame

Example:

By ________/________/_________(When, Who? What? Include a number you can measure)will have ___________(How? Why? Remember to specify results using QET Criteria)

Remember:

If QET is hard to be done, then there is a problem with the objective ( Not SMART)3 objectives per KRATurn generic into specificPresence of at least 2 measure per

objective

QET:

Quantity – Raw Numbers, Percentages

Quality – e.g. Accuracy, Effectiveness

Efficiency- (e.g., pesos/money saved, time saved)

Timeliness- (e.g., within 3 months)

Remember: IPCRF is just like making LPObjective must start with the verb last is

time If the focus is person, use number not %Do not shortcut

New IPCRF Format

CCompetency

Lets Examine: (What is missing?)

Community Involvement Objective

Prepared and submitted complete 160 DLL within the scheduled date of checking.

Quality

5- Prepared and submitted 160 DLL 4- Prepared and submitted 150-159 DLL

3- Prepared and submitted 130-149 DLL 2- Prepared and submitted 120-129 DLL

1- Prepared and submitted 119 DLL and below.

Efficiency Timeliness

5- Submitted DLL on scheduled time. 4- Submitted DLL One (1) day late from scheduled checking.

3- Submitted DLL Two (2) days late from scheduled checking. 2- Submitted DLL Three (3) days late from scheduled checking

1- Submitted DLL Four (4) and more days late from scheduled checkin.g

Community Involvement Objective

Conducted six (6) general /parents assembly meeting with 75% parents attendance within the scheduled date.

Quality

5-conducted 6 GA meetings

4-conducted 5 GA meetings

3- conducted4 GA meetings

2-conducted 3 GA meetings

1- conducted1 or 2 GA meetings

Efficiency

5- conducted meetings /assemblies with 75% parents attendance. 4- with 70% to 74.99 % parents attendance.

3- with 65 % to 69.99 % parents attendance. 2- with 60 % to 64.99 % parents attendance.

1- with 5 0 % and below parents attendance.

Timeliness

5-Conducted Meetings on scheduled time. 4- Conducted meeting One (1) day late from the schedule date.

3-Conducted meeting Two (2) days late from the schedule date. 2- Conducted meeting Three (3) days late from the schedule date.

1- Conducted meeting Four (4) and more days late from schedule date.

SDO Cam. Norte Non Negotiables Teaching Learning (40%)

DLL Preparation (20%) Competencies (10%)

Pupils’ Outcome (30%) NAT Target (10%) Drop out Rate (10%)

Community Involvement (15%) 6 Gen. Assembly meeting (5%)

Community Involvement (15%)

Plus Factor used for IPCRF can not be used in promotion

Thank you for listening