Top Banner
Anton Fedorov BURAN VENTURE CAPITAL tonyfedorov.com
13

Investment analysis of startups

Apr 13, 2017

Download

Business

Anton Fedorov
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Investment analysis of startups

Anton Fedorov BURAN VENTURE CAPITAL

tonyfedorov.com

Page 2: Investment analysis of startups

Table of contents

1. Venture Capital overview

What is VC?

Business model

Risks – Reward curve

2. Investment framework

Team

Business Specifics

Market Opportunity

Exit returns

Risk mitigation

3. Lessons learned

2

Page 3: Investment analysis of startups

3

What is Venture capital and why it exists.

Venture capital (VC) is type of funding for a new or growing business which usually involves

high risk financial risks.

Difficult for traditional financiers (banks / capital markets) to fund these firms due to low credible information and low ticket sizes

VC’s address with three key mechanisms:

Sorting: picking the right entrepreneurs.

Controlling: limiting “agency” problems, through

a mixture of incentives and monitoring.

Certifying: developing a tradition of quality and

fair dealings.

What

Why

Venture Capital overview

Page 4: Investment analysis of startups

VС Business / Economic Model

4

Assets

Investments

Entry

Deal sourcing

Due diligence

Decision making

Deal documentation

Value creation

“6-month plan”

Portfolio review:

Budgeting & strategic decision-making

HR

Exit

Decision making

Organizing exit process

Deal documentation

KPIs

Cash-on-cash multiple also known as

multiple of cost

IRR

Liabilities – Limited Partner commitment

Investment team

Track record

Investment philosophy (investment themes, investment approach)

Investment strategy (deal sourcing, structuring, return targets / risk-reward curve)

Fundraising

Key deal metrics with LPs:

Carried interest rate (standard rate 20%)

Hurdle rate (standard rate 8%)

Management fee (standard rate 2%)

Equity – General Partner commitment

“Skin in the game”

Income

statement

Fund & investors Fund managers

Investment income (+) MF income (+)

Investment cost (-) Carry income (+)

Deal expenses (-) Operational expenses (-)

Gross result / IRR

Net income / (loss)MF expense (-)

Carry expense (-)

Net result / IRR

Venture Capital overview

Page 5: Investment analysis of startups

5

Risk – reward curve

100%

30%

10%

1%

3%

Venture Capital overview

VC’s goal is to provide 5-10x gross return over

7-10 years timeframe

To accomplish one must focus not just on

excess returns, but protecting downside

64.8%

25.3%

5.9%2.5% 1.1… 0.4%

32.4%

48.6%

11.3%

4.8%2.1% 0.8%

0-1x 1-5x 5-10x 10-20x 20-50x 50x+

Gross return based of companies '04-'13Simulated returns if losses reduced by 50%

By % of financings in companies going out-of-

business, acquired, or IPO ‘04-’13. N = 21,460 3

Gross realized Multiple range

% o

f finan

cin

gs

Gross return: 7.5%

Cash-on-cash return: 2.1x

Realized

14.7%

3.9x

Simulated:

Targ

et

retu

rns

Risk

Page 6: Investment analysis of startups

Investment framework

6

Issues /

Conclusions

1. Team

2. Business

specifics

3. Market

opportunity

4. Exit

returns

5. Risk

mitigation

How to protect downside?

(negative protections, liq. pref. and liq. value)

Is founder's team an A-level one?

Is there enough muscle in the company?

(business model, traction, product market fit)

Is there an opportunity to create a large company?

(market, competition, defensibility / entry barriers)

Is there an opportunity to return a >10x?

( successful previous exits in industry, good deal terms)

Page 7: Investment analysis of startups

1. Team:

7

Is founder's team an A-level one?

• Sufficient management team industry expertise

• Serial entrepreneurs

• Founders’ capital contribution US$150k+

• Multiple founders

1

Integrity:

Qualities of Founders:

Reduce asymmetry of

information risk

Goal to accomplish

Reduce founder “flight” risk

Reduce chance of failure

Reduce chance of failure

Scoring questions

Passionate vision:

Experience & expertize:

Leadership:

Commitment.

Cash contribution

Time

Reduce founder “flight” and

asymmetry of information risk

Investment framework

Page 8: Investment analysis of startups

2. Business specifics

8

Scoring questions

• Buran primary investment theme

• First revenues recorded

• Multiple sources of revenue

• Tested and scalable business model

• No external working capital funding required

• Breakeven achievable with Buran investment

2

Business and Financial Metrics

Revenue recurrence (ARR / MRR)

Customer Concentration Risk

Gross margin

LTV (Life Time Value)

CAC

Product and Engagement Metrics

Downloads / Active Users / Customers

Month-on-month (MoM) growth

Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Cohort Analysis / churn:

Gross churn

Net churn

Is there enough muscle in the company?

Company metrics: Threshold levels:

MRR > US$40k

Concertation <15%

margins > 30%

LTV / CAC >4-5x

CAC payback 6-9 months

100’s of paying customers / 100k’s of users

Growth is >2-2.5x y/y, >10-15% M/M

NPS >0

Gross (max): -10% per annum for SaaS or

20% for marketplaces

Net is hopefully negative

Investment framework

Page 9: Investment analysis of startups

• Addressable market size US$100m+

• Market CAGR for next three years 50%+

• #1 position in niche achievable

• Sufficient entry barriers

3

3. Market opportunity

9

Is there an opportunity to create a large company?

Scoring questionsMarket metrics: Threshold levels:

Market Size:

TAM (Total Addressable),

SAM (Served/Serviceable Available),

SOM (Serviceable & Obtainable)

SAM Market growth

HHI of customers

Competition

HHI of competitors

Porter’ 5 Forces analysis

Opportunity timing

Regulatory changes

Technology adoption

UX / Behaviors shifts

SAM >US$100-150m

SOM share 20-30%

in 5-7 years

20-50%

Highly fragmented market

HHI* - Herfindahl-Hirschman Index

Few competitors

Bitcoins

Whatsapp, Youtube, Dropbox, Autonomous driving

Examples:

Dating, Taxi, Snapchat

Investment framework

Page 10: Investment analysis of startups

• Successful international peers

• At least one equity exit in this niche occurred in

the last three years

• Target EBITDA margin > 20%

• Fairly priced rounds

(vs. revenue metrics, vs. previous capital raised)

4

4. Exit returns

10

Is there an opportunity to return a >10x?

Scoring questionsReturn characteristics: Targets:

Exit environment

Diversity of buyers

Sustainable company

cash flow in future

Deal parameters:

Entry valuation

Deal structure

Healthy captable

Investment framework

Fairly priced rounds

(vs. revenue metrics, vs. previous capital raised)

No secondary

Founders own >50% of the company

EBITDA margin > 20%

Gross margin >50%

Ability to create auction

Page 11: Investment analysis of startups

5. Risk mitigation

11

How to protect downside?

Scoring questionsRisk mitigation:

Portfolio diversification:

Minority protective provisions:

Board seat

Reps and warranties

Covenants

Pre- and post-closing conditions

Anti-dilution provisions

Liquidity rights / transfer provisions (tag, drag,

pre-emptions, ROFR, CoC)

Information rights

Indemnities (protection if rights are breached)

• Investment size between US$500-5,000k

• Liquidation preference over 1x

• Liquidation value over BVC investment size

• Board seat and minority protective provisions

• Positive feedback from industry experts

5

Investment framework

Liquidation value:

Liquidation preference > hurdle rate

Important pieces:

Title to the shares

Level of indebtedness

intellectual property

Fraud is a real issue. Protections: due diligence,

personal guarantees, funding in installments.

The only real levers that we have are:

1. Funding schedule and triggers

2. Instigate management changes

3. Forcing a default or an exit

Main consequences:

Follow investment strategy

Page 12: Investment analysis of startups

Lessons learned

12

Founder is the key:

• He needs to be a true entrepreneur: leader, ready to experiment, never gives up

• Better to have several founders than one – improves probability that they have a real entrepreneur inside

• Key founder skills: product, technology, HR, marketing and sales

Our how-to toolbox:

• We are investors, not entrepreneurs. Better to pull the plug early, than become the CEO

• Right motivation builds the business

• If the management is not focused, they lose

• Simpler is better

• Product wins over development

Cream of the crop guide:

• Best investments are counterintuitive – betting against the market. What does this really mean?

- You need to spot the value way before anyone else

- Insider trading is not prohibited on private markets

• Winner takes all” does not always apply

• Underfunding could kill the best idea

Page 13: Investment analysis of startups

13

Thank you