Page 1
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 766
INVESTMENT FEASIBILITY PLANTATION AND OPPORTUNITIES IN
PALM OIL PROCESSING INDUSTRY IN MUARA ENIM DISTRICT
Azwardi1)
[email protected] )
Andy Mulyana2)
Riswani3)
Feriadi4)
1)Economic Faculty of University Sriwijaya
2) 3) 4)Agriculture Faculty of University Sriwijaya and PDD AKN Banyuasin
Abstract
The purpose of research conducted to determine the feasibility of investment in palm
oil plantations and palm oil downstream processed product opportunities. Investment
feasibility palm plantations cover the technical aspects, production aspects, market
aspects, farmer institutional aspects and financial palm plantation business aspects.
However, palm oil downstream commodities cover products derived from palm oil.
Data used including primary and secondary data. Secondary data obtained from the
relevant agencies, such as BPS and plantation department. Besides, primary data is
obtained from observation and focus group discussions with farmers and rubber
trader. Methods used include IRR, NPV and B/C ratio. Based on the research results
feasibility of investment in palm oil plantations from geographical aspect tend to
feasible in all regions of Muara Enim to cultivate palm trees, but the centre area of the
plantation in Muara Enim located in the Rambang Dangku, Gunung Megang,
Rambang, Muara Enim, and Lubai. Average monthly crude palm oil production in all
districts of Muara Enim is 1.69 tons per hectare and annual productivity reaches
33,917.8 tons. Average productivity of local palm oil plantation is 3.38 tons per
hectare. Old palm trees only produce 77 kg per hectare a month and average monthly
production from local plantation is 1.72 tons. Palm oil marketing aspect uses only two
marketing channels. First channel is preferred by farmers consisting 80% of palm
farmers. A group of farmers who choose this channel are generally associated with the
National Plantation company (PTPN), and sales system coordinated by the group
before being taken to a palm mill. In the second channel is generally chosen by a
group of independent farmers. From the measurement of financial feasibility of palm
oil farm by using four eligibility criteria showing whether the farm is feasible to be
developed with the B / C of 1.16 (> 1)which means any costs incurred by Rp.1 will
generate profits of Rp.1,16. Increasing the value added of natural palm oil in this area
can be done by encouraging the growth of the downstream palm industry such as
palm oil, cooking oil, biodiesel, margarine, and so forth. Palm agro-industry will also
increase local employment and promote economic growth in the region.
Keywords:Palm oil, Investment Feasibility, Downstream products
Page 2
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 767
BACKGROUND
The area of plantation in Muara Enim is 242,155 ha or 32.36% of the total
area of Muara Enim. Commodity plantations in Muara Enim spread over 20 districts
with the some major area which rank as follows; Rambang, Gunung Megang, Tanjung
Agung, and Lawang Kidul.
Table 1. Total Oil Palm Plantation According to the District in Muara Enim
N
o District 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1 Semende Darat Laut 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Semende Darat Ulu 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Semende Darat
Tengah 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Tanjung Agung 1.140 1.140 1.140 1.140 1.140 1.140
5 Rambang 50.880 50.260 50.260 50.260 50.260 50.260
6 Lubai 60.660 60.560 28.839 28.839 28.839 28.839
7 Lawang Kidul 4.240 4.240 4.240 4.240 4.240 4.240
8 Muara Enim 49.530 49.460 49.460 49.460 49.460 49.460
9 Ujan Mas 5.080 4.960 4.960 4.960 4.960 4.960
10 Gunung Megang 72.160 76.480 64.640 64.640 64.640 64.640
11 Benakat 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
12 Rambang Dangku 98.500 96.420 96.420 96.420 96.420 96.420
13 Gelumbang 22.340 20.440 20.440 20.440 20.440 20.440
14 Lembak 560 560 300 300 300 300
15 Sungai Rotan 220 540 540 540 540 540
16 Muara Bellida 22.500 22.460 22.460 22.460 22.460 22.460
17 Kelekar 2.520 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400 2.400
18 Belimbing 0 0 11.840 11.840 11.840 11.840
19 Lubai Ulu 0 0 260 260 260 260
20 Belide Darat 0 0 21.721 31.721 31.721 31.721
Total 391.83
0
391.42
0
381.42
0
391.42
0
391.42
0
391.42
0
Sourced by: Statistics Plantation in Muara Enim, 2016
Page 3
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 768
Palm oil has become the flagship commodity of Muara Enim. Using Citra
Landsat 8 ETM+ with path/row 124/062 acquired in June 26th, 2016; 124/063
acquired in june 12th, 2016; 125/062 acquired in June 6th, 2016; 125/063 acquired in
August 6th, 2016 and palm oil plants in Muara Enim spreads over 9 districts with the
biggest three districts are Lubai, followed by Tanjung Agung, dan Kecamatan
Benakat. However, based on statistics plantation in 2016, palm oil plantation spreads
over 17 districts and districts with plantation area greater than 10,000 ha spread over
9 districts as mentioned by result obtained by Citra Landsat 8+.
A. Introduction
Internal Rate of Return is the discount rate that equates the present value of
the cash inflows and investment value of a business, in other words IRR is the
discount rate that produced the NPV = 0. If the capital cost of a business is greater
than the IRR is the discount rate which generates NPV = 0. If the capital cost of a
business is greater than IRR, the NPV becomes negative, so that the business is not
feasible, the higher the IRR compared to the cost of capital, the better the business to
have. Conversely, if the IRR is less than the cost of capital, the project will not be
taken. So the maximum capital costs which may be incurred equals to IRR.
Net B/C is the ratio between the sums of PV positive net benefit with the
sums of PV negative net benefit. The positive present value number is the numerator
and the number of negative present value is the denominator.
Net B/C shows an overview how many times the benefits obtained from the
cost incurred. If the net B/C > 1, then the project or business idea to be established is
feasible. Vice versa, if the net B/C < 1, then the project or business idea to be
established is not feasible. Net B/C ratio is an additional net benefit of acceptable
projects from every 1 unit amount spent.
Break Even Point is the point at which an activity is not gaining money, but
it also is not losing money. Break Even Point or BEP may imply an analysis to
determine and find the number of goods or services to be sold to consumers at a
certain price to cover the costs incurred as well as the benefit / profit.
Page 4
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 769
BEP means a situation in which the company's operations does not earn a
profit and does not suffer a loss (income assessed using the total cost). BEP analysis is
not solely to determine the state of the company reached the BEP point, but the
analysis of BEP is able to provide information to lending companies on various levels
of sales volume, as well as its relationship with the possibility of obtaining profits
according to the level of sales concerned.
METHODOLOGY
In determining the economic feasibility, we are using Internal Rate of Return
(IRR), Benefit Cost Ratio (B / C ratio) and Break Even Point.
A. Intenal rate of Return
IRR can be counted manually as follows:
∑
( )
Where: t is the year of investment projects
n is the life of the investment project
Ct is net cash flow in year t
C0 is the initial capital investment in year 0
B. B/C Ratio
Formula Net B / C ratio is as follows:
∑
( )
∑ ( ))
⁄
Bt is Benefit at year t
Ct is cost at year t
i is Discount Factor
t is the year of investment projects
Page 5
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 770
Indicators NET B/C Ratio is:
If the Net B/C > 1, then the project is feasible to be implemented
If the Net B/C < 1, then the project is not feasible to be implemented
C. Break Even Point
Formula BEP is as follows:
Keterangan :
BEP is Break Even Point
FC is Fixed Cost
VC is Variable Cost
P is Price per unit
S is Sales Volume
RESULTS
Investment Feasibility of Palm Oil Plantation
A. Technical Aspect
Geographically, palm oil plantation is located on areas which meet the ideal
requirement for palm oil trees to grow. These areas are located on Rambang Dangku,
Gunung Megang, Rambang, Muara Enim and Lubai. Generally, palm oil plantation is
owned by big companies and their associates. However, due to the new oil palm
plantation companies and establishment of CPO, independent local farmers start to
open their palm oil plantation.
In 2012, total area for palm oil plantations was 25,107 ha. Palm oil
plantations use the farmers’ idle spaces which separated in tiny spaces. Plantation
crops usually sold in the road side waiting for buyers to came and buy or direct selling
to factories. But, palm oil crops are only able to sustain for 3 days after harvesting and
the price will decrease after that time period.Little knowledge on palm oil plantation
and the fluctuation on selling prices affect the pattern on palm oil cultivation.
Page 6
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 771
Palm oil can grow on the soil consist of Podsolic, Latosol, hidromorfic Grey,
Alluvial or Regosol, sapric peat soils, coastal plains and estuaries. However, it is best
grown on Podsolic soil. Optimal acidity level (pH) is 5.0 – 5.5. To achieve this level
of acidity, it required for peat areas to be given Dolomite fertilizer or Kieserite. The
slope of the palm oil plantation area is less than 15 °. If the slope of the land exceeds
15 ° , the land is required to do land conservation by forming, terracing, hooves, and
trench hillside.
B. Production Aspect
Productivity level can be optimized by using high-quality seeds and use the
ideal planting techniques especially in the use of fertilizer. Based on survey, farmers
has used high-quality seed and yet to use the ideal planting techniques. This results in
lower productivity level.
Monthly average productivity reaches 1.69 tons/ha and total production
reaches 33,917 tons. In Benakat, total production reaches 120 tons from total area of
77 ha.
In 2012, based on data from Plantation Officer, the productivity level is
421,040 tons and based on study, the productivity level is 421,286 tons and average
productivity of local farmers is 3.3 tons / ha and old trees only produce 77 kgs on
average. Hence, average monthly total production of palm oil crops is 1.72 tons.
Other factors causing low productivity of palm oil crop are fake seeds,
improper use of fertilizer, untreated weed, early harvest when crops are not yet ready
and low rain capacity when trees need much water. Palm oil plants need high level of
rainfall around 1,500-4,000 mm per year.
In some districts, the productivity reaches more than 20 tons/ha such as 22
tons in Gelumbang and Abab, 21 tons in Ujan Mas, Benakat, Penukal Utara, Tanah
Abang and Lubai.
C. Marketing Aspect
Palm oil crops are distributed from farmers to consumers or traders using
marketing system approach, marketing utility and marketing function. Marketing
Page 7
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 772
flows only exists when there is marketing institution forming marketing channel.
Marketing channel is needed to give information regarding prices among ma rketing
institutions.
In Muara Enim, there are 2 marketing channels that commonly used by
farmers:
Channel 1: 80% of farmers
Sellers are coordinated by groups Price : Rp. 1500/kg (paid on beginning
of the month)
Channel 2: 20% of farmers
Proice: Rp. 1,100/ kg (cash) Price: Rp. 1,500/ kg
Diagram 1. Marketing Channels Palm Oil Crops in Muara Enim
From above diagram, the marketing channels of Palm oil crops in Muara
Enim are considered to be simple. Channel 1 is the famous one among farmers. 80%
of farmers choose this channel. Farmers who choose this channel usually are
associated with the factories and selling system was coordinated by groups before
selling to the factories. Channel 2 usually chooses by independent farmers. There are
some reasons expressed by farmers while choosing between two marketing channels:
Reasons for choosing channel 1 are emotional binding with the groups
and factories and closer to the farmers’ field and hence reduce
transportation costs. However, the payment system is only once in a
month (treated like salary);
Reasons for choosing channel 2 are no transportation cost because
traders take the crops directly from farmers’ field and the payment
system is cash. Although, farmers receive lower selling price.
Farmers
Association
(KUD)
Palm oil Factories
(PKS) Farmers
Farmers
Pedagang Pengumpul
(Tengkulak ) Perusahaan
CPO (PT PN)
Traders / Agencies Big Companies
CPO (PT PN)
Page 8
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 773
The transportation costs paid by farmer in channel 1 is Rp. 105/kg and
group’s administration fee is Rp. 20/kg, the net price received by farmers in channel 1
is Rp. 1,375/kg. This price is still higher than those using channel 2. Total average
monthly sales volume using channel 1 is 70 tons/village.
There is a price fluctuation received by the farmers around Rp 1,100 – Rp.
1,600/ kg. This is because the palm oil crops are from old palm oil plants which has
exceed the productive age. These crops are not able to follow the standardize price of
palm oil crops. Standardize price is based on the crops harvesting from productive
plants. This condition remains unknown among farmers and hence farmers are still
blaming factories for paying lower than the standardize price.
In the downstream industry, a product derived from palm oil is marketed in
the form of CPO processed by palm oil mills. The majority of this product is used to
meet export demands. There are 3 units of palm oil mills recorded in the Department
of Industry in South Sumatra Province (2015) operating in Muara Enim with the final
product as Crude Palm Oil (CPO) and Palm Kernet Oil (PKO). The main market of
CPO is an international market, with export destinations are varied from China,
Singapore, Malaysia, and so on. Selling prices of CPO in the international market is
on average of five times greater than the selling price of palm oil crops product. In
2015 recorded CPO price in the international market amounting to Rp. 6,700 / kg.
Based on production data, the number of CPO production in South Sumatra,
including contributions from Muara Enim, is quite large, but the export value is not in
line with production quantities produced. CPO export value of South Sumatra
amounted Rp.1,16 trillion compared to total CPO export value of Indonesia amounted
Rp.224,51 trillion in 2014 was a small contribution. This is because factories in South
Sumatra Province sold their products to other provinces, which then sold them
overseas in the same form (CPO and PKO) or derivative industries. Export markets
the majority in Asian countries are namely India (40%), China (16%), Malaysia
(16%), Bangladesh (7%), and the rest (21%) to European countries through the Port
of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.
From the development of the market and profit analysis of the added value
obtained in the downstream industry, the orientation of the market for palm oil
Page 9
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 774
commodity indeed should be directed to the development of downstream industries
rather than just relying on primary products. The added value obtained and more labor
absorption through the development of downstream industries is expected to provide
great benefits. This development is to be done gradually and is unnecessarily to turn
all crops into derivative products. Surplus production can still be exported with
comparative advantage possessed, and in addition it is estimated the production
capacity of downstream industries in the province of South Sumatra cannot
accommodate the total supply of raw materials in the short and medium term.
There are several reasons for the development of downstream palm oil
products in Muara Enim, namely:
1. Prices of palm oil crops in the form of raw materials and primary products are
relatively cheaper and volatile.
2. There is the opportunity to gain added value from commodity production to
produce downstream products.
3. The labor working in the agricultural sector is the second largest (19.21
percent), meaning the welfare of society is strongly influenced by the
downstream sub-sector of plantation products
4. Adding investment opportunities and export market through product
diversification
5. Increasing / stabilizing the foreign exchange through export diversification
6. Saving foreign exchange by producing the substitution of imported products
7. Exploiting the potential demand for upper-middle income
8. Encouraging and increasing in domestic and foreign capital investment
9. Stimulating economic growth
10. Increasing the income of farmers and traders / processors
11. Providing employment
12. Responding to negative campaigning that attacking agricultural commodity of
Indonesia
The downstream palm oil industry is also important to develop Muara Enim.
This is because this area is a center of oil production in the South Sumatra and there is
a potential sea port national and international scale to be built in the province of South
Sumatra. The presence of this port in the future will facilitate the export of this
commodity, previously, CPO export normally have to go through another province
that has a harbor. And thus by extending the distribution path to other provinces is
also means by increasing marketing costs, which of course would reduce exporters'
earnings.
Page 10
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 775
D. Farmer Institutional Aspects
The importance of institutional aspect goes beyond the role of technology
and the existence of resources. Previously, the existence of resources (resource
endowment) is considered to be the most important factor for growth. And
Technology is known as an important factor in improving the effectiveness and
efficiency of resources relation to productivity. However, nowadays, it is recognized
that the institutional role is the most important factor as aligning in the process of
production, distribution and consumption. Institutional factors are recognized as the
most important factor in driving economic growth, beyond technological factors and
the existence of resources because there is no means of resources and advanced of
technological without followed by advanced institutional.
Institutional capacity building and organizational behavior must be supported
by a social consciousness through replanting values. That means the institutional
development together with contractual agreement and the organization are an
important factor in making development policy. Institutional development needs to be
aligned with local values through changing the development paradigm based
participation (participatory-based development).
The existence POKTAN and GAPOKTAN and Villager Cooperation are
able to strengthen farmers who facing the enterprise as the case in the PIR-SUS and
PIR-BUN. However, due to the limited ability of empowerment of farmers, farmers
have less bargaining power in the FFB price determination. Farmer institutions should
promote the bargaining position of farmers, because in the calculation of crops no
farmers cost component but only the price index taken from component average price
of CPO domestic weighted with CPO exports, crude palm oil (CPO), the average
price of the core palm oil and weighted with export prices, as well as the yield of palm
kernel oil. That means the company gained more advantaged in price than farmers.
When the price of CPO exports fell, the price of crops also definitely fell. Although in
practice, the production costs borne by farmers continued to increase. This is where
the oil palm farmers often suffered losses. Based on observations, the need for a
solution that CPO mill was owned by farmers association (KUD), while the
processing industry cooking oil or biodiesel and palm oil as derivative products was
owned by companies such as PT PN VII is unfavorable if the only business in the
Page 11
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 776
upstream sector associated with the high land estates and gardens costs and problems
in the rejuvenation (replanting).
Palm Oil Plantation Financial Feasibility
In this study, it is assumed that: there is an own capital financing in the
construction and operation of palm oil; land for oil palm cultivation is also readily
available, so that farmers does not count the cost of the purchase or lease of land. It
takes 3-4 years to cultivate and maintain palm oil plants properly until they are ready
to harvest. Therefore, the development of oil palm plantations requires long-term
investment with a grace period of 3 years. Components of palm plantation investment
cost as other plantation crops consists of pre-operating costs, land clearing, planting
and maintenance of immature plantations.
Annual operating costs are calculated to facilitate the proponents and
interested third parties to assess the financial outlook for palm oil plantations in the
future. In calculating annual operating costs assumptions were used: (1) the prices of
raw and auxiliary materials essentially will not change significantly; (2) The same
thing applies to direct wages, salaries, and overhead costs; (3) the selling price of the
processed rubber will not change significantly; and (4) inflation in the country will
affect the selling price and direct costs commensurately.
Table 3. Criteria Feasibility per hectare Oil Palm Plantation
No Components Value Characteristics
1 NPV (df 15%) Rp18,313,629 Feasible
2 IRR 20.98% Feasible
3 Gross B/C 1.33 Feasible
4 Net B/C 1.16 Feasible
Page 12
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 777
Table 2. Analysis of Financial feasibility of Palm Oil Plantation For Period of Investment Starting From Year 0 to year 12th
No
Costs And
Benefits
Components
Year
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
I Investment Cost
A. Plants 26.680.500 3.062.345 2.455.475 2.875.400 3.655.300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1. Labors 15.180.000 1.560.000 900.000 1.080.000 540.000
2. Materials 8.575.000 1.223.950 1.332.250 1.534.000 1.360.500
3. Equipments 500.000 1.422.500
4. Contingencies 2.425.500 278.395 223.225 261.400 332.300
Total Investment
Costs 3.755.300 0 0 0 0
B. Management
Fee 1.334.025 153.177 122.774 143.770 187.765
C. Insurance
(1,5%) 400.208 45.935 36.832 43.131 56.330
II
Net Investment
Cost 28.414.733 3.261.397 2.615.081 3.062.301 3.892.895
III Operational Cost 0 0 0 0 0 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.932.450 7.932.450 7.932.450 7.932.450 7.932.450 7.932.450
1. Labors 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000
2. Materials 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250
3. Equipments 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000
4. Management
Fee 252.000 252.000 378.000 378.000 403.200 403.200 403.200 403.200
IV Total Cost 28.414.733 3.261.397 2.615.081 3.062.301 3.999.395 11.906.645 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.932.450 7.932.450 7.932.450 7.932.450
V Inflows 0 0 0 0 13.440.000 16.800.000 16.800.000 25.200.000 25.200.000 26.880.000 26.880.000 26.880.000 26.880.000
Product (TBS) 0 0 0 0 9.600 12.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 19.200 19.200 19.200 19.200
Price (Rp/Kg) 0 0 0 0 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400
VI Revenues
-
28.414.733 3.261.397 2.615.081 3.062.301 9.440.606 4.893.356 8.892.750 17.292.750 17.292.750 18.947.550 18.947.550 18.947.550 18.947.550
df = 15% 1 0,8696 0,7561 0,6575 0,5718 0,4972 0,4323 0,3759 0,3269 0,2843 0,2472 0,2149 0,1869
PVB 5.397.697 2.432.863 3.844.581 9.473.613 8.237.925 7.640.974 6.644.325 5.777.674 5.024.064
PVC 28.414.733 2.835.998 1.977.377 2.013.513 2.286.667 5.919.707 3.418.522 2.972.628 2.584.894 2.254.897 2.158.528 1.705.026 1.482.632
PVR 7.684.363,62 8.352.569,15 7.263.103,61 9.473.613,41 8.237.924,70 7.640.973,64 6.644.324,90 5.777.673,83 5.024.064,20
Page 13
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 778
Table 3. Analysis of Financial feasibility of Palm Oil Plantation for Period of Investment Starting from Year 13th
to year 25th
No
Costs And
Benefits
Components
Year
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
I
Investment
Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A. Plants
1. Labors
2. Materials
3.
Equipments
4.
Contingencies
Total
Investment
Costs
B.
Management
Fee
C. Insurance
(1,5%)
II
Net
Investment
Cost
III
Operational
Cost 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.781.250 7.781.250 7.781.250 7.730.850 7.529.250 7.529.250 7.529.250 7.529.250
1. Labors 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000 6.000.000
2. Materials 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250 1.429.250
3.
Equipments 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000
4.
Management
Fee 403.200 378.000 378.000 378.000 378.000 378.000 378.000 252.000 252.000 252.000 201.600 0 0
IV Total Cost 7.932.450 8.707.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 7.907.250 8.581.250 7.781.250 7.781.250 7.730.850 7.529.250 7.529.250
V Inflows 26.880.000 25.200.000 25.200.000 25.200.000 25.200.000 25.200.000 16.800.000 16.800.000 16.800.000 16.800.000 13.440.000 13.440.000 13.440.000
Product
(TBS) 19.200 18.000 18.000 18.000 18.000 18.000 18.000 12.000 12.000 12.000 9.600 9.600 9.600
Price (Rp/Kg) 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400
VI Revenues 18.947.550 18.947.550 16.492.750 17.292.750 17.292.750 17.292.750 17.292.750 8.218.750 9.018.750 9.018.750 5.709.150 5.709.150 5.709.150
df = 15% 0,1625 0,1413 0,1229 0,1069 0,0929 0,0808 0,0703 0,0611 0,0531 0,0462 0,0402 0,0349 0,0304
PVB 4.368.751 3.798.914 3.096.941 2.692.992 2.341.732 2.036.289 1.770.686 1.026.485 892.595 776.170 539.944 469.517 408.275
PVC 1.289.245 1.121.083 1.070.073 845.006 734.788 638.946 555.605 524.317 413.423 359.498 310.582 263.029 228.721
PVR 4.368.751,48 3.798.914,33 3.096.941,03 2.692.992,19 2.341.732,30 2.036.289,00 1.770.686,08 1.026.484,70 892.595,37 776.169,89 539.944,27 469.516,76 408.275,44
Page 14
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 779
a. Palm Oil Downstream Opportunities
The value added product of natural resources in Muara Enim can be increased by
encouraging the growth of the downstream palm industry such as palm oil, cooking oil,
biodiesel, margarine, and so forth. Palm agro-industry will also increase local employment
and promote economic growth in the region.
Table 4. Potential Agroindustri Downstream Oil Palm Products
Year
Area
(Ha)
CPO
( ton)
CPO
Consumtion
(Ton)
Surplus
CPO
(Ton)
Potential
Cooking
Oil (Ton)
Cooking
Oil
Consumpt
ion (Ton)
Cooking
Oil
Surplus
(Ton)
Choices of
downstream
industries
2010 106,885 1,930,880 1,413 1,929,467 1,448,160 1,931 1,446,229 Cooking Oil
Biodisel
Fatty Acid
butter/
Margarin
Cosmetics
Soap
Salad Oil
2011 220,256 1,197,257 1,538 1,195,719 897,943 1,197 896,745
2012 94,781 1,702,654 1,564 1,701,090 1,276,991 1,703 1,275,288
2013 64,942 1,645,916 1,591 1,644,325 1,234,437 1,646 1,232,791
2014 45,905 1,745,916 1,616 1,744,300 1,309,437 1,746 1,307,691
2015* 22,810 391,420 1,421 389,999 293,565 391 293,174
2016* 22,810 397,885 1,444 396,441 298,414 398 298,016
Sourced by: Plantation Statistics and Other Sources, 2016 (Processed)
Note: PALI is excluded from Muara Enim
The potential of palm oil products are produced in Muara Enim reaches 1,745,916
tons. Demand for cooking oil per capita is 0.227 Liter per month, then the need for cooking
oil for Muara Enim residents is 1,746 tons per year. There is assumption that CPO is
processed as 75 percent into cooking oil that needed for 1,616 tons of CPO, there is a surplus
of 1,744,325 tons of CPO. For the surplus CPO, there is investment opportunities agro-
industry of palm oil, to make CPO (Crude Palm Oil) derived products, such as, bio diesel,
palm oil (cooking oil, salad oil, margarine, shortening) derivative of PFAD among other
things, soaps, fatty acids (fatty acid), a surfactant (emulsifier) and cosmetics.
SUMMARY
The research results show palm plantation investment depends on feasibility of
geographical aspects, production, markets, farmer institutional and financial. Geographically,
Muara Enim is located in areas that have the geographical factors that ideal to grow on oil
palm plantations. Those areas that suitable for palm oil plantation are Rambang Dangku,
Gunung Megang, Rambang, Muara Enim, and Lubai. Oil palm cultivation is relatively new to
most of farmers in Muara Enim except a few locations as PIR-SUS Palm Oil. Independent
Page 15
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 780
local farmers is a relatively new community that just began to enter the palm oil plantation
for a few years back when there is the booming of land clearing for oil palm plantation
companies and the establishment of the CPO mill. The monthly average productivity of palm
oil reached 1.69 tonnes per ha and a production rate reached 33917.8 tons. The average
productivity of oil palm plantation plants produce as much as 3.38 tons per hectare, and the
old plant produces an average of only 77 kg per hectare per month, thus the average
production of palm oil as much as 1.72 tonnes of FFB per month. In marketing sector of palm
oil crops in Muara Enim, there are two major marketing channels. Channel I is the channel
most preferred by farmers (80%). A group of farmers who choose this channel is generally
former plasma farmer from the company (PTPN), and sales system coordinated by the group
before being taken to a palm oil mill. In the second channel is generally chosen by a group of
independent local farmers. From the measurement of financial feasibility of Palm oil
plantation by using four eligibility criteria shows that plantation is feasible to be developed
with the B / C of 1.16 (> 1) means any costs incurred by Rp.1 will generate profits of Rp.1,16.
The value added product of natural resources in Muara Enim can be increased by
encouraging the growth of the downstream palm industry such as palm oil, cooking oil,
biodiesel, margarine, and so forth. Palm agro-industry will also increase local employment
and promote economic growth in the region. The potential of palm oil products are produced
in Muara Enim reaches 1,745,916 tons. Demand for cooking oil per capita is 0.227 Liter per
month, then the need for cooking oil for Muara Enim residents is 1,746 tons per year. There
is assumption that CPO is processed as 75 percent into cooking oil that needed for 1,616 tons
of CPO, there is a surplus of 1,744,325 tons of CPO. For the surplus CPO, there is
investment opportunities agro-industry of palm oil, to make CPO (Crude Palm Oil) derived
products, such as, bio diesel, palm oil (cooking oil, salad oil, margarine, shortening)
derivative of PFAD among other things, soaps, fatty acids (fatty acid), a surfactant
(emulsifier) and cosmetics
Page 16
Proceeding 2nd Sriwijaya, Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference 2016
ISBN 979-587-627-9 781
REFERENCES
Central Board Statistc Muara Enim Regency. 2016. Muara Enim in Figure. Muara Enim
Regency: BPS
Central Board Statistc Muara Enim Regency. 2015. Social Economy Indicator Kabupaten
Muara Enim. Muara Enim Regency: BPS
Central Board Statistc Muara Enim Regency. 2015. GDRP Muara Enim Regency: BPS
Berbagai Tahun. Muara Enim. Regency: BPS.
Dinas Perkebunan. 2012. Pengembangan dan Penguatan, Informasi, dan Database
Perkebunan Komoditas Strategis di Kabupaten Muara Enim. Muara Enim: Disbun.
Dinas Perkebunan. 2015. Laporan Akuntabilitas Instansi Pemerintahan Kabupaten Muara
Enim. Muara Enim: Disbun.
Departemen Perindustrian. 2009. Pohon Agro Industri Kopi. Indonesia: Dep. Perindustrian.
Dirjen Perindustrian Agro Dan Kimia Departemen Perindustrian. 2007. Pohon agro industri
pengolahan karet. Muara Enim: Perindustrian.
Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2013. Economic Indicator. Yogyakarta. UPP STIM YKPN.
Muta’ali, Lutfhi. 2015. Regional Analysis Method for Regionl Planning, and Environment.
Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Geografi (BPFG) Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Saragih, Jef Rudiantho. 2015. Regional Planning and Local Economic Development Based
on Agricultur : Theory and Application. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
Pusat Pendidikan dan Studi Kebanksentralan Bank Indonesia. 2001. Daya Saing Daerah :
Konsep Dan Pengukurannya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta. BPFE.