Top Banner
Investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in case of solar power, electricity consumption and net demand forecasting Dennis van der Meer, Joakim Widén, Joakim Munkhammar Email: [email protected] 2017-10-24
16

Investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in … · 2017. 12. 15. · Investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in case of solar power,

Oct 24, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • Investigating the effect of aggregation on

    prediction intervals in case of solar

    power, electricity consumption and net

    demand forecasting

    Dennis van der Meer, Joakim Widén, Joakim Munkhammar Email: [email protected] 2017-10-24

  • Outline

    • Introduction

    • Motivation

    • Data & Method

    • Results

    • Conclusion

  • Introduction

    • The smoothing effect is well-studied for deterministic forecasting, but not yet for probabilistic forecasting.

    Widén et al., On the properties of aggregate clear-sky index distributions and an improved model for spatially correlated instantaneous solar irradiance, Solar Energy 2017, p. 566-580

  • Motivation

    Fonseca Jr et al., Regional forecasts and smoothing effect of photovoltaic power generation in Japan: An approach with principal component analysis, Renewable Energy 2014, p. 403-413

  • Data & Method • Public data (PV and electricity consumption) of 300 de-

    identified customers in the metropolitan area of Sydney

    • Randomly aggregate the de-identified consumers in steps of 30 customers from 1 to 240 (after data cleansing)

    • Probabilistic forecasting of PV power, electricity consumption and net demand using Gaussian Processes1 (GPs)

    • Net demand = electricity consumption – PV production

    1 Rasmussen & Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (2006)

  • Single customer

  • 210 customers

  • Performance metrics • Prediction interval (PI) coverage probability (PICP) • PI normalized average width (PINAW) • Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS)

    • PICP = 1𝑇𝑇∑ 𝜖𝜖𝑡𝑡𝑇𝑇𝑡𝑡=1 , where 𝜖𝜖𝑡𝑡 = �

    1 if 𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 ∈ 𝐿𝐿𝑡𝑡 ,𝑈𝑈𝑡𝑡0 if 𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 ∉ 𝐿𝐿𝑡𝑡 ,𝑈𝑈𝑡𝑡

    • PINAW = 1𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇∑ 𝑈𝑈𝑡𝑡 − 𝐿𝐿𝑡𝑡𝑇𝑇𝑡𝑡=1

    • CRPS 𝐹𝐹�𝑡𝑡,𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡 = 𝔼𝔼𝐹𝐹�𝑡𝑡 𝑌𝑌 − 𝑦𝑦𝑡𝑡Abs. differences

    − 12𝔼𝔼𝐹𝐹�𝑡𝑡 𝑌𝑌 − 𝑌𝑌𝑌

    Spread

  • Outline

    • Introduction

    • Motivation

    • Data & Method

    • Results

    • Conclusion

  • Aggregating 1 to 240 customers

  • Aggregating 1 to 30 customers

  • Electricity consumption forecast

  • PV power production forecast

  • Net demand forecast

  • Conclusions • Disadvantage of this study: de-identified data so no

    geographical information

    • Most significant improvement occurs for the first 25 customers

    • CRPS remain constant while spread decreases absolute differences also decrease

    • Forecasting net demand offers computational advantages for similar accuracy

    • Future work will focus on removing anomalous behavior by bootstrapping

  • Thank you

    Investigating the effect of aggregation on prediction intervals in case of solar power, electricity consumption and net demand forecastingOutlineIntroductionMotivationData & MethodSingle customer210 customersPerformance metricsOutlineAggregating 1 to 240�customersAggregating 1 to 30�customersElectricity consumption forecastPV power production forecastNet demand forecastConclusionsThank you