INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS Name of Employee RIGINO T. MACUNAY, JR. Name of Rater DALIA P. RENOMERON Position Teacher -I Position Head Teacher -I Review Period June 2015-March 2016 Date of Review April 2016 Bureau/Center/Service/ Division DepEd, Leyte Division Major Final Output KRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELINE WEIGHT PER KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT RATING SCORE KRA 1 I. Teaching- Learning Process 1. Prepared 135 complete set of lessons plans throughout the rating period. 2. Utilized Visuals / Printed IM’s and other Manipulative instructional materials that are appropriate to the lesson’s objective June - March June - March (35%) 5% 12% 5- Prepared 180 and above complete set of lesson plans 4- Prepared 158 – 179 complete set of lesson plans 3- Prepared 135 – 157 complete set of lesson plans 2- Prepared 114 – 134 complete set of lesson plans 1- Prepared 113 – and below complete set of lesson plans 5- Utilized 5 varied instructional materials 4- Utilized 4 varied instructional materials 3- Utilized 3 varied 5 x.05 5x.12 0.250 o.600
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERSName of Employee RIGINO T. MACUNAY, JR. Name of Rater DALIA P. RENOMERONPosition Teacher -I Position Head Teacher -IReview Period June 2015-March 2016 Date of Review April 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division DepEd, Leyte Division
Major Final Outpu
tKRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELIN
E
WEIGHT PER KRA
PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
ACTUAL
RESULT
RATING
SCORE
KRA 1 I. Teaching-Learning Process 1. Prepared 135 complete set of
lessons plans throughout the rating period.
2. Utilized Visuals / Printed IM’s and other Manipulative instructional materials that are appropriate to the lesson’s objective
June - March
June - March
(35%)
5%
12%
5- Prepared 180 and above complete set of lesson plans4- Prepared 158 – 179 complete set of lesson plans3- Prepared 135 – 157 complete set of lesson plans2- Prepared 114 – 134 complete set of
3. a. (For classroom advisers) Established and maintained a classhome that is conducive for learning throughout the year with at least 75% of the Division Standard Classroom Evaluation Checklist achieved.
(Refer to the Division Standard Classroom Evaluation Checklist for Elem. And Sec.)
3. b. ( For special subject teachers) Prepared an updated board structuring and others required of the subject / assignment with 75% accomplishment. (Refer to monitoring checklist.)
4. Taught all competencies in the Budget of Lesson in all subject areas with 75% mastery
June - March
9%
5%
5- Met 96 – 100% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist
4- Met 86 -95% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist
3- Met 75- 85% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist
2- Met 50 – 74% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist
1- Met only 49% of the items on the Division Standard Classroom evaluation checklist
5- Accomplished 100% of the items
4-Accomplished 86 – 99% of the items
3-Accomplished 75 – 85% of the items
2-Accomplished 50 – 74% of the items
1- Accomplished only 49% and below
5- 95% and above of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery4 – 85 – 94% of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery3- 75- 84% of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery2- 65 – 74% of competencies were taught with at least 75% mastery1- 64% and below of competencies were
4 x.09
4 x.05
0.360
0.200
KRA 2
Pupils/Students Outcomes
5. Constructed / Updated 80 complete indexed IM’s / e IM’s ( 10 per subject area assigned).
1. Attained an average MPS of 75% in the NAT
2. Attained 0 drop-out rate in all classes handled
3. Zero-out non-readers ( for Grades 1 to 10)(Based on EGRA/ PHIL-IRI result)
June - March
June - March
June - March
June - March
June - March
4%
30%
5%
3%
3%
3%
taught with at least 75% mastery5- 100 or more completed indexed
IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated
4- 90 – 99 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated
3- 80-89 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated
2- 70-79 completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated
1 – 69 and below completed indexed IM’s/eIM’s were constructed or updated
5- 0 non-reader4- non- reader is only 1-2% of the class3-non-reader is only 3-4% of the class2- non-reader is only 5-6% of the class1- non-reader is 7% and above of the class
5 - 0 non- numerates
3 X.04
5X.05
4 X.03
5X.03
5X.03
0.120
1.53
0.250
0.120
0.150
0.150
4. Zero-out non-numerates (based on EGMA and other tests)
5. Increased the number of readers from non-reader to frustration level; from frustration to instructional /independent level in all classes handled(Note: Non-advisers will take the reading performance of the classes handled)
6. Zero-out failure rate in all classes handled
7. a. Updated school records (for teachers with advisory class)
June – March
June – March
June – March
3%
4%
3%
4 – non numerates is only 1-2% of the class3 – non-numerates is only 3-4% of the
class2- non-numerates is only 5-6% of the class1- non-numerates is 7% and above of the class
5-increased 5 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level4- increased 4 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level3- increased 3 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level2- increased 2 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level1- increased 1 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level
5- 0 failure rate4- average of 1-2 % failure rate3- average of 3-4 % failure rate2- average of 5-6 % failure rate1- average of 7% and above failure rate
5-all School Records listed below are updated Class Records/Grade Sheets
5 X.03
5X.04
4 X.03
0.150
0.200
0.120
SF 1 SF2 SF3 SF 4 SF 5 LIS Portal Class Records Form 138 Form 137 Grade Sheets Summative Test Questions with
TOS SReYA ECCD checklist / card
7 . b. Updated school records ( for special subject teachers )
8. Prepared and submitted any of the following reports as required
Quarterly Periodic Exam Results (MPS)
Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL-
June – March 3%
reflected the bases of students’ rating in all classes/subject areas handled
LIS was updated o or before the deadline
Updated SF 2 every month Updated Monthly Updated SF 1 and SF3 three weeks
after the opening of classes Updated From 138 and 137 every
quarter Updated Form 138,137, 9 and SF 5
t the end of the school year Four Quarterly tests with complete
Table of Specifications4- lacks 1 school record3- lacks 2 school records2- lacks 3 school records1- lacks 4 school records
5 – all School Records updated and /or submitted4- lacks 1 school record3- lacks 2 school records2- lacks 3 school records1- lacks 4 school records
5- Prepared and submitted all reports 2 days earlier than the deadline
4- Prepared and submitted all reports 1 day earlier than the deadline
3- Prepared and submitted all reports on the deadline
4 X.03 0.12
KRA 3
III. School and Community Involvement
IRI Oral and Silent, EGRA, MTB-MLE, Numeracy Test)
Form 48 Action Plan/ CIP Monthly Accomplishment
Report ECCD: Pre/Mid/Post Test SReYA Result Pre-Test /Post –Test Nutritional Status Report PFSTT GAD Report Others (pls. specify) Guidance Action Plan Students Ranklist Others
9. Conducted counselling sessions with supporting evidences.
1. Conducted at least 4 PTA meetings with the following MOV’s:
June – March
June – March
2%
10%
3%
2- Prepared and submitted all reports 1 day after the deadline
1- prepared and submitted all reports 2 days or more after the deadline
5- Conducted counselling sessions 5 times or more per month
4- Conducted counselling sessions 4 times per month
3- Conducted counselling sessions 3 times per month2- Conducted counselling sessions twice per month1- Conducted counselling session once per month
5- conducted 5 or more PTA meetings with complete MOVs
4- conducted 4 PTA meetings with complete MOVs
3- conducted 3 PTA meetings with MOVs
4X.02
5X.03
0.08
1.340
0.150
Agenda Attendance Sheets Minutes of the Meetings Others (pls. specify)
2. Attended School / District Meetings
3. Initiated the conduct of BRIGADA ESKWELA activities
3. Participated in at least three civic-oriented activities
June – March
Year round
June – May
2%
3%
2%
2- conducted 2PTA meetings with MOVs1- conducted 1 PTA meeting with MOVs
5 – 95 – 100% attendance in school /district meetings on time
4- 85 – 94% attendance in school/district meetings on time
3 – 75 -84% attendance in school/district meetings on time
2 – 55 – 74% attendance in school/district meetings on time
1 – 1-54% attendance in school/district meetings on time
5- conducted four (4) BRIGADA ESKWELA activities with complete documentation
4- conducted three (3) BRIGADAESKWELA activities with complete documentation
3- conducted two (2) BRIGADA ESKWELA activities with complete documentation
2- conducted one (1) BRIGADA ESKWELA activity with complete documentation
1- conducted BRIGADA activity with no documentation
5-participated 5 or more civic-oriented activities with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
4- participated 4 civic-oriented activities with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
1. Attended In-service trainings of at least 3 days conducted by DepEd
2.Earned units or Degree in post Graduate Studies
20%
10%
10%
5%
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)2- participated 2 civic-oriented activity
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)1- participated only 1 civic-oriented
activity with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
5-International /National Level4-Regional Level3-Division Level2-District Level1-School Based
5- Doctoral degree holder4- earned units in Doctoral degree3-Masteral Degree2-CAR in Masteral Degree1-units in Masteral Degree
5- International Level4- National Level3- Regional Level2- Division Level1- School / District Level
3 X.10
1 X.10
1
0.4600.300
0.100
0.400
C. Action Research
D. Chairmanship
5- Perfect attendance4- 1 to 2 absences3- 3 to 5 absences2- 6 to 8 absences1- 9 or more absences
5- Action Research Replicated by other schools
4- Implemented the Action Research by the SDS / ASDS
3- Approved Action Research by the SDS/ASDS2- Submitted Action Research Proposal to the SDS/ASDS1- Proposed Action Research to the Immediate Supervisor
5- 3 or more chairmanship school level4- 2 chairmanship school level3- 1 chairmanship or 4 or more membership school level2- active member in 3 or more comm. School level
PLUS FACTOR 2.75 0.1382.5-3.49 50-69% SATISFACTORY1.5-2.49 30-49% UNSATISFACTORY TOTAL 85.75 3.868
BELOW - 1.49 29% AND BELOW POOR DESCRIPTIVE RATING VERY SATISFACTORY
DALIA P. RENOMERON RIGINO T. MACUNAY, JR. Rater Ratee
Approved: TERESITA M. ANTOLIN Principal I
FINAL COPY OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MG TEACHERS
Name of Employee EVELIZA P. MADRAZO Name of Rater ERNEL S. MERANOPosition T-I Position TEACHER-IN CHARGEReview Period S.Y. 2015-2016 Date of Review APRIL 2016Bureau/Center/Service/Division DEPED/LEYTE DIVISION
Major Final
OutputKRA OBJECTIVE/s TIMELIN
EWEIGHT PER KRA
PERFORMANCEINDICATORS
ACTUALRESULT
RATING
SCORE
KRA 1 Teaching-Learning Process
3. Prepared 216 complete lesson plans throughout the rating period.
(8 lesson plans/week/grade level)
4. Taught 100% of the competencies in the Budget of Lesson in all subject areas with 75% average MPS of the Quarterly Test.
3. Effectively utilized instructional teaching strategies/techniques/approaches that are appropriate to the lessons’ objective
ICT/Multimedia Teaching
June - March
June - March
June - March
(35%)
5%
5%
5%
5- Prepared 288 above teaching plans for the school year4- Prepared 252-287 teaching Plan for the school year3- Prepared 216-251 teaching plans for the school year2- Prepared 180-215 teaching plans
for the school year1- Prepared 179 and below teaching
plans for the school year
MOV: Weekly Lesson Plan Checklist
5- 80% and above of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class
4- 75-79% of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class
3- 70-74% of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class
2- 29-56% of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class
1- 28% and below of pupils were able to get 75% MPS in the class
MOV: Quarterly Test Result
5- effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 96-100% from the School Head’s observation of the teacher
4- effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 86-95% from the School Head’s
4. Established and maintained a class home that is conducive for learning throughout the year with at least 75% of the Division Standard Class home Evaluation Checklist.
(For Grade 1-6 teachers refer to the Division Standard class home evaluation checklist for Elem. and Sec.)(For Kindergarten Teachers refer to Kindergarten Monitoring Tools)
June - March 5%
observation of the teacher3- effectively utilized appropriate
strategies as evident in 75-85% from the School Head’s observation of the teacher
2- effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 50-74% from the School Head’s observation of the teacher
1-effectively utilized appropriate strategies as evident in 49% and below from the School Head’s observation of the teacher
MOV: School Head/Master Teacher’s Observation of the Teacher
5-Met 96-100% of the items on the Division Standard Class home evaluation checklist
4- Met 86-95% of the items on the Division Standard Class home evaluation checklist
3- Met 75-85% of the items on the Division Standard Class home evaluation checklist
2- Met 50-74% of the items on the Division Standard Class home evaluation checklist
1- Met only 49% and below of the items on the Division Standard Classhome evaluation checklist
MOV: Division Standard Class Home
5.1 Utilized Visuals/Printed IMs and other Manipulative instructional materials that are appropriate to the lesson’s objective. (for Grade 2-6 teachers only)
5- ICT/Multimedia, Audio, Visual and Printed and Manipulative instructional materials were utilized throughout the lessons.4- Audio, Visual, Printed and Manipulative instructional materials were utilized throughout the lessons.3- Visual, Printed and other Manipulative instructional materials were utilized throughout the lessons.2- Printed materials were utilized throughout the lessons.1- Innovative instructional materials were not utilized throughout the lessons.
MOV: Indexed IMs Checklist
5- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of more than 4 ICTs throughout the lessons.
4- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of 4 ICT throughout the lessons.
3- Implemented Project TIED with the utilization of 3 ICTs throughout the lessons.
5-0 non-reader4-non-reader is only 0.1-1.0% of the
class3-non-reader is only 1.1-2.0% of the
class2-non-reader is only 2.1-3.0% of the
class1-non-reader is above 3.0% of the
class
3.1.1 Increased the number of readers from frustration level to instructional/independent level in all classes handled
(Note: Non-advisers will take the reading performance of the classes handled) (for Grade 2-6 teachers only)
4. Zeroed-out non-numerates ( # of NN/ monthly enrolment)
Unified District tool
June - March
June - March
June - March
(8%)
4%
3%
5- increased 5 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level
4- increased 4 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level
3-increased 3 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level
2- increased 2 readers from current reading level to the next higher reading level
1- increased 1 reader from current reading level to the next higher reading level
MOV: Phil-IRI
5- 0 non-numerate4- non-numerate is only 0.1-1.0% of
the class3- non-numerate is only 1.1-2.0% of
the class2- non-numerate is only 2.1-3.0% of
the class1- non-numerate is above 3.0% of the class
MOV: Numeracy Test
5- 0% failure rate4- failure is only 1% of the class3- failure is only 2% of the class2- failure is only 3% of the class1- failure is 4% and above of the
5. Zeroed- out failure rate
6. Updated school records SF1 SF2 SF3 SF5 LIS Portal Class Records Form 138 Form 137 Grade Sheets Summative Test Questions
with TOS
June - March
June - March
3%
3%
class
MOV: LIS Forms
5 - all School Records listed below are updated:
Class Records/ Grade Sheets reflected the bases of students’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled
LIS was updated on or before the deadline
Updated SF2 every month Updated SF1 and SF3 three
weeks after the opening of classes
Updated Form 138 and 137 every quarter
Updated Form 138, 137, 9 and SF5 at the end of the school year
Four Quarterly tests with complete Table of Specifications
4- lacks 1 school record3- lacks 2 school records2- lacks 3 school records1- lacks 4 school records
MOV: School Record Checklist
5- Prepared and submitted all reports 2 days earlier than the deadline
4- Prepared and submitted all
Sub-total
KRA 3
7. Prepared and submitted the following reports as required
Quarterly Periodic Exam Results (MPS)
Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL IRI Oral & Silent, EGRA, MTB-MLE)
Numeracy Test Result Form 48 Monthly Accomplishment
Report Pre-test/Post test Nutritional Status Report PPFT (Grade 4-6) Others (pls. specify)
8. Conducted counselling sessions to at least 3 pupils/ students with supporting evidences.
June - March 3%
reports 1 day before the deadline3. Prepared and submitted all
reports on the deadline2- Prepared and submitted all
reports 1 day after than the deadline
1- Prepared and submitted all reports 2 days and more after the deadline.
MOV: File copy of Reports Submitted
5- Conducted 5 counselling sessions with supporting evidences
4- Conducted 4 counselling sessions with supporting evidences
3- Conducted 3 counselling sessions with supporting evidences2- Conducted 2 counselling sessions with supporting evidences1- Conducted 1 counselling session with supporting evidences
MOV: Pictures, Anecdotal Records, Counselling Forms
School and Community Involvement
2. Conducted at least 4 PTA meetings
2. Initiated the conduct of at least 2 BRIGADA activities year-round
June - March
Year Round
10%
4%
2%
5- conducted 6 or more PTA meetings with complete MOVs
4- conducted 5 PTA meetings with complete MOVs
3- conducted 4 PTA meetings with MOVs
2- conducted 3 PTA meetings with MOVs
1- conducted 2 PTA meeting with MOVs
MOV: Attendance Sheets, Minutes of the Meetings, Picture
5- conducted four (4) BRIGADA activities with complete documentation
4- conducted three (3) BRIGADA activities with complete documentation
3- conducted two (2) BRIGADA activities with complete documentation
2- conducted one (1) BRIGADA activity with complete documentation
1- conducted BRIGADA activity with no documentation
Sub-total
KRA 4
Professional Growth
& Development
3. Participated in at least three civic-oriented activities