Investment Security in the Mediterranean Region (ISMED) Meeting of the MENA-OECD Renewable Energy Task Force, 9 March 2012
Mar 27, 2015
Investment Security in the Mediterranean Region (ISMED)
Meeting of the MENA-OECD Renewable Energy Task Force 9 March 2012
1 Context
bull The ISMED Working Group was launched by the EC OECD and MIGA in 2010 It is open-ended and focuses on large-scale non-oil and gas infrastructure projects The renewable energy sector was highlighted since the beginning as a key sector to work on
bull Investor demand for investment guarantee coverage in the MENA region has intensified in the wake of recent events due to rising risk perception This includes now also Political Risk Insurance
bull Expert consultations underlined that the current publicly-supported investment guarantee offering is fragmented and could benefit from enhanced cooperation (strengthen mediation function and expand risk-sharing initiatives)
bull Also new emphasis has been put on the need for legal investment security following the real (and perceived) challenging investment climate in some MENA countries
2
2 ISMED Working Group Participants
Original Members
Participants from International and European Financial Institutions
Expert Network
Union for the Mediterranean
Islamic Development
BankGerman
Development BankAgence Franccedilaise
de DeacuteveloppementEuropean
Investment Bank
European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development
International Finance Cooperation
4
Political and economic risks
ISMED Subgroup II on guarantees and insurance schemes
investors (MIGA-led)
Legal regulatory and institutional risk
3 Structure of the ISMED Working Group
The ISMED Working Group works in two Subgroups
ISMED Subgroup I on legal investment protection
(OECD-led)
The ISMED process is coordinated with the Union for the Mediterraneanrsquos labelling procedure for larger regional infrastructure projects but remains open to other project selection processes
5
4 Outputs of the ISMED Working Group
Output 4 EC NIF window for lowering guarantee
premium costs
Long-term investments
led by host states and project
sponsors
Output 1 Joint EC-OECD Support Programme on legal security
assistance
Output 2 MIGA or alternate qualified operatorrsquos role as facilitator in the guarantee
market
Output 3ECEIB risk-sharing
enhancement
Output 1 EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme
Findingsbull Strong emphasis on legal protection for private investors and public
agencies (eg access to international arbitration) for credit enhancement
Recommendationsbull The ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme aims to assess the legal
institutional and regulatory investment framework with a view to supporting specific infrastructure projects
bull Assessment and assistance missions will be conducted upon request within a short time frame (3-4 months)
bull Assessments are intended to provide assistance to host governments and concrete solutions for stakeholders involved in the projects
bull Project-specific assessments will be based on the ldquoChecklist for Investment Protection and Security in the Mediterranean Regionrdquo developed by the ISMED Working Group
6
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
1 Context
bull The ISMED Working Group was launched by the EC OECD and MIGA in 2010 It is open-ended and focuses on large-scale non-oil and gas infrastructure projects The renewable energy sector was highlighted since the beginning as a key sector to work on
bull Investor demand for investment guarantee coverage in the MENA region has intensified in the wake of recent events due to rising risk perception This includes now also Political Risk Insurance
bull Expert consultations underlined that the current publicly-supported investment guarantee offering is fragmented and could benefit from enhanced cooperation (strengthen mediation function and expand risk-sharing initiatives)
bull Also new emphasis has been put on the need for legal investment security following the real (and perceived) challenging investment climate in some MENA countries
2
2 ISMED Working Group Participants
Original Members
Participants from International and European Financial Institutions
Expert Network
Union for the Mediterranean
Islamic Development
BankGerman
Development BankAgence Franccedilaise
de DeacuteveloppementEuropean
Investment Bank
European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development
International Finance Cooperation
4
Political and economic risks
ISMED Subgroup II on guarantees and insurance schemes
investors (MIGA-led)
Legal regulatory and institutional risk
3 Structure of the ISMED Working Group
The ISMED Working Group works in two Subgroups
ISMED Subgroup I on legal investment protection
(OECD-led)
The ISMED process is coordinated with the Union for the Mediterraneanrsquos labelling procedure for larger regional infrastructure projects but remains open to other project selection processes
5
4 Outputs of the ISMED Working Group
Output 4 EC NIF window for lowering guarantee
premium costs
Long-term investments
led by host states and project
sponsors
Output 1 Joint EC-OECD Support Programme on legal security
assistance
Output 2 MIGA or alternate qualified operatorrsquos role as facilitator in the guarantee
market
Output 3ECEIB risk-sharing
enhancement
Output 1 EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme
Findingsbull Strong emphasis on legal protection for private investors and public
agencies (eg access to international arbitration) for credit enhancement
Recommendationsbull The ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme aims to assess the legal
institutional and regulatory investment framework with a view to supporting specific infrastructure projects
bull Assessment and assistance missions will be conducted upon request within a short time frame (3-4 months)
bull Assessments are intended to provide assistance to host governments and concrete solutions for stakeholders involved in the projects
bull Project-specific assessments will be based on the ldquoChecklist for Investment Protection and Security in the Mediterranean Regionrdquo developed by the ISMED Working Group
6
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
2 ISMED Working Group Participants
Original Members
Participants from International and European Financial Institutions
Expert Network
Union for the Mediterranean
Islamic Development
BankGerman
Development BankAgence Franccedilaise
de DeacuteveloppementEuropean
Investment Bank
European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development
International Finance Cooperation
4
Political and economic risks
ISMED Subgroup II on guarantees and insurance schemes
investors (MIGA-led)
Legal regulatory and institutional risk
3 Structure of the ISMED Working Group
The ISMED Working Group works in two Subgroups
ISMED Subgroup I on legal investment protection
(OECD-led)
The ISMED process is coordinated with the Union for the Mediterraneanrsquos labelling procedure for larger regional infrastructure projects but remains open to other project selection processes
5
4 Outputs of the ISMED Working Group
Output 4 EC NIF window for lowering guarantee
premium costs
Long-term investments
led by host states and project
sponsors
Output 1 Joint EC-OECD Support Programme on legal security
assistance
Output 2 MIGA or alternate qualified operatorrsquos role as facilitator in the guarantee
market
Output 3ECEIB risk-sharing
enhancement
Output 1 EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme
Findingsbull Strong emphasis on legal protection for private investors and public
agencies (eg access to international arbitration) for credit enhancement
Recommendationsbull The ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme aims to assess the legal
institutional and regulatory investment framework with a view to supporting specific infrastructure projects
bull Assessment and assistance missions will be conducted upon request within a short time frame (3-4 months)
bull Assessments are intended to provide assistance to host governments and concrete solutions for stakeholders involved in the projects
bull Project-specific assessments will be based on the ldquoChecklist for Investment Protection and Security in the Mediterranean Regionrdquo developed by the ISMED Working Group
6
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
4
Political and economic risks
ISMED Subgroup II on guarantees and insurance schemes
investors (MIGA-led)
Legal regulatory and institutional risk
3 Structure of the ISMED Working Group
The ISMED Working Group works in two Subgroups
ISMED Subgroup I on legal investment protection
(OECD-led)
The ISMED process is coordinated with the Union for the Mediterraneanrsquos labelling procedure for larger regional infrastructure projects but remains open to other project selection processes
5
4 Outputs of the ISMED Working Group
Output 4 EC NIF window for lowering guarantee
premium costs
Long-term investments
led by host states and project
sponsors
Output 1 Joint EC-OECD Support Programme on legal security
assistance
Output 2 MIGA or alternate qualified operatorrsquos role as facilitator in the guarantee
market
Output 3ECEIB risk-sharing
enhancement
Output 1 EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme
Findingsbull Strong emphasis on legal protection for private investors and public
agencies (eg access to international arbitration) for credit enhancement
Recommendationsbull The ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme aims to assess the legal
institutional and regulatory investment framework with a view to supporting specific infrastructure projects
bull Assessment and assistance missions will be conducted upon request within a short time frame (3-4 months)
bull Assessments are intended to provide assistance to host governments and concrete solutions for stakeholders involved in the projects
bull Project-specific assessments will be based on the ldquoChecklist for Investment Protection and Security in the Mediterranean Regionrdquo developed by the ISMED Working Group
6
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
5
4 Outputs of the ISMED Working Group
Output 4 EC NIF window for lowering guarantee
premium costs
Long-term investments
led by host states and project
sponsors
Output 1 Joint EC-OECD Support Programme on legal security
assistance
Output 2 MIGA or alternate qualified operatorrsquos role as facilitator in the guarantee
market
Output 3ECEIB risk-sharing
enhancement
Output 1 EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme
Findingsbull Strong emphasis on legal protection for private investors and public
agencies (eg access to international arbitration) for credit enhancement
Recommendationsbull The ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme aims to assess the legal
institutional and regulatory investment framework with a view to supporting specific infrastructure projects
bull Assessment and assistance missions will be conducted upon request within a short time frame (3-4 months)
bull Assessments are intended to provide assistance to host governments and concrete solutions for stakeholders involved in the projects
bull Project-specific assessments will be based on the ldquoChecklist for Investment Protection and Security in the Mediterranean Regionrdquo developed by the ISMED Working Group
6
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Output 1 EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme
Findingsbull Strong emphasis on legal protection for private investors and public
agencies (eg access to international arbitration) for credit enhancement
Recommendationsbull The ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme aims to assess the legal
institutional and regulatory investment framework with a view to supporting specific infrastructure projects
bull Assessment and assistance missions will be conducted upon request within a short time frame (3-4 months)
bull Assessments are intended to provide assistance to host governments and concrete solutions for stakeholders involved in the projects
bull Project-specific assessments will be based on the ldquoChecklist for Investment Protection and Security in the Mediterranean Regionrdquo developed by the ISMED Working Group
6
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
5 Next steps
7
Output 1 Launch of the EC-OECD ISMED Legal Protection Support Programme in June 2012
Output 2 Presentation of a project proposal by MIGA on how to envisage a facilitation role in the guarantee market for MIGA or for a similarly qualified alternate operator in early 2012
Output 3 A study to assess possible new financial mechanisms for the Mediterranean Region (funded by the UfM Secretariat and the FEMIP Trust Fund managed by the EIB) and work on a Mediterranean project bond initiative has started
Output 4 The Neighbourhood Investment Facilityrsquos (NIF) premium cost-sharing mechanism should be operational soon
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
ldquoInnovativerdquo Guarantee coverage for feed-in tariffs
bull Under the risk category ldquobreach of contractrdquo Political Risk Insurance can protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project
bull The breach of a power purchase agreement by the host government can also be covered under PRI
bull PRI is offered by national ECAs export-import banks export credit guarantee agencies and investment insurance entities or Multilateral PRI providers but not all of them cover breach of contract risk
bull Examples for PRI providers with breach of contract coverage are MIGA EDC Euler Hermes PWC OPIC
bull Independently from the breach of contract coverage OPIC is developing an insurance product specifically tailored to the investorrsquos project and the specific feed-in tariff scheme which will protect investors against a governmentrsquos change in the feed-in tariff that the investor has relied upon to structure its project Compensation will be based upon the investorrsquos lost business income due to the change in tariff
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Annexes
9
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Output 2 Role as facilitator in the guarantee market
Findingsbull Overall recourse to guarantee instruments public and private remains below
capacity even as the risk levels have increasedbull In practical terms investors are looking for easier-to-use instruments faster
procedures larger guarantee and insurance coverage and possibly more attractive conditions
Recommendationsbull Need for a Facilitator to identify the investment guarantee instruments most
adapted to the nature size duration and location of a particular infrastructure project and to coordinate their deployment and use
bull This Facilitator could act as a facilitator for the entire needs of the projectbull It could provide technical assistance to investors and sponsors on specific issues
such as environmental and social aspects or refer them to qualified expertisebull Ideally the Facilitator should provide technical assistance to Southern and Eastern
Mediterranean countriesrsquo ECAs for their investment guarantee programmes
10
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (12)
11
Innovative EU Finance Instruments could potentially be adapted to the Deauville countries
Since 2007 the EC and the EIB have jointly developed instruments to strengthen the financial profile of promoters and projects and to improve access to debt financing for key infrastructure projects within the EU
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Loan Guarantee Facility for TEN-Transport (LGTT)
The Joint EC communication from 19 October 2011 proposes implementation under the 2007-2013 financial framework of a EU Project Bond Initiative
EC Vice-President Tajani mentioned extending project bonds to the Mediterranean neighbour countries at the 8th ministerial meeting (11-12 May 2011 Malta)
bull A potential Mediterranean-wide risk-sharing and project bond initiative would finance infrastructure in the Deauville countries with a partial coverage of risks by the EU and a mitigation of project risks by other financiers like European bilateral development banks and Regional and International Finance Institutions involved in the G8 Deauville Partnership countries
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Output 3 ECEIB risk-sharing enhancement (22)
12
Loan Guarantee Instrument for TENs Transport (LGTT)
Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF)
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Output 4 Creating an ECNIF window for lowering guarantee premium costs
Findingsbull High premiums can be a significant barrier to increased recourse to
guarantee instrumentsbull A guarantee cost-sharing instrument supported by the EC Neighbourhood
Investment Facility (NIF) could make a project more bankable and more attractive to the partner country
bull Official investment guarantee instruments show that marketable premium rates (eg PwCHERMES starting at 05 per year for the region) can create a strong demand for guarantees
Recommendationsbull The ECNIF grant support would be applicable to premiums paid by foreign
investors and lenders and by local investors and banks bull It would be provided within defined ceilings (in percentage value
timeframe) depending on factors such as the nature size and location of the projects
13
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg
Contact Information
Mr Alexander BoumlhmerHead of Unit
MENA-OECD Investment ProgrammeOECD Private Sector Development Division
2 rue Andreacute-Pascal 75016 Paris FranceTel +33-1 45 24 1912Fax +33-1 44 30 6135
Email alexanderboehmeroecdorg