Invitation SPE SC ITB IPWeek_13

INVITATION

Integrated Petroleum Week 2013

THEME Surpass the Boundaries: Human, Technology And

Challange Ahead

DATE

7th March 2013 until 9th March 2013

Organized By

Society of Petroleum Engineers Institut Teknologi Bandung

SPE-ITB Student Chapter

Oil and gas industry brings many benefits to today's

world. Without oil and gas, vehicles cannot move

from one place to another place. No gas, no food to

be cooked and enjoyed by men. Without oil and gas,

life would never be like this.

Therefore, oil and gas play an important role in

human life. Society should have a deeper knowledge

of the technologies for oil and gas fields can be

appreciated that the quantity of oil and gas is

increasingly reduced.

Integrated Petroleum Week (IPWeek) 2013 is a new

program introduced by the SPE-ITB Student Chapter.

This program is aimed specifically to provide

facilities to everyone that eager to develop

themselves to acquire enhancement about

petroleum industry by giving them chances in

seminar, companies workshop, and competition.

The theme for IPWeek 2013 is “Surpass the

Boundaries: Human, Technology, and Challenge

Ahead”. This theme represents what mankind needs in

general to make sure its sustainability in usage of

petroleum. Human will be the vital point of the stability

in using petroleum as the main energy in the world.

Especially the university students will be the leader

whether we still use petroleum as the major source or

not in the future. But still, technology take large part of

the decision making made by humans. If the technology

can support humans to solve problems, there will be no

worry about the challenge in the future for petroleum

industry. We see these three points; Human,

Technology, and Challenge; as a comprehensive thought

that cannot be separated. We assume those points as

boundaries that we have to surpass as petroleum

engineers. This event will be a great trigger to start

thinking about what will happen in the future. A small

step for a bigger jump ahead.

Everyone plays an important role in oil and gas industry,

and that’s why we want everyone to be part of us in this

event. As the director of OGTEC 2011, it is my honour

and pleasure to invite your organization to become the

sponsor for this event. We need strong support and

collaboration fromyour organization, to make OGTEC

2011 a huge, prestigious and successful event. We

believe such event will benefit all parties, whether

students and industry practitioners itself. This is an

excellent way to boost your company’s profile with

industry leaders, professional and students who are the

future leaders.

INTRODUCTION AND INVITATION SPE-ITBINTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

Integrated Petroleum Week is the first

massive project of SPE ITB Student Chapter that

brings refreshment and knowledge about petroleum

industries. Not only for students from related major

but also for people who are eager to know more

about recent and future issues about petroleum

industries. Start from those reasons, SPE ITB Student

Chapter provide facilities to everyone that eager to

develop themselves to acquire enhancement about

petroleum industry by giving them chances in

seminar, companies workshop, and competition

which will be held on March 7th- 9th 2013

We look forward to your participation in IPWeek

2013.

ANDIKA WIRAYUDHA

PROJECT MANAGER OF INTEGRATED

PETROLEUM WEEK 2013

Gathering Night

A good competition will lead to a good

relationship. After competing for two days, we

will throw a gathering night to strengthen the

bond of each delegate from universities with

some barbeque dinner and interactive games.

This bond will be an important value to obtain in

this event that will bring so many benefits in

next challenging future of oil and gas industry.

Integrated Company Days

An exclusive event that held by SPE ITB SC.

After reaching success last year, we want to

maintain our best performance to hold this

event annually. We invite some respectable and

well-known oil and gas companies to give brief

explanation about their companies. Not only

giving a chance to open people mind about oil

and gas industry but also showing a good

impression from companies that take part in this

event.

Seminar Day

This seminar will be one of three main parts

of IPWeek 2013. Beside competitions and

Integrated Company Days, Seminar Day will

enhance the knowledge about the new invention

in petroleum industry. Nowadays, we meet some

obstacle to maintain the rate of oil and gas

production. We need some new technologies to

handle that problem. This seminar will give you

an image about what humankind have invent to

survive those challenge in oil and gas industry.

EVENTS AND COMPETITION SPE-ITBINTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

13rd Annual SPE Student Paper Contest 2013

We, IPWeek 2013 and SPE ITB SC, are honored to

be given such opportunities to conduct the 13rd

Annual SPE Student Paper Contest 2013. This event

is the gate for Indonesian undergraduate and post-

graduate students to create some innovations about

petroleum industry that written in paper. Every

year, the tension of competition is increasing high.

The winner will go through the Asia Pacific SPE

Student Paper Contest.

Debate Competition

An attractive competition which is ignite the

capability of making good reason, especially to show

to public about their point of view in some trending

issues in oil and gas industry. We choose Australian

Debate as the base of this competition rules. 16

teams which consist of three people each will

compete to see who the best.

Smart Competition

Smart Competition is a competition for students

to do battle of brain in mastering the subjects and

compete positively related to petroleum and

geothermal industry such as technical and non-

technical matter. The following phases in smart

competition are elimination phase, quarter final,

semi final and final. Hopefully the event can trigger

students in mastering their discipline and caring the

current issue.

TARGETS

Petroleum Engineering students around Asia Pacific.

Indonesia

a. UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta

b. Institut Teknologi Bandung

c. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November

d. University of Trisakti Jakarta

e. University of Islam Riau

f. University of Proklamasi ’45 Yogyakarta

g. University of Gajah Mada Yogyakarta

h. University of Indonesia Depok

i. University of Dipenogoro Semarang

j. STT Migas Balikpapan

Malasyia

a. University of Technology Malaysia

b. Universiti Teknologi Petronas

c. UCSI

d. University Teknologi Mara

e. University Kebangsaan Malaysia

f. University Kebangsaan Malaysia

Thailand

a. Chulalongkorn University

b. Suranaree University of Technology

Vietnam

a. Ho Chi Minh University of Technology

b. Hanoi University of Mining and Geology

Philipine

a. Pahlawan State University

b. Batangas State University

China

a. China University of Petroleum Beijing

b. China University of Geosciences Beijing

Australia

a. Curtin University

b. University of Adelaide

12:00 - 17:30 Registration Reception

19.00 – 22.00 Short Technical Meeting

08.00 – 09.00 Opening Ceremony

09.00 – 11.00 SeminarSession I

Aula Barat

PROGRAMME TENTATIVE SPE-ITB INTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

Thursday 7th March

All of the competition participants register and confirm their attendance in

lodgment.

All of the competition participants register and confirm their attendance in

lodgment where committees have prepared. The rules and rundown will be

announced once again in this session

09.00 – 10.30 Company Sharing Session I

Aula Timur

Friday 8th March

09.00 Seminar

This session will be given 2

hour each (90 minutes

presentation and 30 minutes

Question and Answer Session)

and will be joined by one

(1)speaker and (1)moderator.

This session will be given for

by company representative

to give brief explanation

about their company

profiles.

Company Workshop

Day

Opening speech by the officiator as well as officiating the ceremony by the

DIAMOND sponsor. This will provide full advertising coverage to all the

audience at the Aula Barat.

11.00 – 13.30 Lunch and Break

13.30 – 15.30 Seminar Session II

Aula Barat

13.30 – 16.30 SPC Paper Presentation First Round Smart Competition

Gd.TM

17.00 – 18.00 Back to lodgement

13.30 – 15.00 Company Sharing Session II

Aula Timur

15.00 – 16.30 Company Sharing Session III

Aula Timur

This session will be given 2

hour each (90 minutes

presentation and 30 minutes

Question and Answer Session)

and will be joined by four

(4)speakers and one

(1)moderator.

Galeri CC Timur




about their company

profiles.

13.30 Competition




about their company

profiles.

Paper presentation session will

be given 30 minutes each (20

minutes presentation and 10

minutes Question and Answer

Session)

.

Saturday 9thMarch 08.00 Competition Company Workshop

08.00 – 12.00 Debate Competition

Octagon

Smart Competition

TVST

08.00 – 09.30 Company Sharing Session IV

Aula Timur




about their company

profiles.

09.30 – 11.00 Company Sharing Session V

Aula Timur




about their company

profiles.

12.30 – 13.30 Lunch and Break

11.00 – 12.30 Company Sharing Session VI

Aula Timur




about their company

profiles.

13.30 – 15.00 Company Sharing Session VII

Aula Timur




about their company

profiles.

13.30 – 15.00 Final Round

Debate Comp and SmartComp

Galeri CC Timur

13.30 – 15.00 Company Sharing Session VIII

Aula Timur




about their company

profiles.

15.00 – 15.30 Closing and Photo Session

Galeri CC Timur

19.00 – 22.00 Gatherting Night

Enjoying BBQ party and sharing some

information about each Student Chapter

A. Eligibility

1. Competitions are open to ALL students. 2. All participants must be listed as active students in their respective universities until the competition finished.

B. Communications

1. All presentations, verbal communications, written documentation, and competition will be in English. 2. Question about the rules can be asked via email [email protected]

C. Rule Changes

1. Competition rules are subject to change. Any rules changes, clarifications, and/or agenda will be announced to all participating universities and during the technical meeting before the competition.

D. Accommodations and Transportation

1. The committees will only grant the accommodation and transportation for the participants (officially selected by committees) during the competition and gathering in InstitutTeknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.

GENERAL RULES SPE-ITB INTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

E. Registration

1) Prerequisite

To complete the registration, please bring at registration time:

1 copy of valid student ID

A copy of transfer payment (if don’t have any, can made the payment while register)

Fill out forms provided by the committee

Please send the form of every competition to [email protected] before registration deadline.

2) Registration Deadline

Smart Competition 17 February 2013

Debate Competition 17 February 2013

SPE Student Paper Contest (w/ abstract) 10 February 2013

3) Contact Person:

AndikaWirayudha (Project Manager)

Email: [email protected]

Tel no: +6281381235267

Fadiel Evan Marastio (Head of Competiton Division)

Email: [email protected]

Tel no: +6289613781233

mailto:[email protected]


I. GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

1. Competition is open to any SPE student chapter/club in good standing with SPE.

2. All competition participant must be student members of their school’s SPE student chapter.

3. All schools must submit completed registration forms for the event. The first 15 teams to

respond will be selected.

4. Each Student Chapter only can submit maximum 2 teams.

5. All presentations, verbal communications, written documentation, and the competition itself

will be in English.

6. Competition rules are subject to change. Any rules changes, clarifications, and/or addenda will

be announced to all participating schools and during the team meeting before the competition.

II. GAME FORMAT

1. The games will be single elimination in which three teams compete. The winning team (team

with most points at end of the round) will advance to the next round.

2. There will be a minimum of three rounds of competition.

III. PARTICIPANTS

1. Competition is open to any student that dominate science of petroleum industry and

geothermal such as Petroleum Engineering, Geophysic, Geology, Petrochemical.

2. All participants must be student of their university.

3. A team consists of 3 players who meet all eligibility requirements. Each team shall designate a

team captain.

4. Each university can send its representatives of maximum 2 teams.

5. Players and schools are responsible for any liability arising from their counduct while at the

tournament. Any purposeful act of dishonesty or an act which does not conform to the spirit

of the competition, observed by tournament official, will be considered cause for expulsion

from the competition. Please refer to Ethics and Conduct section.

RULES OF SMART COMPETITION SPE-ITBINTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

IV. TOURNAMENT OFFICIALS

1. Judges : each game will have three judges. All judges’ decisions concerning compliance to the

rules and awarding of points will be final.

2. Moderator : each game will have a moderator. There may be two moderators to share the

responsibility. The moderator(s) will read the questions, consult judges as needed to

determine the correctness of answers, award and deduct points, and otherwise enforce the

rules of competition.

3. Scorekeeper: each game will have at least one scorekeeper. The scorekeeper(s) will keep the

official score and individual statistics. Games will not be considered final until the scorekeeper

has declared the official score.

4. Timekeeper: each game will have one timekeeper. The timekeeper will enforce time limits and

supervise the game clock.

V. EQUIPMENT

1. All games will be played such that each team in the current game has a “buzzer” – an

electronic device that determines which participant buzzes in to answer a question first.

a. Each team is responsible for monitoring whether their own buzzer is operating

properly throughout the game.

b. If a buzzer malfunctions, only the current toss-up question or the last completed

toss-up question can be replayed, subject to the moderator’s ruling that the

malfunction impacted play of that question.

2. Timed games will use a clock clearly visible to the teams.

3. Participants will be provided paper and pencils.

4. Calculators will be provided by Committee. To ensure fairness, competitors will use only the

provided calculators.

5. Participants may not use reference materials during the game.

VI. TIME

1. The clock shall not stop, except :

a. When stopped by a tournament official to resolve a problem or to replace a

question.

b. At the end of the half or game.

c. When a moderator needs extra questions because of replacement of questions or

overtime.

2. The clock used by the time keeper is the official time and is not contestable.

3. The first round of the game consists of two halves of where the first half is 3 minutes and the

second half is at least 6 minutes of each 4 sessions.

4. The second round of the game will be allocated at least 10 minutes for each 3 sessions.

5. The final round of the game consists of two halves of where the first half is 6 minutes and the

second half is at least 6 minutes and extra time for the betting question.

6. For first and final round, on the first half, the clock starts when the moderator say to start

answer while second half begins when the moderator start reading the first toss-up question.

For the second round, the time begins when the moderator start the first toss-up queston.

VII. TOSS-UP QUESTIONS

1. A player may signal to answer a toss-up question at any point after the moderator has

begun reading the question. Only one player per team may signal to answer each toss-up.

2. When a player has signaled, a game official will recognize the player by name, or by number,

or by pointing toward the player. There is no penalty if a player who has signaled answers

before being recognized.

3. If a player signals before the moderator has finished reading, the moderator will stop at that

point. If the answer given is incorrect, the moderator will finish the question for the other

team only. The moderator will not reread the entire question, bt should resume at a natural

point in the question.

4. An answer to a toss-up must begin within 5 seconds after the player has been recognized.

An answer begun after the moderator has said “Time” will be treated as no answer

5. Players have 5 seconds to signal after the moderator has finished reading the toss-up. If the

player answers incorrectly, the other team (if it is eligible to answer), will then have five

more seconds to signal. Some questions may permit more time, which will be noted

specifically by the question.

6. Decisions as to whether players have exceeded the allotted time to signal or to answer may

be rendered only by the game officials of a given match and are not contestable.

7. For each compulsory question that are right will be given 20 points meanwhile for the

wrong answer will be neither point nore deduction of point.

8. Toss-up question is worth 20 points. If the answer is wrong there will be deduction of 10

points. If the first team failed to get the right answer, the second team which have right

answer will gain 5 points but if they wrong there will be no deduction of points.

VIII. QUESTIONS

1. The game consists of three questions :

a. Compulsory Questions

b. Toss-Up Questions

c. Bonus Questions

d. Betting Questions

2. On the first round, each session will have five same compulsory question to be answered from

each group in about 3 minutes maximum. Next, there will be 10 toss-up questions up to be

answered using buzzer system where fastest group to sound the buzzer gets to answer first.

3. If the first team answered wrong, either one of the two remaining teams get to answer the

question. The question will be announced once again. If both two teams give the wrong

answer, there will be no point on that question.

4. On the second round, it will only have 20 toss-up questions each session using the same

buzzer system as in the first round.

5. On the final round, finalist need to answer 10 compulsary questions and 10 toss-up questions

using buzzer system. At the end of the final round, there will be a betting question. Each team

will bet a number of points regarding their point, any right or wrong answer will be amounted

to their points depends on their betting.

6. If there a tie between any teams, they will receives a bonus question.

IX. CORRECT ANSWERS

1. The moderator will accept only the first answer given by a player, except for multiple answer

questions and situations enumerated below.

a. Anything a player says in his/her answer response will be ignored unless it modifies

the first answer (noun) given. For example, if a player says “Nixon, Watergate,” the

moderator will consider only “Nixon.” If a player says “Nixon, Fred Nixon,” then the

moderator will consider “Fred Nixon.”

b. Modifying words before the first noun of a response are considered as one answer

with the noun.

c. Extraneous information preceding a response is disregarded (e.g., What is a

wombat? Or They’re all Californians), unless the moderator determines that the

extraneous information was given in an unsporting attempt to delay the game, in

which case the respponse is treated as incorrect.

2. If a question requires multiple answers, a player may provide the responses in any order

(unless otherwise specified), without a pause of more than 3 seconds between responses.

3. Common acronyms and abbreviations are often acceptable (e.g., chemical symbols, state

postal abbreviations, organizational acronyms), unless they appear in the question, in which

case the moderator may prompt the player to expand the acronym or abbreviation.

4. If a question asks to identify an answer from a list, the player must name the exact answer

(e.g., NOT “the one that started with D”).

X. ETHICS AND CONDUCT

1. All players, institutional representatives, and other persons associated with a team are bound

by an honour code to behave responsibly and ethically. This includes, but not limited to :

treating all participants, attendees, and officials with courtesy, not receiving or giving

impermissible assistance, not creating the temptation for another to cheat, abiding by all

decisions of the tournament officials, not colluding with another person to “fix” a match

result, not intentionally “throwing” a match, honestly reporting details of game situations to

tournament officials, and promptly reporting violations of this honor code to a tournament

officials.

2. Any tournament official may find that a player, coach, institutional representative, or other

person associated with a team during the tournament has committed misconduct. Misconduct

includes disruptive behavior, unethical behavior, any violation of the honor code, or other un-

sportsman like conduct. Officials may interpret these categories at their disrection.

3. Major infraction and/or repeated infractions may result in ejection for an individual nd/or

disqualification for a team at the disrection of tournament officials.

REGISTRATION FORM

STUDENT SMART COMPETITION

INTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK 2013

SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEER

INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BANDUNG

Institution : ...................................................................................................................

Institution Address : ...................................................................................................................

Institution Phone No. : ...................................................................................................................

FIRST PARTICIPANT

Full Name : .....................................................................

Birth date (dd/mm/yy) : .....................................................................

Gender : .....................................................................

ID/Passport No. : .....................................................................

Home Address : ..................................................................... ..........................................

Mobile Phone No. : .....................................................................

Email : .....................................................................

Department : .....................................................................

Year of Study/Semester : .....................................................................

Photo

2 x 3 cm

SECOND PARTICIPANT

Full Name : .....................................................................


Gender : .....................................................................

ID/Passport No. : .....................................................................

Home Address : ..................................................................... ..........................................

Mobile Phone No. : .....................................................................

Email : .....................................................................

Department : .....................................................................


THIRD PARTICIPANT

Full Name : .....................................................................


Gender : .....................................................................

ID/Passport No. : .....................................................................

Home Address : ..................................................................... ..........................................

Mobile Phone No. : .....................................................................

Email : .....................................................................

Department : .....................................................................


Photo

2 x 3 cm

Photo

2 x 3 cm

1.0 Contest Structure

A regional contest is normally conducted in three divisions: Undergraduate and Master’s. Each

contest division must have contestants from at least three student chapters.

1.1 Undergraduate Division

If there undergraduate degree entries from three or more student chapters, an

Undergraduate Division must be held.

1.2 Postgraduate Division

If there are master’s degree entries from three or more student chapters, a

postgraduate division must be held.

1.3 Combined Division

If any division does not have the minimum of three entries, a combined division contest

can be held with an undergraduate and postgraduate combined division.

.

2.0 Entrance Requirements

2.1 Contestants must be SPE members from Indonesia in good standing at the time of

application.

2.2 Only students enrolled as full-time students are eligible to participate in the contest. The

definition of “full-time” is determined by the student’s university.

2.2 If the student has already earned a degree, it must have been less than nine months

before the contest. For example: a student graduating March 2011 must compete by

December 2011.

3.0 Entrance Procedures

Each participant must adhere to the procedures and deadlines established by the student paper

contest host.

RULES OF STUDENT PAPER CONTEST SPE-ITB INTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

4.0 Rules on Form and Content of Presentation/Paper ( UNDERGRADUATE)

4.1 Only single-author presentation/papers are eligible. The definition of single- author is a

student that has contributed significantly to the presentation/paper even though

other researchers or contributors may have been involved. Researchers and

contributors must be acknowledged within the paper and presentation, but not as an

author.

4.2 Papers should present, as completely as possible, the original work of the author in

planning the investigation, performing the work, interpreting the results, and preparing

the presentation/paper.

4.3 The subject of a presentation/paper must be related to petroleum engineering, which is

defined as the application of basic and engineering sciences to the finding,

development, and recovery of oil, gas, and other resources from wells.

4.4 A presentation/paper based on course work, including theses and dissertations, is

eligible.

4.5 At time of submission, the presentation/paper must not have been accepted for:

• Publication in an SPE peer-reviewed journal

• Presented at previous official SPE RegionalStudent Presentation/Presentation

(Papers presented at Student Presentation/Paper Contests sponsored by universities,

SPE sections, or other organizations are allowed.)

4.6 The abstract, paper, and presentation should be in English Language.

4.7 First selection is an abstract selection

1. Abstract should be submitted before Sunday, 10th February 2013 at 23.00 WIB in

pdf&docx(doc) to [email protected] with subject :

AbstractSPC2013_AuthorsName_University Student Chapter.

Example: AbstractSPC2013_Iqbal Tri Putra_InstitutTeknologi Bandung

Abstract must be sending together with registration form. Each Student Chapter

only can send maximum 2 abstracts.

2. Format of the abstract :

It should be consist of 100-350 words and maximum 5 keywords.

It should be one paragraph in one page of A4 (left: 3 cm;

Right,Bottom,Up:2cm)


Using Times New Roman, 12, spacing : 1.15, In the left top of the page don’t

forget to put the author’s name and your current university

There are only 10 finalists who will go to the next selection.

Announcement for those who will go to the next selection will be given on

Saturday, 23rd February 2013 at 16.00 WIB.Each Student Chapter only can

send maximum 2 abstracts.

4.8 The next selection is a presentation selection.

1. The 10 finalists should make a complete paper (5 hardcopies and 1 softcopy in

pdf&docx<doc>) and presentation (in power point).

2. Softcopy of the paper and presentation should be submitted before Tuesday, 5nd

March 2013 at 23.00 WIB to [email protected] subject

PaperandPresentation_SPC2013_Authors’s name_Univesity Student Chapter.

Example:

PaperandPresentation_SPC2013_Iqbal Tri Putra_InstitutTeknologi Bandung

3. 5 Hardcopies of the paper should be accepted by the committee at least on

Thursday, 7nd March 2013, via post or directly given to :

Society of Petroleum Engineer Institut Teknologi Bandung Student Chapter

Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan

Fakultas Teknik Pertambangan dan Perminyakan

Institut Teknologi Bandung

Bandung 4013

4. Format of Paper :

Paper must consist of a minimum of 1,000 words of text, plus as many diagrams

and supporting illustrations as necessary to clarify the subject matter. The paper

must not exceed 7000 words equivalent of text and diagrams, with each

diagram considered to be the equivalent of 250 words. The paper must have a

front page.

Using Times New Roman,12,spacing:1.5 A4(Left:3cm;Right,Bottom,Up:2cm)

5. Format of Presentation

The presentation may not exceed 20 minutes, with a maximum of 10 minutes

for questions from the judges only.


The time will start if the contestant is ready to start, there will be time keeper

and moderator that will remind the contestants 3 times, when 7 minutes left for

the presentation, 3 minutes left for the presentation, and the last is

presentation is over.

The presentation will be presented only by the author.

The first until the last contestant will be selected randomly by the judges

5.0 Rules on Form and Content of Presentation/Paper ( Postgraduate)

5.1 Only single-author presentation/papers are eligible. The definition of single- author is a

student that has contributed significantly to the presentation/paper even though

other researchers or contributors may have been involved. Researchers and

contributors must be acknowledged within the paper and presentation, but not as an

author.

5.2 Papers should present, as completely as possible, the original work of the author in

planning the investigation, performing the work, interpreting the results, and preparing

the presentation/paper.

5.3 The subject of a presentation/paper must be related to petroleum engineering, which is

defined as the application of basic and engineering sciences to the finding,

development, and recovery of oil, gas, and other resources from wells.

5.4 A presentation/paper based on course work, including theses and dissertations, is

eligible.

5.5 At time of submission, the presentation/paper must not have been accepted for:

• Publication in an SPE peer-reviewed journal

• Presented at previous official SPE RegionalStudent Presentation/Presentation

(Papers presented at Student Presentation/Paper Contests sponsored by universities,

SPE sections, or other organizations are allowed.)

5.6 The paper and presentation should be in English Language.

5.7 First selection is an paper selection

1. Abstract should be submitted before Sunday, 10th February 2013 at 23.00 WIB

in pdf&docx(doc) [email protected] with subject :

PaperSPC2013_AuthorsName_University Student Chapter.

Example: PaperSPC2013_Iqbal Tri Putra_InstitutTeknologi Bandung


Paper must be sending together with registration form.Each Student Chapter

only can send maximum 2 abstracts.

2. Format of the paper :

Paper must consist of a minimum of 1,000 words of text, plus as many

diagrams and supporting illustrations as necessary to clarify the subject

matter. The paper must not exceed 7000 words equivalent of text and

diagrams, with each diagram considered to be the equivalent of 250 words.

The paper must have a front page.

Using Times New Roman,12,spacing:1.5 A4(Left:3cm;Right,Bottom,Up:2cm)

Announcement for those who will go to the next selection will be given on

Saturday, 23th February 2013 at 16.00 WIB.Each Student Chapter only can

send maximum 2 abstracts.

5.8 The next selection is a presentation selection.

1. The 10 finalists should make 5 hardcopies paper and presentation (in power

point)

2. Softcopy of the presentation should be submitted before Tuesday, 5nd March

2013 at 23.00 WIB to [email protected] with subject

PaperandPresentation_SPC2013_Authors’s name_Univesity Student Chapter.

Example :

PaperandPresentation_SPC2013_Iqbal Tri Putra_InstitutTeknologi Bandung

3. 5 Hardcopies of the paper should be accepted by the committee at least on

Thursday, 7nd March 2013, via post or directly given to :

Society of Petroleum Engineer Institut Teknologi Bandung Student Chapter

Jurusan Teknik Perminyakan

Fakultas Teknik Pertambangan dan Perminyakan

Institut Teknologi Bandung

Bandung 4013

4. Format of Presentation

The presentation may not exceed 20 minutes, with a maximum of 10 minutes

for questions from the judges only.

The time will start if the contestant is ready to start, there will be time keeper

and moderator that will remind the contestants 3 times, when 7 minutes left for

the presentation, 3 minutes left for the presentation, and the last is

presentation is over.

The presentation will be presented only by the author.


The first until the last contestant will be selected randomly by the judges

6.0 Selection of Judges and Moderators

The host group is responsible for:

• Selecting the judges to review written papers and the oral presentations

• Providing a non-voting moderator for the presentations

The following guidelines apply to the selection of judges for the contest:

• A minimum of three and a maximum of five judges should be selected for each division of the

contest.

• Fewer than half the judges in each division should be graduates of the same university.

• Judges in the undergraduate division should hold at least an undergraduate degree in

engineering or applied science. Judges in the master’s division should hold at least a master’s

degree. Judges in the PhD division should hold a PhD degree.

• A balance among representatives from research, production, management, and education

should be considered in selecting the judges.

• Each judge must be a member of SPE.

7.0 Judging of Presentations and Selection of Winners

Judges must use the official SPE Student Presentation/Paper Contest scoring rules in evaluating

contestants' presentations and must adhere to the following voting procedures. (Judges should meet

before the contest to review the rules and procedures.)

• Only judges are permitted to ask questions of contestants.

• Following each presentation, judges must score each speaker on the Official Scoring Sheet,

retaining copies of all sheets until the session is completed.

• The judges' total scores for each speaker are recorded on the Official Moderator's Score

Sheet.

• The winners are determined by the ranking of contestants on the Official Moderator's Score

Sheet. There is no provision for tie votes; ties must be resolved by the judges. Winners are to be

named as follows:

If there are six or more contestants in the division, first-, second-, and third-

place winners shall be named.

If there are four or five contestants in the division, only first- and second-place

winners shall be named.

If there are only three contestants in the division, only a first-place winner shall

be named

8.0 Awards

The Winners will be announced in the closing ceremony.

There will be 3 winners in Java Section SPC, 1st winner, 2nd winner, and 3rd winner

The 1st winner : IDR 2.750.000,- + Certificate and Medal The 2ndwinner : IDR 2.250.000,- + Certificate and Medal The 3rd winner : IDR 1.750.000,- + Certificate and Medal

The first place winners will automatically qualify for the Asia Pacific Student Presentation/Paper Contest.

JAVA SECTION STUDENT PAPER CONTEST 2013

SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Full Name

IC No.

Mailing Address City : Postal Code : State:

Gender

Place and Date of Birth

Email

Telephone Home : HP :

Current University

Degree Pursued BS MS Ph.D

State your current year in the university and the expected graduation date :

Paper Title

Which division to compete

Undergraduate Postgraduate

I declare that all of information above is true and subject to the check. I have read and understood the

terms and conditions for as the participant of the Student Paper Contest 2013. I hereby as the

representative for individual or group hereby declare to obey on the term and condition.

Student Signature Advisor’s Signature

Date: Name:

Date:

Photo 3x4

Colour

Debating: develops communication skills

assembling & organizing effective arguments

persuading & entertaining an audience

convincing audience that your arguments outweigh the opposition’s arguments

not: personal abuse, irrational attacks, or purely emotional appeals

I. TOPIC

"RENEWABLE AND GREEN ENERGY AS THE PART OF WORLD NEEDS"

Nowadays many scientists have focused on the development of renewable energy. Renewable

energy is not something new but the urgency of it has increased through the past years in order to

save our fragile earth. Most parts of the world are suffering from energy crisis. Therefore

renewable energy becomes an alternative for this crisis. Renewable energy also fulfils expectations

of energy usage that is ecological friendly. To disseminate the information about the latest

renewable energy technology to face current challenge, we present the annual debate competition

which is conducted by SPE InstitutTeknologi Bandung Student Chapter.

II. MOTIONS

Understand motions

• A motion can be phrased and interpretted differently

• Full propositional statements

• Not questions or phrases

• Affirmative: defend the motion

• Negative: oppose the motion

• Example of motions:

That we would let human cloning research to go on.

That a referendum is not what the Acehnese really need.

That Tarzan should go back to England.

• 1 MOTION PER ROUND

RULES OF DEBATE COMPETITION SPE-ITB INTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK (IPWeek) 2013

• OPEN MOTIONS

e.g. “This House Believe That the glass is half full”

• SEMI-CLOSED MOTIONS

e.g. “This House Would alter its genetic code”

• CLOSED MOTIONS

e.g. “This House Would bomb Iraq”

• SPIRIT OF THE MOTION

This is what the debate calls for.

III. CASE

Case: set of arguments supported by evidences

Anatomy of a case:

Definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate scope

Theme line: core argumentation/basic idea

Team split: distribution of arguments

Arguments and rebuttals

A. Case : Definition

Motion should be defined as a whole

Definition may contain:

Definition of key lexical units (words/phrases)

Parameters

Definition must be reasonable:

Have clear and logical link to motion

Debatable (a reasonable opposition exists)

Negative usually accepts affirmative’s definition

B. Case : Theme Line

“Case in a nutshell”

The underlying logic of a team’s case

Explains team’s strategy

Links together 1st, 2nd, and 3rd speakers

Answers “why?” To the (defined) motion

Theme line may be in the form of:

Words/phrases

A complete sentence

A complete logical syllogism

C. Case : Team Split

Distribution of arguments to speakers:

1st: smaller part (because 1st speaker also has to explain definition, theme line, and

team split)

2nd: larger part (bulk of case)

3rd: usually no part at all

Each speaker must prove case, watch for:

Invalid case (arguing beside the point, not proving case)

Hung case (case proven only after 1st & 2nd combined)

D. Case : Summary

IV. ARGUMENT

A good argument should have A-R-E:

Assertion - statement of the argument

Reasoning - explanation of the argument

Evidence - facts, statistics, etc.

A good argument should be linked back into the motion/theme line

Adjudicators want: logic and relevance

V. REBUTTAL

Argument attacking the opposing team’s argument, e.g. By showing that it:

Is based on an error of fact

Is irrelevant to the proof of the topic

Is illogical

Involves unacceptable implications

Should be accorded little weight

Doesn’t have to be point-by-point

Rebut the theme line or main arguments

VI. POLICY VS VALUE JUDGMENT

a. POLICY DEBATE

Implies the need to institute a policy, program, law, or any other type of action

To understand how a program would work requires that you lay down the mechanisms

of that program

a. VALUE JUDGMENT

Comparison of values and standards

c. ALLOWANCE FOR INTERPRETATION

A value judgment debate may need a policy in order to be assessed whether it would truly

work (the adjudicator is still an average reasonable person)

VII. FORMAT

Format : Asian Parliamentary Debate

Affirmative/Government vs Negative/Opposition

led by a Chairperson

Speech order :

Government Opposition proposes and defends the motion refutes and negates the motion

Prime Minister Leader of the Opposition

Deputy PM Deputy LO

Government Whip Opposition Whip

Gov. Reply Speech Opp. Reply Speech

1. Prime Minister

Provides the set-up of the Debate

• Definition and Context

(preferably non-literal)

• Parameters

• Problem

(or at least the value to be appraised)

• Standards and goals (preferably expressly stated)

• Policy and Mechanisms (For a policy debate)

• Team Split (very brief please)

• Provides 1-2 well formulated arguments

1. LABEL/BANNER (catch phrase) Clarify your premise if you need to

2. HOW?

3. WHY?

4. SO WHAT? (Tie-up with your goals and standards)

5. EXAMPLE

2. Leader of the Opposition

• Rebuts the previous speech – errors of fact, faulty premise, inconsistencies, irrelevance

• Provides a clash, negation, or maintain status quo

• Provides their team split

• Provides constructive matter and argumentation based on their clash

*AREAS OF REBUTTAL

1. FACTUAL ERRORS

2. LOGICAL ERRORS (No links)

3. LOGIC is sound but the argument does not resolve the issue

4. Faulty Premises

- Provide Comparative analysis that allows your team to surpass the other’s argument

5. Breaking deadlocks

*CLASH

• COUNTER POLICY

- Oppose the proposition and provide an alternative resolution to the problem

• STATUS QUO IS WORKABLE OR SELF-CORRECTING

- The clamor by government is exaggerated, unnecessary, and even if there was a

problem it is already self-correcting

• COUNTER – VALUE

- There are other values worth protecting

- Make a comparative analysis of social values of course

*CONSTRUCTIVE VS NEGATIVE MATTER

• CONTRUCTIVE MATTER argues on the merits of a value or proposal

• NEGATIVE MATTER merely negates a value or proposal

• A DEBATE has an equal burden of constructive matter imposed on both sides

• A mere rebuttal case therefore cannot merit a win for a team

3. Deputy Prime Minister/Deputy Leader of the Opposition

• Provide Rebuttals

• Rebuilds the case of government/opposition

• Uses the premise of the first speaker while at the same time providing a distinct argument

• Avoiding a rehash or repackaged case or argument

And if possible a deeper insight into the debate (progression)

4. Government Whip/Opposition Whip

• Gives some rebuttals and provides a summary of the issues which transpired in

the debate and provide a thematic discussion of each issue while advancing the

case of the team.

• Provides a fresh perspective/insight into the debate

• Provides a thematic approach on their analysis primarily emphasizing the merits of

the closing team.

• No new matter from whip speakers.

ISSUE 1:

THEY SAID: WE SAID:

WHY WE’RE BETTER

• An issue refers to a group of clumped arguments referring to an overall topic

- for example, the need to recognize the civic conscience, church dogma, and

liberal modern ideals could all be bannered under the issue of MORALITY

• An ISSUE could also be about contrasting ideologies

- for example MORALS vs LIBERAL ECONOMIC IDEALS

5. Reply Speech

More often than not, reply speakers would just simply talk about how he/she felt

the debate went through and why should the adjudicator give the win to their side

(biased adjudication). Reply speech has no bearing to the adjudication’s decision

but will affect the TOTAL TEAM SCORE. To put it simply, a reply speaker would say,

“adjudicators, make my team win please.”

VIII.OTHER PARTS OF THE SPEECH

• A speech lasts for about 7 minutes

• A healthy speech lasts from 6:45 to 7:15

• Points of Information may be given and taken in the course of a speech

- Points of information are those instances when a speaker from an opposing team

may be given a short period in order to pose rebuttals or clarify issues.

IX. POINTS OF INFORMATION

• 1:00 – 1 CLAP (POIs may now be taken)

• 6:00 - 1 CLAP (No more POIs)

• 7:00 – 2 CLAPS – Please end your speeches

• 7:20 – Possible penalties

• A POI last for up to 15 seconds. The speaker in front must accept it in order for the

15 second period to run.

X. ADJUDICATION

Matter (content) - 40%

o Arguments (logic, use of evidences, relevance)

Manner (delivery) - 40%

o Public-speaking skills: vocal style, use of language, use of notes, eye contact,

gesture, stance, dress, impression of sincerity, and humor

o Personal attacks on opponents reduce manner points

Method (structure) - 20%

o Structure: of individual speech and of team’s case

o Response to the dynamics of the debate

XI. DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE

METHOD MUST BE FOLLOWED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE

1. EXPRESSLY STATE THAT YOU ARE CHALLENGING THE DEFINITION

2. STATE THE GROUNDS OF YOUR CHALLENGE

3. STATE YOUR NEW DEFINITION

4. OPPOSE YOUR OWN DEFINITION

A. GROUNDS FOR DEFINITIONAL CHALLENGE

• TIME-PLACE SET

- Specialized knowledge is highly discouraged. Setting up the debate in

Paraguay, or where else that is not that known is not advisable. Also,

setting it up in the past and somewhere else that a certain event

happened is again not allowed.

• TRUISM

- Simply, debating about a fact that cannot be debated upon. Example of

this is: THBT the sun rises on the east.

• SQUIRREL

- In a Squirreled motion, if ever there is room for debate then try to

engage the government out of the spirit of dynamism

*Only the Leader of the Opposition may impose a definitional challenge

XII. DEBATER DECORUM

• Do not approach the podium until you have been recognized by the adjudicator

• Respect the adjudicator when he/she calls for order

• Do not badger your opponent or use intimidation tactics

• You may cross the house after the debate

• Leave the room after the debate but remain within nearby premises

REGISTRATION FORM

DEBATE COMPETITION

INTEGRATED PETROLEUM WEEK 2013

SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEER


Participant’s name: ________________________________

Gender: Male Female

Date of Birth (dd/mm/yyyy): ______/_______/__________

E-mail: _________________________________________

Cell phone number (if any): _________________________

Participant’s Signature


Gender: Male Female


E-mail: _________________________________________



Institution Data:

Institution Name : …………………………………………………………………………………………..

Address : …………………………………………………………………………………………..

Phone Number : …………………………………………………………………………………………..

Website (if any) : …………………………………………………………………………………………..

E-mail : …………………………………………………………………………………………..

Principal : …………………………………………………………………………………………..


Gender: Male Female


E-mail: _________________________________________



Registration Requirements

Submit 5 (five) photos (2x3cm), Color or B/W

Submit a photocopy of ID Card or Student ID

Submit a letter from the institution which the participant represent, declaring that the

participant is part of that institution, and therefore represents them

If you are registering for more than one team, please fill the second team details on

the different form.

All participants must come on the Technical Meeting which will be held on the 8th April

2013

Note :

Call the registration committee to register first and tell us when you want to submit or

send the Registration Form and documents needed.

Contact Person :

Fadiel Evan Marastio (+6289613781233/[email protected])

Aditya Prasetyo (+6285782566660/[email protected])

Invitation SPE SC ITB IPWeek_13

Documents

itbintegrated petroleum week

integrated petroleum week

spe itb sc

reviewed journal presented

petroleum engineer institute

itb student chapter

integrated company days

fadiel evan marastio