31 August 2020 INVESTING 16 WWW.MONEYMARKETING.CO.ZA RORY SPANGENBERG Director of Global Equities at Northstar Asset Management and portfolio manager of the Northstar Global Flexible Fund But how, you will ask, does one decide what’s ‘attractive’? In answering this question, most analysts feel they must choose between two approaches customarily thought to be in opposition: ‘value’ and ‘growth’. Indeed, many investment professionals see any mixing of the two terms as a form of intellectual cross-dressing. We view that as fuzzy thinking (in which, it must be confessed, I myself engaged some years ago). In our opinion, the two approaches are joined at the hip: Growth is always a component in the calculation of value, constituting a variable whose importance can range from negligible to enormous and whose impact can be negative as well as positive. - Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter – 1992 L ong before factor investing enjoyed the prominence it does today, Warren Buffet eloquently dispelled the notion that the concepts of value and growth, not to mention quality, momentum and low volatility, could somehow be decoupled from one another, only to be resold to investors as a neatly packaged product. Northstar Asset Management’s proprietary research process is focused on identifying companies with a sustainable competitive advantage, which can be bought at a discount to a conservative estimate of intrinsic value, consistent with our mantra: “Long-term exposure to quality assets, where value exceeds price.” We believe an integrated approach, which combines our fundamental assessment of competitive advantage (‘quality, growth’) with a disciplined valuation framework (‘value’), results in a more holistic view of the businesses we invest in, the risks inherent in the investment case we discern for each, while avoiding the peril of falling into a dogmatic trap of your own making. Equally, we believe that an active and forward-looking assessment of the dynamic ‘factors’ determining a company’s prospects and valuation is imminently superior to the backward- looking and oſten simplistic criteria utilised in the construction of passive and or style-driven products. How competitive advantage drives value We believe the practice of disaggregating quality, growth and value, which Buffett refers to as ‘fuzzy thinking’, can result in a significant disconnect between the theoretical value derived by investors and the manner in which corporate value is created in reality. More oſten than not, this disconnect is compounded by the fact that the majority of investors tend to approach valuation in a very linear fashion, guided by investor relations practices, which are, in turn, informed by the typical three- to five- year corporate strategic plan. No surprise then that a large part of the stock market return or shareholder value, oſten over fairly meaningful time periods, is unexplained by earnings growth, interest rates or any of the other so- called ‘drivers of value’. As professional investors, charged with allocating our client’s savings in a prudent manner, the significance of this residual value component, oſten dismissed as sentiment, cannot go unexplained. At the same time, the duration mismatch – which exists between how value is theoretically held and how it is derived in practice – creates a time arbitrage opportunity for patient investors. Our fundamental belief is that a relatively small group of companies benefits from certain strategic competitive advantages, which affords them the ability to stave off competitive forces, in order to generate returns on capital above their cost of capital, for an extended period of time. In a world with perfect information and foresight, investors would accurately determine the timeframe within which returns fade to cost of capital – Miller & Modigliani’s Competitive Advantage Period – which would then be efficiently reflected in share prices. Oſten, because of the substantial duration mismatch between a company’s competitive advantage period and investor’s shorter analysis timeframe, or due to strategic action by management to lengthen the competitive period, a significant amount of value creation occurs beyond the initially determined competitive advantage period. Determining the competitive advantage period and valuing companies accordingly As students of competitive advantage, our departure point is generally to consider industry structure and the competitive landscape a company finds itself in. Industry concentration, relative market share and barriers to entry can contribute meaningfully to competitive advantage, as well as its duration. Other company-specific forms of competitive advantage may come in the form of a license, a patent or an established brand or distribution network or scale advantage oſten built up over decades. Taking a view on the source, strength, durability and trend in a company’s competitive advantage, as well as the likely rate of change or delta, directly informs the competitive advantage period and ‘fade’ rate of returns relative to cost of capital, which is then integrated into a discounted cash-flow valuation. Taking a more explicit approach to the intermediate period of a typical three-stage model, with fade and duration directly informed by competitive advantage, results in greater sense of tangible value and sensitivity than would otherwise be the case. In this way, the residual value that oſten resides beyond the initial assessment of the competitive advantage period is not lost in less- nuanced assessment of terminal value. Helpfully, the implied competitive advantage period can also be ‘backed out’ from the current market valuation and be considered in a conceptual framework, relative to a subjective assessment of the likely competitive advantage period or to the market and industry peers. Lengthening timeframes and avoiding point estimates e nature of competitive advantage is such that it requires time and an informed but subjective view. By lengthening analysis and investment timeframes, we ensure that more of the value ‘lost’ in the residual is brought to the fore, to be explicitly considered. By doing so, we recognise the quest for accuracy in valuation is futile and exchange a point estimate approach to valuation for a scenario approach, incorporating a probability-weighted Bull, Bear and Base case investment thesis and valuation, which more fully accounts for the potential delta in competitive advantage periods. Taking an integrated approach to traditional factors, such as quality, growth and value, has resulted in far greater nuance in our analysis and valuation, while our scenario-driven approach to valuation has meant that inherent risk and sensitivity to fundamental drivers of value are better understood. Why an integrated approach to fundamental value, informed by competitive advantage, offers better risk-adjusted returns Source: Northstar Asset Management, MSCI and Bloomberg Northstar Global Quality & Value Model – Top 50 MSCI AC World (Ex-Financials & Real Estate) constituents ranked on proprietary Quality & Value criteria, equally weighted, rebalanced annually.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
31 August 2020INVESTING
16 WWW.MONEYMARKETING.CO.ZA
RORY SPANGENBERG Director of Global Equities at Northstar Asset Management and portfolio manager of the Northstar Global Flexible Fund
But how, you will ask, does one decide what’s ‘attractive’? In answering this question, most analysts feel they must choose between two approaches customarily thought to be in opposition: ‘value’ and ‘growth’. Indeed, many investment professionals see any mixing of the two terms as a form of intellectual cross-dressing.
We view that as fuzzy thinking (in which, it must be confessed, I myself engaged some years ago). In our opinion, the two approaches are joined at the hip: Growth is always a component in the calculation of value, constituting a variable whose importance can range from negligible to enormous and whose impact can be negative as well as positive.- Berkshire Hathaway Chairman’s Letter – 1992
Long before factor investing enjoyed the prominence it does today, Warren Buffet eloquently
dispelled the notion that the concepts of value and growth, not to mention quality, momentum and low volatility, could somehow be decoupled from one another, only to be resold to investors as a neatly packaged product.
Northstar Asset Management’s proprietary research process is focused on identifying companies with a sustainable competitive advantage, which can be bought at a discount to a conservative estimate of intrinsic value, consistent with our mantra: “Long-term exposure to quality assets, where value exceeds price.”
We believe an integrated approach, which combines our fundamental assessment of competitive advantage (‘quality, growth’) with a disciplined valuation framework (‘value’), results in a more holistic view of the businesses we invest in, the risks inherent in the investment case we
discern for each, while avoiding the peril of falling into a dogmatic trap of your own making.
Equally, we believe that an active and forward-looking assessment of the dynamic ‘factors’ determining a company’s prospects and valuation is imminently superior to the backward-looking and often simplistic criteria utilised in the construction of passive and or style-driven products.
How competitive advantage drives valueWe believe the practice of disaggregating quality, growth and value, which Buffett refers to as ‘fuzzy thinking’, can result in a significant disconnect between the theoretical value derived by investors and the manner in which corporate value is created in reality.
More often than not, this disconnect is compounded by the fact that the majority of investors tend to approach valuation in a very linear fashion, guided by investor relations practices, which are, in turn, informed by the typical three- to five-year corporate strategic plan.
No surprise then that a large part of the stock market return or shareholder value, often over fairly meaningful time periods, is unexplained by earnings growth, interest rates or any of the other so-called ‘drivers of value’.
As professional investors, charged with allocating our client’s savings in a prudent manner, the significance of this residual value component, often dismissed as sentiment, cannot go unexplained. At the same time, the duration mismatch – which exists between how value is theoretically held and how it is derived in practice – creates a time arbitrage opportunity for patient investors.
Our fundamental belief is that a relatively small group of companies benefits from certain strategic competitive advantages, which affords them the ability to stave off competitive forces, in order to generate returns on capital above their cost of capital, for an extended period of time.
In a world with perfect information and foresight, investors would accurately determine the timeframe within which returns fade to cost of capital – Miller & Modigliani’s Competitive Advantage Period – which would then be efficiently reflected in share prices.
Often, because of the substantial duration mismatch between a company’s competitive advantage period and investor’s shorter analysis timeframe, or due to strategic action by management to lengthen the competitive period, a significant amount of value creation occurs beyond the initially determined competitive advantage period.
Determining the competitive advantage period and valuing companies accordinglyAs students of competitive advantage, our departure point is generally to consider industry structure and the competitive landscape a company finds itself in.
Industry concentration, relative market share and barriers to entry can contribute meaningfully to competitive advantage, as well as its duration.
Other company-specific forms of competitive advantage may come in the form of a license, a patent or an established brand or distribution network or scale advantage often built up over decades.
Taking a view on the source, strength, durability and trend in a company’s competitive advantage, as well as the likely rate of change or delta, directly informs the competitive advantage period and
‘fade’ rate of returns relative to cost of capital, which is then integrated into a discounted cash-flow valuation.
Taking a more explicit approach to the intermediate period of a typical three-stage model, with fade and duration directly informed by competitive advantage, results in greater sense of tangible value and sensitivity than would otherwise be the case. In this way, the residual value that often resides beyond the initial assessment of the competitive advantage period is not lost in less-nuanced assessment of terminal value.
Helpfully, the implied competitive advantage period can also be ‘backed out’ from the current market valuation and be considered in a conceptual framework, relative to a subjective assessment of the likely competitive advantage period or to the market and industry peers.
Lengthening timeframes and avoiding point estimatesThe nature of competitive advantage is such that it requires time and an informed but subjective view. By lengthening analysis and investment timeframes, we ensure that more of the value ‘lost’ in the residual is brought to the fore, to be explicitly considered. By doing so, we recognise the quest for accuracy in valuation is futile and exchange a point estimate approach to valuation for a scenario approach, incorporating a probability-weighted Bull, Bear and Base case investment thesis and valuation, which more fully accounts for the potential delta in competitive advantage periods.
Taking an integrated approach to traditional factors, such as quality, growth and value, has resulted in far greater nuance in our analysis and valuation, while our scenario-driven approach to valuation has meant that inherent risk and sensitivity to fundamental drivers of value are better understood.
Why an integrated approach to fundamental value, informed by competitive advantage, offers better risk-adjusted returns
Source: Northstar Asset Management, MSCI and Bloomberg Northstar Global Quality & Value Model – Top 50 MSCI AC World (Ex-Financials & Real Estate) constituents ranked on proprietary Quality & Value criteria, equally weighted, rebalanced annually.
CIS DISCLOSURES
Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) (Pty) Ltd is an approved Manager in terms of the Collective Investment Schemes
Control Act, 2002. Collective investment schemes in securities are generally medium- to long-term investments. The
value of participatory interests or the investment may go down as well as up. Past performance is not necessarily a guide
to future performance. Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) (Pty) Ltd (the manager) does not provide any guarantee,
either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. The manager has the right to close certain portfolios to
new investors, in order to manage it more efficiently, in accordance with its mandate. Collective investment schemes
are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. The collective investment scheme may borrow
up to 10% of the market value of the portfolio to bridge insufficient liquidity. Annualised returns are period returns re-
scaled to a period of one year. This allows investors to compare returns of different assets that they have owned for
different lengths of time. Actual annual figures are available to the investor on request. Performance is based on NAV to
NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-div date. Performance is calculated for the portfolio and
the individual investor performance may differ as a result of initial fees, actual investment date, date of reinvestment
and dividend withholding tax. Investment performance calculations are available for verification upon request by any
person. Different classes of participatory interests apply to these portfolios and are subject to different fees and charges.
Forward pricing is used. The portfolio valuation time is 08h00 for fund of funds and 15h00 for all other portfolios and
the transaction cut-off time is 14h00. The transaction cut-off time should be 14h00, for portfolios except fund of funds,
but execution is not always guaranteed. If execution could not take place on the same day, it will take place the next
business day, or at the earliest possible opportunity. For fund of funds, the cut-off time for the execution of trades is
14h00 on the day preceding the pricing date. Foreign securities within portfolios may have additional material risks,
depending on the specific risks affecting that country, such as: potential constraints on liquidity and the repatriation of
funds; macroeconomic risks; political risks; foreign exchange risks; tax risks; settlement risks; and potential limitations on
the availability of market information. Fluctuations or movements in exchange rates may cause the value of underlying
international investments to go up or down. Investors are reminded that an investment in a currency other than their
own may expose them to a foreign exchange risk. The terms and conditions, a schedule of fees, charges and maximum
commissions, performance fee frequently asked questions as well as the minimum disclosure document (MDD) and
quarterly investor report (QIR) for each portfolio are available on Sanlam Collective Investments’ website at www.
sanlaminvestments.com. Associates of the manager may be invested within certain portfolios and the details thereof
are available from the manager.
THE FINANCIAL ADVISORY AND INTERMEDIARY SERVICES ACT, 2002
Northstar Asset Management Proprietary Limited is an authorised financial services provider in terms of the Financial
Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 2002. All information contained in this document should not be construed, or
relied upon, as advice. If you require financial and/or investment advice, please engage the services of an independent
financial adviser.
INFORMATION AND CONTENT
The information and content (collectively 'information') accessible in this document are provided by Northstar as
general information about the company and its products and services. Northstar does not guarantee the suitability or
potential value of any information or particular investment source. Any information in this document is not intended nor
does it constitute financial, tax, legal, investment, or other advice. Nothing contained in any service or any other content
in this document constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement or offer by Northstar. Nothing contained in
any service or any other content in this document constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement or offer
by Northstar. Illustrations, forecasts or hypothetical data are not guaranteed and are provided for illustrative purposes
only; returns or benefits are dependent on the performance of underlying assets or other variable market factors; there
are risks involved in buying or selling a financial product; past performances are not necessarily indicative of future
performances; and no guarantees are provided.
NORTHSTAR ASSET MANAGEMENT
Northstar Asset Management (Pty) Ltd
Registration No. 1996/001423/07 | FSP number 601
Suite 1A, Madison Place, Alphen Office Park, Constantia Road,
Constantia PostNet Suite #784, Private Bag X16, Constantia 7848
Tel +27 (0)21 810 8400 | Fax +27 (0)21 794 2885
[email protected] | www.northstar.co.za
SANLAM COLLECTIVE INVESTMENTS
Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) (Pty) Ltd
Registration No. 1967/002865/07
2 Strand Street Bellville, 7530 PO Box 30, Sanlamhof, Bellville, 7532
Tel +27 (0)21 916 1800 Fax +27 (0)21 947 8224
[email protected], www.sanlaminvestments.com
Please refer to our website for directors & company secretary details
DISCLAIMER
The Management of portfolios is outsourced to Northstar Asset Management (Pty) Ltd, (FSP) Licence No. 601,
an Authorised Financial Services Provider under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002. This
information is not advice, as defined in the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (No. 37 of 2002). Please be
advised that there may be representatives acting under supervision. The manager retains full legal responsibility for the
co-named portfolios. Legal Information http://northstar.co.za/page/legal-information/
Northstar Global Flexible Fund (USD) The best of both worldsEquity beating returns with less downside. Our obsession with research delivers better performance.7.1%* annualised since inception.
www.northstar.co.za
*At 30 June 2020, the Fund placed in the following percentiles: 6th (3 years), 5th (2 years) and 17th (1 year), since inception (1 June 2017), in the EAA Fund USD Flexible Allocation category. Annualised return is the weighted average compound growth rate over that period. Highest annual return over a 12 month rolling period is 21.35% (Dec 2018 - Dec 2019). Lowest is -3.60% (Dec 2017 - Dec 2018). The benchmark for the fund is the EAA Fund USD Flexible Allocation category. The annualised returns for the benchmark over the same period is 1.6%. Reflects the charges of the most expensive fee class available to members of the public. Source: Morningstar. Past returns may not be indicative of future returns and an investor should seek independent professional financial, legal and tax advice relevant to their individual circumstances before making any investment decision. To view the performance of this fund visit our website. Northstar Asset Management (Pty) Ltd is authorised in terms of the FAIS Act (FSP 601). There are risks involved when buying, selling or investing in any financial product and the value of these can increase or decrease over time. A schedule of fees is available on request and the Fund is a sub fund of and administered under the Sanlam Global Funds PLC (Section 65 approved fund). The manager is Sanlam Asset Management (Ireland) Ltd. No offer to purchase securities will be made or accepted prior to receipt by the offeree of all appropriate completed documentation. Contact Northstar Asset Management for full details.
Closer to the truth
Related Documents
